Here is an article from only 2 days ago. Dean was going to be more "conciliatory."
Dean Works To Smooth The Edges
Democratic Front-Runner Stays Calm as Rivals Attack
By Jim VandeHei
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, January 6, 2004; Page A01
CHARLES CITY, Iowa, Jan. 5 -- Former Vermont governor Howard Dean is campaigning like a candidate who appears increasingly confident of winning the Democratic presidential nomination, striking a more conciliatory tone and signaling how he would run in the general election.
Leading in polls in Iowa, in New Hampshire and nationally, Dean is toning down attacks on his Democratic rivals and avoiding the back-and-forth criticism that has defined much of the presidential campaign.
<snip>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A57289-2004Jan5.htmlNow there is evidence that's not true.
<snip>
"The Bradley message could be, like, (Dean) knew where he stood on the war, is still a Democrat, takes . . . positions, blah, blah, blah," the staffer said.
The next day, the speaker said, "surrogates" for Dean, both local and national, could "then hit Clark on the flip side of the argument: that he's indecisive, didn't know what party he's with, doesn't know his position on the war," she said.
The strategists ended their conversation when another reporter joined the conference, telling him, "I think you may have the wrong call-in number. This isn't a press call."
<snip>
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/0106dean-interview06.html<snip>
Breaking from Clark embed on MSNBC
Dean supporters are handing out smear flyers outside Clark campaign rallys.
More to come....
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=76385&mesg_id=76385<snip>
What is going on here? Does Dean have problems with the truth? Is he running his campaign? Are the "surrogates" running it? Who are these surrogates?