|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
| NashVegas
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:03 PM Original message |
| Raise Your Hand If You Remember When DU Considered Banning the Use of "Bitch" In the Rules |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| Occam Bandage
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Against. Still against. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Uzybone
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. Banning words is a stupid idea |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Whisp
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 14. prick does not = b, do we have to give you lessons all over again? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NashVegas
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:15 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 22. Does Not Equal, But Equally Insulting |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Uzybone
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 25. Dick and prick, no difference |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NashVegas
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:21 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 36. Part of the Point of "Bitch" As An Insult |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HiFructosePronSyrup
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:23 PM Response to Reply #36 |
| 39. You just argued for their equivalence. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Whisp
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:21 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 35. beg to differ |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NashVegas
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 44. Yeah, I Know |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Zuiderelle
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:56 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 108. It's only insulting if you have an adjective attached like "tiny" or "shriveled" then it's good. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Uzybone
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:15 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 23. Yes I'm ok with the "n" word being used (it's just a word) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cliffordu
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 31. By what metric have YOU decided that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Whisp
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:26 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 43. I have decided that for ME and am not cramming anything down your throat. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HiFructosePronSyrup
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #43 |
| 57. Well then don't use the word "bitch." |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cliffordu
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #57 |
| 60. Yep. What you said. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Whisp
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #57 |
| 95. I don't use the word, but some asshole might use it against my daughter. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HiFructosePronSyrup
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:12 PM Response to Reply #95 |
| 99. I'll call your daughter whatever she deserves. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Whisp
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:41 PM Response to Reply #99 |
| 105. o, I will, big man, I will. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HiFructosePronSyrup
|
Fri Oct-24-08 03:05 PM Response to Reply #105 |
| 115. Uh huh. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Whisp
|
Fri Oct-24-08 04:43 PM Response to Reply #115 |
| 123. and I bet you molest cockroaches. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HiFructosePronSyrup
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 33. "bitch" isn't anything like the word "nigger." |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cliffordu
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:21 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 34. but not here in the sensitive persons uber alles section of the planet. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HiFructosePronSyrup
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:22 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 37. I've seen people here get upset at the clothes girls wear on the Disney Channel. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LisaM
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:30 PM Original message |
| Ummmm. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HiFructosePronSyrup
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 51. Only humorless prudes. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cliffordu
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:31 PM Response to Reply #51 |
| 55. and the douchenozzles they rode in on..... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LisaM
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #51 |
| 68. I'm not a humorless prude |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HiFructosePronSyrup
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #68 |
| 82. If you're going to dish it out, you're going to have to take it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LisaM
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #82 |
| 84. You know... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HiFructosePronSyrup
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:55 PM Response to Reply #84 |
| 86. I do? I don't even remember who you are. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cliffordu
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
| 53. Me???? I've been a douchebag for years!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| QueenOfCalifornia
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:25 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 42. I am cracking up |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Whisp
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 45. pricks don't get lynched or raped. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HiFructosePronSyrup
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:30 PM Response to Reply #45 |
| 49. LOL |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cliffordu
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #45 |
| 58. You might want to do a little study of same sex rape. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HiFructosePronSyrup
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #58 |
| 61. And lynching. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Whisp
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #58 |
| 73. I should have added as a general rule. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HiFructosePronSyrup
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:56 PM Original message |
| As a general rule? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Whisp
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 93. as a general rule men are raped more often than women. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HiFructosePronSyrup
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #93 |
| 97. I thought it was the other way around. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| QueenOfCalifornia
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #45 |
| 90. Not too well |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DevonRex
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 56. I agree. Bitch and bastard are descriptive of behavior. The N-word is not. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cliffordu
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:37 PM Response to Reply #56 |
| 64. You are exactly right: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DevonRex
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #64 |
| 67. Yes it is. Hopefully most folks here see that very clearly. If not, we |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Whisp
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:47 PM Response to Reply #56 |
| 75. bitch is a descriptive of a woman, not of behavior. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DevonRex
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:50 PM Response to Reply #75 |
| 79. Tsk tsk to you. I call men who behave badly bastards. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Whisp
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:55 PM Response to Reply #79 |
| 87. I wasn't talking about you, personally. sorry you took it that way. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| gauguin57
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 76. I use dick, prick and bastard for men, and bitch for women who deserve it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DevonRex
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:54 PM Response to Reply #76 |
| 85. That is exactly right. Thank you. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BoneDaddy
|
Fri Oct-24-08 02:23 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 114. By whose freaking logic do you come up with this shit? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| woofless
|
Fri Oct-24-08 04:28 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 120. You are making arbitrary distinctions. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alwysdrunk
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 101. Right. Banning ANY words is a bad idea |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DefenseLawyer
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. I will always be against banning words. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NashVegas
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. Let Me Put It This Way |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cliffordu
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:38 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 65. Exactly. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DevonRex
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. Wasn't here. AGAINST now and always. Also against insulting |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wildflower
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. I think |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hepburn
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. Don't recall this.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ecstatic
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. I do, and now I think the whole thing is stupid. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HereSince1628
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. I can remember when an OP had to have 5 sentences. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ecstatic
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:11 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 16. lol! I don't remember the 5 sentences rule, but I do vaguely |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NashVegas
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:11 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 19. I Don't Remember That |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HereSince1628
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:24 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 40. Nope it was a GD rule. About the time when SHE WHOSE NAME MUST NOT BE SPOKEN |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NashVegas
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:29 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 47. Heheheheh |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Melinda
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 21. Ummm, I don't remember that either... you sure you haven't mixed up your websites? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HereSince1628
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:18 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 30. Nope, I've just been here a while. You know this is DU Version 2, right? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Melinda
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:38 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 66. Sorry, but we just don't recall things the same way. That's all. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Melinda
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:55 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 88. ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HereSince1628
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #88 |
| 91. Haha! Memory lane. Gotta be careful around here cuz the nets capture all! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Melinda
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:23 PM Response to Reply #91 |
| 102. :>) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HiFructosePronSyrup
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. The whole concept is as innane as it ever was. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pecwae
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. You're right. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Staph
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. I don't like the idea of banning anything. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MadBadger
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. To tell you the truth, the only place I dont use the word is here. Never use as sexist attack |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| goodgd_yall
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. It's overused |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Whisp
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:15 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 24. what I don't like is the hypocrisy - can you imagine calling Hillary that word |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| emilyg
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 46. It's NOT ok. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NashVegas
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:31 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 54. Plenty Did |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Whisp
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:51 PM Response to Reply #54 |
| 80. yes, they were used, but not near as often as now. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| goodgd_yall
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:10 PM Response to Reply #54 |
| 98. They certainly did. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Melinda
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. Egads, so much water under the bridge. Still here, still a bitch at times too. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TornadoTN
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. Always against the banning of words |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Submariner
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 20. Just don;t use the word "Cracker", at least to explain Palin |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NashVegas
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:18 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 26. Really? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Submariner
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 69. I looked up cracker in the dictionary afterwards |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NashVegas
|
Fri Oct-24-08 04:12 PM Response to Reply #69 |
| 116. Whoa |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| renie408
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 107. You're kidding? You got smacked for calling Palin a cracker? God, that is stupid. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cliffordu
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 27. delete |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| QueenOfCalifornia
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 28. Quit yer bitchin' |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DevonRex
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:30 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 48. Yep. I bitch sometimes too. I call McCain a bastard occasionally. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Throd
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 29. I fondly remember the great "Douchebag" debate from a while back. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NashVegas
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:36 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 63. Somehow |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Throd
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #63 |
| 94. It was priceless |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| donheld
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 32. No I do not remember when bitch was banned. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| izzybeans
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
| 38. I'm not in the business of banning words |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CowboyHeyHey
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 41. The only censorship I believe in is self-censorship |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Boudica the Lyoness
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 50. I don't think it should be banned |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| supernova
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
| 52. I remember the Bitch Wars |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LisaM
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 59. A lot of people use it in a sexist way |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NashVegas
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:34 PM Response to Reply #59 |
| 62. Yeah |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| iamthebandfanman
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 70. hey, make a poll... n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| adoraz
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 71. would have been stupid |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| crankychatter
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 72. language defamatory of race, gender, sexual orientation, nationality, religion... all the same |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ElboRuum
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
| 74. Against. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| backscatter712
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
| 77. I don't remember any new announcements on the use of "bitch" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| OPERATIONMINDCRIME
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 78. No Way Should It Be Banned. It Needs To Be Used For People Like That Lying Bitch Ashley. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DevonRex
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #78 |
| 81. Exactly. Just like bastard is used for people like that lying bastard McCain. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| backscatter712
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #81 |
| 83. How dare you!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DevonRex
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #83 |
| 89. ROFL! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JackBeck
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 92. Words should never be banned. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| lumberjack_jeff
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
| 96. Still against. The only words I would agree to ban are the "c" word, the "n" word and... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| snake in the grass
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 100. While I personally don't use the term because... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| POAS
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 103. I HATE censors whatever their politics! n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Fri Oct-24-08 02:07 PM Response to Reply #103 |
| 113. Deleted message |
| BlooInBloo
|
Fri Oct-24-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #103 |
| 119. That's nice. You're always free to make your own website.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| snooper2
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 104. Yeah, that would have been a bitch if they went through with it |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Blondiegrrl
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
| 106. I don't remember it, but I am 100 percent against it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ElboRuum
|
Fri Oct-24-08 02:00 PM Response to Reply #106 |
| 109. I just love the word "douchenozzle". |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Myrina
|
Fri Oct-24-08 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 110. I remember. Never got into the mix, though. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Lucian
|
Fri Oct-24-08 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 111. Against. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| renie408
|
Fri Oct-24-08 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 112. I am not a big believer in censorship. I feel the boards will self-regulate on matters such as these |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BlooInBloo
|
Fri Oct-24-08 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 117. I don't really care too much either way - both sides have something going for them... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| musicblind
|
Fri Oct-24-08 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
| 118. I still support it n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Beacool
|
Fri Oct-24-08 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
| 121. More than B*tch, they should ban the "C" word. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NashVegas
|
Fri Oct-24-08 04:42 PM Response to Reply #121 |
| 122. That IS Banned AFAIK |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Beacool
|
Fri Oct-24-08 05:22 PM Response to Reply #122 |
| 127. OK, I've seen it used before on this board. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DailyGrind51
|
Fri Oct-24-08 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 124. If someone compares herself to a "pitbull" with lipstick, I believe it applies! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MaineDem
|
Fri Oct-24-08 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 125. Posts are still deleted when the word is misused. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 1corona4u
|
Fri Oct-24-08 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 126. I'm against banning 'bitch' specifically. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Fri Oct-24-08 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 128. Deleted message |
| mvd
|
Fri Oct-24-08 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 129. Locking |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Jun 19th 2013, 03:35 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC