Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

98.65%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Chichiri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 09:58 PM
Original message
98.65%
Here's what I did: I took the Obama prices from Intrade, used those as probabilities of Obama winning that state (for simplicity, assume that McCain's probability is 100-Obama), and performed a Monte Carlo simulation of 5,000 trials per run, similar to what TIA did. I ran the spreadsheet about a dozen times and averaged the results.

Per Intrade, Obama currently has a 98.65% chance of winning the election.


Any questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Be careful in your assumptions...
these sorts of sims tend to assume that there is a simple Gaussian statistical distribution which may or may not be true.


Doug D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hey 98.6
it's good to have you back again
(old sixties song....never mind)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is of course assuming no election fraud ala Diebold
In a FAIR election, I'd rate Obama's chances about that high. I'm just not sure we're going to get one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Realityhack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No it assumes a level of accuracy in intrade. Election fraud...
would be factored into the share price.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Diebold could swing the election to McCain
regardless of the accuracy of the prediction model. It's an independent variable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Realityhack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Not on intrade.
Intrade is independent investor estimates. As such it takes into account any fraud those investors expect might happen. Unlike a poll or predictive model.

So NO it is not an independent variable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC