Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Delusional Freeper post of the day

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 12:29 PM
Original message
Delusional Freeper post of the day
I will remind everyone of the following fact:

All of the polls have an oversampling of Dems implying anywhere from 6-11% edge for Dems in voter ID. In order to believe we are losing, you must accept this premise. I do not accept the premise because I don’t believe Obama is gaining votes that were bush votes in 2004. Additionally, I don’t believe Obama will get 100% of the Kerry vote from 2004.

The Obama campaign expected to get 40,000-50,000 early voters to the polls last week in OH. They only ended up getting 5,000 approximately. The narrative of TREMENDOUS energy for Obama is a myth. Empircal data shows you its a myth. The obama nuts may make the most noise, but they aren’t the most people.

The downtrodden attitude in this and other forums is a sure sign that, as much as we rebel against DBM, we are falling victim to it. Don’t buy the BS. Go with what your common sense tells you.

Looking for Good news in these polls is kind of like being on trial and asking the prosecutor to help you out with your defense. It isn’t there and it isn’t going to be there because of the assumptions above.

2006 was the result of a ton of close races won by Dems running as conservatives. In addition, the evangelical vote stayed home due to Foley, Macaca, and Abramhoff. Presidential elections draw way higher turnout, and no lib since Jimmah Caatah has pulled over 50%.

But if you want to base your think on a false premise that is only supported by inflated voter registrations (many of which are proving to be the result of a quota program at ACORN) and the supposed energy of the YUTE vote; then you are going to have three more weeks of misery.

Obama will not draw greater than 46% of the popular vote nationally. period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Follow the swinging watch with your eyes. You're getting sleepy. Obama will lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. series!1
they got us right where they want us :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well..at least this one can spell and use some big
words.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. The polls are oversampling Dems?
When did that start? Usually it's the other way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well since we have more Dems registered now
Edited on Tue Oct-14-08 12:50 PM by Jake3463
You would think they would do it that way :silly:

Oh by the way lurking Freepers Acorn registrations to Mickey Mouse aren't on voter rolls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Because all the repubs are hiding out
Edited on Tue Oct-14-08 01:03 PM by dgibby
in the witness protection program!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ps1074 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's what they were talking in 2006
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. there must be so many candidates for that title ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC