Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Zogby poll taken THROUGH Thursday, and it's well within the +/-3.2MOE!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 07:00 PM
Original message
Zogby poll taken THROUGH Thursday, and it's well within the +/-3.2MOE!
Edited on Fri Sep-03-04 07:01 PM by flpoljunkie
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=857

President George W. Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney have taken a two point lead over Massachusetts Senator John Kerry and North Carolina Senator John Edwards (46%-44%), according to a new Zogby America poll. The telephone poll of 1001 likely voters was conducted from Monday through Thursday (August 30-September 2, 2004) during the Republican National Convention in New York City. Overall results have a margin of sampling error of +/-3.2.

The Time poll is a helluva outlier, alright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheStateChief Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Still a 9-point Bush bounce
Don't mean to be negative, but Kerry led by 7 in mid-August. But the Zogby numbers don't include much reaction to Bush's speech so it could still change a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mourningdove92 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. And smirk is the incumbent "war" president. Kerrys numbers
look great. He survived the SW lies, the RNC klan rally and this is the best smirk can do?

nothing to see here, move along
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. That shouldn't surprise anyone after how nasty August was for Kerry
and the RNC. This would still show an even race.

Maybe the press will start going after * instead of Kerry (I know, I know but we could hope and when some of the dirt starts coming out on him from Barnes and Kitty Kelly's book, the press loves a scandal).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Told all the bullshit sky is falling whiners that they were overeacting.
Do they listen to me? Nooooooooooooooooo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Oh, but Nooooooooooooo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for the good news!
Let's e-mail MSNBC, etc. and tell them to report THOSE numbers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Time poll does not make sense
not that many people watched the convention

how did they do the sampling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Does anyone know how they determine "likely" voters?
Does that only include people who have voted in past elections? Does it include newly registered voters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemMother Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. There's no one set way. For a good analysis, go to
"Adventures in Likely Voter Land

It has not escaped my notice that many people are puzzled as to how exactly polls go about determining "likely voters" (LVs). There's a good reason for this: polling firms or sponsors rarely put much effort into explaining, clearly and precisely, the mechanics of how they select these LVs."

from donkey rising, for the rest of the story:

http://www.emergingdemocraticmajorityweblog.com/donkeyrising/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Thanks DemMother. Here is an interesting tidbit from that site:
A Zogby poll conducted August 30-September 2 showed George W. Bush leading John Kerry among likely voters by 2%. The poll also found, however, that, by 48% to 46%, the respondents wanted "someone new" rather then agreeing that Bush "deserves to be reelected"]/i]

That's very revealing. Shows that the majority of people do not believe that Bush deserves to be reelected.

The more I read about polling methods and the way they are reported in the media, the less faith I have in them.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Once again "Likely Voters"
Edited on Fri Sep-03-04 07:09 PM by maine_raptor
There are a lot of voters that WILL be voting that would not fall into that slot. Lots of new voters upset with Bush, folks that vote on and off each year. These people have "a bone to pick" with Bush. And people with "a bone to pick" are MUCH more willing to vote that those who just want "4 more beers".

So as far as I am concerned, let the polls show a slight margin. It's natural when those polls undercount the new voters. Let the polls show a Bush lead, it's called over confidence. And that can be a real killer to a campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. After our convention, the talking heads said meaningful polls wouldn't
be out until the following week. Now they are pimping for the chimp the next day. I'm not going to get worked up over these polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I remember hearing that also after the DNC
They said that you need to look at polls a week after the convention to get a true idea of any "bounce".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. It still doesn't include the Chimp's speech, though
Edited on Fri Sep-03-04 07:33 PM by incapsulated
His spoke late at night and I doubt they were polling many people afterwards.

Everyone needs to be patient and wait for next week's poll results, they are the only ones that will really be an accurate assesment of the RNC.

I suspect they will get a small bump, just Kerry did after the DNC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC