Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Meet RightChange.com 527, this year's bailout swiftboats...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:00 PM
Original message
Meet RightChange.com 527, this year's bailout swiftboats...
Edited on Fri Oct-03-08 07:20 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
"What is Right Change.com? RightChange.com is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to helping Americans see through the haze of politicians’ “spin” to understand the facts about crucial policy choices. Our goal is to make sure that the coming wave of political change in America is the “right” kind of change, in terms of conforming to the facts and common sense. RightChange.com is focusing on the next generation, not the next election, always reminding our fellow citizens that the policy choices we make in the near term will have enormous long-term impacts on the quality of life of the future generations. We are dedicated to advancing the “right” kind of ideas, not electing or defeating any political candidate. RightChange.com communicates with a zingy edge and a sense of humor, without being afraid to pose difficult questions to those in power. RightChange.com believes that Americans can address our national challenges by working together across party lines and not simply accepting political “sound bites” that are contradictory to the facts and insulting to our intelligence."
This outstanding non-partisan (sic) group has run two ads in Virginia in the last twenty minutes. The first attacked Obama for the bail-out without mentioning McCain. The second praised McCain's leadership in fighting Fannie and Freddie, which appear to be Black Panther front organizations judging from the tone of the ad.

Further evidence of this groups non-partisan nature, and how they do not work to elect or defeat any candidate (which would be a violation of the election finance laws John McCain wrote) is this, from their home page.
Who bears the responsibility for this crisis?

As the Washington blame-game heads into double overtime, with fingers pointing across the aisle at which party bears the blame for this mess, the fact is, there is plenty of blame to go around. Sen. Barack Obama, one of the loudest critics of the firms, has been on the receiving end of over $125,000 in campaign contributions from Fannie and Freddie since his election to the U.S. Senate four years ago - the highest amount of any Member of Congress over the last 10 years. Fifty seven percent of Fannie and Freddie contributions have been made to Democratic members.

As you watch Members of Congress denounce the barons of greed who precipitated the financial crisis, remind yourself: today's criminal was yesterday's contributor.

10 Things You Need to Know About Senator Obama’s Tax Proposals. Read the Paper: "Michael Boskin: A CLOSER LOOK AT OBAMANOMICS"

Under the tax plans of Barack Obama and his Democratic friends in Congress, American families will only be left with… the change in their pockets.
And here are the descriptions of their TV ads... how very non-partisan!
"Fighting"
For years, John McCain warned of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s risk to the economy and pushed for reform. Learn who opposed him and caused the financial crisis.


"Fought Reform"
Chronicles the opposition of key Congressional leaders to reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, while Senator Obama accepted more contributions than any other Member of Congress.


"Angry?"
Obama’s economic proposals stick small businesses with the Bill for the Wall Street Bailout. Angry yet with politicians pushing higher taxes in an economic crisis? Read the fine print of Barack Obama’s tax plan.


"Yes We Can"
Yes We Tax. The facts on who pays for Obama’s programs and tax increases.


"Bungee"
Change? Before you fall for it, get the facts. What’s it cost? Who pays?

http://rightchange.com/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. ---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. I love the "non-partisan" moniker
Aren't these guys supposed to be in trouble? I thought I read that some organization managed to get a judge to stop them from advertising. Am I imagining things?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I cannot answer your question because that winking thing is freaking me out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. LOL
Sorry. I won't keep it up much longer. But I made it with my own two handsies - so I gotta brag for a bit. :)

But seriously, I know I read about some group somewhere getting an injunction against inflammatory anti-Obama ads. It may have been those forced-birth crazies or the gun-zealots...I dunno
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think the Obama campaign took some action against the NRA (?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yeah, that's probably it
So, anyone know who Tim Pittman of Washington D.C. is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Are you on Facebook?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I have looked into that guy
I'm not sure he's the same fellow. That Pittman on teh Facebook is a D.C. artist.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/22/AR2007012200540.html

Then again, according to the Post, he's not much of an artist. Maybe he is the same guy. You know how those frustrated artists can turn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. Here's another big money man for this 527
http://www.accountableamerica.com/taxonomy/term/126



Fred Eshelman, a pharmaceutical executive, is the primary backer of Rightchange.com. He served as Senior Vice President for former Glaxo, was recently appointed to the management board of Anton Pharma, and founded his own consulting firm, Pharmaceutical Product Development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Ahh, the money man
The plot thickens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Being in a swing state I am getting BOMBARDED with their ads and I
fear they will induce a cerebra-vascular event.

They are really horrible.

(They are also completely integrated with the Sean Hannity line.... FOX is all about Fannie and Freddie and how Obama and Raines are a couple of shifty negroes.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graystate Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
12. Sorry, but I want more.
I admit that I am only here as a result of working on my own fledgling rhetoric blog (graystate.wordpress.com), but I want more than this.
I came to this site after seeing the rightchange video on Freddie and Fannie, and I was looking for a response to the video's assertions. All I was able to find (anywhere) was a response to their credibility, which I agree is questionable. However, does pointing out bias really refute an argument? I don't think it does all by itself.
So, anybody have any insight into rightchange's the finger-pointing. Are they lying? Are they stretching the truth? Are they right?
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Since they are presenting a story the facts are largely irrelevant.
I imagine I could produce a TV ad using only facts that would imply McCain is a member of al Queada.

The RightChange narrative is that black people are responsible for all of America's economic woes. The veracity of data points they use to spin the narrative are all but irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Well there is that old interview from the 90's
where McCain said that maybe Osama Bin Laden really isn't such a bad guy . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyhuskyfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Couple things
McCain was nowhere near the front line of any warnings about Fannie and Freddie. I believe Hagel put some legislation forward in 2005 and a year later, McCain threw his name in and had a brief statement about it, but didn't take anything close to a leadership role. Everything else he has ever supported has been to avoid government oversight.

The money Obama received was from individual employees of Fannie and Freddie - I don't find that significant. Individual contributors don't effect policy - the CEOS and lobbyists do. Those people were in bed with McCain - including his campaign advisor.

Any charges that Obama was connected with Raines are absolutely silly. There were a couple calls from the Obama campaign to try to get insight into the problems, but that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Good points all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LordJFT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yep, the swiftboaters were "non-partisan" too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medicswife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. I saw one of their ads just yesterday here in KY. nt I thought it was
pretty lame in comparison to the Swift Boat ads from 2004. And, it was even more surprising to me that they're actually playing it here in the Kentucky/Tennessee area. Shouldn't these areas be safe for McCain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stolivodka Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
19. The Swiftboaters were much better than these guys.
Hell, they suck so much at pretending to be "non-partisan" that they put "right" in red in their freaking name. Pretty lame, guys. Too bad for you that Bush is a Republican and Failin McCan't run from that.

I agree that it would have been a HUGE game-changer if McCain came down against the bailout, but it didn't happen, because McCain knows who pays his campaign expenses, buys him things, and makes him feel like an important senator when he's just some unemployable jerk from flyover country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I find their ads effective
Edited on Sat Oct-04-08 01:26 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
I worry about them more than the more frontal Muslim and Jerimiah Wright pedddlers.

Despite all evidence, the average American does think Democrats cannot be trusted with money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stolivodka Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. America thinks that Democrats can't be trusted with money?
If that's the case, then why do Democrats consistently poll better than Republicans on the economy?

Listen, I've seen the ads, too. Personally, I strongly oppose the bailout. Sure, the Democrats got conned into voting for that crap, but it was pushed by a Republican President and McCain even "suspended" his campaign to make sure that it got passed. A lot of people are really, really pissed about the whole thing, but most of the rage is directed at Bush and the Repukes, who are largely regarded as being the ones who screwed up and caused the whole mess, in the first place.

At worst, it's a wash, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC