Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Beware the Wall Street bailout - it's classic bitchslap politics!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 08:19 PM
Original message
Beware the Wall Street bailout - it's classic bitchslap politics!
Edited on Sat Sep-20-08 08:29 PM by backscatter712


We cannot allow this bailout to go through without demanding big concessions. Others have explained, better than I can, that this is a classic Shock Doctrine maneuver, designed to force through a fascist agenda by riding on a disaster.

It's definitely that. For the Shock Doctrine reasons alone, we must demand concessions that provide relief for the middle and working classes.

But it's also intended to make the Democrats look weak, just in time for the election, and Bush is going to do it by the classic bitchslap maneuver.

All the Bushies are gonna be screeching at the top of their lungs about how it's an EMERGENCY!!! and that we need to pass this bill NOW NOW NOW!!!

Don't fall for it.

It'll be like FISA all over again.

If Pelosi and Reid do their usual pattern, there will be an ineffectual pushback, then a rancorous cave-in. The bitchslap.

We'll be made to look like a bunch of wusses. We'll be made to look weak.

Watch Obama's poll numbers drop ten points overnight. That's what this bailout bill and all the screeching is designed to do - to make us look like a bunch of bitchslapped pantywaists.

I'm sorry if this offends people. But this election isn't going to be decided by us. It won't be decided by the well-informed, smart voters who can see through this bullshit. It will be decided by the morons. The rednecks. The LIVs, who will vote for McCain just because they think the Democrats are "a bunch of sissies."

Under no circumstances, ever should we allow a bitchslap to take place without retaliating with an immediate right hook.

At the bare minimum, we should be pushing Bush to veto the bailout at least three times, and we have to push the fight past election day.

Appearances do matter, and we cannot afford to let the Rethugs make us look weak.

Call your Congresscritters and tell them not to let us be bitchslapped!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Credit where credit is due...
I'm not the first one to bring up the bitchslap theory of politics.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/003295.php

There is a meta-debate going on here, one that I'm not sure even the practitioners fully articulate to themselves and one that I'm painfully aware the victims don't fully understand.

Let's call it the Republicans' Bitch-Slap theory of electoral politics.

It goes something like this.

On one level, of course, the aim behind these attacks is to cast suspicion upon Kerry's military service record and label him a liar. But that's only part of what's going on.

Consider for a moment what the big game is here. This is a battle between two candidates to demonstrate toughness on national security. Toughness is a unitary quality, really -- a personal, characterological quality rather than one rooted in policy or divisible in any real way. So both sides are trying to prove to undecided voters either that they're tougher than the other guy or at least tough enough for the job.

In a post-9/11 environment, obviously, this question of strength, toughness or resolve is particularly salient. That, of course, is why so much of this debate is about war and military service in the first place.

One way -- perhaps the best way -- to demonstrate someone's lack of toughness or strength is to attack them and show they are either unwilling or unable to defend themselves -- thus the rough slang I used above. And that I think is a big part of what is happening here. Someone who can't or won't defend themselves certainly isn't someone you can depend upon to defend you.

Demonstrating Kerry's unwillingness to defend himself (if Bush can do that) is a far more tangible sign of what he's made of than wartime experiences of thirty years ago.

Hitting someone and not having them hit back hurts the morale of that person's supporters, buoys the confidence of your own backers (particularly if many tend toward an authoritarian mindset) and tends to make the person who's receiving the hits into an object of contempt (even if also possibly also one of sympathy) in the eyes of the uncommitted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Locking
When discussing race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, religion, or other highly-sensitive personal issues, please exercise the appropriate level of sensitivity toward others and take extra care to clearly express your point of view.

Members should avoid using racist, sexist, homophobic, or otherwise bigoted terminology.

Thank you;

dogday
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 26th 2014, 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC