Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain's Financial Stance at Odds With Anti-Regulation Past

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 01:00 PM
Original message
McCain's Financial Stance at Odds With Anti-Regulation Past
Sept. 18, 2008 – 12:31 a.m.

McCain’s Vows to Tighten Reins on Financial Industry at Odds with His Anti-Regulation Past
By Jonathan Allen, CQ Staff

Republican presidential nominee John McCain is hitting a populist note with the zeal of a convert amid the deepening crisis on Wall Street. That’s probably because he is a convert when it comes to giving government greater regulatory authority on behalf of “the public interest.”

“Government has a clear responsibility to act in defense of the public interests,” the Arizona senator said in Florida on Tuesday. “In my administration, we’re going to hold people on Wall Street responsible. And we’re going to enact and enforce reforms to make sure that these outrages never happen in the first place.”

On ABC’s “Good Morning America” yesterday, McCain said of the current upheaval in the financial world: “Congress, the regulators paid no attention whatsoever to it. We have an alphabet soup of regulatory agencies; all of them were asleep at the switch.”

That’s the same McCain who waged a quixotic battle against a “public interest” provision in the sweeping 1996 rewrite of the nation’s telecommunications law.

One of five senators who eventually voted against the landmark law, McCain waged a passionate battle against what he saw as excessive government regulation throughout the legislation.

The bill allowed regional Bell companies to provide long-distance service for the first time, after they were prohibited from doing so when “Ma” Bell was broken up in 1982. To do so, they would have to meet a “checklist” of requirements and persuade the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that the move was “consistent with the public interest.”

McCain railed against new powers for the FCC and said the “public interest” provision would be a detriment, not a benefit, to the public.

good read
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. That was one of the only issues that McCain agreed with his party on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyrone Slothrop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Weather Vane McCain
His policies and ideas all depend on which way the wind's blowing that day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC