Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawmakers sue to stop 'Troopergate' probe of Palin

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 01:55 PM
Original message
Lawmakers sue to stop 'Troopergate' probe of Palin
Lawmakers sue to stop 'Troopergate' probe of Palin
By STEVE QUINN – 1 hour ago
JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — Five state Republican lawmakers want a judge to stop an investigation into Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's firing of a public safety commissioner.
A bipartisan oversight committee had unanimously approved an inquiry into whether Palin, now the Republican vice presidential nominee, dismissed the commissioner because he wouldn't fire her ex-brother-in-law, a state trooper.
In Anchorage Superior Court on Tuesday, three state representatives and two state senators sued to stop the investigation. Palin had said months ago that she welcomed the inquiry. The lawsuit called the investigation "unlawful, biased, partial and partisan."

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jOTk11gvqDAgD0cY3i4WjI_2YOxwD937V32G1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. not a smart move
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. It is if you know the results of the probe will fuck you hard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Didn't Palin say she "had nothing to hide" like a week ago?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. they're trying to make it look like and you'll excuse the term a "Witch hunt" that
way they can try an pull the fake outrage card again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. a lawsuit brought by five republicans for a biased inquiry?
now that's what I call biased, partial, and partisan.

Funny how that kettle don't know its own color.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. What are they trying to hide?
How about some transparency! If the investigation is stopped there will always be a cloud hanging over anything she does in the future.

Open the investigation, expedite it to clear her name.


Unless they are trying to cover up her inappropriate actions as Governor of Alaska.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. At this point I believe the question is, what AREN'T they trying to hide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. The funniest thing about that situation is that it was being investigated LONG BEFORE she was chosen
But Republicans lie lie lie lie lie.......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Right, and she's a pitbull, 'cept don't ask
her any tough questions, and she's a reformer, except when she isn't, and stop all investigations, 'cause that would be picking on her, and....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spritz57 Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Who will be the appointed Judge?
I wonder who the presiding judge will be? What is his/her party affiliation and current leanings? Alberto Gonzalez went back to Texas right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. It doesn't matter - they want to stretch this out with appeals if necessary
They want to get this into the court system. If they don't get a favorable ruling, they'll probably appeal all the way to the Alaskan Supreme Court and make this last as long as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC