|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 01:55 PM Original message |
Lawmakers sue to stop 'Troopergate' probe of Palin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
1. not a smart move |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krawhitham (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 02:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. It is if you know the results of the probe will fuck you hard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
2. Didn't Palin say she "had nothing to hide" like a week ago? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 02:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. they're trying to make it look like and you'll excuse the term a "Witch hunt" that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
3. a lawsuit brought by five republicans for a biased inquiry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
4. What are they trying to hide? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibraLiz1973 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. At this point I believe the question is, what AREN'T they trying to hide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibraLiz1973 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
5. The funniest thing about that situation is that it was being investigated LONG BEFORE she was chosen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis-t (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
8. Right, and she's a pitbull, 'cept don't ask |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spritz57 (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
10. Who will be the appointed Judge? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 02:07 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. It doesn't matter - they want to stretch this out with appeals if necessary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC