|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-15-08 11:25 PM Original message |
There were some threads bemoaning Oprah declining to have Palin on her show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madeline_con (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-15-08 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
1. All the more reason Oprah should have her on. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-15-08 11:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Just the opposite, If Oprah asked them the repugs would just go see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-15-08 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
2. Oprah said and continously said that her show would not be a platform for politics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-15-08 11:31 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I am not advocating for Palin to be on Oprah's show. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-15-08 11:36 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Transcript? Link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-15-08 11:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. How the hell would I have a transcript or a link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 12:33 AM Response to Reply #8 |
20. Doesn't change the fact that Oprah doesn't have to have every nutjob |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rexy (181 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 01:08 AM Response to Reply #8 |
21. I thought Oprah decided to stop using her show as a platform for politics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 12:06 AM Response to Reply #5 |
16. I can't believe I found this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 12:11 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Cool find! That was waaay back in October 18, 2006! (link) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 12:17 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. And little more than 3 month later on February 10, 2007 Obama publicly announced his candidacy for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snake in the grass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 04:48 AM Response to Reply #5 |
30. Leave the artificial Hillary anti-Hillary indignation at home! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 08:27 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Why is your profile hidden? I suspect you're a newly resurrected sockpuppet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snake in the grass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 11:02 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. I wasn't aware that it is hidden. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-17-08 12:36 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Click "Options" at the top, then "Edit Your Profile", and answer "NO" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-15-08 11:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. They have a close relationship and that was BEFORE he was running. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoQuarter (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 12:03 AM Response to Reply #3 |
14. the point is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 02:55 AM Response to Reply #3 |
24. Oprah gave a boost to Arnold Swartzeneggers' Cal campaign when he appeared on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 04:36 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Het Dere Braddah....how you stay??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-15-08 11:40 PM Response to Original message |
6. Oprah didn't decline anything! Someone asked her if she would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-15-08 11:43 PM Response to Original message |
7. Oprah declined EVERYONE. No to Obama, Biden, McCain & Palin...its a smear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-15-08 11:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. But she did have Obama on her show last year along with Michelle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-15-08 11:49 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. She had already said it on Larry King before that. And it was BEFORE he officially ran. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democracy1st (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-15-08 11:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Ok Obama has the Oprah show Palin has Fox |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 12:00 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. This is true. But that's all pre-Palin and definitely pre-McCain, so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 12:04 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. True. Thanks for your honesty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 12:08 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Hey, no problem... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwooldri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
22. There's a so-called easy solution for this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 01:25 AM Response to Original message |
23. It's Oprah's show. She can have whoever she damn well pleases on it.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 03:16 AM Response to Original message |
25. WHY should Oprah have Palin on, she hasn't had Biden on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 04:03 AM Response to Original message |
26. OMG.....:o) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
San_Antonio_Guy (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 04:43 AM Response to Original message |
28. Too Many Questions from press |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rectangle (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-16-08 04:47 AM Response to Original message |
29. How about getting Palin on "The View"???? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-17-08 12:39 AM Response to Original message |
34. Nothing worse than an uppity Republican..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-17-08 01:04 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Its their OBSSESSION to Dominate...they Gatta be in Control or they are pissed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDsweetpea (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-17-08 01:12 AM Response to Original message |
36. Oprah.is between a rock and a hard place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-17-08 11:25 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. She has a long standing policy of not doing anymore Pols on her show. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC