Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain is turning this into a culture war (that we could lose) -- Jay Rosen article

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
weezie1317 Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 01:53 PM
Original message
McCain is turning this into a culture war (that we could lose) -- Jay Rosen article
From Jay Rosen:

John McCain's convention gambit is now a culture war strategy. It depends for its execution on conflict with journalists, and with bloggers (the "angry left," Bush called them last night) along with confusion between and among the press, the blogosphere, and the Democratic party. It revives cultural memory: the resentment narrative after Chicago '68 but with the angry left more distributed. It dispenses with issues and seeks a trial of personalities. It bets big time on backlash.

At the center of the strategy is the flashpoint candidacy of Sarah Palin, a charismatic figure around whom the war can be brought to scale, as it were. In fact the Politico is reporting just that: Palin reignites culture wars.

I have no idea if the ignition system will work; nor do I claim that "this is what they were thinking" when they made the decision to nominate Alaska Governor Sarah Palin. Other interpretations may turn out to be truer than mine. This post is my look at the bets McCain and company seem to be placing. I am not recommending the strategy. I am not predicting it will succeed. I think it was improvised, like my description here....

The storm around Sarah Pailn overtakes the story of the Republican convention and merges with it, like a smaller but stronger company taking over a larger but troubled enterprise. Behind the storm a "wave narrative" builds as her appointment generates headlines on multiple fronts. The irresistible force of fact-fed controversy meets the immovable enthusiasm for Palin as cultural object: charismatic everywoman straight from the imaginary of conservative America.

* The basic strategy is: don't fight the "crisis" narrative. Rather, do things that bring it on; and in that crisis re-divide the electorate hoping to grab the bigger half.

The evangelical wing, and other social conservatives are strongly moved by her candidacy. More and more of their commitment to McCain is vested in him through her. As Andrew Sullivan writes: "The emotions involved -- especially among the Christianist base who have immediately bonded on purely religious and cultural terms with Palin -- are epic."

* The strategy: sell the epic version of her candidacy. Allow her to become bigger than McCain in narrative terms. And let the two mavericks together overawe the Republican party, a damaged brand.

Continued bad news on the investigation front adds further drama, new fact streams and more protagonists to the Sarah Palin story. As more comes out about the decision to name Sarah Palin to the ticket, it's harder to see how anyone on the inside thought it McCain's best choice for president-in-waiting.

* Strategy: Give no ground, pile on the praise for her performance in Alaska, pump up her governor's experience to death-defying extremes, hope for theatrical confrontation with characters in the mainstream media who can star as the cosmopolitan elites in the sudden politics of resentment the convention has been driven to.

Bloggers and open platforms continue to publish riskier--and risque--material, some of it unfit for family consumption, some of it false, salacious and reckless, some of it true, relevant and damaging, a portion of which is picked up by the traditional press.

* Strategy: confound and collapse all distinctions between closed editorial systems (like the newsroom of the New York Times), open systems (like the blogging community DailyKos.com) and political systems, like the Democratic party and its activist wing. Whenever possible mix these up. Conflate constantly. Attack them all. Jump from one to the other without warning or thread. Sow confusion among streams and let that confusion mix with the resentment in a culture war atmosphere.

As more emerges about how the McCain camp made the decision, the appointment looks more and reckless, the decision rushed, the vetting inadequate. This leads to advanced jeering from the left, intense criticism in the press, damaging leaks from within the Republican party, fueling calls from within and without for Sarah Palin to remove herself.

* Strategy: stick with "she was fully vetted" no matter what comes out. People who don't believe it are trying to bring down Palin's historic candidacy; or they don't accept that a conservative women can be the one to break the glass ceiling. If some establishment Republicans are skeptical or trying to stop her, that's good for the crisis narrative, and good for two maverick candidates.

Sarah Palin under intense pressure then gives a charismatic performance on Wednesday of convention week and wows much of America, outdrawing Obama in the ratings and sending a flood of cash to McCain and the GOP.

* Strategy: bingo, that's your big break. A wave effect is unleashed by a stunning televised performance. It is shock and awe in the theater of the post-modern presidency.

Journalists watching all this keep saying to themselves: wait until she gets out on the campaign trail. Wait until she sits for those interviews with experienced reporters and faces a real press conference.

* Strategy: double down on defiance by never letting her answer questions, except from friendly media figures who have joined your narrative; like Cheney with Fox. No meet the press at all. No interviews of Palin with the DC media elite-- at all. De-legitimate the ask. Break with all "access" expectations. Use surrogates and spokesman, let them get mauled, then whip up resentment at their mistreatment. Answer questions at town halls and call that adequate enough.

Meanwhile, the investigation of her performance in Alaska puts more and more pressure on the Palin appointment as things come out that would ordinarily disqualify a candidate from consideration or cast doubt on her truthfulness in a grave way.

* Strategy: Comes from Bush, the younger. When realities uncovered are directly in conflict with prior claims, consider the option of keeping the claims and breaking with reality. Done the right way, it's a demonstration of strength. It dismays and weakens the press. And it can be great theatre.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let's ask our fellow citizens what they want.
More culture wars or jobs? More culture wars or schools? More culture wars or food on the table? More culture wars or affordable fuel? More culture wars or habeus corpus? More culture wars or a roof over their heads? More culture wars or sons and daughters alive and well at home?

That's what we need to take to the nation. More of the same bullshit of the last decade, or something meaningful to their day-to-day lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weezie1317 Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. That's smart, but it's not how people think about it now. We have to frame it for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zambero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. The ones "energized" by Palin were voting for McCain anyway
Since they can't vote more than once, she's no big help to the ticket. Her impact on middle-ground independent and undecided voters is not likely to be a positive one, especially in considering the question of McCain's age and the possibility of her succession to the presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. She is a help to the ticket. They were voting for him, but they were lukewarm about it.
That would have affected the level of money donated and hours volunteered. She's just increased both of those substantially.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weezie1317 Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. No, they may not have voted at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is how the GOP wins. They know they can't win on issues
so they manipulate the coverage they get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weezie1317 Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Exactly, and we can't let it work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. You said it!
We must learn from their strategy to beat them at their own game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. How Do We Stop Them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_Carcetti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. "It's the economy, stupid."
It worked in 1992, it will work in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weezie1317 Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes it will. We just have to help get that issue back to the front burner for the next 2 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. It could work, but only against a weak Democratic candidate
Obama is too strong to run against that way. The Republicans will be stuck playing defense against a VERY hostile media. They have already ABANDONED trying to run on issues. Their only prayer is for the religious right to turn out 100% and overwhelm the rest of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Butch350 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. 1st mistake is reading Politico...buy the way...What is your point?

I think the repubs basically are trying to get the pissed off vote against Barack for getting the nomination over Hillary
and maybe some pissed off women who didn't get a woman for the Presidency run. Of course Sarah will give a great speech
tonight - the rebulicans have been writing a special BULLSHIT script just for her tonight.

The hell with Sarah - just keep attacking McCain on the economy, new technology to help loosen our dependency on petrolium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
14. Excellent Article -- this is exactly what is going on == KICK AND RECOMMMEND n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
15. Are there more rational Americans than there are whack fundamentalists?
If the answer is yes, then framed correctly that's a war Republicans will LOSE handily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC