Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin pic my wife took January 25th 2008

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
akangel2008 Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 04:26 AM
Original message
Palin pic my wife took January 25th 2008
I'm not gonna discuss this time, just post the pic. This was at a local teacher conference.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. hmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hard to tell much of anything in that outfit
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. She looks exactly the same as in the gov photo months later when
she gave birth....so odd....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Welcome to DU! Now you get on to bed, Sarah.
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 04:31 AM by Bluebear
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
akangel2008 Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 04:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. My name's not Sarah but it is getting late LOL
at about 12:30am AKST. The reason I wanted to post the pic is because I know it wasn't photo shopped by anyone as it came off my camera and directly onto my laptop. Hope there is nothing wrong with trying to show unedited pictures so people can make an informed decision on "babygate".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. If
it came straight from your laptop why did you strip the EXIF information from it? Come on, you know what that is. That's the stuff that shows the date the image was taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. Whay are you avoiding answering Michael's question about the EXIF data?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
21. She looks pregnant to me.
I didn't show until my 7th month with my first. Hardly anybody knew it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. So, according to you, she was looking pregnant in January.
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 10:07 AM by lizzy
However, the baby bump must have disappeared by March, because her pregnancy announcement in March surprised even the people who worked for her-people are quoted as saying they had no idea she was pregnant.
Makes total sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Only my family knew and even my co workers didn't until
I was 7 months and I had him that same month. Yes, they were really shocked.

The truth of the matter is it is none of our business and beneath us. If you want to lose votes keep this shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. Perhaps they were both preggo.. and one "lost" the baby and one had the baby..
Who knows and I really don't give a flying hoot about babies.. I care about her telling me that I can't choose what to do with my body if she became President by default.. That issue is bigger to me than the other.. Now, if someone like the Enquirer digs the dirt, then let the mud fall on this little piggy shit.. We know she's lied about other things, so her credibility is already in question.. In her debut speach, she lied... so, let the people who get to throw dirt do what they do.. and let them bring out the speculation.. not DU and other more liberal sites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. What are we discussing?
Just kidding. Those look like fishing lures for earrings. They could be given her location.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. "Those look like fishing lures for earrings."
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 04:47 AM by depakid
:rofl:

They do, don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'm searching for where she bought them now.
I found a site just now for fly earrings!

http://www.bjenterprisesonline.com/index.php?main_page=...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. They very well could be.
You don't know Sarah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. But I'm learning!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
12. Please discuss this
why did you take the time to strip the EXIF data from this image? It's the information that is embedded with every photo showing when the photo was taken and with what kind of camera. You say the image is from Jan 2008 but the date field is empty, that only happens when someone removes the data. Don't try the film excuse because if it was film it would have been scanned at some point, turned into a data file with a date and what type of scanner.

Why hide this info?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Why would someone remove the date and time data from the photo, then claim it was January?
Why would they try to sell it here as such?

There sure has been a steady onslaught of posters trying to stop the discussions and investigation into this curious set of events that suggest Palin has been lying and misusing government assets for personal gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. And only 39 posts! Nice catch!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Yep, data has been intentionally stripped. I believe this person is a Troll trying to
pull a fast one, by switching in a pic from a previous pregnancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Good question, MichaelHarris--I also await the date info from akangel, but I
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 08:19 AM by lulu in NC
doubt he'll provide it. Which tells us a great deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
20. Seriously.
She announces her pregnancy on March 6. It's reportedly a total surprise to even people working for her, because at that time she was not showing.
So, I seriously doubt she'd be showing already in January.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
23. waiting for answer for mr harris
rec'd for the questions he posed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 27th 2014, 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC