Palin pic my wife took January 25th 2008

[akangel2008]

I'm not gonna discuss this time, just post the pic. This was at a local teacher conference.

[d_b]

1. hmm

[merwin]

2. Hard to tell much of anything in that outfit

:shrug:

[K8-EEE]

4. She looks exactly the same as in the gov photo months later when

she gave birth....so odd....

[Bluebear]

3. Welcome to DU! Now you get on to bed, Sarah.

:hi:

[akangel2008]

5. My name's not Sarah but it is getting late LOL

at about 12:30am AKST. The reason I wanted to post the pic is because I know it wasn't photo shopped by anyone as it came off my camera and directly onto my laptop. Hope there is nothing wrong with trying to show unedited pictures so people can make an informed decision on "babygate".

[MichaelHarris]

13. If

it came straight from your laptop why did you strip the EXIF information from it? Come on, you know what that is. That's the stuff that shows the date the image was taken.

[HCE SuiGeneris]

16. Whay are you avoiding answering Michael's question about the EXIF data?

[JeanGrey]

21. She looks pregnant to me.

I didn't show until my 7th month with my first. Hardly anybody knew it.

[LisaL]

22. So, according to you, she was looking pregnant in January.

However, the baby bump must have disappeared by March, because her pregnancy announcement in March surprised even the people who worked for her-people are quoted as saying they had no idea she was pregnant.
Makes total sense.

[JeanGrey]

24. Only my family knew and even my co workers didn't until

I was 7 months and I had him that same month. Yes, they were really shocked.

The truth of the matter is it is none of our business and beneath us. If you want to lose votes keep this shit up.

[glowing]

6. Perhaps they were both preggo.. and one "lost" the baby and one had the baby..

Who knows and I really don't give a flying hoot about babies.. I care about her telling me that I can't choose what to do with my body if she became President by default.. That issue is bigger to me than the other.. Now, if someone like the Enquirer digs the dirt, then let the mud fall on this little piggy shit.. We know she's lied about other things, so her credibility is already in question.. In her debut speach, she lied... so, let the people who get to throw dirt do what they do.. and let them bring out the speculation.. not DU and other more liberal sites.

[Life Long Dem]

7. What are we discussing?

Just kidding. Those look like fishing lures for earrings. They could be given her location.

[depakid]

8. "Those look like fishing lures for earrings."

:rofl:

They do, don't they?

[Life Long Dem]

9. I'm searching for where she bought them now.

I found a site just now for fly earrings!

http://www.bjenterprisesonline.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=667

[Blue_In_AK]

10. They very well could be.

You don't know Sarah.

[Life Long Dem]

11. But I'm learning!

[MichaelHarris]

12. Please discuss this

why did you take the time to strip the EXIF data from this image? It's the information that is embedded with every photo showing when the photo was taken and with what kind of camera. You say the image is from Jan 2008 but the date field is empty, that only happens when someone removes the data. Don't try the film excuse because if it was film it would have been scanned at some point, turned into a data file with a date and what type of scanner.

Why hide this info?

[TexasObserver]

14. Why would someone remove the date and time data from the photo, then claim it was January?

Why would they try to sell it here as such?

There sure has been a steady onslaught of posters trying to stop the discussions and investigation into this curious set of events that suggest Palin has been lying and misusing government assets for personal gain.

[crispini]

15. And only 39 posts! Nice catch!

:thumbsup:

[berni_mccoy]

17. Yep, data has been intentionally stripped. I believe this person is a Troll trying to

pull a fast one, by switching in a pic from a previous pregnancy.

[Mist]

18. Good question, MichaelHarris--I also await the date info from akangel, but I

doubt he'll provide it. Which tells us a great deal.

[spanone]

19. so?

[LisaL]

20. Seriously.

She announces her pregnancy on March 6. It's reportedly a total surprise to even people working for her, because at that time she was not showing.
So, I seriously doubt she'd be showing already in January.

[fishnfla]

23. waiting for answer for mr harris

rec'd for the questions he posed