Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

surprised Obama still sizable lead in Gallup +6

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:02 PM
Original message
surprised Obama still sizable lead in Gallup +6
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 12:03 PM by gabeana
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not surprised given that he picked Palin for VP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto-Che-Guevara Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why the surprise?
Palin was not expected to erase a 8 point deficit alone. Remember, Biden produced very little bump if any. It wasn't until after Clinton's speech and Bill's and Obama's speeches that the big bump occurred. Therefore, we should wait to see what happens after the GOP convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I guess I was meaning from a post from last night
who actually made a lot of sense that Obama would probably be tied by today and next week down by 8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. yeah, and I don't think 6 points is "sizable"
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 12:06 PM by npincus
unless the GOP convention is a demonstrable suck-athon, the lead will certainly diminish.

OK, now here comes the crap from my friends at DU... "FEAR FEAR FEAR, bla blabla"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. 6 % is landslide territory. And Gallup has a republican house effect of about 2%
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 12:20 PM by Teaser
So the lead is more likely to be closer than other polls would measure.

That's a problem with both tracking polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe more want a Constitutional scholar instead of a biblical know it all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Has there been a recent 'likely voter' poll released?
Isn't that the one (they say) to really keep on eye on?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bbbbut...I thought Gallup was just Republican shills!
Or is that only when everyone doesn't like the poll results?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. David Poluffe said these Daily Tracking Polls are ridiculous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. yup they are
and I desperately need to kick the habit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto-Che-Guevara Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Any valid reason to prove they are "ridiculous"?
Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. because they reweight their proportions of R/D/I
to fixed values for every poll. Even though party ID is known to fluctuate with public mood. It has the effect of artificially pushing numbers that are farther apart in their "true" values closer together.

Satisfied, "Che"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Here you go. Enjoy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. 538 weights by age and poll type
Right now they've got the EC going 290 for Obama, 248 for McCain (270 to win). The popular vote is very tight at 48.8% Obama to 47.9% McCain, though, so an Obama victory hinges on the same kind of canny play we saw in the primaries.

See: fivethirtyeight.com

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. The 290 value from 538 is a maximum likelihood value
which means it's only the *most likely* outcome. There are other outcomes in which O wins, and if you add them all up, O wins in 60% of scenarios Nate runs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. That's his 'Win Percentage', right?
The percent of all scenaria in which each candidate wins at all?

His Scenario Analysis has some really interesting details:

Likelihood that McCain wins all the states that Bush won is only 12%, while likelihood that Obama wins all the states Kerry won is 57%.

Likelihood that Obama could lose Ohio and still win the election is 26%, likelihood for McCain to do the same is .5% (that's 1/2 of 1 percent).

No wonder Ohio is getting lots of attention!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nycmjkfan Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. I still think
with the fact that these polls rarely, if ever, poll first time voters, there are a lot of young Obama votes that are not tracked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. isn't that considered a dead heat!! *snark*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. We will get a better sense of where this race really is after the pukes finish their convention.
And it will be regional polls in the battleground states that we need to pay attention to, not the national polls.

IMO, McSame will not get any kind of bounce from his convention and Obama will lead all the way to November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. Good news!

Last 8 days of 3-day average results:

45-45-44-45-48-49-49-48
vs.
45-45-46-44-42-41-41-42


Stable up through Wednesday's released numbers (i.e., Tuesday's poll pre-Hillary speech), so about 45-45 on days until then.
One day's numbers gave a big boost after Hillary's speech brought it up to 48-42. That day's numbers just dropped out, so Saturday's numbers must not have been too bad for the average to stay up.

My calculations assuming that the last 3 single days up through Tuesday were 45-45-45:

Wed: 54-36 (Bump from Hillary endorsement)
Thur: 48-42 (cooling off)
Fri: 45-45 (Palin day offset Obama's speech)
Sat: 51-39 (People thought about Obama's speech and about Palin)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC