Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain just cemented that he has no judgment whatsoever....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:59 AM
Original message
McCain just cemented that he has no judgment whatsoever....
It was a Hail Mary pick. Pandering, panicked and foolish. I can't say that it wasn't daring, but jumping off a cliff is pretty daring too, not too bright though.

She has some things going for her. Young, attractive. Sure she's inexperienced, but she also doesn't have a mile long record to pick at either. But she's a paradox, really. What she has going for her is canceled out by other reasons.

First of all, it's an obvious pander to women. He wants those supposedly angry Hillary holdouts. But Hillary supporters and women voters aren't stupid. Palin is a woman, but she's a right-winger. She's been around for two years. Hillary is an icon, she's been fighting this battle and inspiring generations of women for a few decades now. Not quite as long on a national level, but almost. If the GOP thinks women are going to drop the party of Hillary Clinton, for somebody they never heard of until today who doesn't have much of a record on anything good luck. And if she does bring in some women, I still think there are alot of Republican men who would be turned off by the thought of a woman being a heartbeat away from the presidency. She doesn't galvanize the sexist racist part of the party who believe women are basically meant for breeding and cooking, that's for sure.

And it also kills his "inexperienced" argument. If experience was so important, why would a 72 year old man with health issues pick somebody who isn't even remotely qualified to be president? Even then, she has shown little judgment on anything. It makes little sense.

I don't know if her ethics issues will be a problem, but does McCain really want to start delving into petty Rezko stuff, when it will drudge up the Alaska scandals, and then Keating 5 and his Abramoff coverups? Even if he can win these battles, it wouldn't be by much. Not enough to truly hurt Obama. He put out those ads last week with Rezko, Ayers etc, and they sunk like a stone. Maybe they can get some traction, but Obama has crushed that stuff time and time again and nobody in the media or anybody else seems to think there is anything to that stuff.

But last, and I said it yesterday. He's serving up a lightweight to Biden. McCain's a lightweight himself, he can barely remember a talking point about the price of milk without a cue card, and since he's starting to turn his POW line of defense into a punchline, he's starting to be forced into actually talking about policy, something that he seems to know frighteningly little about. Someone like Romney at least had a fighting chance. I think they conceded debates to Biden already. I'd look for them to play down expectations in both debate settings. If McCain and Palin can avoid going out and drooling all over themselves, it might be fine, so long as they lower expectations enough.

Problem is, this is an election of high expectations. Nobody wants to lower the bar, we're looking to rise to the occasion. As a pick, I'd say she's a D. A desperate move that evidently McCain felt he had to try. Poor judgment and it leaves the door wide open for Obama this fall. He just has to keep the momentum and go do what he has to do. All of us do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. shameless kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. regarding her Scandal regarding wife-beating brother-in-law... McCain voted AGAINST
Violence Against Women Law.

DU'er have ignored my post about that but it's what we need to emphasize NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. oh no!
Yeah that needs to be brought up for sure. It's like McCain has no cognitive abilities at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Higher Standard Donating Member (499 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Little experience, under investigation, marital connection to big oil...
Was Palin actually vetted? Because I can't fathom how someone like that would ever get chosen to be a presidential running mate. She automatically nullifies any experience argument that McCain makes against Obama, as well as undercutting McCain on the big oil issue with her connections to it. And, should McCain not make it through his term, is this someone that people would really feel comfortable with in the White House?

Congratulations, Senator McNutty, you've erased all doubt about how good your judgment is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's bizarre
I just don't get it. She has some things going for her, but a whole helluva things not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's bizarre
I just don't get it. She has some things going for her, but a whole helluva things not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC