Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So how did Mark Warner do for himself? He is running for an important seat in an important state.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:00 AM
Original message
So how did Mark Warner do for himself? He is running for an important seat in an important state.
I found his speech interesting and worth listening to. The delivery made me feel like I'm glad he didn't run for President though.

What say you.....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. He did OK, but not very memorable. He'll make a fine Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That pretty much sums it up. Fine job, looking forward to seeing him in Senate. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. I couldnt really get into him, but I wish him luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM7nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good, but no Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. He was pretty bad
Unfortunately for him, the night belonged to Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. i really like mark warner.
i liked his speech. he'll make a great senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. A decent speech, some good lines.
But Schweitzer should have done the keynote address -- he was spectacular, while Warner was merely pretty good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I think that is why Schweitzer is not running for anything......
and Mark Warner is running for something that will make a differene in an Obama administration governing....so I understand why the choice was made. Plus Schweitzer was certainly placed in between the two, so that was a good place to have him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. He would have won a general election in a massacre
Much higher electoral vote total than Obama or Hillary.

His problem was getting the nomination vs. star power and without great charisma. He figured that out and is a lock to win big in Virginia.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
66. Yeah. Another smooth, clean cut JE type
Hopefully there's substance in there somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
71. I suspect he stepped aside for Hillary. I believe he's DLC.
But I agree, I think he would do better then Hill or Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. Content good, delivery meh. Yeah in retrospect, Schweitzer would've been better,
he had the fire going. I liked Warner though. He's no Barack or Hillary though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl_interrupted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Warner Boring, Schweitzer Excellent!, Hillary Amazing!
I wish Warner luck, he has an election to win and he's afraid to rock the boat. That's ok...we need Virginia. Schweitzer might have made a better keynote speaker, he got the crowd going, very likable personality. And Hillary was just awesome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
12. He did better than I thought (a bit sharper than I thought it would be),
but it wasn't really on the level of Schweitzer or Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
13. Excellent style and delivery (technique 10) but message was just ok.

Good solid message but he had to be compared against Michelle, Hillary, Brain, Teddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
14. God was that boring. It may help him in his Senate race, but he was smart to give up his
presidential aspirations. He just doesn't have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
15. In watching his speech again, something is very obvious
Warner doesn't identify clever or powerful words to punctuate a thought. The themes are fine but the wording is bland as hell.

In journalism school one professor always stressed that every word was important. Someone needs to convey that to Mark Warner. Better writing would make his speeches far more memorable, although I concede his personality puts a regulator on how commanding he can be, regardless of the syllables.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #15
37. We did not vote for him to be an eloquent speaker
We him to be a good governor, and he was. We will vote for him to be a good senator, which he will be. Don't give a damed whether he is a polished public speaker or not. He is a very effective publc servant with the welfare of the citizens at heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #37
68. He was my top choice for president
I think you're a bit defensive on this topic. My comment was an observation, not a condemnation.

At YearlyKos '06 here in Las Vegas he have a speech that was considered dull, even though he did many great things at that gathering and subsequently. I had not seen a major speech from Warner since he pulled out of the presidential race. Last night was superior to his previous speeches -- more energy -- and I mentioned that in other threads. But he does need snappier more memorable phrases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. If he would run for the office of President, I would vote for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
16. the second coming of Chuck Robb
and equally exciting as a speaker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Hey, being that you're from Texas, I wouldn't cast stones on any other state's politicians.
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 01:05 AM by beac
Warner gets 100% of the credit for beginning the amazing transformation of Virginia from red to blue and here in the Commonwealth we love him for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Hey, my being from Texas is irrelevant to Warner and Robb.
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 01:17 AM by TexasObserver
Do you know anything about Chuck Robb?

If the only thing you can think of is to yell "yeah, well TEXAS!" just do yourself a favor and remain silent, rather than reveal yourself that vacuous. Don't bother responding. You're going on my ignore list, because I can't imagine you ever typing anything I would find worth reading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Holy moly-- calm down.
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 01:24 AM by beac
I was refering to BUSH and thought you'd know that.

Of COURSE I know who Robb is, I've lived in VA all my life.

But yeah, you're reaction did kind of conform to a lot of Texas stereotypes, so I'm sure your fellow citizens will thank you for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #19
32. Did you want to talk about his trist with a playbunny?
Or his drug use in Va Beach? Regardless, he was a moderating blue voice in a sea of red.

Again, where's W from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. Yes, I know Chuck Robb. Dumb as a box of rocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. That would be at least a few rocks smarter than W.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. At least Chuck Robb went to V.N..
and wasn't playing fly boy in Alabama.

Hey, why are we comparing Chuck Robb and shrubya anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. there is no logic, only a strained rationale
I commented about how Warner was boring, reminding me of another Virginia Democratic Senator, Chuck Robb, a guy I helped get elected to his senate seat and was friendly with for a number of years. Although a nice guy, Chuck was not a good speaker. He was boring. Much like Warner is a boring speaker.

I compared them.

The poster with the tenuous hold on reality then took my comments about Warner and Robb as an insult to Virginia, and in his mind, striking back at Texas was the appropriate response. His comments about Bush are intended to show that Bush is a butthole, so there, Texas! Like I care about Bush or any of the GOP fixtures that have been elected here.

He's taking offense on behalf of Virginia, and striking back at "Texas," he imagines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. I never met Chuck, but I did meet Lynda..
she was a wonderfully gracious woman, just like I imagine her mother was. My MIL used to see her in the grocery store sometimes too. She was never pretentious or snobby.

Agreed that Chuck probably would never have made it as a politician without his wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. I got to know Lady Bird a little after LBJ died.
I met LBJ and Lady Bird when I was a soldier, in 1968. My next contact was with her in about 1975, when she was on the board of regents at University of Texas. I was lobbying for the law school in those days, and got to know her and several of the regents while doing so. She was ever bit the lady, and very charming.

I didn't get to know Chuck until the mid 1980s, when I was working with the DSCC. He was one of the Democrats we had pegged for the senate, and he was one of our recruits to run for the US senate in the late 1980s.

Competent, if somewhat conservative, guy. Not a movie star.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. One more bit of my Chuck Robb trivia..
I know some people who went to high school with Tai Collins in Virginia Beach. They said she was pretty much of a nerd back then.

I think the repubs set him up for that, not that it's any excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. it's shocking how many politicians get caught with their pants down
If I can be so blunt, there are many "star fuckers" out there who go for politicians - governors and US senators, mainly. They are drawn to the power. Even guys you don't expect to step out will fool you (I'm looking at you, John Edwards!)

That little incident ruined Robb's chances to do more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. But it was just a massage! LOL!....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #42
58. Because somebody from Texas got their panties in a big ol' twist.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. It's Connecticut we should be crapping on..
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 04:32 PM by Virginia Dare
they gave us Bush (all of them) and Lieberman!

(this is a joke, I love the CT!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #61
67. Oh no, it's gonna be WAR!
:rofl:

(I was born in CT and love it too, BTW)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. If your point is that George Bush is an idiot, WELL DUH!
So is John Coryn. So is Kay Bailey Hutchison.

You see, the fact that I am from Texas and Bush is from Texas has relevance only to you, because you think and talk like a child. My criticism of Warner and Robb has nothing to do with Virginia, and only a person with a very small brain would think my criticisms of them is a criticism of Virginia.

In summary, grow up and stop acting like a mad 13 year old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #16
31. As a Virginian I take exception to the contempt you have displayed for our politicians.
At least I can say W is from your state and not mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. I don't care what state they're from, they're both very boring.
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 10:09 AM by TexasObserver
Stop acting like a child. There is nothing lamer than your pretending my comments are an insult to your STATE. My comments are an insult to two Democratic politicians. If you don't like it, don't read it, friendo.

Both guys are extremely boring speakers. That is my point, one you'd know if you had any political experience at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. You are the only one acting like a child here.
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 01:53 PM by smiley_glad_hands
I'd rather have a boring dem than a fascist republican anyday.

Political experience?

You know nothing about Virginia politics. lolz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. More nonsense from a poster bereft of intelligent thoughts.
Your comments are silly and childish. Stop acting as if criticizing a politician is the same as criticizing a state. And my comments about politicians are acceptable here. Your personal attacks on me are not acceptable here.

I know more about Virginia's politics than you ever will. I know Chuck Robb, and helped him get elected in Virginia.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. I'll never get over Chuck letting Macaca roll over him the way he did..
it seemed like his heart just wasn't in it anymore and he wouldn't fight for it, and it REALLY pissed me off that we were stuck with that boob in the Senate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Chuck wanted to be president, and when he figured out that was not going to happen ...
... he began to lose interest.

Chuck is a decent guy, but if he had never married LBJ's daughter, we would never have heard from him. I liked the guy on a personal level, but he simply lacked the depth and range of a guy like Biden or Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #51
75. Prove you know him personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #48
73. Right. Continue in the personal attacks?
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 06:52 PM by smiley_glad_hands
Where? you are the one that bashes a state and its dem politicians.

Fan of rove much? Seems you enjoy using his tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #40
63. Clearly,
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 04:35 PM by beac
TexasObserver seems more interested in stirring sh!t than anything else.

He (and at least I bothered to check his gender, a courtesy he didn't afford me) said Warner "the second coming of Chuck Robb and equally exciting as a speaker"-- clearly commenting on MORE than Warner's "boring" speech. Not that he's "man" enough to admit in now.

Alas, he banished me to his ignore list, so I suspect you are on your way there too. Don't Mess with Texas! O NOZ! :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #63
74. I hope I do make his ignore list.
Well he says he got Robb elected, yeah don't mess with texass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #31
55. .
:applause:

:thumbsup:

Texas... yeah, that's the ticket. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
41. I'd take 100 Chuck Robbs over 1 Macaca Allen...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #41
53. amen to that
My biggest problem with Chuck was and is his lack of speaking ability. He's simply not a good public speaker. Warner was better, but both LOOK better than they talk. IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. I just hope that people don't write Mark Warner off now..
he really is a good guy, and I hope people give him a chance. Not everybody can be an Obama at the podium. Perhaps he'll prove himself in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #57
62. just remember the recovery Bill Clinton made from his 1988 disaster!
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 04:35 PM by TexasObserver
OMG! It was so bad.

I don't think Warner is an inherently bad speaker. He needs to work on his whole approach, however. Speaking requires passion. If you're just reading lines, it does not sell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #62
76. If you knew anthing about Va politics, then you would know his speech and delivery was on target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NEM Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
18. ZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
When warner was speaking, I heard a lot of toilets flushing across the country.

That was potty time for many Americans.

Good speaker but man, his speech worked better than counting sheep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. the most boring speaker the convention will have
Good lord he's a snoozer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smartvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
44. I second that. Also didn't like how much was about himself. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
20. His delivery was beyond terrible. Same with Sebelius. Just awful.
I listened to both of them on NPR and they both sounded flat, stumbling and monotone.


Maybe they were better on tv, but on radio they were awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Kathleen looked good on TV, but her delivery was not the best....
as for Warner, it seemed almost hard for him to get through it. But what he talked about was good to hear, just not impactful enough....not even like Chinese Food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #20
38. To all those who pushed Sebelius for VP
Be glad you were wrong.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
24. His speech was forgettable and mostly typical Dem convention fare
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 01:30 AM by fujiyama
It wasn't terrible. It just wasn't exciting or anything. He was right that following Obama's speech last year is tough (no one wants to follow him speaking), and Hillary absolutely blew it out of the water today. Her's was truly magnificent.

I've seen Warner speak before and I think he's more interesting when going into detailed policies. He seems more like a policy wonk type.

I still really appreciate Hillary's speech. Amazing. I wish she were VP, but I can understand Obama's reasoning in going another way. I hope she has a prominent role to play in an Obama administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
25. Typical for Mark Warner
A thoughtful speech delivered in his usual under-inspiring style. He was probably the best Governor in Virgina in the last 50 years (my opinion). He will win the election to the Senate easily. He will make an excellent Senator. I do not believe that he will ever be very popular with the DU. I find his political vision is pretty well near the center.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damndude Donating Member (306 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
26. the media did have this right.
tepid speech. tepid delivery.
there was no meat to it. no teeth to it. i wanted to see someone come out there and set fire to that crowd and show the television audience why democrats are THE choice this year and he did no do that. it took hillary clinton to do that. this was my first experience seeing mark warner in action and after all the things i had heard i was underwhelmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
27. Warner was a great Gov and lead the way to turn us blue. Kaine is also good but
accomplished alot less due to his style. He turned off all the central/southern VA legislators and nothing happened as a result. Warner will liven up once in the Senate. I predict he'll be a great Jr Senator, get on the best committees and have an excellent career there. Then, he'll run for President one day and get in. Just my opinion.

We in VA are soooo grateful to him. I live in the mountains just west of Fairfax. When I moved here 5 years ago from there, I realized I just moved to the "deep South" in mindset. For an original feminist and lifelong Democrat, that was hard to stomach. But I figured, it's beautiful here, no traffic, no "cement cities" etc., and that I'd work to make a difference.

I got a call last night while watching the convention from a stranger here who got my name from the DNCC donation list. He's hosting a party Thursday night. While I can't attend due to poor health right now, we made arrangements for me to begin work at home on the computer and phones. I should be much better in a few weeks and will start knocking on doors, hosting parties, lining up folks to drive to the polls on 11/4 etc.

It felt soooo good to finally talk to a fellow Dem who is getting involved. I told him I'm afraid to put an Obama sign in my yard since a neighbor put a Kerry sign up in 04 and someone poisoned his dog. I live alone on 6 acres and have 3 of them in my fenced yard.

We'll turn this rural hamlet blue one day - hopefully soon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
28. Content of the speech was good, delivery blah.
Public speaking is not his forte, but he'll be OK in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eshfemme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
29. The Obama keynote was to blame for the boredom I felt but under ordinary standards, he gave a solid
speech. It just wasn't comparable to Obama's, that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklynChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
30. The content was good but the delivery put me to sleep. But the fact that he was center stage will
help his Senate bid tremendously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
33. I have seen him and Sibelius speak before
He is just a bland speaker. He's smart and has his heart in the right place,
but just isn't a rousing speaker. Sibelius was a surprise, though. I've seen
her speak before, and this was like Sominex.

I must say, having Schweitzer give the keynote speech would have been the better
move, but that's 20-20 hindsight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
34. Will you haters still be bored with him when he wins in November?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
43. I have no idea why Mark Warner was chosen to make the keynote..
he's NEVER been known for dynamic speaking style. He was a fantastic Governor, will be a good Senator, and I think he'd probably even make a good President.

FWIW, I know people who have met him personally, and they say he is much better in person than on stage. I think he's a basically a good solid moderate Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
45. The only thing worse than his speech last nite was the ending
prayer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
54. He wasn't speaking to the liberal base looking for a rockstar performance
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 04:15 PM by cbc5g
He was speaking to the rural people that Democrats have trouble with. You know, those people that come and tow your car when your car breaks down on a rural road? Yeah, those folks. The folks that will make Warner win in a landslide in Virginia and can possibly help Obama win as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
64. I think the GOP could not find a good opponent and has basically given up on that race
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
65. I caught some distasteful snippits
He was minimizing the difference between liberals and conservatives, and he bragged about getting rich off the cell phone industry in the sound bites I heard.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
69. He did ok, just a bad spot to make a speech like that
You have to remember, he followed Obama as keynote speaker, no way could he top that. Then he went on a little bit before Brian Schweitzer rocked the house, compared to that he looked dull. Then, of course, he was appearing the same night as Hillary, he can't compare to her. And she went out and made the speech of her life, too. So he was what the ancient Etruscans might call "a little bit screwn" all around.

All in all, he said some good things, he did well for himself, it was a little wishy-washy, and his delivery was somewhat flat, but he was fine. He'll make an excellent senator and someday make a solid run at the presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
72. I thought he did well. A little too stiff, but hey, you can get away with that in the Senate. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC