Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Johnny McPOW Telling More ' TOUGH GUY ' Fable Stories Again?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 11:01 PM
Original message
Is Johnny McPOW Telling More ' TOUGH GUY ' Fable Stories Again?
Little Man McCain wants to show the world he's a really tough guy on war strategy issues as a ploy to cover up his failing judgment.


Did McCain Push Rumsfeld For More Troops In Iraq? Rumsfelds Notes Suggest He Didnt.


Throughout his campaign, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) has disguised his support for a failed strategy in Iraq by regularly railing against Donald Rumsfeld. A lengthy Washington Times article today highlighting McCains advocacy for more troops (calling it a David against Goliath battle) reveals that McCains push for more troops may have been more tepid than he portrays.


In an August 2003 meeting with Rumsfeld, McCain made a very passionate case that we need to look at adding more troops, according to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC). But in a note from Rumsfeld just after meeting, McCain reportedly told Rumsfeld, the answer may not be more troops in Iraq:


An aide to the secretary said Mr. McCains account is incorrect. In November 2003, Secretary Rumsfeld and Senator McCain had one of a number of conversations that ended with the two in agreement on the need to win in Iraq, Keith Urbahn said. Senator McCain may prefer to characterize their meeting as a Showdown at the OK Corral, but thats not straight talk. Its a fairy tale.


Mr. Rumsfeld wrote a two-sentence summary shortly after his meeting, according to his office. I had breakfast with Senator McCain. He said, The answer may not be more troops in Iraq, but the answer is not the status quo. I agree with him.


On the campaign trail, McCain assails Rumsfeld as one of the worst secretaries of defense in history. Yesterday, however, The Jed Report unearthed a 2001 Larry King interview with McCain saying he would have hired Rumsfeld had he been elected President in 2000. McCain said Bush assembled the strongest national security team in history.

Watch it:


<http://thinkprogress.org/2008/08/21/rumsfeld-mccain />


Oh yes, and Cheney, he added gleefully, saying that he told Dick Cheney at the time, If I had been elected President, youd have been my nominee for Vice President. Hell, yeah, McCain told Stephen Hayes about Cheney serving in a future McCain administration. But in 2007, McCain said Bush was very badly served by Cheney.

As ThinkProgress has documented, McCain continued to try to have it both ways despite criticizing Rumsfeld, stating in 2005, we will have made a fair amount of progress if we stay the course.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Such a liar......
he just goes on and on and on with his lies.

We don't need a lying President in the White House.

Been there, done that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. His self serving lying antics seem to be the norm with this nut case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 26th 2014, 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC