Why Isn't The Media Claiming * Is Allowing JK To Define Him Via SBV?

[stopbush]

We all heard how the SBV were "defining JK," and how "JK is allowing himself to be defined by the * campaign" many, many times.

Well, turnabout is fair play. JK is now defining * through the fiasco of the SBV liars. The connections between */c '04 and the SBV is now well established, leading to resignations from the * campaign team (Cordier, Ginsberg). The Navy's own records have proved that Kerry is right on the medals issue while the SVB/* people are lying through their teeth.

It seems to me that JK is using the SVB debacle to define the * campaign as a bunch of gutter politicians, liars and slime merchants. Even more, they're now pointing out the * family's history of gutter politics and the pattern of lies they've used for decades to advance their family's evil designs.

So why are we not hearing in the same media that "* is allowing JK to define his campaign"?

Just asking.

[Nite Owl]

1. Now that we have gotten

to this point it's time to change the subject. Now it becomes old news since the show is on the other foot. We need the Dems out there to press this now I hopethey will be there and not let the turn in the story escape.

[lucca]

2. I think that the media

are the ones that are allowing Bush and his buddies to define this campaign, by saturating us over and over again with the swift boat ads, and their biased reporting favoring Bush.

It seems that when it is a bash Kerry day by the republicans, the cable news shows seem to jump on the band-wagon.

Kerry has been actively explaining his plans and ideas for this country, and has been challenging Bush.....but,that doesn't make the news.

I keep waiting for the media to get some integrity and have fair and balanced reporting......:think: