Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's with all the Clark = VP posts?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:21 PM
Original message
What's with all the Clark = VP posts?
Can anyone given me real, concrete evidence that he has more than a snowball's chance in hell at actually being the running mate? Seems like a lot of wishful thinking by DUers. Never in my life have I seen such a netroots-driven politician as Wes Clark. Don't misread me, I think the man's great and has given his life to public service, but I hardly hear or read about him outside of this website. Based on what I read here, one would think he's the next coming of Dwight Eisenhower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. He was really the most liberal candidate we had.
Edited on Thu Aug-14-08 05:24 PM by MookieWilson
Other than Kucinich. The others are middle of the road fakers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arnold Judas Rimmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think a lot of it has to do with the "theme" of Wednesday (Veep day) at the convention.
Edited on Thu Aug-14-08 05:26 PM by Arnold Judas Rimmer
"Securing America's Future" - which happens to be the first words you see at Clark's website oddly enough named securingamerica.com

Not exactly a solid piece of evidence, but interesting none the less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Its a process of elimination
Edited on Thu Aug-14-08 05:26 PM by DJ13
Every other name often associated with being a potential VP for Obama has been assigned convention speaking times.

The only two serious contenders not already scheduled to speak are Clark and Richardson as far as I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. that doesn't mean squat except that the Obama camp are really good at confounding
the media. They jump to conclusions like that and think just because somebody has been "assigned" a speaking spot means they won't be VP. Look at Wed night Biden and Bayh speak, but it could easily be changed to have one or the other speak instead as the VP candidate. If it's Clark I'll be very pleased, but it doesn't mean anything these speaking slots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Of course it doesnt mean squat
That doesnt mean it isnt fun speculating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Why is Bayh speaking on Securing America's Future night?
He's a DLC wimp: hardly anyone I see qualified to secure America's future militarily, politically, economically or in any way.

If you look up milquetoast in the dictionary, you'd see Bayh's picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arnold Judas Rimmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Richardson will be speaking Wednesday, apparently.
but in what capacity?

I think it's one of the two (Richardson or Clark) myself, and I'd be fine with either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Clark kicks ass.
We like him. Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wishful thinking
It's like me and others hoping Obama picks Brian Schweitzer. It's not going to happen but it's nice to hold on to a slim hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Schweitzer will be speaking - did you know that?
I'm thrilled. He was my fave, too, when I thought he still had a chance.

I'm so happy many more people will get to "know" him (and Jag) as a result of his appearance there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. I didn't know that....that's really exciting.
I'm glad he's going to get exposure on a national stage. Maybe next time... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. You claimed Hillary would be VP. Do you have evidence for that?
No, of course you don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. You forgot to mention a few things about Clark....
Clark is a Rhodes scholar, speaks several languages, is a decorated combat veteran, has superb diplomatic skills, has a touching rags-to-riches biography, was against the Iraq War from the beginning, has populist leanings and is very, very, very popular with veterans` groups. Oh, yeah...Clark knows international affairs inside-out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. Gen Clark is nearly the perfect VP for Obama
Edited on Thu Aug-14-08 05:52 PM by DCBob
military, really knows how to win wars, clean cut, smart, psuedo-conservative, white guy, southerner, former Clinton supporter -- best of all he outranks McCain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. the first response claims he was the most liberal candidate we had
which is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yes, yes, we get it, you want to trash Clark in favor of Hillary.
When he's nominated, I'm sure you'll be crying in your beer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Clark's not conservative, but he is a real patriot...
...and that appeals to many conservatives who respect the sacrifice Clark's made for his nation by dedicating himself to a long military career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Not a true "conservative" but not a flaming liberal either
He looks and feels conservative especially with the strong military background.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. In 2004 he was the only presidential candidate to
have the courage to say he was a liberal and explain why he was one. I don't remember him being a candidate this time, although there were many that wanted him to be.

I wish he was going to be the VP choice, but I don't think he will be. Like Shakespeare said. "If wishes were horses, we'd all be kings." (or something like that)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Agree -- he would be an outstanding choice. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. Clark makes sense in so many ways that is is easy to assume
that someone as intelligent as Obama is would at least be seriously considering him. Clark shores up most of Obama's relative weaknesses without undercutting his change message. It would reassure a lot of voters worried about Obama's thin national security resume to have Clark close at hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salonghorn70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
21. Flavor of the Day
On another post a few days ago, Clark's son was quoted as saying that Clark hasn't been vetted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Clark doesn't need to be vetted
He has been throughly vetted already from past position in Clinton admin and his run for Prez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. No--that's not vetting. "Past positions" mean nothing. We're talking
his personal finances, his associations, whether or not he'd ever had an affair, whether or not there is anything harmful in his military record. You are vetted until somebody investigates all that--Edwards ran for Prez and wasn't himself sufficiently vetted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. I'm sure if Obama considered him, his team vetted the hell out of Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I imagine so. They'd be stupid not to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. One way or another he's been vetted..
I predict he will be the VP nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumptheshadow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
25. Clark would underscore the return of competence
Voters are tired of incompetence and nepotism. He and Obama share similar biographies, in that both of them hailed from modest roots and excelled at their careers through a combination of dedication, work and brains. He complements Obama perfectly that way, along with his strong international and military credentials.

Both men are inspirational.

While I respect McCain's service, he is a textbook example of an incompetent guy who got a leg up through family connections.

What a contrast Clark would make to McCain. Picture the commercials they could make on the theme of competence if Clark is on the ticket.

He also is a guy who could connect to World War II generation voters. Don't underestimate the importance of the older vote in this election. Pry a few percentage points of that vote away from McCain and you've got some swing states, and the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
26. No corner of the earth is as supportive of Clark than this board, he was #1 her in '04
He won poll after poll here, had the most energetic supporters and was by all indications the most supported candidate here, more than Dean, more than Kerry, more than anyone.

I can think of nowhere else where this was the case, other than a literal Clark board, but it was pretty damned resounding.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
28. Big fan club here and on DKos, rest of America couldn't pick him out of a lineup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumptheshadow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Lineups
How many Americans could pick Evan Bayh or Tim Kaine out of a lineup?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Maybe Bayh, just because he's been around a while politically, but doubtful--
Kaine, no. Sebelius and Scwheitzer, no. Biden, yes. Reed, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.1
==================



This week is our third quarter 2008 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Please take a moment to donate! Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
35. Gen. Clark has moved up to number 2 on Intrade and number 3 on Rasmussen Markets
Edited on Thu Aug-14-08 06:59 PM by Douglas Carpenter
Of course this does not prove anything except there has been a significant recent increase in buzz and rumor leading to increased speculation about a credible plausibility about Gen. Clark as a conceivable V.P. nominee.

On Intrade Prediction Markets:


1. Bayh now speculating at 32.2% chance he will be the V.P. nominee

2. Clark now speculating at a 17.9% chance he will be the V.P. nominee

3. Biden now speculating at a 17.2% chance he will be the V.P. nominee

4. Kaine now speculating at a 13.3% chance he will be the V.P. nominee

5. Sebelius now speculating at 12.3% chance he will be the V.P. nominee

http://www.intrade.com/jsp/intrade/contractSearch/

On Rasmussen Markets


1. Bayh now speculating at a 29.4% chance he will be the V.P. nominee

2. Biden now speculating at a 16.9% chance he will be the V.P. nominee

3. Clark now speculating at a 16.5% chance he will be the V.P. nominee

http://markets.rasmussenreports.com/aav2/trading/tradingHTML.jsp?selConID=68205#
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC