Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry, 6 Senators Pledge Support for More Diplomacy With Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 10:15 AM
Original message
Kerry, 6 Senators Pledge Support for More Diplomacy With Iran
07/24/2008

Kerry, 6 Senators Pledge Support for More Diplomacy With Iran

Senators Endorse Opening an Interests Section in Iran

WASHINGTON, D.C. – In response to recent revelations that the Bush Administration is considering opening an interests section in Iran, Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.), Carl Levin (D-Mich.), Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Russ Feingold (D-Wisc.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), and Patty Murray (D-Wash.) today sent a letter to the President to offer congressional support for a limited diplomatic presence in the country.

“We know that a hands-off approach has isolated us and strengthened Iran,” said Sen. Kerry. “The Administration’s decision to reverse course and join direct talks with Tehran is the right one, however late. While the United States has remained on the sidelines and outsourced our diplomacy to Europe, Iran used that time to continue to master the nuclear fuel cycle and get closer to a nuclear weapons capability. Even if direct dialogue fails to reach an agreement, we will be armed with new leverage that strengthens our hand with Europe, Russia, and China to impose tougher sanctions and begin to reverse this dynamic.”

“I am pleased that the administration seems to be more open to engaging with the people of Iran,” said Sen. Feingold. “This sends a more positive message about our objectives and should enhance our ability to understand the political dynamics in Tehran, something that is sorely missing today. If Iranians are able to interact with Americans on a more regular and consistent basis they will be less likely to believe the negative rhetoric promoted by their government.”

“American strength, in part, resonates from our openness and visibility overseas,” said Sen. Durbin. “A robust international presence helps facilitate understanding between peoples and provides our diplomats with a far greater understanding of complex international situations. While we continue to work with our allies to put a halt to Iran's nuclear weapons program, we should also reach out directly to the Iranian people and expand America's diplomatic presence in this vital region of the world.”

“Opening an Interests Section would give the United States a formal diplomatic presence in Iran, and would be a positive step for two countries that have not had a diplomatic relationship for 30 years now,” said Sen. Feinstein. “I strongly support a robust diplomatic effort with Iran, and opening an Interests Section would be a step in the right direction. It would increase direct contacts between the American and Iranian people, assist Iranians wishing to travel to the United States, and improve our understanding or Iranian society. I strongly support this move.”

“An interests section in Iran would provide the base for diplomatic efforts with the Iranian public that has been missing for nearly 30 years,” said Sen. Murray. “It would facilitate travel, encourage an exchange of ideas, and allow us to communicate our common values with the people, despite our many differences with their government. It would also help us to better understand a country whose fate is so intertwined with our own national security. I urge the President to move forward with laying this important diplomatic groundwork because the stakes are simply too high not to.”


Full text of the letter is below:


July 24, 2008

President George W. Bush
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President:

We are encouraged by recent revelations that your Administration is actively reviewing the possibility of opening an interests section in Iran, and write to express our support for this limited but strategically significant U.S. diplomatic presence. By establishing direct contact with the people of Iran, facilitating their travel to America, and increasing our understanding of Iran’s complicated domestic politics, this initiative will advance our national interests.

Along with your welcome decision to send Under Secretary of State William Burns to Geneva to join in talks with Iran over its nuclear program, this will send a positive message to the Iranian people and the international community about our intentions and enhance our ability to apply greater pressure on the Iranian government.

As you know, Iranians are among the most pro-American people in the Greater Middle East. Many hold the United States in high regard as a country that cherishes the values of freedom, tolerance, and human dignity. Despite our strong differences with their government over its nuclear ambitions, support for international terrorism, and hateful rhetoric towards Israel, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice recently said that “e are determined to find ways to reach out to the Iranian people.” Opening an interests section in Iran, as we have done in other countries such as Cuba, is a highly-visible way of accomplishing this important objective.

The United States has not had any diplomatic presence in Iran since the hostage crisis in 1979. As a result, Iranians who are interested in traveling to the United States must go to Dubai to obtain U.S. visas, impeding familial, cultural, and scientific exchanges that over time can begin to transform Iran. The more frequently that ordinary Iranians have an opportunity to interact with Americans, the more likely they are to ignore their government’s propaganda demonizing our country.

At the same time, a limited diplomatic presence in Iran would improve our understanding of the competing political factions that influence Tehran’s decision-making. As Under Secretary Burns recently acknowledged, our knowledge of Iran’s political and policy-making processes is currently rather limited. Iran already operates an active interests section in Washington, DC, ostensibly for these types of reasons, so our own diplomats are at a relative information disadvantage.

While we recognize that this initiative alone will not resolve our profound disagreements with Iran’s leaders, we believe it is a step in the right direction with the Iranian people. If it comes to pass, we look forward to working with your Administration to provide any necessary congressional support.

Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to your reply.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Diane Feinstein, I would love to see her replaced.
Edited on Thu Jul-24-08 10:18 AM by alyce douglas
only 6 Senators now that is really sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I wonder why this particular set of them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Most of them are not surprising at all. Often, these letters have a small number of senators
who sign because it takes a long time for the signatures to be gathered. It does not mean that other senators do not agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. makes sense. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Kerry and Feingold have had several joint actions on SFRC issues
including the Kerry/Feingold Iraq resolution and a 2006 bill to increase the focus on Afghanistan. That Durbin and Kerry are both on this should suggest to other countries that Obama might proceed in this direction. Levin and Leahy are both very senior Senators and they head Armed Services and Judiciary between them.

I don't think we can assume that ONLY these people support this - many may simply not have had time to read and consider signing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Unfortunately, this will have to wait until January. I do not see * and Rice doing that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. They will not, but
it's good to say it loud and clear while the Bush admin is trying to spin.

Bush has to live with his legacy of failure.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. It also creates a concrete proposal to ask Obama and McCain if they agree
This could be a nice issue to have with people switching between saying that McCain and Obama are nearly the same on Iraq - and then saying that they are miles apart.

I like that Kerry distinguished between the people of Iran and the lunatic President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Excellent point.
This is a good challenge for Mr. "Bomb, Bomb Iran" McCain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That does make a huge contrast, doesn't it
and as Senator Kerry pointed out - the Senator McCain he knew might not have sung that - it's the wannabe President McCain who did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. Diplomacy; it's what enlightened and healthy human beings use
Edited on Thu Jul-24-08 10:36 AM by OhioBlues
to discuss differences.

We've been in such dark times with such sick leaders for so long that it appears our congress people (except for these 7) have swallowed the bs fear and they are sticking with it.

(that and there is no $$ to be made from diplomacy).

edited for 7 not 6 people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC