Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Edwards. I'm afraid he's done for good politically.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rhombus Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:13 PM
Original message
John Edwards. I'm afraid he's done for good politically.
Edited on Wed Jul-23-08 06:13 PM by rhombus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Load of crap.
Why even post this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattP Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. are there pictures are not, if not I withhold judgment
i don't get this story, if they caught him where are the pics, just asking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. They have no pictures. They also claimed hotel guests saw it happen, but gave no quotes...
...from those 'guests'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
62. NO PHOTOS NO PROOF NO TRUTH.
With all the cell phones in the world today, photographic proof would HAVE to exist....


Why do DU'ers have to slime Democrats???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gcomeau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nobody is EVER "done"...
...due to the works of fiction printed in supermarket tabloids. Please be serious. You might as well say Clinton is also done because of that whole adopted alien baby scandal.

It's the enquirer for the love of all that is holy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kdmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's done for politically
because he tells it like it is? You think the National Enquirer prints real news?

He's right. They are tabloid trash, full of lies, and he shouldn't even lower himself to trying to answer questions about such a huge load of shit.

Like he said "I'm here to talk about helping people".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
40. What was hilarious was- he looked confused by the fact that a
supposedly "real" reporter was asking about a BULLSHIT story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kdmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #40
60. I would have been, too!
I probably would have been less political and asked them why the hell they were asking me about that shit?

I think he did really well. Still proud of him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
51. I agree.
And why is there "National Enquirer" BS posted here at DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kdmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #51
61. No clue
I don't know why this is even considered legitimate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah, so is Batboy
What a crock of shit Rhombus, I can't believe you even posted this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. Well, Batboy did want to be Kerry's running mate.
Maybe this is the publisher's attempt to get back at John for stealing Batboy's thunder in 2004?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caria Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Cui bono? (Who benefits from this story?)
1. Distracts the public from Obama's successes.
2. Distracts the public from McCain's bumbling.
3. Distracts the public from the economy, wars, etc.
4. Knocks out a popular VP pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Bingo, Caria!
Well played.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Perfect. Although I'd love to see him on the Supreme Court. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
37. #4 was my first thought too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
48. Ding ding ding
We have our winner!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
63. Plus, attacks (yet again) a consistent voice against corporate hegemony
The corporations hate John Edwards because they know he is a threat to their monopolies and obscene profits. The media is owned by corporations. Hence the constant attacks on John Edwards. I can't believe how many here fall for it time and again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
75. and this media loves to distract us.
I don't believe the story, National Enquirer should not be viewed as credible news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. This crap belongs in the George W. Bush sewage treatment plant. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. How does this mean he's done? It's made up trash from the same mag who said Obama's an Iranian plant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Funny how some cherry pick what they believe in tabloid trash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Dupe
Edited on Wed Jul-23-08 06:43 PM by Kerry2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Someone posted last night that they were right about Rush, so that means they're always right.
So does that mean they're right about Obama being an Iranian Plant?

They first launched this baseless witch hunt on Edwards during the primary, and it didn't go far because it lacked evidence. And now with the second piece, they provide nothing. No smoking gun like a photo or a video. And they said hotel guests saw this 'event' unfold, yet not ONE guest was quoted in the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Everyone knew about Rush. That was no scoop on the part of the NE.
I saw that last night, too. It made me nauseous to think that some Dems are believing this crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. They have a horrible reputation and sketchy image.
Edited on Wed Jul-23-08 06:49 PM by Kerry2008
My mom is a former tabloid reader, and she told me they're so baseless most of the time she doesn't even bother looking at them on the magazine racks.

The fact they'd do this to a man with children and a wife battling cancer is sickening and vile, and the poor woman who is being attacked as his "mistress" doesn't deserve this bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. bad story that does not bear repeating...especially after being posted
ad nauseum yesterday....

myself, i'm still waiting for the alien crop circle dudes to trim my palm trees...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Exactly. They posted no evidence or any photos of the event.
How could people buy into this shit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
18. We are being played and several of us are falling for it.
It's sad when the realization that we aren't all that smart hits home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. It's incredibly sad that smart Democrats are buying this without an ounce of evidence.
I just post a "detailed" description of my secret affair with Hillary Clinton, but it doesn't mean that's true either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
41. Anyone who is falling for it is a fucktard
Sorry, it had to be said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Like she said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. Oh please
I'm not even a fan of his but this is the Enquirer - does ANYone take it seriously?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I wonder if they believe all the lies printed about Obama too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
24. The Enquirer??????
Please, they are the people who predict every year that Hillary will finally divorce Bill.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Exactly. They seem to have a very anti-Democratic bias. And VERY unreliable.
They're aren't a newspaper, they're a tabloid.

Sketchy and not accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
26. Till I see pictures and dna.. I am not buying this..too
many times innuendo has hurt and sidelined good politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:52 PM
Original message
Bingo. No evidence, no story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
31. A yep!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Bingo. No evidence, no story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Back in October they said they had all kinds of evidence...emails, etc.
Where is this evidence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. I'll tell you where it is: It doesn't exist!
You don't run two bombshell stories, one building off the other, without providing the goods to prove it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #32
42. If it existed as it was written, they would have PHOTOS of him at the hotel.
Assholes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. you know, where is the evidence is right!
Just some mud the rw talking heads are trying to churn up to distract from the Obama overseas trip. They thought they were cute by half by challenging him to go overseas, and he has been handing them their lunch.. so now what.. go after someone else.. anything to yell .. LOOK HERE.. ME ME ME.. sad isn't it!

Have not John Edwards and Elizabeth Edwards not been through enough without these hell hounds trying to smear them.. disgusting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. about as disgusting as their enablers here
unbelievable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #43
54. Yep!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #26
65. Another "whitey" type story, with no proof
These stories feed off of the prejudices that people already harbor. John Edwards is a "pretty boy" so he obviously must be cheating on EE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuckinlodi Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
30. Rush and Glenn Beck are broadcasting it
I don't believe it either, but it's got legs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Hopefully it's not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. It's got legs because Rush and Glen Beck are covering it?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
68. So we have the National Enquirer, Glenn Beck, and Pillboy Limbaugh...
Now all we need is for the Onion to get on this story and no one will be able to deny the credibility of this breaking news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #30
70. Oh, well, shit-
Edited on Thu Jul-24-08 12:55 AM by Kool Kitty
if Rush and Beck are broadcasting it, it MUST be true! :rofl: You ARE kidding, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
36. This is the third time I've seen a thread on this subject
and each time the OP has a low post count.

Just sayin...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
38. What crap.
We went through this crap a long time ago. Makes me wonder if you've been paying attention, and furthermore, why on earth you you post this bs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. Someone has an agenda, Rocky.
That is was is so sad about this whole thing. And it might just be another Democrat behind this....who knows? They take their 'opponents' strength and turn it into a weakness. They start a whisper campaign with a rumor that can never be proven. This whisper campaign will be difficult to silence. But we've got John's back. We are Edwards Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #45
55. Hey Inspired, always great to hear from you.
I almost hate to say hi to you here, because I don't want to kick this crap, but hey, you're worth it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
39. Possible Veep candidates being picked off one by one.
Of course that's what's behind this.

I don't believe it for a minute, but this is what worked in 2000 and 2004.

They are at it again. Certain topics are taboo here at DU, but let's just say that I see echoes of the Swift Boaters in a certain movement that does not seem to be losing any energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. I get your drift and I agree 100%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Thanks. I will look for your posts and appreciate the comment.
To ignore what is happening is madness, but all threads are locked as "refighting the primary."

That's not the case at all. This is a topic that should be aired here at DU, but it isn't allowed.

And so it festers, as did the Swift Boaters, without response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #47
69. I agree, and it's maddening to me.
Maddening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #39
53. I agree
Winning at any cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
49. Reliable witnesses like the swift boaters for "truth".....yeah right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
50. Why is this getting coverage on DU
Again? This crap should be deleted. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
52. There are poverty issues/opportunities within and outside an administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
56. Posted this crap and bailed, huh OP?
Come on Rhombus! Get back in here and defend this post. If you can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. A hit and run on Edwards? Looks like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monomach Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
58. Pics or it didn't happen
Not one of these "reliable witnesses" or tabloid reporters had a cell-phone camera?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
59. Wow. I bet you said the same thing about Kerry when the Swiftboaters
started lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
64. Edwards will not be blemished in the least from this absurd
fake issue dredged out of the sewers of the editorial board of The National Enquirer.

The Enquirer is to public discourse what those crappy ceramic Indian princesses and ceramic rodeo cowboy dolls advertized on the back page of PARADE magazine are to Art.

John and Elizabeth are very likely doing just fine and any post that says different holds less than a half-ounce of cricket piss with me, especially one quoting a source as scurrilous and pointless as The National Enquirer.

Look for at least John and possibly Elizabeth as well to serve in Obama's administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
66. Still skeptical
because there's NO WAY the Enquirer wouldn't have a photographer staked out as well. But Edwards' reaction seemed off - he looked nervous to me, not angry or outraged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #66
71. Skeptical? You should be outraged. This is an attempt to smear a very decent man.
And now smart Democrats, like yourself, are analyzing John's every action and reaction? The question asked by this 'reporter' was out of line and inappropriate for the setting it was asked. He seemed nervous to you? He seemed annoyed to me, and rightfully so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
67. Yeah, I also heard in the Weekly World News a while back that he was born on the planet Xenu
I think that story really killed him, especially that part about how he was part of an interplanetary plot to turn us all of us mortal humans into slaves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
72. I'm not saying he's guilty, but imagine if Edwards were the nominee right now. YIKES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #72
74. The NE printed bullshit about Obama, too, remember?
I saw no traction with that. Why is this any different?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
73. Bigfoot and Elvis are done, too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jul 29th 2014, 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC