Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Angry Clinton Supporters Start Rallying for McCain Online

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:22 AM
Original message
Angry Clinton Supporters Start Rallying for McCain Online
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 07:37 AM by Fighting Irish
They're mad as hell, and Hillary Clinton's supporters aren't going to take it anymore.

Some Clintonites are so mad about Barack Obama's Tuesday victory that they've launched a web site to build support to launch a lobbying group to support Republican John McCain.

"We're going to run campaign ads to defeat Obama," says Ed Hale, a 63-year-old rancher and a Clinton supporter from Wellington, Texas. "We have doctors, lawyers, CPAs, the blue bloods, and then we have rednecks like me. It's a very diversified organization."

(snip)

Hale launched the "Hillary Clinton Supporters for John McCain" group last Saturday. The campaign claims to have 5,000 supporters, and its website visitor counter says that it has already attracted 37,8071 visitors.

"Last night, when they crowned Obama king, that's when I sent my e-mails out to people, and since then, we've gotten thousands of hits," he says.

Hale, a Vietnam veteran and a long-time Democrat, says that many of the group's supporters are Reagan Democrats, and their primary concern is foreign policy and defense. A call to the Texas Democratic Party confirmed that he was supposed to have been a delegate to the state convention this week.

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/06/angry-clinton-s.html?fark

Reagan Democrats my ass. They're Republicans.

:eyes:

And if McCain wasn't good enough when she was in, why is he any better now?

Watch this one get its 15 minutes, then fade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TeamsterDem Donating Member (819 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hale can go Cheney himself. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fran Kubelik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. ha! perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
67. Their message: HILLARY = JOHN MCCAIN OR MCSAME
Not flattering message about their candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fran Kubelik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. I agree. It's stupid.
I'm a Clinton supporter and I think it's ridiculous. I am sure Hillary does too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeraAgnes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
33. Whoa..............They are not republicans
and we need their vote. Obama needs to court the girls back to the Party. McCain can see they are valuable; why can't we do that? I'm sure they have been activist and donors...........yeap, we need them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamsterDem Donating Member (819 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #33
41. "They are not republicans" --- sure they're not.
if you want to go chasing people setting up websites and groups to elect McSame you go right ahead. I wont stop you or criticize you but I'll be damned if I'm going to get involved in that folly. If I wanted to see what a perfect waste of time felt like I'd go listen to one of McSame's speeches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeraAgnes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #41
48. Obama can do it.
He has the control of the Party now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
miles 2 go Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #33
46. They may not be republicans but they sure as hell act as stupid
as the uninformed republicans who vote repub even though it's against their own best interest. Let's call them the woodsy variety of republican. Must be born out in the fuckin woods or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LowerManhattanite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #33
51. “Obama needs to court the girls back to the Party...”
Isn't this kind of sexist in itself to say? What is he? Some sort of Valentino-esque suitor? Bearing flowers and fine bon-bons? How Goddamned retrograde.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #33
58. Ed Hale is a "girl"?
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 11:31 AM by Hell Hath No Fury
The founder of this organization is a man who is clearly a megahawk. Fuck'm and his organization.

On edit: And, oh yeah, fuck any Dem/feminist "girl" who votes McCain over Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. It took an intervention to get Hillary to realize and accept she lost
is it any surprise that many of her supporters are equally out of touch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. That's hateful speech and does no good BO supporter. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. It's not hateful, it's reality
We're supposed to shut our eyes and pretend they're not trying to derail our party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:33 AM
Original message
Truth is not hatefull, It is what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. Ahh there is not hate in that speech, it's just the harsh reality of the situation
Sorry if you don't like the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
34. TRUTH has a strong LIBERAL bias - Stop fighting the truth and your cognitive dissonance will ease.
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 10:43 AM by bushmeat
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
39. you guys call anything not 1000% kissing your ass hateful. grow a thicker skin plz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
53. Emotional codependency much?
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 11:13 AM by TahitiNut
When folks surrender control over their own behavior and act in self-destructive ways, blaming another, it's called "codependent" behavior.

Q to husband: "Why do you drink so much?"
Husband: "Because she nags."
Q to wife: "Why do you nag?"
Wife: "Because he drinks."

Oversimplified? Sure. Emotional codependency is, imho, one of the most common neuroses in our society. I personally believe it leads to depression and other more sever maladies.

The pernicious myth than we can control the behavior of others - especially common with poor parents - leads to a surrender of control over our own behavior ... which is about the only thing we're barely well-equipped enough to achieve.

:rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
60. well, I guess if you consider truth to be hateful...ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Reagan Democrats" tells the story
They were never Democrats, just disenchanted right wing types who claimed to have been Democrats in the past. I have one of those in my family, an uncle who calls himself a "Reagan Democrat". The truth is he hasn't voted for a Democrat since Harry Truman.

I suspect that many of these really radical Hillary "supporter" sites belong to people like that and that real Democrats who support Hillary do not have that kind of animosity toward Obama and will vote for him once theey have some time to deal with their disappointment and emotions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamsterDem Donating Member (819 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Totally agreed. I think we're all issued an uncle like yours. I want to strangle mine. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLib at work Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. I believe that is what the more rational and intelligent among will do..
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 07:38 AM by BrklynLib at work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. You hit that nail directly on its head
They never had an inclination of voting democratic.. reagan dems, have kept their registration but voted republican for almost 30 years now.. and they hate the clintons above all.. just another tactic to derail the democratic party.. this juggernaut is scary for them this time, and they will do anything, and I mean anything to hurt the party..

And like any candidate, clinton has her out on the edge supporters who will no doubt be in denver, denver, denver.. obama has them too..but the atwater/rovian/rush theory of stealing from you and telling you about it to your face, is working on that very small group who have invested too much of themselves in a candidate .. (never a good thing) and they juice them up... use them, heck even laugh at them when they call in on radio shows.. but there you have it..

Again.. certainly a very small sampling of the supporters.. but that is all it takes.. one a room of 100 who is yelling bloody murder.. will clear the entire room..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeraAgnes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #25
50. Yes they want to vote as they always have voted,
with confidence, as a Democrat! To assume they are anything less is ignorant and Obama's loss. Obama controls the Party now, he mush show the leadership and bring them back!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #50
55. They can vote with confidence as a Democrat.
Obama is a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #50
59. Most '''Reagan Democrats"...
are nothing but pre-civil rights Dems who never bothered to change their registration and have voted primarily GOP since 1964.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Their Anger has Turned to Insanity. This is why it was so wrong for Clinton to tout McCain
Because she said so many nice things about McCain, her more insane and/or idiotic supporters are flocking to McCain out of insane anger. And it's anger that she created within them. She could have assuaged that anger by endorsing Obama on Tuesday night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Stop the hate speech. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Are you alright? Just saying, your responses to these posts are inappropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLib at work Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. You are being VERY kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
64. Mental, aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. they are not Reagan Dems, they are spoiled crybaby losers who felt entitled
now they are going to damn this country out of spite that they didnt get what they wanted. The absolute worst kind of person and I hope that they have kids that are of draft age to send to fuel McSame's next and continuing wars.

This HATE is not for her supporters that convert to support the Democratic Nominee but only those who "take their ball and go to McSame's camp".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. They are bigots n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. Sore Losers For Hillary
would be a better name for their little self-pity group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
9. "rednecks like me" Cross-over Republicans who supported Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
44. I think so, too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLib at work Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. Is a "Reagan Democrat" really a Democrat? Would they have supported FDR's
programs? How do they feel about unions? Health care? Women's right to choose?

The term "Reagan Democrat" is as inherently oxymoronic as "Gay Republican". The two words should never be uttered together in the same breath...
Right up there with military intelligence, jumbo shrimp, and of course, honest politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
19. Whatever...There will be no air left in that balloon by convention time
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 07:40 AM by BeyondGeography
:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
20. Even George Wallace carried 10 million votes back in the 60s
Our country refused to be held hostage based on principle then, and I refuse to be held hostage based on principle now. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
21. I'm so mad at them that I'm going to have to poke my own eye out
/sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
22. Bet this jackass voted for Bush twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
23. Raygun Democrats, nothing more than cockroaches with computers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lakeguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
24. oh come on!
seriously? are hrc and bho really that different platform wise...especially when compared to mcsame?

i highly doubt these people had any intention to vote for hrc in the first place. if they are really telling the truth, then i would like that list because i know some "doctors, lawyers, and CPAs" that i would not trust with dirt, let alone my organs or money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent-Voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
26. No surprise here - That's a bitter bunch of sourpusses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen_Penn Donating Member (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
27. If Hillary really supported the Democrat Party and working
Americans, she would NOW, not this weekend.

Deliver one helluva speech telling her supporters to shut the hell up with the whining and get on the donkey.

Her behavior only re-confirms my low opinion of her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
28. Operation Chaos "Democrats" - Yeah, they were going to vote for Hillary in the GE...
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

No really...

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

SHUT UP...I MEAN IT!!!1111!

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
busymom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
29. wow. Crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vilis Veritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
30. K & R
But there will be more articles...just like it in order to create division in the party.

Be vigilant.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
31. I don't believe many of them are real Dems anyway...
There has been a lot of DINO's following Rush in lock step - just being disruptive for the hell of it. This fringe group will be ignored. In fact, we should do the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
32. Texas Democrats, eh?
Were they really Democrats to begin with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
35. McCain Operatives
They're out trying to sew seeds of discontent amongst Hillary supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
36. If you support McCain, you support Bush, Cheney, Robertson, PNAC, endless wars/homophobia/racism...
As for Ed Hale, I assume he supports Bush and Cheney. Good riddance, turncoat.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
37. 5,000 claimed supporters out of 18 million?
That would be .03% of the people who voted for Clinton. If I were to spend 1/2 a minute today worrying about this, I would already spend more time than it's worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #37
62. Do some homework. It is one of many groups breaking with the Dem party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeeDeeNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
38. "Their primary concern is foreign policy and defense"?
So it makes sense to back a candidate who needs Lieberman whispering in his ear to correct him every time he makes some stupid mistake about Iraq. These people sound are true "morans"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
40. Yeah, right...Ultra-feminists who claim to support Clinton will then in protest vote McCain in?
Who believes this for even a second? Right, women who have been fighting the good fight for decades to have equality and rights for women in the workplace, a woman's right to choose, etc. and they are going to vote for McCain over Obama and have the whole SCOTUS permanently made into a right wing court that reverses everything?

Don't believe it folks...these are right wingers pretending to be Clinton supporters and it smacks of Rovian tactics and its a joke....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
42. Leave already. These people will never vote for Obama, There are a lot more new voters that will!!
People who have never been involved in the process are going to register and vote for Obama!!! Everyone should be volunteering to help sign up new voter registration. People who have felt disenfranchised, who thought what does it matter will be voting this GE.
There are 300 million people in the US. I guarantee we can cover the few thousand Reagan Dems that won't vote for Obama. A change is gonna come and it is going to scare the shit oudt of the repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
43. Rush Limbaugh's Angry Clinton Supporters Start Rallying for McCain Online
yaaawwwnnnn.....!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
45. So is this the face this election's "swiftboat veterans" will take?
We all remember "Swiftboat Veterans for the Truth". We know it's coming again. The fake "grassroots" website campaign with the bullshit ads funded with big bucks from the repukes. They felt it did some damage in 2004, so we can count on more of the same this go-round. Forewarned is forearmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #45
65. Exactly what I was thinking this morning.
These are not Democrats, they're professional pot-stirrers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundancekid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
47. nose meets spite meets face
these screamers were NEVER democrats this election cycle, but Hillary sucked them up in the huge sucking sound of her tasteless campaign where ego was everything and who she "used" turned out to be her paper tiger mallet; THIS is the unquenched feminism???? Wow, the UNMASKING of Hillary supporters has just begun, and no, silly, they are hardly all truly disenfranchised women over 60 years of age making less that the stated 50K
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
49. Phase 2 of Operation Chaos!!! *Revenge of the Morans*
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
52. Kerry and Daschle asked McCain to be Kerry's VP in 2004--
These two were among the earliest Obama supporters . McCain refused. What has he done in the past four years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdx_prog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
54. I love this line....
"I am one of them bible thumping, gun toting red necks and dam proud of it.Ed"

That pretty much sums this guy up.

Illiterate, uneducated and hopelessly stoooopid...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
56. This is just a republican tactic to try and divide the democratic party
Nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
57. Reagan Democrats? Pretty soon they'll be known as Clinton Democrats
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 11:29 AM by Catherina
and they'll have no one to blame but themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
61. and you believe this shit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #61
72. Nope. Most likely Repub psyops n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pointsoflight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
63. Even knowing this?
On July 22, 1998, McCain filled out the National Right to Life Committee's 1998 Congressional Candidate Questionnaire, including this question:
"Do you support the complete reversal of the Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton decisions, thereby allowing the state legislatures and the Congress to once again protect unborn children?"
McCain responded, "Yes."

On August 19, 1999, McCain told the San Francisco Chronicle, "I'd love to see a point where is irrelevant, and could be repealed because abortion is no longer necessary. But certainly in the short term, or even the long term, I would not support repeal of Roe vs. Wade"

On September 12, on NBC's Meet the Press, host Tim Russert read McCain his statement to the San Francisco Chronicle and then asked,
"Would President McCain support the repeal of Roe v. Wade in the short term?"
McCain responded, "I would support the movement in that direction."

Two weeks prior to his appearance on Meet The Press, on August 31, McCain spoke to this issue at a news conference in New Hampshire. McCain said he would "immediately support efforts to move in (the) direction" of banning abortion if he was elected president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kdpeters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
66. Whoa!! Did you read that crazy site? Obviously wingnuts and Bushbots.
Just read through even for five minutes and you'll notice how he can't help but betray the dittohead he really is with every sentence and every thought.

You can always tell wingnut moles trying to act like liberals. They don't talk the way we think. They act like the invented wingnutty caricature of liberals that hear about on hate radio but have never actually met one. If you come across an obnoxious person online who acts like that, you've got yourself a wingnut mole.

Don't believe it. These sites weren't started by disaffected Clinton folks. They're right wing freaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
69. As if!
"doctors, lawyers, CPAs, the blue bloods, and...rednecks like me" from Texas...as if more than 10 percent of them would ever vote for any Democrat in the general election!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trickydix2000 Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
70. Madness
People can try and justify their actions all the want , the bottom line is they are not ready for change, and I’m not going to play the race card this one is to obvious. I would have expected this group to be from WV or KY I guess TX still has a few turncoats hanging around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auburngrad82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
71. The only contribution listed on Opensecrets for him is to Pat LaMarche
She ran for Governor of Maine in 2006.

http://www.pat2006.com/about/

According to Wikipedia she's Green Party...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
73. Someoen should ask this guy who he voted for in the last four elections
Somehow I suspect it wasn't Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #73
74. exactly:
they claim to be life-long Democrats who care only about defense and foreign policy. We all know who they voted for in 2004. They were stupid then and I doubt there is anything we can do to make them not be stupid now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC