Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you think that Senator Clinton could possibly run as an independent?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Politics_Guy25 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:24 PM
Original message
Do you think that Senator Clinton could possibly run as an independent?
Her language last night about her 18,000,000 voters needing to be respected, etc. and refusal to conceed was a bit frightening. I guess in a way I can see her trying as hard as she possibly can to strong arm Presumptive Nominee Obama into it and if he says no (which I would if I were him), she might claim that her "voters" haven't been respected and that she "owes" it to them to run for "their" issues. Look at the behavior of the Clintons over the years. I don't doubt for one momemnt they would consider doing this. Do you all think she could run as an indy? My mom, who I spoke to last night, thinks that it is possible. Does anybody know the deadlines for getting your name on the ballot in GE states? Would she have the neccessary infrastructure? I'm sure that the democratic establishment in many states would do all they can to keep her off the ballot the way they do Nader but the damage that she could do would still be profound. Also, remember, that she feels betrayed and that something that was "her turn to get" and that she was "entitled to" has been "stolen" from her and she probably thinks that if only MI/FL had counted, she'd be the nominee. I put nothing past her.

The above is how I imagine her feeling and with Bill and his delusional language on the trail all year long, I kind of question their mental state right now.

That said, she'd compete with Mccain for the GOP vote and our nominee would have an huge independent and democratic base to draw from while HRC and Mccain duke it out for the fringe votes.

What do you all think? Possible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. No. No money, and no time to get on ballots. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why not? Unlike Nader's inclusion, she'd ensure a McCain victory.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't know that she could get on the ballot. There are requirements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politics_Guy25 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Right-thank god for those requirements
That might be the biggest factor stopping her along with, of course, money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StevieM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Well that just works out perfectly. Now you can say for the rest of your life that she really
wanted to.

Steve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think she neither would nor could. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't think that she will do that.... Giving Hillary the benefit of the doubt...
I think she will get behind Barack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. A number if states have already closed their ballots, plus a lot of states have a "sore loser" rule
That keeps people from doing this. She can do what she wants but it won't be effective and end her political career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Too bad ALL states don't have the "sore loser" rule

...or as it should be renamed "the Sore LOSERMAN rule"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. She might retain her staunchest supporters,
but I don't see her attracting voters from McCain or Obama.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. why would she
if she really really really wanted to screw the democratic party.....she'd exemplify unity by joining McCain on his ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. She couldn't win
And so I see no reason for her to do so. The goal was to be the president, if she can't get it why waste the time and money trying as an independent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. no
While it might wreck Obama in 2008 it would wreck Clinton for 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. You "imagine" this is what she's thinking?
Sounds like you're trying to stir up trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. No I think she loves this party to much to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. Sore Loser Laws
She can't run and neither can Ron Paul. Sore loser laws are effective in two key states - Ohio and Texas. And you can't possibly win the presidency without the electoral votes of those two states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. This is a new one by me
Can you explain "sore loser laws" to me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Middle finga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. I don't think big donors will gamble their money on her. They will put
their money behind a major party candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. No, she wouldn't even if she could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. Too late to get on all the ballots coast to coast.
it is not possible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. Nope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC