for Hillary, it has stopped being about what is best for America ...it is now pure power hungry

[greenbriar]

power grabbing.




She could care less about Working America


She just doesnt' want to lose now, and that is scarey because she will stop at NOTHING and that makes her dangerous

[razorman]

1. That has always been the case.

[Zodiak]

7. You are correct

DLCers are socially liberal and economically conservative. They are the absolute opposite of populists, but there she is trying on the populism suit only because it suits her at the time.

No DLCer is populist...they are the opposite, elitist.

[SeaLyons]

2. She is our only chance of winning the GE...

That's what she cares about.

[greenbriar]

3. there was a time, when I thought that might be the case

but now, it is just for power She doesn't care about what is best for US

[hfojvt]

16. as if Edwards could not have won

He polled as the most electable. And Obama would have a better chance of winning if somebody's campaign was not determined to tear him down.

[InAbLuEsTaTe]

34. That had to be a long time ago.

[newmajority]

4. So you admit she's power hungry?

[SeaLyons]

no more so than your guy....

in fact, I think he tops that list.

[newmajority]

14. I don't know about that, but here's the difference....

Our guy won the nomination. He's not writhing around in pathetic desperation for something that is impossible.

[SeaLyons]

24. We will see.....

[peoli]

5. she is our only chance of dividing the party and country is more the reality.

[SeaLyons]

6. sorry, I think your Unity guy has

been the one that has totally divided the country.

[EmperorHasNoClothes]

9. And how exactly has he done that?

pray tell.

[SeaLyons]

10. you don't need to look further than this board

for your answer.

[EmperorHasNoClothes]

15. Obama is posting here?

Cool! Link?

[hfojvt]

17. Not to mention the fact that Hillary supporters

NEVER post divisive things.

[EmperorHasNoClothes]

23. What an incredibly sexist thing for you to say.

:sarcasm:

[TahitiNut]

12. Wow! Such a totally fact-free post. How's the weather in CloudCuckooLand?

:eyes:

[razorman]

13. I do not believe she could win the GE.

Half the country hates her. Nothing would galvanize the Republicans behind McCain more than a Hillary Clinton candidacy. Most Pubbies do not like or trust McCain very much, and will only back him reluctantly. They will swarm for him if Hillary is the other choice, though.

[RainDog]

21. I couldn't disagree more

I know so many ppl who simply cannot vote for her b/c ppl are SICK of the Clintons and want them to stop trying to make the Democratic Party their valet service.

[cali]

22. it's just delusional to make that claim. The evidence points

to both Hill and Obama being electable. In addition, it's 5 freakin' months to November. Anything can happen that could effect the contest. Many things likely will.

YOU are no oracle.

[Crunchy Frog]

30. Okay, you can add delusional megalomania to her list of reasons.

[ladjf]

8. I don't think it ever was about America's best interests.

Unfortunately, the same could be said for most politicians.

[barack the house]

11. Yep, tha is what is unsettling to ignore all rules to try and win.

[gal]

18. It's always been about power for this couple

[Skip Intro]

19. I remember when fighting for votes to count was a badge of honor for the party.

[scheming daemons]

26. Fighting for illegitimate votes in an unconstitutional contest (Michigan) is NOT a badge of honor

A federal judge has already ruled the Michigan primary as UNCONSTITUTIONAL.


Therefore, fighting for THOSE votes amounts to fighting for an ILLEGAL action to stand.



That's what Bushies do... not us.

[Crunchy Frog]

31. Yes. I remember when Lieberman did it in 2000.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9407EEDC133BF936A25754C0A9679C8B63

[blm]

33. It would have been if Clintons' DNC had secured election process after 2000s theft, but they didn't,

did they? And there is no evidence of Clintons directing their chosen DNC chair McAuliffe to secure the election process for Dem candidates and Dem voters even after all the revelations of dirty tactics by the RNC and GOP officials setting up the election theft of 2000.

Nope. Clintons needed 2008 kept open for Hillary and could care less about Dem votes being secured in 2002 or 2004.

[RainDog]

20. keep those checks coming in, hardworking Americans. Hillary is only a millionaire

who needs your hard-earned cash to pay off the loans she gave herself.

If she doesn't drop out this next week, I predict she will become a pariah of the Lieberman variety.

[Bake]

25. Have you had an ORIGINAL thought lately?

This is about the 1,000th post that says basically the same thing. Don't you people have anything new to say?

If you want it to be over, call your damn superdelegates and tell them to grow a spine and END IT NOW. Otherwise, you're really just wasting bandwidth.

Bake

[greenbriar]

27. actually, I have posted maybe 5 posts on GDP in the last 3 months

so your argument is not valid

[sfam]

28. Welcome to two months ago...then again...

I think most politicians think of them first and foremost and everyone else in far second place.

[Perry Logan]

29. "no candidate in the history of presidential elections has ever conceded prior to the Convention..."

...with the amount of support that Clinton has.

[salguine]

32. It never was about what was best for America.

It was always about Hillary.

[Raine]

35. It's ALL about what Hillary wants for Hillary

that's all it's ever been about with the Clintons. x(