Dems need to lay the ground work for the inevitable capture of Osama.

[mzmolly]

People here have mentioned before we need to start floating memes in the media:

"We've spent billions on the so called war on terror, and Osama is still at large, this is an outrage."

AND/OR

"We should have had Osama 2.5 years ago, instead we went to Iraq."

etc...

My husband has a friend in the military who said they have had Osama for a while and are pulling him out in time for the election.

Any thoughts on preparation so that it doesn't help * as much as it might in the minds of gullible Americans?

Dem-stratigist, if your tuned in ;)

:shrug:

[Kierkegaard]

1. You answered your own question, I think...

"they have had Osama for a while and are pulling him out in time for the election"

[mzmolly]

2. Actually, I am looking for feedback about the coming so called capture.

:hi:

[olddem43]

3. Won't it look just a little too convenient?

Sorta like Peterson's wife going missing.

[CaTeacher]

4. you know what? I don't think

it will help him a bit (assuming he can bring in Osama--which I doubt). Getting Saddam didn't even help him for a week--Osama isn't going to do much more for him. He is toast. Just wait until F911 comes out on DVD!

[Kierkegaard]

5. That was my inclination in the earlier post

There have already been too many coincidences for him to skate by with capturing bin Laden right before the election. I could be wrong, but the level of skepticism about anything this administration says could effectively cause people to disbelieve the incrediby convenient timing of his capture.

[mzmolly]

6. Sure, but they'll call us looney's again and poof, it won't matter.

;)