Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is the media letting Hillary get away with her claim I have more popular votes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:16 PM
Original message
Why is the media letting Hillary get away with her claim I have more popular votes
she keeps claiming a lie. And the media lets her get away with it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because no one in the Obama camp is challenging her on it.
The only way to get rid of spin is to counter it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Henny Penny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Must be true then... count all the votes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Have you heard a single speech Obama has given over the past few weeks?
He counters it in EVERY SINGLE ONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. That is the million dollar question.. Every one is scared shemight cry.
Edited on Mon May-19-08 05:18 PM by Bensthename
That is the only thing I can think of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because they're lazy and they want the fight to continue
Only Olbermann is willing to do the minimal research necessary to prove that she's completely full of shite. The rest of them are enjoying the battle, because it means they don't have to worry about finding a headline each evening.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. You got that right!
That's why it is so stupid when the Clinton camp comes out attacking the media and saying they all have been calling for her to "drop out"! I have not heard one member of the media say that. They "WANT" her to stay in to keep the fight going for ratings!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. The MSM doesn't want to call attention to the crazy person because her camp is screaming unfair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. the media is reporting it
with a roll of the eyes-nobody is taking her candidacy seriously anymore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because Pat Buchanan will have a blubbering hissy-fit if Hillary is challenged. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. because she does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM7nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Yes, if you decide to count Florida, only her votes in MI, and none of the caucuses.
How democratic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfaprog Donating Member (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs much?
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
30. Sounds like you failed remedial math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. on hardball, everyone was like
Edited on Mon May-19-08 05:27 PM by ErinBerin84
"why do these states keep voting for Hillary when they know it's over?" I think it's because...a lot of these states do not understand that it is over, or why it is over, and they believe everything that Hillary is telling them about the "more votes". On CNN, they had a young man who said "I think that the math is going to be in Hillary's favor after Kentucky." I'm just not sure he knows what math he's talking about. And didn't he get the memo? It's not the math, it's the map! But then again, that would mean Hillary throwing these red state Democrats in Kentucky under the bus. And why no discussion of how McCain is the republican nominee, and there is still an embarassing number of "protest" votes against him as well, due to demographics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. That's their job. Chris Matthews admitted as much.
Edited on Mon May-19-08 05:29 PM by kenny blankenship
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/07/chris-matthews-admits-msn_n_100537.html

Backing Crusades in the Middle East and backing Hillary Clinton are two aspects of the same agenda, given by media owners and top managers to their talking hairdos, like Matthews, on all channels to push on the American people. Maybe Matthews has has enough of this poison but others in his line of work still fear for their jobs.

It's bad news for America but they don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. I don't understand why she's allowed to get away with a dishonest argument
Anyone who can read and who has access to the story of these primaries understands why those votes are not in her column, no matter how much she and her sorry, spinning crew click their heels and want them to be.

The MSM has a vested monetary/ratings interest to see this thing drag out.

Howard Dean could explain very clearly that she's pretty much lying, so I'm not sure what the long-range plan is turning out to be.

One thing the Democratic party needs to be aware of is that this lie is not helping to heal a rift. Hillary keeps planting the notion that she is ahead in the vote, like a Rove-style misinformation campaign. Keep repeating the lie often enough...

What it's going to do is get her most fervent supporters whipped up in a frenzy that she has somehow had this nomination 'stolen' from her if they assume she's telling them the truth but somehow loses the nomination. I don't understand why she's allowed to misinform her supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
godai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. The SDs know the facts. They can't be impressed by her charade.
The SDs have to be shaking their heads in amazement as to what the Clintons will say and do to try to salvage the nomination, against all odds. It buys the Clintons time as they pray for an Obama scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's kinda like a senior citizen with dementia walking down the street just taking away...
with no one there to listen and if there were people there they would just ignore the babbling. No one would approach them and tell them they are not making any sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hillary knows it is a lie but uses it to get money from her groupies to pay her debt...
Supers know better and are moving toward him..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. Popular votes don't mean shit in the general election-Electoral votes do-As proven Gore vs. Bush
Edited on Mon May-19-08 05:40 PM by GreenTea
in 2000, when Gore won over 600k more popular votes than Bush and "lost" by only a few electoral votes for the presidency, because Florida's electoral votes were stolen and given to Bush by the US Supreme Court!

The Electoral College should be abolished forever, the republicans came up with it and only they have benefited by it.....Let's get rid of it once and for all!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
38. There were no Republicans when the EC was created.
Nor when the 12th Amendment passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. Probably pity
Like that insane guy in the train station, hooting and hollering about the end of the world. Do you stop him, or do you just walk past and get on your car?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. More people have voted for Hillary than for Obama n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Not in elections and caucuses they haven't
Furthermore Michigan was not an election. You can't have an election when you're the only person on the ballot. Does that not make sense.

"OoOoooooo look I beat myself at tic tac toe. what a genius I am." :eyes:

This whole line of reasoning is rock headed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. "rock headed"
Thanks, I'll take that as a complement. I stand by the statement as written ("uncommitted" is not a vote for Obama).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Stand by it with an argument please
How can you justify counting an election with one candidate on teh ballot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. I wasn't on the ballot
How many votes do I get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. None.
Now I was the ONLY person on the ballot. How many votes do I get? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. it's compliment
complements are things that go together like truth and logic or honesty and character.

According to RealClearPolitics

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html

she is only ahead in votes if you count Michigan, where Obama's name was not on the ballot and if you don't count Iowa, Nevada, Maine and Washington. Something like 150,000 people caucused in Iowa where 70% of them voted for "not Hillary" and something like 200,000 in Washington where Obama won 66-33%. So there's 66,000 Washington Democrats that apparently neither you nor Hillary think should count, along with Maine voters, Iowa voters and Nevada voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. Well in my case it's both
It goes with me well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southern_belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
22. I've been asking myself the same thing
for a while! The pundits do seem to be laughing at her, though. They should be reporting the FACTS! :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaldem4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
23. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
akbacchus_BC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
24. Because the media seems to be selecting the candidates who would
lose against the republicans. But this time the media is wrong, Senator Obama is winning this Presidency, hands down, so the media is spewing BS once again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
26. I don't know why she would say that you have more votes.
It doesn't help her AT ALL!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
27. because the media knows it's a fact
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. The same media that you claim is sexist?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Are you saying the media is a bunch of dumbasses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerrad Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
37. Oh Gee... here's how she claims it . . . .
Edited on Mon May-19-08 07:07 PM by Lerrad
She actually has him by 139,427, if you count it with Florida and Michigan, but exclude caucuses. Any other way you look at it Obama has her beat.

This is why I dislike Hillary sooo.... much, she likes to stretch and twist the truth.

TOTAL OBAMA HILLARY
TOTAL 12,891,604 12,217,745 (w/o FL & MI - w/caucuses and territories)
TOTAL 13,460,645 13,403,104 (w/ FL&MI, w/caucuses)

TOTAL 12,891,604 11,889,594 (w/o MI - w/caucuses and territories)
TOTAL 12,535,451 11,730,409 (w/o MI - excludes caucuses)

TOTAL 12,535,451 12,058,560 (w/o FL & MI - excludes caucuses)
TOTAL 13,104,492 >13,243,919< (w/ FL & MI - excludes caucuses)

Florida 569,041 857,208
Michigan XXX,XXX 328,151
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC