Will Hillary be remembered as the Nader of 2008?

[frustrated_lefty]

It certainly seems she aspires to that lofty position.

[BlooInBloo]

1. Only if the voters make it so.

[TexasObserver]

2. No, because Obama will win in spite of her

[WA98070]

3. No, Nadar has ethics and fights for values. He miscalculated Gore's in ability to...

put Bush away. Nadar is a "has been" Hillary is a"Never was."

[slinkerwink]

4. No, she's not going to be Nader

[HiFructosePronSyrup]

5. Clinton won't be remembered.

[book_worm]

6. No, only if she ran as an independent in the GE

[Blue_In_AK]

7. Of course not.

Nader didn't run as a Democrat. Besides which, this is a primary.

[bowens43]

8. No, I don't think so. She and Obama have made history.

That's how she will be remembered.

[Poll_Blind]

9. No, she's now her entirely own archetype. Hillary != Nader and vice versa.

  At least with Nader, people understand that he's not part of the Democratic Party. There's a lot of armor that we wear when thinking about members of other political parties, a certain prgmatic xenophobia.

  But Senator Clinton is the rot from within, not the rot from without.

PB

[Youphemism]

10. That Position Has Already Been Filled

Thank you, Bob Barr.