Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NARAL Pro-Choice backs Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:48 PM
Original message
NARAL Pro-Choice backs Obama
NARAL Pro-Choice backs Obama
By BETH FOUHY – 35 minutes ago

NEW YORK (AP) — Democrat Barack Obama has won the endorsement of NARAL Pro-Choice America. The leading abortion rights advocacy organization has supported rival Hillary Rodham Clinton throughout her political career.

The organization was set to announce the endorsement of its political action committee Wednesday.

NARAL president Nancy Keenan said in a statement: "Today, we are proud to put our organization's grassroots and political support behind the pro-choice candidate whom we believe will secure the Democratic nomination and advance to the general election. That candidate is Senator Obama."

Officials said NARAL's political committee board was about evenly divided among Clinton and Obama supporters and that the decision to endorse was hard fought. Ultimately, the board voted unanimously Friday to support the Illinois senator.

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jvzT8keHzVS3YjP8BJDDrf64A_AwD90LHRTO2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow. Another group that doesn't matter to Clinton and her supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think this one did and it still does
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
33. Yes, it certainly does. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. No worries. The shameless political hacks of NOW still endorse Clinton.
The juxtaposition of their glowing endorsement of Hillary with their anti-war statement on their website was bad enough, but lying about his record on abortion issues to IA and NH voters was beyond the pale. I tore up my membership card after that. It's supposed to be the National Organization for Women. That means all women, not one woman named Hillary Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Instead of reading letters of women supporters, Hillary should read letters of Iraqi women
whose homes and family have been destroyed by the war that she did so much to bring about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's a nice endorsement
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. If the NARAL women can unite behind Obama's nomination
I hope the rest of us can do so after June 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeraAgnes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
37. I will no longer donate to NARAL
Obama does not support abortions....so this is insane and illogical! This organization has gone corporate or something so, it's over for me that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Obama has a 100% rating from NARAL and Planned Parenthood
http://www.votesmart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=9490

2007 In 2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America gave Senator Obama a grade of 100.

2006 Senator Obama supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 100 percent in 2006.

2006 Senator Obama supported the interests of the Planned Parenthood 100 percent in 2006.

2005-2006 Senator Obama supported the interests of the National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association 100 percent in 2005-2006.

2005-2006 Senator Obama supported the interests of the National Right to Life Committee 0 percent in 2005-2006.

2005 Senator Obama supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 100 percent in 2005.

2003 Senator Obama supported the interests of the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council 100 percent in 2003.

2002 Senator Obama supported the interests of the Illinois Federation for Right to Life 50 percent in 2002.

2001 Senator Obama supported the interests of the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council 100 percent in 2001.

1997-2000 Senator Obama supported the interests of the Illinois Federation for Right to Life 0 percent in 1997-2000.

1997-1998 Senator Obama supported the interests of the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council 100 percent in 1997-1998.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #37
52. What????
Do you get your facts from fantasyland?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #37
54. Check out some background on her. She is not friend: (Nancy Keenan)


Check out some background on her. http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/06/whats-wrong-with-nancy-keenan/

She's not well-liked by the board or membership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #54
69. if the board doesn't like her, why is she still there?
The board could get rid of her if they wanted to. She's been at NARAL since 2004, and NARAL widely was praised for being very effective on behalf of pro-choice Democrats in the 2006 mid-terms, which is why NARAL's endorsement of Obama is, in fact, a big deal, particularly to superdelegates.

Sorry for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #69
81. its. split. time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #81
83. how much time? the blog you posted is two years old
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #37
59. he does support abortions for women
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #59
62. Hi stranger!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #37
60. Who "supports abortions"? It's about being "pro-choice" and Obama has a 100% rating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #37
63. CHrist some of you people are idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #37
72. Obama has 100% PP/NARAL ratings. He literally has a perfect record on abortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #37
73. !
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #37
77. Good grief!
What a tool! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:50 PM
Original message
Someone needs to tell them he is Black and has a penis
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. and that his Penis, in truth, is big and Black!
How Worrysome! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. Frenchie, stop it!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #26
45. !
:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #45
55. On a more serious (and positive) note, I think this
endorsement effectively ended our primary season! This is HUGE! We're about to see something truly historic in the coming months! :party:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98070 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. How do you know? Any other distinguishing characteristics?
Edited on Wed May-14-08 01:28 PM by WA98070
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #31
50. Much evidence abound......
for those who are informed about such matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
44. HAHAHAA!!!!
Edited on Wed May-14-08 01:40 PM by BlooInBloo
EDIT: If I had a nickel every time I said that...

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
75. Now, hold on here. You can't just go making accusations without evidence.
I demand detailed photographic proof of this claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
64. The thing is, once you go Barack...
you never go back... lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #64
79. Hahahahaa!
Good one.:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. NARAL is dead to me. Bunch of sexists./sarcasm
Do you get the hint yet, Hillary? IT'S OVER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe it is because Clinton Supporters are stating that they are willing to vote for
anti-choice NeoCon John McCain't. That doesn't look good to any organization who's interested in winning in November. Especially one whose whole purpose is to insure that reproductive rights will be protected!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
82. Bingo!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thats a huge endorsement. They have a million members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is a big one.
I've been staying away from here because of all of the infighting, but I have to chime in on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wow!
I wasn't expecting that.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Excellent news.
It helps Obama build strength among the women's movement. I think it will coalesce around his candidacy soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. K & R!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yes! This is excellent news.
NARAL :yourock: THANK-YOU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. The video of announcement here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. "Obama is the leader who can unify Americans"
Sen. Obama is the leader who can unify Americans on both sides of our issue. He has reached new generations and energized young voters, independent voters, and Republican voters. He's the candidate of the future, and today we are proud to put the power of NARAL Pro-Choice America's one million strong members, activists and supporters behind Sen. Barack Obama.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nancy-keenan/why-naral-pro-choice-amer_b_101708.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phillycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
42. Except, you know...50% of the Democrats.
Real unifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #42
65. Riiiight. lol I think you loony few who can't let go are in a scant minority
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phillycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. You're not great with numbers, are you?
I have let go, I know Obama is the presumptive nominee and I will willingly vote for him (although I will not donate or volunteer) but that doesn't change the fact that nearly 50% of Democratic voters in this primary voted for Hillary. If it were a scant minority, we wouldn't be having this argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. They haven't united with him because she's still in the fucking race, fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phillycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. You are just a charmer, aren't you?
That's the end of this discussion for me, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. NARAL is nothing but sexist eggheads. And blacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
74. LOL. And elitists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. This is a big deal.
And makes clear yet again that it's all over but for Hill's concession speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phillycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. Wow, that's a shame. :(
If only Obama had even half the comprehensive platform for women's rights that Hillary has. Oh well, I guess they have to support the presumptive nominee, no matter whether he best supports their views or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. McCain had a 0 voting record on choice
That makes the decision much easier. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Obama's record on reproductive rights is every bit as good as Hillary's
His platform is excellent, and Hillary is now bordering on complete irrelevancy. Obama is the only logical choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
71. but does he have a vagina?
because apparently that's all that matters to some supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. That's really unfair. Kate Michelman endorsed Edwards, and then Obama.
And she was very clear and eloquent about why she chose both of those candidates over Hillary, long before we had a presumptive nominee. It appears NARAL is doing the same thing, and not out of expediency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phillycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Then why did they wait so long, and why were they split about the decision?
Clearly they wanted to support Hillary, the better candidate as concerns women's rights, but the tide went against them and they ended up with Obama in the end. As has the rest of the Democratic party. Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #38
46. "ultimately, they voted unanimously..."
No, not all of them wanted to support Hillary, and I disagree that she's necessarily the stronger candidate on women's rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phillycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. And you're welcome to.
But it's subjective, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #51
57. I never said it wasn't.
I'm just saying it's unfair to characterize that decision as one solely of expediency, and not based in their belief in Obama's position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #38
47. Clearly Obama is the better candidate as concerns women's rights.
Who am I supposed to believe? NARAL or some anonymous sore loser on the internet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #47
85. Both candidates are the same on women's rights
It's all about the delegate math, and the need to quit giving McSame a free ride.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #38
84. They waited until the delegate math made the nominee clear
Since both candidates are 100% pro-choice, there wasn't any other distinguishing criterion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
23. This is wonderful news!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
24. KR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
27. Why NARAL Pro-Choice America Endorsed Barack Obama
Nancy Keenan

Why NARAL Pro-Choice America Endorsed Barack Obama

I am pleased to announce that today, NARAL Pro-Choice America's political action committee endorsed Sen. Barack Obama for president.

I know that most of you are probably thinking, "Why did you decide to endorse Obama, and why are you doing it now?"

Sen. Obama has been a strong advocate for a woman's right to choose throughout his career in public service. Since joining the Senate in 2005, he has worked to unite Americans on both sides of this debate behind commonsense, common-ground ways to prevent unintended pregnancy. He supports legislation to provide our teens with comprehensive sex education, prevent pharmacies from denying women access to their legal birth-control prescriptions, and increase access for family-planning services.

Sen. Obama has said, "A woman's ability to decide how many children to have and when, without interference from the government, is one of the most fundamental rights we possess. It is not just an issue of choice, but equality and opportunity for all women."

Further, I believe Sen. Obama is going to be the Democratic nominee. He leads in pledged delegates, superdelegates, the popular vote, and cash-on-hand. As a former elected official, I know that having the three "m's" of a campaign - money, message and manpower (or womanpower!) - are how we win elections. Sen. Obama will be our next president.

<...>

Finally, NARAL Pro-Choice America, as the political leader of the pro-choice movement, felt it was time to take a leadership role. We have been so fortunate to have two fully pro-choice candidates running for the Democratic nomination and to that end, we've consistently praised both Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama for their leadership in standing up for women's reproductive rights. We continue to look forward to working with them in the future. But, for the sake of the reproductive-rights movement, we need to put any perceived differences behind us, and get to work putting Sen. Obama in the White House. We want to let women know that, no doubt about it, we have trust and confidence in Obama's ability and willingness to fight for a woman's right to choose. He's already proven himself in that regard.

more




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsmirman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
28. And frankly, this is the organization that should matter most to ALL of us right now
THIS is what is at stake. THIS is what Hillary puts in jeopardy by her willingness to turn this campaign into a class war where she is the representative of a class she wouldn't spend a single weekend with at the Berkshires. THIS is the disgustingness of Hillary choosing her ego over what is truly important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
29. Great news.
K & R :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
30. Clinton campaign's reaction: SURPRISED!
Asked for reaction on media conference call, Clinton spokesman Wolfson says, “Surprised.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsmirman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. That's right, jackass. Surprise! Enjoy a nice, healthy cup of reality. No one is buying
the tripe you are selling and the disgusting politics of destruction you and Lanny are advancing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
32. Biggest. Endorsement. Flip. Of. The. Primary. Season.
This is huge. This is bigger than five superdelegates flipping at once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98070 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
36. This should be no surprise, she is only pro-choice because it is important to Dems....
She keeps trying to find a place on the fence but there is NO fence on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #36
86. Oh, please! Both have 100% ratings from NARAL
The issue here is the delegate math and the need to start going after McSame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
powergirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
39. This is HUGE - a proud and feminist organization
and they support Obama. Thank you NARAL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
40. Does that mean Obama's VP pick is likely to be pro-choice?
Wonder if they would request a guarantee of that sort of thing.

Though I am strroooongly pro-choice myself, one of my top picks for VP is technically not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
43. Funny how they played this on MSNBC. They were in the middle of discussing how/if Hillary can still
win, then Brewer announced the endorsement in the middle of their conversation, and Ann Cornblut responds by saying it's no surprise that they'd endorse the presumptive Dem. nominee and it would've been more significant "if they endorsed during the primaries." Um, if they acknoweledge that Obama WILL BE THE DEM. NOMINEE, why are they spending time discussing if/how Hillary can still win it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. Because they are morons. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #48
53. Obviously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. I haven't watched cable news in almost a year.
Can't...take it...anymore!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #56
70. I wish I could do the same...
but I can't look away!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
49. I cant wait for NY NOW to respond
I predict they will revoke NARAL's ovaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
58. Excellent news! they are endorsing the presumptive nominee and gearing up for the fall campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
61. Great endorsement!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
76. NARAL
is dead to Hillary :rofl:









GOBAMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
78. where have all the Clinton supporters gone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
80. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
87. They, unlike so many of Hillary's backers, understand what's at stake
in terms of the Supreme Court. So they know Obama needs help, not some self centered person trying to bring him down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC