Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For the benefit of Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:19 AM
Original message
For the benefit of Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton:
"It is distinctly possible to stay too long at the fair."

--Joan Didion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Brief, but heavy in meaning. Like a haiku ! Thanks OC :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hiya, K Gardner. Good morning!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Barack Hussein Obama:
she should "stay in as long as she wants."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. He can't not say it, BigDDem. But I can say it.
I agree with Obama owing to the position he'd be in if he tried that statement. But the writing is on the wall.

Has been for a while, I'd say.

I only get one vote, as you do. But in Denver I think it will be Illinois' junior Senator who takes the podium and not New York's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. For all those who have been for months now...
Edited on Wed May-14-08 09:35 AM by RichGirl
wanting Hillary to drop out: Why? Oh, I know, because that's how it has always been done. Like in 2004. Howard Dean had huge popularity and we really believed in him, but by SC, I think, he'd dropped out. A few states voted, the media pounced him and he was done. Imagine that he had stayed. What if he'd decided that all 50 states needed a say in the primaries. I worked very hard on the Kerry campaign but I didn't choose him. I didn't know a single person who would have chosen him. One state and he was inevidable. If Dean had stayed in, maybe Clark and Edwards too...it would have removed the "inevidable" label and all the states would have had a say. Things could have been different and we would have gotten the candidate that most people wanted.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. You have to even ask why??? Look at the map...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Screw the map.
Edited on Wed May-14-08 09:49 AM by RichGirl
You didn't understand my post. I'm talking about staying power. Staying until it's finished even if it doesn't look good. I support Hillary because I think she's best qualified to be president. But, I have to consider that on a deeper level, women are much stronger than men.

The way it has always been done is the man's way. The easy way...a few states vote and you're done. No one wants to push it to the end if they aren't on top. This is what men do, when the going gets tough...they leave. It's a statistical fact that men leave their families by huge percentages over women, which is actually rare. They leave their wives, their children and their responsibilities. A woman can have three kids, no home, no job, but she'll be there as long as she can stand. The irony is that having that kind of leadership in the white house would be the only real change we can hope for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. thats an incredibly sexist post...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. It's a fact.
If I say that women have vaginas...is that sexist????? If I said that Obama can carry more books than Hillary, would that be sexist? And maybe ageist too??? You're need to criticize anything Hillary has gone on over-drive and is totally ridiculous!

Go to any shelter in any city and you'll see WOMEN and children. It is not sexist to point that out.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. There's a dearth of logic in your "reasoning"
Vaginas are a physical characteristic exclusive to females- and a few hermaphrodites. Character is another story. It's simply foolish to claim that women are stronger character wise than men, and yes, it's sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. The inability to distinguish between opinion and fact seems to be the hallmark of Clinton sycophants
Edited on Wed May-14-08 10:19 AM by TahitiNut
:shrug:

It often appears that sycophants are related to elephants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. no, it's an opinion and an incredibly stupid one. don't change the topic with that shelter shit...
Edited on Wed May-14-08 10:25 AM by dionysus
you know that's not what we're talking about...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yeah, rules don't apply when your last name is "Clinton."
The Clintons are political royalty, as such, they get to change the rules and CHEAT their way to the Nomination. :grr: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. What sexist horseshit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Does RichGirl need a whaaambulance? You sound bitter. Have
some 'men' issues? That's too bad. Also sad the female candidate couldn't cut the mustard with the majority of voters. Better luck next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. I don't have men issues.
In fact, I have a wonderful relationship primarily because we are equal, but different.

This is not just about Hillary. Our whole country is a disaster area. It has been run almost exclusively by men. Only 14% of our government is women. Can you remove yourself from your Obama worship for just five minutes to consider that maybe we have been way, way out of balance for many, many years??? I don't think you can....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. It has nothing to do with Obama worship and everything to do
Edited on Wed May-14-08 10:14 AM by babylonsister
with Clinton, the name Clinton, the dynasty, issues of likeability, electability, trust. She FAILS at all of them.
Just because she's a woman and a Clinton is no reason to vote for her. And guess what? I won't.

Judging from the map, I'm not alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. I don't vote for penises or vaginas. I vote for the individual.
There's not, for example, a woman politician that I can think of in my state who I'd vote for over Bernie or Pat. On the other hand, I strongly back a woman running for gov't, because she's better than the men running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. Further proof that Hillary supporters tend to have some serious psychological issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. LOLOLOL!!!
Obama supporters have maturity problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. your post reveals an ignorance of past dem primaries.
In 1980, for example, Ted Kennedy took his campaign all the way to the convention despite being waaay behind in delegates and running against a sitting dem president. And you make waay too much of a distinction on silly premises between men and women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
29. Yes!!! EVERYBODY should have stayed in!
Edited on Wed May-14-08 12:13 PM by bvar22
Wouldn't that be a wonderful use of Democratic Party resources.
Imagine if nobody dropped out just because they were no longer a viable candidate for the nomination!

The Primary process IS a culling process.
Hillary was culled after Wisconsin, but nobody had the balls to tell her.
(Look what the Hillary campaign did to Richardson).



She has NOT been a viable candidate since Wisconsin, and now she is only helping Republicans.


"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans. I want us to compete for that great mass of voters that want a party that will stand up for working Americans, family farmers, and people who haven't felt the benefits of the economic upturn."---Paul Wellstone




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
31. A deeply loyal Kerry Democrat here.
I listened very carefully to what John Kerry had to say about the Vietnam War and watched the shit he had to shovel just to tell the truth, and from that very early hour knew he was the real deal.

I also believe the Kerry/Edwards ticket defated the Bush/Cheney ticket in Ohio, and with that victory would have come the election.

Dean? Love him. I would have begged him to take the Chair's position had he not decided to go for it. His 50-state strategy and the new registrations he and Obama have inspired have been a huge gift to many down-ballot Dems.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxmyth Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. For the benefit of Barack Hussein Obama:
The game's isn't over until it's over.

YOGI BERRA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. except this time, it really is over. hillary lost.... learn to adjust...
Edited on Wed May-14-08 09:50 AM by dionysus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxmyth Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. That's an inning, not the game
Learn the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. thats funny... she won't have the votes or delegates... she has already lost... learn to adjust...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. That's technically true but not pragmatically real.
He outflanked her.

It's all over 'cept the shoutin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. Dear Clintons, Don't go away mad ... just GO AWAY! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
28. Dear ShortnFiery,
Dont go away mad, just GO AWAY (again.)

Sincerely,
Me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
12. you mean for YOUR OWN benefit
what bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. No, not for my benefit. I stand for one lone vote in the process
and make no further numeric claims.

But I believe that Obama ran the far superior campaign and that he has defeated Sen. Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phillycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
14. Because it would be a lot better if Obama was losing these primaries to a ghost.
Man, it's like some of you don't understand politics at all.

Oh, wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
36. Obama's campaign set a trajectory from pre-2007 into the end of the
caucus and primary calendar in 2008.

Senator Clinton failed to do this. Not out of stupidity, but out of arrogance

It cost her Iowa, as Obama and Edwards defeated her there, and this after she negotiated the withdrawal of Evan Bayh and Tom Vilsack.

She is not a ghost. But she is not going to be the nominee.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## DON'T DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.1
==================



This week is our second quarter 2008 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Whatever you do, do not click the link below!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
35. John Edwards Endorses Obama! YAY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC