Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal Review Composite Poll: Kerry 296, Bush 242 (8-3-04)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 07:40 AM
Original message
Federal Review Composite Poll: Kerry 296, Bush 242 (8-3-04)


http://www.federalreview.com/compositepoll.htm

THERE IS A BOUNCE
Bush 47.4% – 242 EV | Kerry 50.4% – 296 EV

EV without Toss Up states (under 2% margin): Bush 200| Kerry 253| Toss 85

August 3, 2004

With conflicting results in different polls and most showing changes within the margin of error, it's difficult to tell if Kerry/Edwards got any bounce from their convention. Clearly, they did. Although it is certainly not as large a bounce as we have seen historically, that should be no surprise with as few people reportedly undecided as we have in this year of polarization.

Although many polls show changes within their own margins of error, when several polls move in the same direction, the odds are that there has been real movement. The meta analysis techniques employed in the Composite Poll confirm that movement. From the pre-Convention Composite Poll to Tuesday, August 8, Kerry gained 1.4 points and Bush lost 0.5. That equals the biggest one week swing since we started this analysis on March 8. Kerry now leads by 3 points. A respectable lead in such a close race.

While much has been made about the odd results of the USA Today / Gallup Poll, I note that it has traditionally been the most stable poll this year, and its weekly variance from the weekly mean has been generally to Kerry's favor by 0.4 points (i.e., it is barely more Kerry favorable on the average). Any suggestion that the Gallup poll is generally pro-Bush is simply untrue. However, it is possible that this week's poll is a bad sample. But the nature of polling is such that 5% of the time, you can get ridiculous results. Alternatively, there's a chance that Gallup is the only one with the correct turnout model. Personally, I think it's reasonable to discount this week's results as an outlier - showing Bush with a 4 point lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tarheelhombre Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Great analysis
But why did they switch the traditional associations of the Blue and Red states?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Actually, he said the incumbent is traditionally in Blue...
Who knows? I like it the other way better, too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jfxgillis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Actually, this IS the traditional alignment
Incumbent party blue, challenging party red.

The "tradition" you refer to is all of 3 and a half years old!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defoliant Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. I am encouraged, but still nervous
The better the polls look, the nastier the Republican attack ads will become. They know what is at stake here, too. If Bush loses, the Neocons may never get another chance to hijack the party and the country. They will fight hard and fight dirty. So do not let these results lull you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC