Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Poor Joan Walsh....( Salon Magazine)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:04 PM
Original message
Poor Joan Walsh....( Salon Magazine)
She was/is so invested in the Clinton candidacy. She reminds me of so many middle aged white women that I know and care about. They have had an emotional attachment to this idea of a woman President, and now that it seems to be slipping away, they still can't seem to be honest with the fact that Hillary Clinton is not the right person to fulfill that dream.

As a Black man in that age group I'm torn about my sympathy and smugness because I haven't forgotten how THEY got the fruits of the affirmative action programs that were meant for Black men. Not to mention the countless numbers of us who met their fate because of some real or imagined affront. :shrug:

I continue to remind my friends that the Supreme Court is at stake, and hope they'll keep that in mind when they go forward this election season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   Well then who is the right woman?  LisaM   May-07-08 08:06 PM   #1 
   I think there are others  jaysunb   May-07-08 08:10 PM   #4 
   Did you work for, or support, Pat Schroeder?  LisaM   May-07-08 08:27 PM   #22 
      No I didn't  jaysunb   May-07-08 08:37 PM   #29 
         Sigh. I just think that there will always be a justification.  LisaM   May-07-08 08:39 PM   #34 
            You're smart,  jaysunb   May-07-08 08:50 PM   #45 
            I'm a woman and I don't support Hillary. I would support someone like Barbara Boxer, though.  Oregonian   May-08-08 11:23 AM   #103 
               Barbara Boxer is not running. That is a false argument.  LisaM   May-08-08 12:31 PM   #104 
   Kathleen Sebelius, Governor of Kansas. The truest form of class and integrity who is self made. n/t  Exilednight   May-07-08 08:12 PM   #5 
   I don't like her. When she gave the response to the SOTU  LisaM   May-07-08 08:25 PM   #21 
   Do you even know her record? She's quite liberal in a state that is pretty conservative........  Exilednight   May-07-08 08:43 PM   #38 
      Like I said at the time:  Jed Dilligan   May-07-08 09:58 PM   #67 
         " Whitemanistan "  jaysunb   May-07-08 10:07 PM   #69 
         self delete. I meant to respond above, and did. thanks.  Mezzo   May-07-08 11:09 PM   #79 
         How fucking racist of you.  Mezzo   May-07-08 11:10 PM   #80 
            I'm sure all the poor oppressed white men are deeply offended  Jed Dilligan   May-07-08 11:13 PM   #81 
               Whitemanistan is a keeper...the whole GE will be about Whitemanistan  BeyondGeography   May-08-08 02:52 AM   #84 
               poor and oppressed go hand in hand, but OOOOOH you're a fucking hoot.  Mezzo   May-08-08 10:04 AM   #95 
   A: ...........  Husb2Sparkly   May-07-08 08:51 PM   #46 
   Clinton certainly had the best shot... I hope another opportunity comes for  featherman   May-07-08 08:14 PM   #8 
   No I didn't support her.  jaysunb   May-07-08 08:17 PM   #12 
   Just like racism is a larger part of this election than people want to acknowlege, so is sexism.  last1standing   May-07-08 08:23 PM   #20 
   One will come along ... just like Obama came along from really  movonne   May-07-08 08:33 PM   #26 
   maybe the ideal woman candidate has not run yet!  DontTreadOnMe   May-07-08 08:37 PM   #32 
   One doesn't need to know who it is...  dchill   May-07-08 08:39 PM   #33 
   The Ideal Woman Candidate  Crisco   May-07-08 08:45 PM   #40 
   No candidate is ideal, for starters...  orangepeel68   May-07-08 09:46 PM   #64 
   Sebelius would be awesome  Gore1FL   May-07-08 09:46 PM   #65 
   a woman who isn't for herself first. Obama says we, us. She says  roguevalley   May-08-08 01:12 PM   #106 
   Was affirmative action only meant for certain men, and not women?  villager   May-07-08 08:08 PM   #2 
   I think you're right about the divisive aspect  jaysunb   May-07-08 08:12 PM   #6 
   She always looks so ... constipated.  TexasObserver   May-07-08 08:08 PM   #3 
   about Joan Walsh  wrando   May-07-08 08:14 PM   #9 
   I certainly agree w/ you about Walsh  jaysunb   May-07-08 08:22 PM   #18 
      you people and the msm  wrando   May-07-08 08:45 PM   #41 
         Neither does the Supreme Court  jaysunb   May-07-08 08:49 PM   #44 
            supreme court has been lost  wrando   May-07-08 08:53 PM   #49 
   I was going to say she always looks like she just remembered she left the iron on  IDemo   May-07-08 08:52 PM   #48 
      I hope I remembered where I parked this time  burythehatchet   May-07-08 09:19 PM   #59 
      maybe I should have used "pained, worried and fretful"  TexasObserver   May-07-08 09:41 PM   #63 
   I've been reading Salon since 1997, and have been stunned at their pro-Clinton bias.  Shakespeare   May-07-08 08:14 PM   #7 
   Compared John Edwards to an orc?  LisaM   May-07-08 08:29 PM   #23 
   Just an orc, generically speaking.  Shakespeare   May-07-08 08:33 PM   #25 
      Well, yeah!  LisaM   May-07-08 08:36 PM   #28 
   Someone's Got to Balance Out the 'sphere  Crisco   May-07-08 08:47 PM   #43 
      You don't understand the difference between...  Shakespeare   May-07-08 10:38 PM   #73 
   Don't feel sorry for Joan or and middle aged white woman.  Mags   May-07-08 08:15 PM   #10 
   Is that a threat not to vote for Obama in the GE?  Shakespeare   May-07-08 08:16 PM   #11 
   Is what a threat? You folk are so nervous. Your guy is winning.  Mags   May-07-08 08:18 PM   #14 
   My guy was John Edwards. "you may be sorry" is most definitely a threat.  Shakespeare   May-07-08 08:21 PM   #16 
      I don't have to explain anything to you, I was also an Edwards supporter. SO?  Mags   May-07-08 08:23 PM   #19 
         Yeah, that's what I thought. n/t  Shakespeare   May-07-08 08:32 PM   #24 
            and just what that thought?  Mags   May-07-08 08:34 PM   #27 
   Pssst -- you're responding to "Mags"  Bucky   May-07-08 08:22 PM   #17 
      I have been here a very long time, You can call me whatever you like,  Mags   May-07-08 08:37 PM   #30 
   You make my point for me. n/t  jaysunb   May-07-08 08:18 PM   #13 
   Oooo, a threat. I bet you're really gonna enjoy that pyrrhic victory when Justice Stevens retires.  impeachdubya   May-07-08 08:57 PM   #52 
      well...I think you've covered all the bases.  jaysunb   May-07-08 09:00 PM   #54 
   "reminds me of so many middle aged white women"  Bucky   May-07-08 08:20 PM   #15 
   poor bucky, poor pitiful you. everybody is against you and you cry,cry,cry.  Mags   May-07-08 08:40 PM   #35 
      some day, my friend, you will learn how to express a complete thought  Bucky   May-07-08 08:46 PM   #42 
         try to grow up soon.  Mags   May-07-08 09:26 PM   #60 
   I will be happy to see a Democrat in the White House.  dogdayDU Moderator   May-07-08 08:37 PM   #31 
   Good point  jaysunb   May-07-08 08:42 PM   #37 
   Boxer. If she wants to make a run later, she'll have a ton of support.  knixphan   May-07-08 08:42 PM   #36 
   Don't you think she'd be a little too old ?  jaysunb   May-07-08 08:45 PM   #39 
      oh, you may have a point there... I'm CA as well.  knixphan   May-08-08 02:30 AM   #83 
   Poor Joe Walsh!  Condem   May-07-08 08:51 PM   #47 
   haha !  jaysunb   May-07-08 08:54 PM   #50 
      thank you, jay  Condem   May-07-08 08:55 PM   #51 
         light em if you got em  jaysunb   May-07-08 08:58 PM   #53 
            Yessir, Jay  Condem   May-07-08 09:02 PM   #55 
   On a complete different point I would like to point out that the real benificiaries of  grantcart   May-07-08 09:14 PM   #56 
   One thing to consider  TragedyandHope   May-07-08 09:14 PM   #57 
   Tough shit, Joanie, you backed the wrong horse. nt  billyoc   May-07-08 09:17 PM   #58 
   "poor" Walsh because she wasn't an Obamabot?  Pietrogustapov   May-07-08 09:35 PM   #61 
   jobs meant for black men? Like the vote was meant for just black men,too?  Iris   May-07-08 09:37 PM   #62 
   "How THEY got the fruits that were intended for black men"?????? FUCK OFF.  Mezzo   May-07-08 09:48 PM   #66 
   Are you drinking ?  jaysunb   May-07-08 10:06 PM   #68 
   since I QUOTED you, I think perhaps you should check either your sobriety or your sanity.  Mezzo   May-07-08 10:09 PM   #70 
      Ok  jaysunb   May-07-08 10:20 PM   #71 
         OMFG. You just proved my point. Sexism in the context YOU intend.  Mezzo   May-07-08 10:48 PM   #75 
   Amen!  pirhana   May-07-08 10:58 PM   #77 
   This blatent sexism (and racism while we're at it) is fucking crazy.  Mezzo   May-07-08 11:09 PM   #78 
   But women aren't a minority.  Lautremont   May-08-08 03:02 AM   #85 
   Are you being sarcastic?  bluetrain   May-08-08 03:04 AM   #86 
      No. There are more women in the world than men. That's all.  Lautremont   May-08-08 03:07 AM   #88 
         Women are the largest minority group in the world.  bluetrain   May-08-08 03:37 AM   #89 
   originally, affirmative action was meant to reverse the effects of pariahzation...  NorthernSpy   May-08-08 10:57 AM   #99 
   Why are you fomenting division?  JoFerret   May-07-08 10:30 PM   #72 
   and sexism. and racism, but I suspect the OP is of the mind that blacks can't be racists, which is  Mezzo   May-07-08 11:15 PM   #82 
      We all grow up and live in a racist society  JoFerret   May-08-08 07:09 AM   #93 
   On MSNBC tonight she had the gall to say Obama had run his share of negative  mod mom   May-07-08 10:42 PM   #74 
   Do you think Obama hasn't run negative ads? Clearly you're not that stupid, HARRY AND LOUISE  Mezzo   May-07-08 10:57 PM   #76 
   You mean the people sitting at a table ad?  hnmnf   May-08-08 03:06 AM   #87 
   That was a particularly negative and destructive ad  JoFerret   May-08-08 11:06 AM   #101 
   that comment was hilarious  TexasObserver   May-08-08 06:03 AM   #92 
      but you do realize Obama has run negative, right? I mean, you're not trying to rewrite history, are  Mezzo   May-08-08 10:03 AM   #94 
   This thread is flamebait. Divide and conquer is the RNC's best tool. Why is it at DU?  McCamy Taylor   May-08-08 05:51 AM   #90 
   I hear you Bro. I agree with you about Joan Walsh. She is so  Kahuna   May-08-08 05:55 AM   #91 
   You got that right! Day in and day out it's hard to hear her SPEW HRC talking points on Hairballs.  ShortnFiery   May-08-08 10:05 AM   #96 
   this is a blatantly sexist OP. nt  xchrom   May-08-08 10:42 AM   #97 
   OMFG... meant for BLACK MEN? wow.  Texas Hill Country   May-08-08 10:45 AM   #98 
   oh stop with the faux outrage. and fear mongling!  rodeodance   May-08-08 11:03 AM   #100 
   This post is blatantly divisive and sexist  frickaline   May-08-08 11:20 AM   #102 
   That's One Of The Most Idiotic, Ignorant, And Sexist Piece Of Shit Things I've Seen On Here.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   May-08-08 12:34 PM   #105 
   Locking  The Magistrate   May-08-08 01:54 PM   #107 
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well then who is the right woman?
I'm getting really sick of the anyone but Hillary argument. Barbara Boxer? I like her, but please. She is very happy where she is.

Pat Schroeder ran a few years back. Her campaign was brief, so you may have missed it. Were you supporting her?

Or Carol Mosely-Braun?

Really, it makes me cross. JUST WHO is this ideal woman candidate, who's actually willing to make a run?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think there are others
The Governors of Kansas & Arizona look good to me. I'd work hard for either of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. Did you work for, or support, Pat Schroeder?
She's about as good as they come, and she has a heart-wrenching personal story on abortion (what they wrongly call partial-birth abortion) that would put the issue into perspective for once and all.

I just find it disingenous (sorry if I'm ratcheting off on you too much) that all these people who say they'd support the right woman never worked for any of the women who've actually run. Their candidates are all theoretical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. No I didn't
Although I liked her very much personally ( sorta had a crush on her. LOL ! ) she was another PERSON who came along at the wrong time in history. Also, she was never a serious candidate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. Sigh. I just think that there will always be a justification.
Of course, it helps Obama (and please don't take this wrong) that he's not so overtly black as someone like Al Sharpton (I thought Al's speech had it all over Obama's in 2004, BTW), but I guess there's not much chance that we can find a candidate who's only HALF female!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #34
45. You're smart,
and very thoughtful. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #34
103. I'm a woman and I don't support Hillary. I would support someone like Barbara Boxer, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #103
104. Barbara Boxer is not running. That is a false argument.
Did YOU work for Pat Schroeder or Carol Mosely-Braun (or at least support them?)

Between Hillary, Mosley-Braun, and Pat Schroeder, you pretty much get the spectrum of available women. Which one did you support?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Kathleen Sebelius, Governor of Kansas. The truest form of class and integrity who is self made. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. I don't like her. When she gave the response to the SOTU
she started out by trying to blur party lines. I found that to be a compromise position and I think she is way more to the right than Hillary.

In fact, I found her response confounding. It sounded like a conciliation, not a rebuttal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #21
38. Do you even know her record? She's quite liberal in a state that is pretty conservative........
take a look at her record, you might be surprised at how liberal she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #38
67. Like I said at the time:
Not my type but I think she'll play well in Whitemanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. " Whitemanistan "
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #69
79. self delete. I meant to respond above, and did. thanks.
Edited on Wed May-07-08 11:11 PM by Mezzo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #67
80. How fucking racist of you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #80
81. I'm sure all the poor oppressed white men are deeply offended
I know I am!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu May-08-08 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #81
84. Whitemanistan is a keeper...the whole GE will be about Whitemanistan
:thumbsup: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #81
95. poor and oppressed go hand in hand, but OOOOOH you're a fucking hoot.
and a racist. it is really, really sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
46. A: ...........
....... waaaaaay too 'middle'

B: Less exciting than drying paint.

She's great for Kansas, but not for national office. (I said the same thing about Clinton, way back when .... except for the drying paint part.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Clinton certainly had the best shot... I hope another opportunity comes for
someone soon. This American process is so strange and difficult. A strong and capable woman has a much better chance of being rewarded with the top spot in a parliamentary system instead of our political version of American Idol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. No I didn't support her.
Nor CMB, who happens to be a friend, but I did work to pay off her campaign debt. Also worked hard for Mondale Ferraro.

For me, it IS about Hillary. She has, for better or worse, been a part of the problem the past 20 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Just like racism is a larger part of this election than people want to acknowlege, so is sexism.
But there are two sides to both. You ask who the right woman is and I can't tell you. That is a sad statement because I know there are many, many women qualified to run this country including Clinton.

Personally, for me it wasn't Clinton's lack of ability that turned me to Obama after Edwards quit. It was her style of campaigning. I felt she went too far in her quest to destroy Obama. Basically her argument for the nomination became "Now that I've ruined his reputation, don't you see that you can't elect a guy damaged goods?" That was the wrong way to go.

I will say that I won't vote for a president because she's a woman any more than I'll vote for a president because he's black. I'll vote for the person I see as the best qualified. The fact that Obama was not only able to weather Hillary's attacks but come out stronger sealed it for me. I know he was attacking as well, but he was much more discreet about it and much more professional.

My question is do you see any women who are rising stars in the party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. One will come along ... just like Obama came along from really
nowhere to probably being the next president...I also would like to see a woman as president...hillary was not the one...I probably will not live long enough to see that, but maybe you will be..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DontTreadOnMe (670 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. maybe the ideal woman candidate has not run yet!
Edited on Wed May-07-08 08:40 PM by DontTreadOnMe
Ever think of it in those terms?

I am not going to vote for a candiate just because they are the "first" of any human category.


I am getting really sick of Hillary supporters lack of common sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. One doesn't need to know who it is...
to know who it isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. The Ideal Woman Candidate
Edited on Wed May-07-08 08:45 PM by Crisco
Is the one white men aren't afraid will think independently if/when they agree to turn the White House keys to her.

Think for a moment of Obama's inexperience. If you don't think the white men in the party's upper echelon believe that's going to make him controllable, consider the Wright separation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
64. No candidate is ideal, for starters...
but not only are there women on the national stage now who could be president -- Sebelius, Napolitano and McCaskill to name three -- there are plenty of women that neither you or I have heard of yet. Who knows who will come to prominence in the next 8 years?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed May-07-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
65. Sebelius would be awesome
I would have chosen her over Obama (but after Edwards) had she run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
106. a woman who isn't for herself first. Obama says we, us. She saysUpdated at 3:57 AM
me, I. There is a huge difference. I will not vote for the first woman just because she is a woman. This campaign was awful and if she was such a great choice, she would be winning. She isn't. Ideal woman? How about a good campaigner with good tactics who can sell a good plan? It worked for Obama. Too bad she didn't try it. Being 'inevitable' and feeling invincible is the height of hubris. And I am an old white woman. She offends me with her actions, words and campaign. Too bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Was affirmative action only meant for certain men, and not women?
I think we're all excited that the Oval Office may at last go to someone not stamped from the same template we've used for the last 200-plus years... (i.e., rich white guy, though "well off" still certainly seems to help... ;-) )

But we may not want to do the other side's work in pitting ourselves against each other, viz. what group -- outside that template -- is more innately deserving than another...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I think you're right about the divisive aspect
I wish it hadn't happened like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. She always looks so ... constipated.
How does a person spend a lifetime with such a strained look on their face? She's got that "Debbie Downer" ooooooohhhhh nooooooo look most of the time.

I can't believe they use her. She doesn't do well on TV, it hurts to look at her face, and she's a run of the mill shill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wrando (949 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. about Joan Walsh
not a Hillary supporter, but one of the best objective journalists left

you morons want to throw her overboard because she doesn't think Obama is the second coming

when MSNBC is all you have left you'll be begging for someone with Joan Walsh's integrity

bill from ct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. I certainly agree w/ you about Walsh
I have nothing but respect for her and her resonable objectivity. I plan to continue read and appreciate her, but I stand by my original observation that was not an attack on Ms Walsh OR middled aged White women.

K ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wrando (949 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
41. you people and the msm
you're making it impossible to reconcile Clinton supporters

BO has no chance without us

you are losing us

bill from ct

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Neither does the Supreme Court
have a chance without you.. or this country for that matter..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wrando (949 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #44
49. supreme court has been lost
have you noticed the right is firmly in charge of the court and will be for many years

they could reverse Roe any time, but they like the issue better

bill from ct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
48. I was going to say she always looks like she just remembered she left the iron on
but constipated works, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #48
59. I hope I remembered where I parked this time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #48
63. maybe I should have used "pained, worried and fretful"
I couldn't look that worried if I tried, and she carries that look as her default facial position. It's got an air of disapproval and displeasure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. I've been reading Salon since 1997, and have been stunned at their pro-Clinton bias.
It's not even subtle (though I still love the site, and will continue being a paid subscriber in perpetuity--take note, you KO bashers).

And it's not just anti-Obama; it's anti-anybody but Hillary. For godsakes, Rebecca Traister compared John Edwards to an Orc in one of her Broadsheet posts when he was still in the race.

I think the two worst pieces they ran (opinion pieces, NOT news stories--and they should have been labeled as such) was the ridiculous piece on why Hillary should be winning, and the one from a few days ago trying to legitimize the gas tax holiday proposal. Those were roundly discredited. Come on, Salon. You're MUCH better than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Compared John Edwards to an orc?
That shouldn't be funny but it made me laugh. Which one, Shagrat?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Just an orc, generically speaking.
It was a hideous thing to do. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Well, yeah!
I could see comparing Dick Cheney to an Orc - hunched over, drinking oil for water - but not John Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
43. Someone's Got to Balance Out the 'sphere
it's anti-anybody but Hillary.

Quelle fucking horror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #43
73. You don't understand the difference between...
...justifiable critical coverage, and outright fantasy pieces, demonstrably so (the two I mentioned). And regardless, I'm still a huge Salon fan, and will remain so. I don't feel it necessary to start an enemies list of every media outlet who says something that says something I may not like. That's another difference between Hill supporters and everybody else.

I've never seen a more tone-deaf bunch of supporters than Hillary fans. You guys will tolerate not a single negative word about her campaign, no matter how much she's done to deserve it. That's not living in a reality-based world, folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. Don't feel sorry for Joan or and middle aged white woman.
We still have a vote in the GE. You many be feeling sorry for BO and yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Is that a threat not to vote for Obama in the GE?
Is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Is what a threat? You folk are so nervous. Your guy is winning.
Why so nervous?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. My guy was John Edwards. "you may be sorry" is most definitely a threat.
I just want you to be specific, Mags--for posterity's sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I don't have to explain anything to you, I was also an Edwards supporter. SO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Yeah, that's what I thought. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. and just what that thought?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Pssst -- you're responding to "Mags"
Mags is here as a disrupter. No posts over two lines long, no posts demonstrating good manners. Don't waste your time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. I have been here a very long time, You can call me whatever you like,
You haven't swayed anyone with your crap since you have been here. All you can do is name call. Seems you wasted your time to respond, bucky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. You make my point for me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed May-07-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
52. Oooo, a threat. I bet you're really gonna enjoy that pyrrhic victory when Justice Stevens retires.
"Sure, Roe v. Wade has been overturned, the birth control pill is against the law, and the Supreme Court has just granted stem cells rights under the 14th amendment.

But But But But the Democrats didn't nominate Hillary--- and it was HER TURN, DAMMIT!

And, of course, it was more important to stomp my feet, whine, and make a point about how MAD I was at Barack Obama than it was to VOTE FOR THE DEMOCRAT WHO WON THE PRIMARY PROCESS.

Waaaaaaaaaah!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. well...I think you've covered all the bases.
LOL ! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. "reminds me of so many middle aged white women"
I am so fucking tired of people filtering everything through race. Every time someone injects race into a non-race discussion, they end up looking like a moran.

Joan Walsh isn't a woman; she's a white woman.
Michelle Obama isn't like Jackie Kennedy, she's like a black Jackie Kennedy.
Obama wants to be the black president.
Bill Richardson is qualified to be the first Hispanic Secretary of State.

These are all moronic comments made here on DU in the past few weeks. Everyone quoted on this list needs to get their heads out of the 19th century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
35. poor bucky, poor pitiful you. everybody is against you and you cry,cry,cry.
get over it and grow up. It is politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. some day, my friend, you will learn how to express a complete thought
You're so close now. Please, keep trying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #42
60. try to grow up soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
31. I will be happy to see a Democrat in the White House.
And that sustains me at this moment....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. Good point
and I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
36. Boxer. If she wants to make a run later, she'll have a ton of support.
She'll have to start now, in advance. Barack would back her in '16.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Don't you think she'd be a little too old ?
she'd be 76. BTW, she's my Senator and I love her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #39
83. oh, you may have a point there... I'm CA as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed May-07-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
47. Poor Joe Walsh!
Did Joe Walsh die?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. haha !
that's not fair :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed May-07-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. thank you, jay
You have a god-damned good sense of humor. Hey, can we lighten up around here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. light em if you got em
I'm tokin mine as we type. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed May-07-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Yessir, Jay
I am, indeed ,with ya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
56. On a complete different point I would like to point out that the real benificiaries of
affirmative action.

My point is that in post war America order was well established in main street America with its local banks and its local chambers of commerce. Everything of importance was decided literally at the country club. The prime example of this is Dan Quayle. The local newspaper, the local drug store owners the local manufacturers and so on. It was a closed society. If you moved to a new town then you had to have a reference to open a bank account. Up to 1965 it was a closed system. Closed to blacks but also closed to aspiring hard working white men as well.

Affirmative action made it a crime to make those decisions at the country club. Violate it and you broke the law could be sued and also get bad headlines. So the bookkeepers and the accounting vice presidents had to become manpower experts, procedures had to be followed and systems for hiring had to have traceability.

The main beneficiaries of Affirmative Action were the young bright well educated young men who already had the skill set to meet the needs of great jobs but didn't have prior access at the country club. They would get the good jobs and eventually the Dan Quayles would not get those plum jobs. In later years young African Americans and women would benefit from affirmative action in the colleges and universities get the skills necessary to be able to compete in a fair system but it would take time.

The first winners? People like Bill Clinton, hard working, intelligent white guys who never had keys to the Country Club.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TragedyandHope (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
57. One thing to consider
Edited on Wed May-07-08 09:21 PM by TragedyandHope
I hate to see the constant tug of war between two groups which have both been handed similar short ends of the stick. I think we will see a woman President in the coming years and I will be proud to support her if I believe she is the best person to lead our country. (Yes, sorry, this is probably a theoretical candidate.) Believe it or not, some of us did judge Clinton as a person and choose otherwise.

Anyway, what I want to ask people to consider is that the tone and conduct of Obama's camapign notably rejects the traditional chest-beating and saber-rattling bluster of politics as usual. That is a completely different mindset than that of our current "War President." I have no doubt that Obama will be able to make the tough choices on national security, but he doesn't have to play a caricature of an American cowboy to maintain his image and get things done. I strongly believe that kind of thing is what leads Presidents down the wrong path to and into military quagmires.

Obama genuinely embraces his own humanity. Of course, the Right may use this in an attempt to emasculate him, as some have already done during the Primary campaign, but I see his humility and willingness to endure and persevere through these attacks as a greater strength than exaggerated displays of caveman machismo.

I think this alone is a significant aspect to his appeal, among many other positive factors.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
58. Tough shit, Joanie, you backed the wrong horse. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pietrogustapov (15 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
61. "poor" Walsh because she wasn't an Obamabot?
Sure. It makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
62. jobs meant for black men? Like the vote was meant for just black men,too?
My god. could you be more ... sexist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
66. "How THEY got the fruits that were intended for black men"?????? FUCK OFF.
How dare you pretend women are not a minority. How dare you pretend only Black men, and not black women somehow are in need of affirmative action.

You are what's wrong with the Democratic Party, sir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. Are you drinking ?
or just unable to read ? :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. since I QUOTED you, I think perhaps you should check either your sobriety or your sanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. Ok
Then maybe you should educate yourself as to what affirmative action and the quota system was back in Ms Walsh and my day meant. If you did, you'd uderstand the context of my statement. Granting White women minority status was an afterthought and part of a compromise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #71
75. OMFG. You just proved my point. Sexism in the context YOU intend.

"granting white women minority status was an afterthought and part of a compromise"

Since women got the right to vote a full fifty years after men, you're a bit ridiculous to say the least. Actually, THAT you think there is no problem with that statement tells a lot about you.

and I repeat: You ARE the problem with the Democratic party sir, FUCK OFF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed May-07-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #66
77. Amen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #77
78. This blatent sexism (and racism while we're at it) is fucking crazy.
This is where and WHY the divide is. This guy *IS* the problem with the Democratic Party. period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lautremont (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #66
85. But women aren't a minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluetrain (993 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #85
86. Are you being sarcastic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lautremont (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #86
88. No. There are more women in the world than men. That's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluetrain (993 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #88
89. Women are the largest minority group in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #66
99. originally, affirmative action was meant to reverse the effects of pariahzation...
Edited on Thu May-08-08 10:59 AM by NorthernSpy
... and give blacks a stake in the institutions of American life. It was intended to be a narrowly-applied de-"pariahzation" tactic, so to speak.


Thing is, other groups got added to the formula -- including those who had never actually been made pariah groups by law. This weakened the rationale.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
72. Why are you fomenting division?
Why are you engaging in simplistic thinking?
Are you feeling a wave of self pity or sore winnerdom?
Your empathy for this person rings hollow so I assume your post header is sarcastic. Why?
Are there no black women? Are you angry at them too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #72
82. and sexism. and racism, but I suspect the OP is of the mind that blacks can't be racists, which is
BULLSHIT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #82
93. We all grow up and live in a racist society
Edited on Thu May-08-08 07:13 AM by JoFerret
We all internalize and try to make sense of those attitudes. We are all racist in our thinking.
The same applies to sexism. Both of these are on display in the post. The self pity and schedenfreud are notable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed May-07-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
74. On MSNBC tonight she had the gall to say Obama had run his share of negative
ads! WTF is she delusional?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May-07-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. Do you think Obama hasn't run negative ads? Clearly you're not that stupid, HARRY AND LOUISE
that was a RIGHT WING NEGATIVE ATTACK AD from the Obama camp against Hillary's health care plan, and they ripped it STRAIGHT OUTTA the republican attack ads from the 90's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #76
87. You mean the people sitting at a table ad?
Heaven forbid!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #76
101. That was a particularly negative and destructive ad
using republican themes and language to attack a a key democratic value - universal health coverage. That was pretty shameful.
But - all campaigns make mistakes and do whatever it takes to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #74
92. that comment was hilarious
She was disagreeing with other comments to the effect that Hillary had been really dirty in negatives, but he had kept it pretty clean. She reacted as if she was personally offended.

She's been Hillary all along, and now she's having separation anxiety watching the campaign's death throes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #92
94. but you do realize Obama has run negative, right? I mean, you're not trying to rewrite history, are
you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
90. This thread is flamebait. Divide and conquer is the RNC's best tool. Why is it at DU?
Edited on Thu May-08-08 05:53 AM by McCamy Taylor
Read Angela Davis's "Women, Race and Class" for why all oppressed people should work together. And remember that in the US as around the world, women are the victims of more violent crimes--rape, murder, assault, domestic violence, child rape, forced prostitution---than any other oppressed group.
African-American women have it the worst of all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
91. I hear you Bro. I agree with you about Joan Walsh. She is so
vested in Hillary she has lost her objectivity as a journalist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu May-08-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
96. You got that right! Day in and day out it's hard to hear her SPEW HRC talking points on Hairballs.
Joan Wolsh is SOOOO "in the tank" for Hillary it's pathetic.

Yet, Tweety treats her like journalistic royalty.

Salon.com really does itself a disservice to keep Joan Wolsh on the payroll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
97. this is a blatantly sexist OP. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
98. OMFG... meant for BLACK MEN? wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
100. oh stop with the faux outrage. and fear mongling!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frickaline (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
102. This post is blatantly divisive and sexist
"THEY got the fruits of the affirmative action programs that were meant for Black men"

Pitting black men against women? Pretty sad ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
105. That's One Of The Most Idiotic, Ignorant, And Sexist Piece Of Shit Things I've Seen On Here.
No surprise that it came from such an ignorant jackass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-08-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
107. Locking
Flame-Bait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov 23rd 2009, 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC