Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC is airing the Clinton Conference call right now

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bill219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:13 AM
Original message
MSNBC is airing the Clinton Conference call right now
Wow..alot of spinning going on this morning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. They are insane...
they are truly continuing on.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. All this spinning makes my head hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. God, these people are making
me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
powergirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's giving me a headache - Can Sen. Clinton please be merciful
and set Wolfson free?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. What are they smoking/ingesting/inhaling?
Damn, they are delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. The essence of power.
It's escaping them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. Unfucking believable
They're insane
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. My enitre family stands here, mouths agape. Unfreakingbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. What is being said?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
106. he's black, he can't win whites so we will go on and win. delusional and racist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yeah he cannot win the white vote!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Did she say that this morning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
22. Her campaign flunkies did, yes.
they continue to spin their losses last night into a "win".

Didn't she only win the 65+ category in NC? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #22
84. She only won 65+ in Indiana
Under 65: Obama won 53 to 47
Over 65: Hillary won 69 to 31

All Obama supporters: Ask your parents to stay at home if they live in any of the remaining primary states. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #84
158. marathons of
Lawrence Welk, Barnaby Jones and Murder,She Wrote will take care of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerousRhythm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #158
165. ROFL!
Oh, Jessica Fletcher, you scoundrel!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #84
159. delete, dupe
Edited on Wed May-07-08 12:51 PM by Cheap_Trick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. IMO....
...they are acting like there is hope so the donations will keep on coming in and before she quits, she can retire some of the huge campaign debt she has.

No one, honestly no one, could be so delusional to believe what is being said.

JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. What is being said!???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. That Obama
cant win the white blue collar vote...ie...but but hes black! is what it boils down to.

The Michigan Florida thing is still be tossed out there but all math says...seat them and he still wins.

But I guess they have to try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ps1074 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #21
92. there is a reason for that
White blue collar vote is the republican base. No wonder he can't win that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nels25 Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
64. Russert (I believe, could have been Matthews) implied as
much last night.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #64
149. Yeah, I do believe you are correct...
...seems to me that Russert voiced this opinion last evening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. If I understand this correctly
Edited on Wed May-07-08 09:18 AM by Bill219
The Clinton camp is going to pushing the race isssue even more than they have done in the past
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
powergirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
13. Barnacle just called out the Clinton campaign for
emphasizing her support among "white people." He said something like "We all know Barack Obama is Black, we get it!! This is so offensive." Right on Barnacle!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dascientist Donating Member (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
14. The aides don't even believe what their own words, all that stuttering
..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
16. So basically Rachel Maddow was right in her comments last night?
Edited on Wed May-07-08 09:22 AM by Tatiana
Clinton is going to continue on with the scorched earth, divisive strategy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. sounds like it to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. Yes! I do not understand why any would believe she wouldn't
after all of the negative campaigning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. The whole panel (including Keith O) disagreed with her.
But what she said had the ring of truth to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #16
35. I saw that too and hoped that Rachel was wrong. But as normal
she nailed it considering what has transpired in the last 12 hours
which almost equaled McCain and his 100 years in Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nels25 Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #16
67. Looks like it - SIGH!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #16
97. Rachel Rules
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kdpeters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #16
145. She said Clinton was "post-rational"
Seems so to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clevbot Donating Member (357 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
18. link???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
19. I've been listening...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
24. HAHA... i can tell from the comments that she is not dropping out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #24
36. So you support the racist, scorthed earth divide she's creating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. oh, get over yourself... i am so sick of that bullshit meme
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #40
49. You need help!
This is race-baiting, pure and simple.

Christ-O-Rama, let it go already. It's fucking over. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #40
55. So apparently, you didn't listen to the conference call....its not a "meme" when is verifiable ...
campaign strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avenger64 Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #40
117. Nader. Every time I hear this kind of shrill victimization ...
.... 'you're a racist, you're a racist, nah nah nah nah nah', I just think, that's not what I'm going to support. Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #36
41. Pollsters use the sociological categories of Black, and white voters. Nothing racist about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #41
54. Excuse me?...Nothing racist about it?
WTF is wrong with you people?

This is getting weird. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #54
59. you got that right. NOthing racist to say black or white voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #54
70. take a trip over to hillaryis44.com, and wear protective gear.
there's a thread around here that is simply disgusting. How any self respecting black person can still support Hillary's campaign at this point, is a mystery to me. They make no bones about their outright hatred for blacks. While it doesn't surprise me that some of them post here, it does disappoint me. These are not the kind of people that should be part of the "Democratic" party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #41
108. And women
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #41
163. you guys are out of ideas over at capital hill?
:rofl:

it's over shillbot...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
162. either you want the dems to lose or you are a total idiot, which one is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
25. how are reasonable rational people suppose to be "nice" to her. like so many threads today
demanding we be respectful and "nice" to hillary now it is clear she lost.

how are we supose to respect her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. I agree
She should get the treatment she wants. As a delusional candidate that's hurting the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #25
110. No idea.
*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
27. She's a fucking lunatic.
I'm sick of hearing about her and from her anymore. She pathetic and irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
habitual Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #27
102. what does her sexual activity have to do with this?
cmon, just kidding, i couldn't help myself. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #102
151. shame on you...
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
28. Please consider taking the pledge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DMorgan Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #28
45.  I think the voices on that conference call convinced me............
There's no reason to "pledge" to anything, if Hillary is still going on with her campaign as if nothing happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. We need to give them at least 24 hours, it takes time to accept
that they lost. They have been going at it for over 15 months. I don't think a day is too much to ask
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #47
112. They might have chosen to start working on accepting that fact long ago. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #47
113. we who?
do you think that "we" here at du have anything to do with their decision to fold it up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DMorgan Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #113
120. Right.... this call for 24 hours of silence is going a bit too far! Looking like...
Censorship of thinking people. Asking us not to have opinions about what the Hillary campaign is doing to the Dem party today... as they blythely plan to stick more pins into Obama, force his campaign to spend needless $ fighting Hillary instead of McCain, waste volunteer time, with stupid "white voter" divisive messages..... 24 hours is TOO TOO LONG. IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #28
53. Fuck that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #53
137. Is that the only word you know today?
Or just your favorite?

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
29. Whoever is telling Hillary to fight on is simply crazy,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
30. Whoever is telling Hillary to fight on is simply crazy,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. I think Bill is the one telling her to fight. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #30
38. Rush is telling her to keep on ~ he is in control
and she if falling for it.

Power + Grapper = HC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #30
127. I read so had to put a bunch more of
her own money in last month, to keep going she would have to do more. Who is going to give her money now knowing she is on a losing path?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
32. i think the supers have heard enough from hillary
if they are using the race card on national tv to justify their candidate...i won`t go there yet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
34. This is all about raising $, Obama should keep his focus on McCain.
Clinton needs to get back at least 6.4 million she loaned her campaign, after all public service is only good to her if it is profitable. (See Rose law firm, etc.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. then she can do it without trashing obama and causing him more problems. integrity
integrity... a foriegn word to the clintons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #39
46. She will use whatever motivates her followers to open their wallets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #46
133. But they haven't opened their wallets very wide
or she would be rolling in $$'s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
37. When was this call made?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #37
42. This morning at around 10:15 MSNBC aired it live
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
43. Her campaign
handed her a bigger shovel. There's lots of manure to shovel, but people who shovel manure tend to take on the odor of that which they shovel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
44. So, because she is a woman, she does not have the same
rights previous males have had when they have carried their "losing" campaigns all the way to the convention? You know, like Ted Kennedy who went to the floor of the convention with 700 delegates, Jerry Brown also went all the way to the convention, as did Gary Hart. I'm sure there are more, but you get the drift. None of these male candidates had anywhere near the number of delegates Hillary Clinton has, nor the support.

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are practically tied, and you want her to quit so your blessed anointed one can have an easy time, and you wonder why so many Hillary supporters will not support BO IF he becomes the nominee?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DMorgan Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #44
48. We want her to quit because #1 she's not running a clean honorable campaign and
#2

SHE CAN'T POSSIBLY WIN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How many times do we have to do the math for your folks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #48
71. Clean and honorable is like beauty, all in the eyes of the beholder.
I call you on you bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #71
85. And I put you on Ig. You are like a Japanese soldier who doesn't know the war is over. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #71
154. And I push your bullshit call back on you
Clean and honorable are in the eye of the beholder?

Your ethical relativism astounds me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #44
50. It has NOTHING to do with being a woman.
No one has ever said such a thing. Why must you try to start gender wars?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rob Gregory Browne Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #50
57. Because it's the only thing they've got. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:49 AM
Original message
Well, what other difference is there?
Kennedy had only 700 delegates. It is what it is. It looks pretty obvious to a lot of women, whether you like or not, and it's hurting your candidate, not helping him. But, keep on looking foolish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
116. Do you see that having only 700 meant that he could not stop Carter?
He was FAR less a threat and he WAS criticized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #116
122. ?
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
128. Big difference.
Big differences in campaign styles, organization, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
140. So who said Kennedy did the right thing?
His antics gave us Reagan.

This has nothing to do with gender, it has to do with understanding the impact of her continuing a scorched earth campaign. If she wants to run a positive campaign ala Huckabee, then she should go on ahead and do it.

At this point she has no chance of winning the nomination. (she had no chance as of Wisconsin, actually)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
155. So you're saying that Obama running against a woman
is hurting his campaign?

I get it now. Thanks for that illuminating tidbit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #44
51. Going to convention is DEmocratic Party suicide.
It takes time, cash, energy and planning to run a general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #51
62. I just called the Party headquarters and they connected
me to Dean's email.
They said they would call me back.

I told them not a dime or my time until she stops the race baiting and being divisive for the party.

I mean it and I told them.

Last week they sent me a begging letter and I sent Dean a " Hell No until you stop her from playing the race card!"

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #62
69. Money talks......
So on a brighter note, I heard a pundit say last night Clark is the logical choice for VP. I think Barack should focus on McCain, the economy, his VP choice and campaign in Oregon over the next two weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #69
96. Clark as a VP...
Hmmm...I like the sound of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #62
77. i said the same to dnc a couple weeks ago. i was donating once a month from cr card
stopped that 6 months ago. they called for donation and i said no... not until i know who the money is going to. they wont get a penny fr hillary run.

the man was so upset.

no, i said. again and again

not until
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #51
73. This has all been done before, you know. Perhaps this is your first rodeo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #73
79. I see the ignore button is still necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #79
88. Yep, that is always the answer to a battle Obama supporters cannot win.
Won't bother me at all, and it certainly won't be the first or last time one of you puts me on ignore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #73
134. Yes,it's been done before and we are sick of it

We want CHANGE.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #44
52. they are not "practically" tied. she cannot win. and she is trashing the man
Edited on Wed May-07-08 09:35 AM by seabeyond
and making him spend the money we could use against repugs and setting states up for dems to not be able to vote obama... flo and mi.

those are facts.

looking at the facts... it cannot be justified
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #52
83. The trashing and the baiting is the end for me

If she is so solid with the White Vote than they would vote for her anyway.

Why does she have to say that in order for the Rush Clowns to agree with her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #83
93. i cannot stand what she has done with fl and mi. irrehensible to me. so lacking in integrity
i cant get past that one. to pin it on obama when he is soooo not responsible and lose those people during the election in nov.

i dont get it. i dont get the people that support her and actually allow that bullshit to flourish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #93
123. They would never have let him act like this ...
I am starting for blame the Democratic Party officials now.

I don't care if she stays in until forever... the race stuff must stop!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #44
56. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #44
58. obama fans conveniently forget that Dem candidates have gone to the
convention in the past.

their calls for her to stop makes them look weak. No opposition for the Savior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #58
60. Two more weeks
and you can't post this anymore.

Will you still hang out here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DMorgan Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #58
61. Please read a few posts above yours, or learn some history
Remember Kennedy/Carter? Reagan won over Carter.

Please list the number of times since JFK that a Dem won an election after settling on the candidate as late as the Convention.

Answer: ZERO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #61
66. your ZERO is a zero to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #61
78. When I posted, none of the other replies were visible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #61
99. Here's some history, too, from someone who voted the first time in Carter v. Reagan
Edited on Wed May-07-08 10:12 AM by Straight Shooter
Reagan was a silver-tongued smooth-talking sumabitch who made people pretend that "happy talk" can make everything better, who manipulated the hostage crisis to his advantage, who lied from the very beginning, who is famous for "There you go again" type of putdowns towards a decent rival candidate who was outmaneuvered by the slickness of the Reagan package which still gawdamn appeals to this day to the delusional Repubs.

There's your history. That's why Reagan won. Not on the issues. Not because Reagan had substance, but because he had style and the gullible populace ate it up like ice cream. And we're all the worse off for it.

When I woke up and learned Reagan won, I began to cry. Somewhere inside me, I knew it was over for America. We've been on a downhill slide ever since.

ETA typing too fast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DMorgan Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #99
115. I cried, too when Reagan won. What's Your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #115
118. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
That's my point. America is getting fooled again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DMorgan Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #118
139. Obama is NOT incumbent Carter facing Iran hostages and inflation!
Nor are people "fooled" by Hillary's lies and fake gas tax panders.

People are sick of Bush, and won't vote for John McSame. End of argument.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #139
146. There are critical issues now, just as the Iran hostage crisis was a critical issue.
There are always issues, in every election. Yes, people will vote for John McSame. Are you frickin' kidding me? Party over country is the GOP motto. There is no end to the argument simply because you decree it so. We are light years away from November.

Go ahead and sleep well at night predicated on your unshakeable belief that hatred of the bush years assures an Obama presidency. I remember all too well the high-fivin' on DU on Election Eve and Election Morning in November of 2004.

I occasionally visit Repub forums and sites to assess the atmosphere in the enemy camp. They are coming around to McSame, they are talking themselves into believing in his ability to lead this country. Never underestimate the power of the GOP to regroup. And never underestimate the ability of Democrats to snatch defeat from the drooling jaws of victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KSinTX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #99
150. Using sumabitch don't make ya a Straight Shooter, there Tex
Somewhere inside me, I knew it was over for America. We've been on a downhill slide ever since.


Then you couldn't possibly have benefited from the Clinton years so your point that we're getting hoodwinked somehow and should back another Clinton who has promised more of that same is a dog that just don't hunt.

Cryin's pretty cathartic. You might try doin' a little more of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #58
65. Every time it has happened in recent history
the Democratic candidate LOSES the general election.

In 1968, the brokered convention lead to a loss by Humphrey to Nixon.

In 1972, the brokered convention lead to a loss by Mcgovern to Nixon.

Even the Republicans experieneced it when Reagan took the 1976 Republican nomination to the convention and Ford lost to Carter.

In 1980, Kennedy took it to the convention and Carter lost to Reagan.

In 1984, the long primary challenge by Gary Hart ended up with the devestating laoss of Walter Mondale to Ronald Reagan.

Take ti to the convetion and JOHN MCCAIN IS PRESIDENT.

There is no way around that fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nels25 Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #65
81. I also have a hunch that a brokered convention
of strained convention will lead to trouble to our down ballot candidates.

I thought the idea was to strengthen our numbers in the house and senate??

Not make it harder.

Convention fight may mean less of us in the House/Senate.

Is that a chance you want to take?

when it is over, it is over.

If this was a softball game and I was umpire it would be time to invoke the slaughter rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #65
82. Both Humphrey and McGovern were weak candidates.
We know why Carter lost to Reagan and that was strictly because of the Iran hostage affair. Anyway, as ya'll are so fond of saying, "rules are rules" and taking your fight to the convention is not against the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #82
95. No, but we are now in teh realm of negative returns
Edited on Wed May-07-08 10:04 AM by IWantAnyDem
Every day Hillary Clinton remains in the race erases political capital.

If she is still around June 3, she will become the party pariah.

Her endorsers are now jumping ship.

If she keeps it up, her pledged delegates will jump ship.

she stands nothing to gain and everything to lose by staying in past May 20.

tehre is no longer any path whatsoever to the nomination for her. It's over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #82
138. Exactly. Speaking of Humphrey, I was in a fog when I voted for
Nixon vs. Humphrey way back when. We were all sick of the viet war. I was disillusioned with Humphrey because of what I thought his hawkish stance, so I wasn't going to cast a vote all all. I listened to what I thought was great speech from Nixon rather reassuring us that he would get us the hell out of Vietnam; so He got my vote. I had been kicking my ass ever since by letting my Democratic party down during that election. I will vote for Obama if he gets the nomination, although I don't like the idea because Obama will have a worse time than Clinton winning the general election. I believe that is why Clinton is holding on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Counsel Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #44
74. Her Being A Woman Has Jack Shit To Do With Anything...
...and you know it.

Yes, Hillary has 1600+ delegates. Yes, she has every right to carry them into the convention, just as John Edwards has every right to carry his 25 or so into the convention.

The problem is this: there is NO REALISTIC SCENARIO in which she wins the nomination. None. The lady is dragging this thing on WAY too long. She needs to suspend her campaign PDQ. At least then she wouldn't have to release her all-important delegates.

Hillary and Barack are "practically tied?"

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #74
100. Yes, practically tied
I mean, what's a hundred or so delegates between friends? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Counsel Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #100
103. Sorry ... Lost My Head. ;-)
Edited on Wed May-07-08 10:14 AM by The_Counsel
That's like saying the Colorado Rockies should at least share the World Series championship with the Boston Red Sox 'cause they only lost the series by four games. I mean, come on! They were "practically tied!"

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #103
107. It's like youth sports
Everybody is a winner! Yeah! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nels25 Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #44
76. I shudder to point out that in the cases you cited
we as a party did not come out of it so well.

Can you say the words President Reagan twice (due in part to Kennedy v Carter, Hart V Mondale)

Jerry Brown was considered nothing more than a minor nuisance, never a factor, bad example.

Take it to the convention if you wish, but prepared for the consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #44
89. Hmm... Jerry Brown, Ted Kennedy, and Gary Heart.
Edited on Wed May-07-08 10:03 AM by yibbehobba
What do these three individuals' presidential aspirations have in common?

Oh, that's right:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #44
111. Point well taken, juajen. I will vote Dem if Obama gets nom,
even tho' I don't think he can handle the job as well as Clinton with her connections and experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #44
114. It is not because she is a woman
It is, ironically because she is running closer than in most other cases. No one cared about Dennis Kuchinich in 2004 or even Jerry Brown in 1992 because the nominee was 100% certain seen to be Kerry and Clinton respectively. Kerry had actually clinched the nomination after SuperTuesday with his wins in NY, CA and MA and other states. By late spring, Clinton had a hard time getting the final delegates - but Brown was nowhere near getting them - he simply was keeping Clinton from getting the needed pledged count.

You are wrong though in saying that Ted Kennedy didn't get calls to withdraw - he did and he got a huge amount of criticism. He said he stayed in because of issues - which Clinton can't really claim - though many did not buy that argument. In fact, the Kennedy analogy may be the most relevant - which is ironic. He did have (and has) a block of supporters who were a key part of the Democratic base. Other things are different - Carter did not have the enthusiasm behind him that Obama did and there is no mainstream alternative liberal, like John Anderson. The similarity - at this stage - was that the continued campaign could hurt the nominee.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sentelle Donating Member (659 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #44
148. what does gender have to do with anything?
Yes, it is statistically *almost* impossible for her to win. Most objective talking heads have now called Obama the nominee.

If I were running Obama's campaign, I'd take that concall to the superdelegates and ask them if they want to go on record supporting this. And running as if the convention has already happened. No more debates with her, no more mention of her in speeches. You know, act presidential, and contrast to McCain. At a certain point the media will ignore her as they ignored jerry brown.

Is that sexist? Only if the media ignoring a spoiler is considered gender specific.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
63. I've asked this question before about why Hill should shut it down
when previous candidates have taken it all the way, without nearly her support or delegates, and, somehow, I never get an answer. Anybody want to explain why she should quit when previous candidates have not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #63
68. EVERY TIME IT HAS HAPPENED IN RECENT HISTORY
THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE LOSES THE GENERAL ELECTION!!!

In 1968, the brokered convention lead to a loss by Humphrey to Nixon.

In 1972, the brokered convention lead to a loss by Mcgovern to Nixon.

Even the Republicans experieneced it when Reagan took the 1976 Republican nomination to the convention and Ford lost to Carter.

In 1980, Kennedy took it to the convention and Carter lost to Reagan.

In 1984, the long primary challenge by Gary Hart ended up with the devestating laoss of Walter Mondale to Ronald Reagan.

Take ti to the convetion and JOHN MCCAIN IS PRESIDENT.

There is no way around that fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #68
109. let's look at another history of failures
...just to illustrate how stupid your "always lost the election before" theme is:

Jesse Jackson got 9,000,000 votes for president. He lost.

Al Sharpton ran for president. He never made it out of the primaries.

Alan Keyes, same.

So, to parrot your kind of logic about history predicting success, an AA man can't win.


I don't believe that. Nor do I believe that we can't win from convention on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #109
135. Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #63
75. Do you want to beat McCain or not?
Democrat first or Hill supporter first? Which is it?

She will not win the nomination, that much is clear.

Unite or die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #63
80. you wont acknowledge it doesnt work. why do you keep asking? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #80
141. Because some have HOPE ?
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #63
86. She should shut it down because it damages our nominee, Barack Obama
McCain is getting away with murder while we talk about flag pins and sniper fire. This isn't good for the party or our nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #86
90. When was Aslan Obama crowned?
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #90
94. she CAN NOT win. those are four very simple words. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #94
144. Why ?
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shellgame26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #90
124. You are making yourself so obvious
The die-hard Hillary supporters on here have such a virulent and irrational hatred toward Obama, then accuse everyone who doesn't support Hillary as being misogynists. Sounds like you have a little racist chip on your shoulder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #124
147. And you are such a sweety using the race card !
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shellgame26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #147
160. I'm telling it like it is sweetie
The term "using the race card" was invented during the 90s as a way to muzzle anyone who spoke out against racism. Sorry, but I'll continue to speak my mind. Hillary Clinton clearly HATES Barack Obama. And it clear most of her supporters feel this way too. This is patently obvious now. I'm sure if he was a white candidate instead of an uppity black boy she would've conceded long ago. The sting of who is beating her is too overwhelming. Go ahead. Accuse me of 'using the race card again'. I WILL NOT BE CENSORED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #90
125. Last night
Unless your avatar can pull out 70% margin wins in the remaining races, he has won the pledged delegate count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #86
91. The DNC should shut it down for the good of the party
YES

THEY

CAN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #86
143. Don't you have confidence in your candidate
or the Democratic party? Most of your compatriots think Obama is a shoe-in in the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #143
153. I have plenty of confidence in the candidate
The media and voters, not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #63
101. Nobody likes to talk to a brick wall
You've already proven yourself to lack listening skills. That's why most people are ignoring you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #63
104. I'll answer your question if you answer mine
"How many of those nominations that went all the way to the Convention, resulted in anything other than an "EFFING" LANDSLIDE VICTORY FOR THE REPUKES?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #63
129. John McCain n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
72. It's now time for the super delegates to lead her out to pasture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
87. The Clintons - STILL race-baiting eh?
"BUT HE'S BLACK! He's not like US!'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #87
98. how to lower my opinion of hillary?
its bottomed out already
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
105. That's okay, all she is doing is ensuring that she will have lost a ton of her own money
Edited on Wed May-07-08 10:15 AM by MessiahRp
I hope the Obama campaign refuses to pay off her campaign debts and lets her hang herself with her stubborn ignorance of the facts. She can continue on, Obama will clinch the Pledged Delegate win soon enough and Super Delegates will bolt to his side.

Then he doesn't owe her nothing. Not a VP nod, not campaign debt relief, not even a nod to someone she would prefer to be in that VP slot. Nada.

And her political career will be over.

In every instance of going to the convention to fight over the nomination in Democratic history, the candidate that did so never had a viable Presidential candidacy ever again. Hopefully this will end it for the Clintons once and for all.

Then what a happy day next January will be. We'll have both President Obama and the end of the Bush and Clinton dynasties all at once!

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
119. I'd sure like to know where most of you Obama supporters
were the last crucial general election in 2004. You certainly weren't giving 'your all' on this forum for the Democratic candidate in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #119
121. I was on the Kerry site. You got a problem with that? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #121
126. Didn't you notice I said MOST Obama supporters were not
around? No need to get your nose outta' joint. If you recall we didn't have this much action on DU last GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #126
131. I was here and for Kerry not here much now
because too much fighting....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #121
132. Me too!
I was a lurker here, and joined around the time of the election, but spend most of my on-line time at the Kerry site. It's amazing how many Democrats here really dislike Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #119
130. I was n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #119
136. Maybe some of them were too busy, volunteering,in person
and if that's the case hopefully it'll pick up to an even greater amount as G.E. rolls around THIS time. Others perhaps weren't even old enough to vote at that time, and having the power to do so now, can stimulate interest for some. Just a few possiblities
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #119
142. I was busy wishing I was born eight months earlier
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #119
157. You have your head up your ass.
In 2004, I was in Kerry headquarters phone banking my ass off and I drove from DC to Ohio to help put up signs in the "end game".

And yeah, I was on DU then too, but had a different screen name. In fact, I've been on DU since GWB's inauguration in 2000.


Sore loser. Shove off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #119
161. Obama expanded the electorate and brought in millions of new voices
Haven't you been following the news?

Or did you think they made that up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
152. Well my motto is: there can be good in almost anything,
even if it brings out the worst in people. I'm glad there are more people taking an interest in politics, a very important component that affects our very lives. This is something I have been hoping for all of my life. Maybe it has taken a strong black man and a strong woman to bring people to the political table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvme Donating Member (486 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
156. As far as Kerry
Edited on Wed May-07-08 12:24 PM by nvme
I was a Dean lover. I admired his grassroots appeal he was a prelude to Obama. When Kerry got the nomination i know it was a foregone conclusion we would lose in november. His gaffe with hunting his drunken lookin heiress wife all but assured our inevitable loss.
If Clinton manages to secure the nomination it will be through underhanded tactic that we have seen thus far. Her campaign is fatally wounded and poorly run. The example of changin campaign managers and pollsters proves that the direction was wrong. "kitchen sink"strategy only serves to divide and conquer at a time where Unity is needed.

Yes Obama has been weakened somewhat in this process, but this is not fatal. May to November is a very long time given the current political climate. The winds will change. America hungers for the hope that Obama stumps for. 8 years have been a painful lesson for this great nation. One fact clearly overlooked with in all this back and forth. Obama during his time at Chicago U was a professor of constitutional law. His understanding and teaching of constitutional law will be beneficial toward unravelling the gordian knot Bush has left for us. Perhaps a return of civil rights might be in order.

The race baiting is veiled. Ever since civil rights movement the racist elements of our society have had to adapt to new realities. It is unfashionable to say the" N "word. You can't say,"because he's black". New phrases like, "rural voter or does not attract white voters" will replace it. Since when has attracting 90% black voters been a bad thing?
Obama never ran on a " Black Platform", from what i recall he was running a Unity message. He avoid many Afro-centric events. He was criticized by many in the black community for not being black enough. Ironic.
When Bill Clinton attempted to minimize Obama's SC victory, that is when the racial issue entered the frey. Obama's camp pointing out this fact also played into the hotbutton of race. The problem is when blacks saw that Obama was infact a viable candidate that is when they rallied. As has been demonstrated in primary after primary Black's are the most loyal constituents in the democratic party.

Blacks have longed for participation in this process. They have fought, sweat, been beaten and died for the opportunity to be truly American. Through out our history this particular group has been on the receiving end of some of the greatest atrocities that can only be comprehended by one other group, the Jews.

So to say that Obama will not be able to attract the votes is misleading. Obama can and will recieve the traditional democratic voters. He will win in the big states. His message of Unity Hope and Change echo through out the country. the Traditional states will vote for benefit of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
164. does anyone have audio or video??? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC