Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Clintons and the 'War on Obama'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
peoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:18 PM
Original message
The Clintons and the 'War on Obama'
By Robert Parry
May 4, 2008

"Last December, when I first learned via Clinton insiders that their “oppo” package would include Barack Obama’s associations with fiery black preacher Jeremiah Wright and Vietnam War-era radical William Ayers, I shrugged at what sounded to me like sub-standard fare from the dark side of American politics.

So what if someone’s minister said some stupid things or that an aging one-time student radical had lent some support to a politician’s campaign, I thought.

Besides those two themes, Clinton insiders were plotting how to exploit Obama’s past political ties to indicted real-estate developer Tony Rezko, and they even were hashing over how they might slip in suggestions that Obama’s dead mother had been a leftist. (When I heard the “oppo” about the dead mother, I really couldn’t believe my ears.)

Even then – in December before the first votes had been cast – the Clintons were so caught up in their ambition to return to the White House that they were veering toward the worst aspects of politics, what is generally associated with the American Right and the most ruthless Republican operatives – guilt-by-association, red-baiting, McCarthyism and racial messaging.

The rationale that I heard from the Clinton operatives was that these Obama vulnerabilities would be exploited by the Republicans in the general election, so it was necessary to destroy Obama when there was still time for another Democrat (i.e. Hillary Clinton) to be nominated."

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2008/050308.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. dude!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. This highlights one of my biggest gripes with our media
This guy heard 2 months ahead of time how sleazy the Clinton campaign was going to become, but he said nothing about it ahead of time when doing so might have so turned off the mainstream Democrats that it could have prevented them from using those tactics.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wonder if they dug up anything on Edwards ...
Back in December, he was supposed to be her primary opposition ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaptBunnyPants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They were going to make him a gay elitist.
Hair cuts, breck girl, mansions, etc... They seem to do whatever the Republican playbook calls for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Wow -- they got the "mainstream media" to do that dirty work for them
Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
parasim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. "I shrugged" Why the hell didn't you say something then, idiot?
Edited on Mon May-05-08 07:39 PM by parasim
nt


on edit: i wasn't referring you, horseface. (Although, even that sounds like an insult.) : ) Just wanted to make that clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I didnt read it that way anyway. thanks :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Her 'War on Obama'? Do you play sports? !f you don't want to compete, don't play!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Interesting. The Wright story "broke" AFTER the TX and OH must win for Clinton primaries.
Had Obama beaten Clinton in Ohio, or gotten more popular votes than she in Texas, the campaign effectively would have been over for Hillary Clinton, but she never brought Rev. Wright up, who obviously in hindsight is the most controversial association that Obama had,. She fought for and won the popular vote in OH and TX, risking everything, without using that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC