Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hill is Gollum

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Dbdmjs1022 Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:29 PM
Original message
Hill is Gollum
If we're making Lord of the Rings parallels, I'm sorry but the only character Hillary fits is Gollum. She had the taste of power once and it corrupted her. Now she's lost it and will go to any lengths to regain it, even as it eats away at her and turns her into a despicable, wretched creature. Obama, on the other hand, is Frodo. He's fighting to destroy the Ring (current politics), something that Hillary can't live without. So she'll pander to him while at the same time plotting his destruction. But, like in the book, Hillary's thirst for power will destroy her and "politics as-usual" in one fell swoop.

/Just got out of my final exam in my "Tolkien" English lit course
//Was disgusted by the comparison of Hill to Gandalf


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought that was Carville?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Put me down in the Carville camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I thought it was this one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. I thought Carville was Wormtongue...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've been saying that for two months.
Smeagol has been dead a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisa58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. good one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisa58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. that's how I see it too...
...and I agree that the comparison to Gandalf is disgusting.

Hillary = White Wizard? nah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sorry. Her ears are not big enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. This place is turning into Free Republic. {EOM}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Turning? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I'm convinced that many DU Hil-bashers are retread FR Hil-bashers.
They will travel many long miles, visit many websites, expend much time and money and wear many disguises for a chance to vomit vitriol at Hillary. Personally, I think they're demon-possessed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I thought that in 2004, and in 2006 as well.
The problem is that they were still there in 2003, 2005, and 2007 too. DU is largely a conglomeration of single issue assholes, retreads from FR, and a small minority of actual progressives that have an intact central nervous system. Thus it has always been, and so it shall always be, sadly. I think that's the fate of all internet forums, frankly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
styersc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. We should all thank Gollum for leading the heroic hobbits
out of the wilderness in an attempt to destroy the evil ring.

Although I'm no surrogate, on Hill's behalf, I say "You're welcome".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dbdmjs1022 Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yep, he lead them alright. Right into Shelob's lair because he couldn't do his dirty work himself.
Gollum's a coward. And so is Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think she's more like Saruman. Or maybe Wormtongue.
Certainly nothing like Gollum, except perhaps in the singlemindedness of obsessive pursuit for that which will forever be out of her reach, but calls to her like... well, like the One Ring calls after Gollum, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. You don't seem to understand the characters at all then


Obama is certainly not Frodo, and if he is --then we have grave problems because ultimately Frodo could not withstand his lust for the power of the ring (politics as usual)

By your own analysis then --if Hillary was Gollum --then it will be her pursuit of the Presidency that prevents Obama (Frodo) from keeping the ring and becoming a twisted wraith himself. Essentially saving Obama from "politics as usual" as opposed to Obama, himself being able to throw off it's yoke.

In fact, given the duel nature of Smeagol-Gollum, it's arguable that it was Smeagol (not Gollum) that decided to save Frodo from the ring in an act of self- sacrifice. (Likely given Tolkien's Christian background)

Will Hillary save the naive young Obama's soul from 'politics as usual' by taking the nomination from him? That's where your analogy would lead.

At any rate --I see Obama and Hillary more as Faramir, the well spoken and gentle Prince -- and Eowyn, the woman-warrior that fought battles both internal and external.

I tend to save the evil roles in LoTR for the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dbdmjs1022 Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. I respectfully disagree
It's apparent by the time we reach Mount Doom that Smeagol is gone permanently. To see this as a Christian allegory would be a mistake, as Tolkien himself wrote many times that he despised allegory and never used it in his writing. The scene at the Crack of Doom does show Frodo falter, and the fact that we've seen Obama get his hands dirty recently (I wont deny it) shows how tempting the power of politics-as-usual really is. But the scene at the end is not a redemption of Gollum, rather, it is the fulfillment of a theme shown time and again throughout Tolkien's legendarium that evil will always undo itself with evil. In this case Gollum, at his most evil, undoes the even more powerful evil of the Ring. Just as Hillary, who is getting more and more desperate and corrupt before our eyes, will eventually fail, and take the evil nature of Washington politics with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. You prove my point for me
Edited on Mon May-05-08 03:23 PM by maddiejoan
Tolkien despised allegory and he would have similarly disagreed with your own analogy to the political race, which you seem to think is the only worthy interpretation.

People see what is in their hearts (this is true of any work of art) I'm sure Tolkien would have told you that once Middle-Earth left his pen -- it was open to all manner of interpretation and not all of it would have been either his intent --or necessarily wrong for that fact.

Tolkien also would have told you that there was no way to know what was in Gollum/Smeagol's mind at that exact moment --whether consious or not. Smeagol was a hobbit when all is said and done -- and they were made of sterner stuff. In any event it is not 'apparent' that Smeagol was gone permanently.

The phrase "oft evil will shall evil mar" does not describe all the forces in Middle-Earth either --unless it's your contention that Tolkien was saying that Good survives --only because evil is a screw up. Sorry --though it is indeed a prevalent theme in Tolkien's work --it is not the only theme. What chance brought the ring to Gollum? Was it evil's design --or was it good's?

I find your comparison of Hillary Clinton to Gollum to be a vile repugnant piece of slime, and it says far more about you then it does about Smeagol, Tolkien or even Hillary Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hillum??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. I like the parallel. I wrote a piece comparing her to the dark lord but i definitely like your take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. Wow, you're so brilliant, you figured out how to surf at Freerepublic
Where they've had visuals of Hillary as Gollum for years, now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC