Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary is more dangerous than Bush because people think she's smart

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
nuncvendetta Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:12 PM
Original message
Hillary is more dangerous than Bush because people think she's smart
Edited on Wed Apr-30-08 12:15 PM by nuncvendetta
I just have to vent a bit. This gas tax proposal of Hillary's offends my sense of purpose more than anything else could because it flies in the face of undisputed economic reality. Only a brain-dead lunatic would think that lowering taxes on a good that is refined by oligopolistic producers, the raw materials from which are garnered from a CARTEL, would actually save consumers money. Has she ever seen a supply and demand curve before? Oil companies do not exist at a competitive equilibrium, so their profit-maximization response would be a distributional transfer of burden from producer to consumer. The actuarial realization of the tax would not be passed along as savings. Further, any reduction in price at a pump would be met by increased demand, eating up any savings. Further, you have a cartel at the top that has the complete ability to price-regulate the raw material in response.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080430/pl_nm/usa_politics_gastax_economists_dc

I'd like to give Hillary the benefit of the doubt on this one, but there are only two possibilities: 1) that she knows it's a stupid proposal but is using it as a political ploy to trick people into voting for her, which is conniving and intellectually dishonest, especially considering that people look up to her as a policy wonk; or 2) she doesn't understand basic economics and is so arrogant that she's attacking someone (Obama) with sound economic judgment as to the inefficacy of this plan, which is dangerous considering the economic trouble our country is currently in.

Here's why Hillary therefore worries me more than Bush: At least with Bush, his influence on shaping the polity over the long term was self-limited by people thinking that he's stupid, so they tend to discount his analytical frame of reference. Hillary, on the other hand, is the intellectual "wolf in sheep's clothing." She's more dangerous in galvanizing a bunk interpretation of things because it's like having a professor who teaches you all the wrong things. We as a society would become even more blind.

Even if Hillary ends up implementing good policies once president (if my #1 explanation is what's going on here), then she leaves all of her policies open to being reversed after she leaves office, because we as a society will not have grown in our understanding of things for the sake of her obfuscations. This is the key difference between opportunism and leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. The word:conniving (key root of the word - CON) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Too bad Bush isn't running so you could vote for him..........
since he doesn't worry you as much as a Dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuncvendetta Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I'd honestly buy a one-way ticket to New Zealand over voting for that monkey
Edited on Wed Apr-30-08 12:20 PM by nuncvendetta
But nice way to try to label me as a Bush-lover to avoid the hard issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. ummm... she is a brilliant person actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's right - And the Lion of Tuzla's HONEST, too!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. duplicate post
Edited on Wed Apr-30-08 12:17 PM by cliffordu
Tuzla
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. If so, then she is the worst sort of candidate: one who puts personal ambition over the greater good
The nation is in record debt and our infrastructure is crumbling to the point that people are DYING for want of bridge repair. One does not cut taxes for roads under those condition unless one is:
A) a fucking idiot
B) a fucking egomaniac who puts self above all else and doesn't consider PEOPLE ARE DYING from bad choices politicians make.

If she is brilliant, she should think up a way to sell the American people on the idea of rebuilding the nation, not further eroding it for the short term and her own immediate future.

If being a wind sock is all she's got, she ain't that brilliant. Blinding ambition is not the same as intelligence and it is no substitute for moral fiber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. she has fought for the greater good for 35 years... dont ignore her record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Yes, her record; Board of WalMart comes to mind as an illustration
Vote to let bush do what ever he wanted with the US military instead of preserving Congressional oversight through the Constitutional authority to go to war...

Sorry, not buying that she gives a tinker's dame for people who aren't rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. I don't believe that.
I don't think she'd have blown such a massive lead with so much stupid shit if she were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napoleon_in_rags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah! Elect Bush 2008! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. I will trust the economic disaster we're in to Hillary....
she is brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuncvendetta Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Can anyone who claims that she's briliant actually give some proof for once?
Edited on Wed Apr-30-08 12:27 PM by nuncvendetta
Because she sounds smart? Because she sounds like she knows what she's talking about? Let's have some substance here. If you're going to entrust our economic disaster to her, I'd like to hear from you what your personal analysis was, step by step, in figuring out that Hillary has sound economic judgment. Please cite treatises and policy papers. Both empirical and theoretical models are acceptable.

and yes, I did that due diligence on Obama. Because if you're just basing it on a "gut feeling" without any intellectual analysis on your part, it's no better than Bush choosing Harriet Myers because "she has a good heart" or thinking Putin is a good man because Bush could "see into his soul."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Here is the "substance" for you about Hillary
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_Clinton_awards_and_honors Hillary Clinton's awards.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_Clinton Hillary education. She's a lawyer and passed the bar.

You want treaties and policy papers? Who does that when running for public office. Not even Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuncvendetta Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'm sorry but that doesn't cut it
because there are many people out there who graduated from a good law school, passed the bar to become an attorney, and has received awards and distinctions who shouldn't be allowed to run the country. Mitt Romney, for example. Awards, distinctions, and resumes merely serve as imperfect proxies for intelligence, and they unfortunately can be both under- and over-inclusive.

The only way to hit at the issue directly is to analyze someone's policy positions, position by position, to see whether they make sense. To figure out whether they make sense, especially in an area not of one's expertise, look to scholarly articles perhaps not directly analyzing a particular policy position, but giving a framework of reference into which one can judge a position's efficacy.

So no, I don't mean for the candidates to write treatises and policy papers. But treatises and policy papers have been written about the mechanics behind how things work (e.g. taxation in oligopolistic market structures) that provide a jumping-off point with which a particular candidate's position can be scrutinized. I think short of doing this, one is relying too heavily on proxies and is setting one's self up to be burned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Many men don't have as impressive a resume.
I don't care if you don't like her. Her resume is impressive. Her politics you have a right to disagree with certainly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Especially working for Gerald Ford and the congressional RNC.
Impressive lady.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. She flunked the DC bar exam.
She eventually passed it in Arkansas. Yeah, bril.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. How many years out of university?
I doubt I could pass my college exams, etc. today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. She initially FAILED her bar exam.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. So did a lot of people including John Kennedy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. John Jr.
And you are a disgusting creep for speaking ill of the dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Yes....Jr.
It's a fact not an insult. It was well known.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guyanakoolaid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. All tax breaks and other handouts to the oil companies needs to end now
The Democrats all need to make a concerted, unified effort. We saw the oil execs get "dressed down" in front of Congress, and now the American people are still wondering what the hell more you're going to do about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hillary is smart and can speak a whole sentence.
Edited on Wed Apr-30-08 12:27 PM by mac2
She like Bush is a graduate of Yale. Yale is a globalist institution today. It used to be a Protestant divinity school. Their endowments are huge. What would they say if they knew their university had become a Fascist teaching one?

Tony Blair is to teach religion, trade, and government. What! A man who committed genocide along with Bush with their Shock & Awe to get one man teach young students at Yale (one of our Ivy League universities who educate/graduate future leaders)?

The Congress, the wealthy, and many government leaders (in and out of office) belong to those secret illegal organizations who decide our fate in secret and behind closed doors with other world elite leaders (mostly European royals). It violates the Logan Act.

Most of the group from Chicago area are Leo Strauss believers. The elite rule...even though they themselves prospered under our democratic contract.

They have taken an American University and wealth/power and used it for themselves and the future loss of our nationhood,freedoms, and democracy.

Who do I vote for when it is a lose, lose situation for our future?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. And Obama is safer because....
people think he isn't smart?????? :shrug: Ummmmm!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. The media and books, magazines , posters all over said so.
They spent a lot of money to prove he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. LOL! I have the same problem with Bush that I have with Obama. It's not how dumb he is.
It's how dumb he thinks "I" am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. funny, hillypoo does that for me. and this bullshit gas tax holiday
is evidence of her treating the voters as stupid. screw her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
futureliveshere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
18. She is smart which is why she knows that if you control the media.. you can say anything..
..and get away with it. There is no way this tsx will help anyone but the oil cos, and I am 100% sure she know that. But hey, "say whatever you want" politics works in America. Go ask the good people of PA and OH if you don't believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
20. McCain is the only one more dangerous than Bush
Edited on Wed Apr-30-08 02:51 PM by KingFlorez
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Cheney?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. Yep, Hillary is fooling people the same way but using more sophisticated manipulation.
Edited on Wed Apr-30-08 02:56 PM by barack the house
If we don't focus we are in for trouble, if Hillary did this to Obama she has worse in store for the rest of us. His plan is wiser tax cuts for middle class and working folk to have more in pocket all year round to afford the gas. She has no qualms of selling folks out for the big bucks all it does is give oil cops more profits as they raise the price due to demand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
29. Remember -- in 2000, people thought George W was smart.
People thought he'd be the CEO President, and touted his MBA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. No the RWers thought he was smart because he went to Yale.
He had an MBA. Media hype.

Someone must have taken his tests since he was learning challenged. Barbara admitted it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eutanasio Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
35. Clinton support universal health care, embryonic stem cell research
Is pro-choice, etc. etc. How can a person who has better view of the world than Bush be more dangerous than him? Your analysis is kooky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC