Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My concerns of Obama as a Obama supporter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BigD_95 Donating Member (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 09:57 AM
Original message
My concerns of Obama as a Obama supporter

I understand he wants to change the way politics is played and wants to stay above the fray and I respect that...

But the truth is that negative AD's and attacks work. Thats why Politicians use them. There is no doubt that if he attacked her the last week in Texas he wins easy. Or if he attacked her in PA he cuts that win to a 5pt or less instead of a 10pt win.

Ever since Hillary used the "kitchen sink" strategy it has worked for her because it lowered him. It created doubt in him as a person and one of the reason late deciding voters always go to her because people vote safe.

Im a little scared because after he gets the nomination, the Republicans will come at him full force with negative attacks like he never seen. Which puts him on the defense. He needs to attack and put McCain on the defense. And yes he needs to negative attack him in order to win. McCain has a standing as some kind of war hero and maverick. He needs to bring him down.


I would like to see Obama go after Hillary hardcore in Indiana and put a end to this process. I want to see Sniper fire AD's & NAFTA Ad's showing how she supported it & now is against it. AD's about all her lobbyist ties. I don't even care if he makes up some half truths in the process. She doesn't mind doing this crap.

Obama needs to understand that negative AD's and attacks work. That is the one point Hillary is right on and in some ways would make her a better candidate because you know she will be relentless in attack McCain. Its also why Im so unhappy with her because she did it to another Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree somewhat
It's possible that a good chunk of the electorate want to see a WWE throwdown. I wish we had the luxury of saying we don't need those voters but we don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. I know what you mean.
I don't want him to go as far as she has. But I would like to see some of the ENDLESS
footage that exists of her touting NAFTA back in the 90's. Her lying about it has been really
disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. Although I understand your post, I personally hope that Barack stays above the fray....
He think his charisma comes from his being able to refrain from mud slinging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. the Truth is not mud slinging. NAFTA, Bosnia isn't "mud", it's unfavorable reality to Clinton
as are the Clinton pardons, some of which were to buy votes for Hillary with people she actually met in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. Obama understands the difference between attacking a fellow Democrat
with a scorched-earth policy, and doing the same to a Republican. The former hurts our party--he won't hesitate to brawl with McCain, however. The SD's know that. They know he's got it wrapped up, and that he doesn't want to trash Hillary--because he doesn't NEED to. The vitctories she's gotten since March are pyrrhic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigD_95 Donating Member (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. If he is
holding out because its another Dem thats ok...I guess.


But he needs to go after McCain hardcore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. That's why this practice round is so good for him. He's got more up his sleeve...
... to increase his lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gcomeau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. Obama understands perfectly well....
...that negative ads work. If all we wanted from our politicians was to do whatever got them a personal advantage in an election what we'd get would be... well... what we've been stuck with in Washington for many a decade.

The whole damn point of Obama is that he doesn't use "it works" as his guiding moral principle. Leave that to the Republicans and Clinton thank you very much, keep it the hell away from Obama. You can't keep complaining about the ethical bankruptcy of the government and then demanding that your guy play at the exact same level if it helps HIM win and expect anything to ever change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. he will use them against McCain.
he needs Hillary's supporters in the GE, so he won't go negative on her now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Not all "negative" ads are equal.
I doubt Obama will stoop to using the gutter tactics Hillary has been using against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madwivoter Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Exactly.
I think his campaign will go all out against McCain, he can't afford to go negative against Hillary because there's already such a rift, he will need everyone to be on board once this insane primary season is finally over with.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. Disagree. She went negative before PA and blew a 20 point lead. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. Why do people think that Obama doesn't understand politics? Confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
12. Bottom line - I'd rather lose with Obama then win with Hillary.
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 10:09 AM by bowens43
Voting for Obama is the right thing to do. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msmcghee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
13. You have it right.
People make purchase decisions because of emotion - not reason. Fear is a far more powerful emotion than love. Politicians who need to get people to "buy" them rather than the opposition need to plug into the strongest emotions available - especially when they have less to spend than their opponent. Every nickel has to be spent to get the greatest impact. That means tapping in to fear emotions - and that means negative ads that make people fear what would happen to them if their opponent wins the contest.

In a sense Obama's strategy is to use his greater resources to get less per dollar on his ads than Hillary by not going as negative as Hillary is being forced to do - and then attempting to compensate for that by highlighting that contrast to his advantage. Nothing wrong with that.

BTW - I prefer HRC but will support whoever wins the nom. I appreciate seeing an Obama supporter analyze things like you have. By that I mean you can step back and see what's happening on another level - while still keeping your emotional attachment to Obama. Keeping those separate in your mind is a wise thing to do. It's a very interesting contest if one rises above the partisan emotions and takes a wide-angle look at it. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
15. Did anyone hear Matthews talking about the SEIU ad that ran supporting Obama?
Has anyone seen it/ Matthews mentioned it at least twice, saying THAT was the type of ad Obama needed to run in PA. I was curious as to the content of the ad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigD_95 Donating Member (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. here it is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Thanks. I hadn't seen that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
16. He's already said he's not going to be anywhere near as nice to McCain.
They know all this. They're smart people. They just can't totally blam blam blowout on Hillary because they need her base. But sometimes I wish he would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graycem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
17. Of course they work..
That's why they were able to turn John Kerry, the real war hero, into a "pansy" up against the fake hero, George. I do agree with the idea that he's showing restraint towards Hillary so that he doesn't polarize the people voting for her, past the point of no return. I think it's a wise decision, because while negativity works in a general election, I don't believe that fellow democrats, or super delegates are particularly fond of it, no matter which side it comes from. That's why both of their negatives have been going up. So even if it "works" it's unneccesary in our primaries, and does more harm than good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
20. To me, the real challenge is to get white blue-collar voters
to understand that Obama will fight for them.

Obama appeals to the young and the well-educated because of his idealism.

The factory workers need to know that an idealistic person can fight for them just as hard as a practical person--and win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. I agree and he will show that when he is the nominee
He's already wrapped up the primary though. Why go negative against a fellow Dem? At least half of all Dems understand that to slime a fellow Dem is disgusting, immoral, and contradicts your supposed dedication to your policies. That's why we hate Clinton so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
21. He's in a lose-lose situation.
If he doesn't go after her, it looks as though she's setting the agenda despite the fact he's ahead in the delegate count and the popular vote.

If he does go after her, then it goes against his whole campaign. Also, if he beats up on her too much, it'll give some white women voters second thoughts about supporting him because he looks like a menacing black man (allegedly) mugging a white woman.

It's a real pickle for him. I hope he finds a way to get out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC