Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack did NOT out-spend Hillary in PA by 3-to-1... He out-RAISED her by 3-to-1

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:38 AM
Original message
Barack did NOT out-spend Hillary in PA by 3-to-1... He out-RAISED her by 3-to-1
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 12:41 AM by DeadElephant_ORG
Since when did a candidate's comparative inability to raise money become a mark of superior electability?

Obama's financial strength is a direct expression of the mass movement of small donors which he created out of NOTHING! In contrast, the bulk of Clinton's cash has come from a small number of super-rich party insiders. Her inside donors are so in the thrall of their own importance that they threatened in writing to bolt the Democratic Party if the Supers didn't meet their demands. Some "Democrats", eh?

It's laughable that Clinton supporters now wear their candidate's impoverishment as a badge of honor. If she was electable, she'd have money.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. exactly correct
Of course if Hillary had it she would not have spent it on principle lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sorry to have to ask but:
Links??? I would truly like to see your data, not because I doubt it but because it makes a great counter argument. btw, I got the first rec and by the time I finally post this your thread will likely be on greatest page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I've read various comparative estimates ranging from 2-and-half-to-1, to 4-to-1
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 01:09 AM by DeadElephant_ORG
Those are the relative amounts that the two campaigns spent in PA. I'm saying that Obama was able to spend more than Clinton because he had better financial resources, because he has broader support than Clinton. Obama is not some independently super-rich candidate funding his own campaign - a la Mitt Romney. Obama's money represents the huge mass of people with whom he has connected, and whom he has inspired. I don't know what portion of his campaign chest (which, by the way, is the largest in history) was donated by Pennsylvanians specifically.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Ok, got it.
big sigh, I was hoping for a nice link with charts and graphs and what-nots.

As to the campaign incomes, I agree with you, I have seen plenty of evidence that you are right. I have not seen what got spent though but I suspect that Senator Clinton spent everything she could in order to stay in the race. Someone should put it together with those bars and graphs and what-nots just to keep us anal-retentive types happy. (Likely find it over at Huffington Post tomorrow)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. sorry... I do bars and charts all day.... I just can't continue it at night. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. Her money came from drug and insurance companies and their lobbyists...
..she got MORE money from lobbyists (drug/insurance) than ANY other candidate who has run since this campaign began. And she's spent all of it and then some running as a Republican on the Dem ticket and trying to fool everyone about that. People aren't buying it. And they're NOT paying for it either. Only the corprats are - and their lobbyists, mostly.

Obama's money largely came from donations from people like you and me. WE outraised Hillary 3-to-1!

YES

WE

CAN ...

and

WE

DID! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. so why hasn't he nailed her as the corporate candidate?

She was on the board of Walmart, for God's sake!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. Obama's got all that money & still can't close the deal. That's what REALLY matters. nt
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 01:04 AM by TheGoldenRule
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. If he hasn't "closed the deal" then Hillary sure as HELL hasn't. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Hillary had a $100+ million warchest...
in 2007. She expected it to be completely FINISHED in her favor by Super Tuesday, February 5th. Why didn't she close the deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. "closed the deal" is a bullshit meme
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. He'll close the deal when he gets the most delegates.
And that will most assuredly happen. No one is denying it's been a close contest. But he will win in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. What really matters is that Hillary doesn't have enough supporters
or her supporters don't believe in her enough tofork over cold cash.

Take your pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. That's the worst thing about the spin...
they're trying to claim that somehow he had this money handed to him. He's no Mitt Romney, as you said. He is raising funds from average Americans just like Hillary is. He just has a hell of a lot more of them giving to his campaign. That shouldn't be used as a knock on him to try to belittle him. In fact, it's pretty damn stupid to try to belittle his donors. But I suppose she couldn't give a rat's ass since she would take the public funding ($85 million) and be pretty happy with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. exactly. unlike Romney, Obama's money tells us something important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbert Donating Member (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. Being out spent is a good thing, it's like a tornado, all spin and damage to immediate surroundings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TragedyandHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. Just starting to notice the Clinton illogic?
Did you know that maintaining a consistent second place position in this race somehow makes her the only candidate with a chance of winning in November?

Remember when she hinted at offering Obama the VP slot?

I could go on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. T H A N K Y O U for this moment of clarity! NT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
18. hilary doesn't have as much money
as Obama. So we should have a little pity party for hilary.

:nopity: :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Austinitis Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. It's not a badge of honor for Clinton: it's an embarasment for Obama
Seriously, Pennsylvania is like Obama's Vietnam. He sunk tons of time, money, and resources in and got nothing out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Nothing? He cut her lead by 16 in her HOME STATE, but that's nothing?
He forced her to spend money she doesn't even have... but that's nothing?

Oh, dear...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Austinitis Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Have you LOOKED at the polls?
Seriously. Try it for the first time.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/pa/pennsylvania_democratic_primary-240.html#polls

OBAMA DIDN'T MOVE AT ALL THE LAST TWO WEEKS GOING IN. Seriously. What was he doing with all that time and money there? Certainly he wasn't making progress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. That matters how? He cut her lead by 16 points in her home state.
The fact that her shit-flinging slowed him down didn't change the fact that she blew a 25+ point lead in her HOME STATE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Austinitis Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. It didn't "slow" - IT STOPPED.
He got NOTHING those last two weeks. All those millions and millions of dollars. All of the man hours from volunteers. All of the time he personally spent there. That whole two weeks, NOTHING.

That raises HUGE questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC