Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What a smear looks like backfiring: Hillary's "patronizing elitism"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 10:07 PM
Original message
What a smear looks like backfiring: Hillary's "patronizing elitism"

Clinton Portrays Herself as a Pro-Gun Churchgoer

By Julie Bosman
Hillary Rodham Clinton - The Caucus - Politics - New York Times Blog

VALPARAISO, Ind. - Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton managed to co-opt Mr. Obama’s message of hope and optimism, beginning a speech in Valparaiso, Ind., by talking about how positive and “fundamentally optimistic” Americans are.

“We don’t get bogged down and looking back – we’re always looking forward,” she said, as heavy applause nearly drowned out her words. “Whatever obstacle we see, we get over it. Whatever challenge we have, we meet it. We’re the problem-solvers, we’re the innovators, we’re the people who make the better future.”

For the third time since Mr. Obama’s remarks were made public Friday night, Mrs. Clinton criticized him at length, saying his comments seemed “kind of elitist and out of touch.”

“I disagree with Senator Obama’s assertion that people in our country cling to guns and have certain attitudes about immigration or trade simply out of frustration,” she said.

She described herself as a pro-gun churchgoer, recalling that her father taught her how to shoot a gun when she was a young girl and said that her faith “is the faith of my parents and my grandparents.”

more


Time to take a stand

<...>

Now, like some of you may have been, I was taken aback by the demeaning remarks Senator Obama made about people in small town America. Senator Obama's remarks are elitist and they are out of touch. They are not reflective of the values and beliefs of Americans. Certainly not the Americans that I know - not the Americans I grew up with, not the Americans I lived with in Arkansas or represent in New York. You know, Americans who believe in the Second Amendment believe it's a matter of Constitutional rights. Americans who believe in God believe it is a matter of personal faith. Americans who believe in protecting good American jobs believe it is a matter of the American Dream.

<...>

That Clinton statement represents a major moment in the 2008 presidential race. It's a moment that can't be undone and represents a significant Clinton commitment to a new line of attack and an emphasis on "American-ness" that hides the patronizing elitism that lies at the core of Clinton's DLC views.

In the name of "American-ness" and "bringing America together" Senator Clinton is maligning the leading Democratic presidential candidate using a Republican line of attack that makes him out to be elitist and, by implication, un-American...counter to all the available facts.

Clinton is, in the name of "unity", creating a contrast between what she clearly delineates as her "American" heritage and her belief in "the faith of our parents and grandparents" and Senator Barack Obama. The "American" angle is deliberate and obvious. There is not a sliver of daylight between Clinton's overuse of the quality "American" to contrast herself with Barack Obama and John McCain's first television ad: "The American President Americans have been waiting for."

While Clinton makes points about trade and immigration that sound within the Democratic frame, she is actually using a highly divisive line of attack against a fellow Democrat that takes his words and ideas in the worst light imaginable and amplifies her disagreement with Obama using Republican frames that have been used to destroy Democrats in previous elections. Further, she is doing this to explicitly hide her own pro-Nafta, pro-corporate, pro-DLC elitist views.

more



Stick Your Elitism Where the Sun Doesn't Shine

by wmtriallawyer
Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 08:38:26 AM PDT

Let me get this out of the way out front: by every measure, people are free to consider me part of the "elite." My wife and I make substantial income, live in a nice house, buying an even nicer one, drive nice cars, hold good jobs with pensions and health care paid for, are overeducated, hold positions of respect and power within our communities, etc., etc. Hell, we even live near Washington, D.C., home field for the elite.

But you damn sure better never call me an "elitist."

Elitism, as defined by the American Heritage Dictionary, is the following:

The belief that certain persons or members of certain classes or groups deserve favored treatment by virtue of their perceived superiority, as in intellect, social status, or financial resources.

That ain't me. And neither is it Barack Obama.

I don't have any perceived superiority. I don't believe in favored treatment just because of my status. I feel damn lucky to be where I am. I work hard, just like lots of Americans. But not nearly as hard as some. Not nearly as hard, for instance, as the South Asian guy who runs my local 7-11 where I pick up my morning coffee. He's there every stinkin' day, managing that place, early morning to late evening. I once saw him in the grocery store with his FIVE small boys. I've gained a ton of respect for that man.

And I'm sure if Barack Obama met him, he would have a ton of respect too. Because Obama worked with folks like him in his community organizing days, when he didn't have to. Because Obama was raised by a single mom, without any particular inherent advantage, and received top notch schooling to get ahead. Because Obama personifies the damn American dream...that given an equal shot, we all can get ahead.

And let's not kid ourselves. That's what the American Dream is. Not "work hard, and you'll get ahead." I know plenty of people that work their asses off -- friends of mine -- and they can't get ahead. No, the dream is to have an equal shot to get ahead, and you too can make it.

And that equal shot is not forthcoming. And damn right people are bitter about it.

You want elitism? Try being married to an heiress to a beer distribution fortune and being stuck in the most exclusive club on earth inside the beltway for the past twenty years. THAT'S elitism.

You want elitism? Try making $109 million over the past six years and running for President by virtue of the fact that your husband has already been President. THAT'S elitism.

You want elitism? Try being a pundit that been ensconsed inside the ultimate insider world of Washington politics, and then poo-pooing telling the truth about the mood in the countryside as being "condescending." THAT'S elitism.

I have a news flash for all these elites...

YOU ARE PROJECTING.

You are projecting the fact that you are elitist yourself, knowing full well YOU are the ones out of touch with America. I mean, do you seriously want us to believe that the American public isn't pissed and bitter with our government when the public approval of all of our branches of government is at all time lows? Do you really want us to believe that the "resilient" American public is walking around with smiles on their faces thinking "happy days are here again"?

<...>

Simply put, Obama's words were only condescending if you are an elitist.

To the rest of America, they are the TRUTH.

link


Imitating Republicans:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/2/23/14417/7638/731/434555">Hillary to Obama: 'Shame on you' (Video)

Hillary Clinton Joins In (Video)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Action: K & R.
Reason: Obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. K & R (nm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. She's gone from "Shame on YOU, Mom" to "Concern Troll"
Concern troll

A concern troll is a pseudonym created by a user whose point of view is opposed to the one that the user's sockpuppet claims to hold. The concern troll posts in web forums devoted to its declared point of view and attempts to sway the group's actions or opinions while claiming to share their goals, but with professed "concerns". The goal is to sow fear, uncertainty and doubt within the group.<11>

For example, in 2006 a top staffer for then-Congressman Charlie Bass (R-NH) was caught posing as a "concerned" supporter of Bass's opponent, Democrat, Paul Hodes on several liberal New Hampshire blogs, using the pseudonyms "IndieNH" or "IndyNH." "IndyNH" expressed concern that Democrats might just be wasting their time or money on Hodes, because Bass was unbeatable.<12> Bass lost the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Next thing we know, Hillary will say Obama "looks French". nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I wouldn't put it past her. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Great post. This expressed my furstration with Clinton's remarks and her attacks on Obama n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's gotten to the point where I yawn when Hillary mis-steps
because it always comes right back at her. Karma's a bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. this really pisses me off:
her faith “is the faith of my parents and my grandparents.”


So, bite it Hillary. Nice way to rephrase the muslim slur. Must be nice when your life and your attributes and your experiences and ideas represent "America" and Obama's by implication don't.

Take your religion and shove it. If you truly were a Christian, you wouldn't act like this. You wouldn't have voted for war and you would
have gone against Bush at every step no matter the cost because it would have been RIGHT. HOW MANY FUNERALS HAVE YOU GONE TO, HILLARY? How
about going and seeing the fruit of your labors?

You are beyond hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You make a good point, nowhere in Christianity do you get brownie points for your forefather's piety
You stand or fall on your own and if you were any kind of Christian, you would know that, Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Do you think Hillary even realizes she's totally full of shit anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. Did you ever hear back from rapid response on this, prosense? >>>
USAToday:

Michelle Obama's hospital: On senator's wish-list

By Mike Dorning | Washington Bureau
3:15 PM CDT, March 14, 2008

...

"Obama released on Thursday a list of all his requests for earmarked federal
spending in 2005 and 2006. He already had released a list of spending requests
made in 2007.

In among them was a request for $1 million in federal funding in 2006 for a new
pavilion at the University of Chicago Hospitals, where his wife, Michelle Obama,
was a vice president at the time."

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/obama/chi-earmarks-obama,1,7838316.story


USAToday:
Hospital officials say Obama's wife deserved big raise

Obama_iii Officials at the University of Chicago Hospitals say a promotion and large
pay increase given to Sen. Barack Obama's wife shortly after the Democrat was elected
to Congress were well-deserved boosts for an executive who is "worth her weight in gold."
The Chicago Tribune has the story.

"She's terrific," added Michael Riordan, who was president of the hospital in March 2005,
when Michelle Obama was promoted to vice president for external affairs and had her annual
salary increased from $121,910 to $316,962.

Hospitals spokesman John Easton told the Tribune that Michelle Obama's salary is in line
with those of the 16 other vice presidents at the not-for-profit medical center.

Riordan told the Tribune that the promotion and salary increase had nothing to do with
Obama's husband becoming a U.S. senator. "She was hired before Barack was Barack," Riordan said.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/obama/chi-earmarks-obama,1,7838316.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC