Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Casey: Clinton Arguments Against Obama Getting "Really Ridiculous"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 04:27 PM
Original message
Senator Casey: Clinton Arguments Against Obama Getting "Really Ridiculous"
Senator Casey: Clinton Arguments Against Obama Getting "Really Ridiculous"

April 10, 2008 4:46 PM

snip//

The mild-mannered Casey showed a little fire after I asked him about Rendell’s argument that Clinton had been thoroughly vetted and Obama has not –Rendell's calculation being that there’s only 10% unknown about Clinton and 50% unknown about Obama.

"I think the other side needs to start coming up with better arguments about how Obama can’t win," Casey said. " Some of these arguments are beginning to get really ridiculous because this should be a campaign about why their ideas are better."

Taking aim at Rendell’s "vetting" argument, Casey said "the idea that everybody in the country has everything they need to know about one candidate and 50% about Obama is a mystery, because to make that argument, and to get that argument past the hysterical laughter test is to assert that the national media has a conspiracy to keep Sen. Obama’s record under wraps until the Republicans get a hold of it and hit him over the head with it. It’s a ridiculous argument. Both of these candidates have been vetted for 18 months now, and they’ll be vetted even more. So I think whoever is nominated, they’re both going to be vetted."

Casey said he decided to publicly endorse in March after he decided whom he'll vote for in the state's April 22 primary.

"When a primary of this dimension is taking place in your state and you are a decided voter and you are an elected official who has run for state-wide office a number of times," Casey said, "I thought it was important to weigh in."

"I think he can best unite the country and the world," he said of Obama. "Both challenges are going to be before the next president."

more...

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/04/senator-casey-c.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think he's coming up on Hardball
Edited on Thu Apr-10-08 04:31 PM by FLDem5
interesting that Russert was on - perhaps because of the Matthews piece coming up on Sunday?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/13/magazine/13matthews-t.html?_r=2&ref=politics&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. he's on now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Edited on Thu Apr-10-08 04:30 PM by BumRushDaShow
Casey has been able to thus far campaign without getting rattled and he comes across as pretty secure, which give me some confidence. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. His temperment seems similar to Obama's, both in stark contrast
to the other two candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Her claim that they should only count votes while both in the Senate was particularly lame.
Edited on Thu Apr-10-08 04:39 PM by AtomicKitten
She is desperate to cover her IWR vote like kitty poo in a litter box, but her YES vote on the IWR stands in stark contrast to Obama's clear, out loud opposition to the war in 2002. Several TV talking head pundits hit on this particularly lame line of attack, as it should be. This kind of bullshit subterfuge is becoming exhausting. Maybe that's her strategy: To wear the electorate out like a 2-year-old running screaming around a restaurant. Oy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes, trying to move those goal posts whenever possible. It's amazing
to me that she doesn't think we'd notice. I think she should be embarrassed, but apparently that's not an emotion she has any problem with. Hell, remember the Clinton camp floating the electoral college totals? Oye!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Remember?
They're still doing it!

I saw somebody float that one just yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Absolutely laughable! Does that mean we can discount now 28 years of
her so-called "experience" since she's only been in the Senate for 7 years?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. I hope this race ends soon. Things are getting silly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. The very argument made by the Obama campaign
in this slanderous BO campaign memo which repeatedly smears Clinton as a liar:

FULLY VETTED?

Clinton Claims To Be Fully Vetted But Does Not Release Tax Returns And Cites Presidential Privilege On Information Related To Her White House Years, Drawing Criticism Even From Allies. Clinton’s “gates-drawn stance raised concerns that shadow her presidential bid today — that she reacts with a siege mentality under pressure, retreating behind a restrictive wall of presidential and attorney privilege. ‘There’s no question that her first instinct was to protect herself and the president,’ said former Clinton chief of staff Leon E. Panetta.” Roger Simon wrote,

http://thepage.time.com/obama-camp-memo-on-clinton-misleading-voters/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think it's proven that Hillary is indeed a liar.
Tuzla?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. It's a smear campaign tactic -- as low as they come
They used the exact same smear on Al Gore in 2000 -- it was a Dem that behind that it time too. It's character assassination.

http://ariannaonline.huffingtonpost.com/columns/column.php?id=228
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. so she did land during sniper fire
in Bosnia.

Good to know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Getting really ridiculous? They've been ridiculous for weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andrew99 Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. Casey did not support Clinton's candidacy in 1992
Just for the record. It shows how good of a Democrat he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. That was his dad, not him
His dad actually was a solid Democrat, who simply did not approve of Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. rezko rezko rezko rezko rezko rezko rezko
i`m running up the rezko spike on the internet...maybe it will make it to google first page!

by the way the rezko trial could be in trouble because the key witness was going through hundreds of thousand of dollars worth of drugs and gifts during the time he was wearing a wire...

we know everything there is to know about barack...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. Casey: let me suck up to "progressives" by shilling for O so they get off my case
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. Casey strikes me as not knowing what he's talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
21. Casey' s Arguments Against Clinton Getting "Really Ridiculous"
Really. He should zip it up already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
22. Casey: "(Obama) can best unite the country and the world."
I fully agree!

Two good things about Obama winning the nomination: No more Clintonian psychodrama on TV, and no more Ed Rendell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC