Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why would Obama pull out the Richardson endorsement so far away from any voting?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:21 PM
Original message
Why would Obama pull out the Richardson endorsement so far away from any voting?
Edited on Sun Mar-23-08 10:22 PM by Skip Intro

My guess is that the Wright thing, which will be back in the fall whether he's able to brush it aside now or not, was hurting him so badly he needed a distraction. I have my suspicions about passportgate as well.

But really, for what other reason would it make sense to pull that endorsement out now, when any effects on voting will be minimal, at best?

Doesn't make a lot of sense, otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ossman Donating Member (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Superdelagetes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
parasim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who says Obama "pulled out" the endorsement?
Does Richardson himself not have a say in the matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ossman Donating Member (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Didn't you hear? He's only good for Latino votes. Nothing else.
Edited on Sun Mar-23-08 10:24 PM by ossman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. So you think uninterrupted swiftboating was the better strategy?
Besides, Richardson said he decided to endorse right after the speech. So I don't think Obama was in control of the timing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. My guess is that's when Richardson decided. But go on with your partisan wank fest....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Except that the candidates are known for holding back these announcements
Edited on Sun Mar-23-08 10:27 PM by avrdream
until handy: examples are Kennedy before Massachusetts, Shriver before California, Napolitano before Arizona.

Maybe I am suspicious of the whole process but I, too, think he announced now in order to detract from the Wright (wrong) controversy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. It isn't an uncommon view, by any measure. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe Richardson himself got tired of Clinton BS,
and decided to make the announcement himself.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ethnic politics at its worst. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. Stupid question
you should be asking 'why would Richardson endorse now?' And I think the answer to that question is that he can do so whenever he wants; of course, the larger answer may be that many uncommitted Democratic Party leaders are coming to the conclusion that the continued primary fight, when the outcome is all but inevitable at this point, is onlyh damaging the party, and that support of the likely nominee is the wisest choice; Richardson's endorsement is possibly reflective of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. To hit Hillary.
She is in debt, and loses the endorsement of a close ally. It is a big hit to the perception game. And, it came on the heels of a failed smear by association attempt.

Obama is moving up in the polls, again. He's on top, again. And, a Clinton ally is on board.

Perfect timing. He has more to come before PA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. That's what I've been thinking...there will be even bigger names
coming forward before PA & NC. Of course, Bill Richardson is now dead to them as well. Bill's timing was brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. Obama "pulled out" the endorsement?
Was Richardson lying flat on his back, while Barack loomed over his prone body with a pair of pliers, extracting an endorsement against his will?

You might want to rethink this - because it doesn't, on its face, make any sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. ...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. You perhaps then have no exposure to common colloquialisms.
Which is a shame because that would indicate that maybe you lived under a rock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I think the poster is saying
it was Richardson's decision, not Obama's. Obama didn't choose the timing; Richardson did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. We have no way of knowing that.
The poster attempted to be sarcastic, I know, but it was based on nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Sheah, calling Nance out on language is a real smart move.
Roll another one, dude.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. I beg your pardon?
The phrase "pulled out" specifically implies that the endorsement, and the timing thereof, was up to Obama and not the endorser himself, Bill Richardson. I have the crazy feeling that Richardson had some say in the matter.

In addition, the fact that you have chosen to personally insult me, instead of offering a viable response to my remarks, can only lead an intelligent person to one conclusion: You have no viable argument or response; therefore, a personal attack was the only avenue open by which to offer comment - the last resort of the intellectually impaired.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. To Send Hillary The Message
It's over, time to bring the party together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Bingo!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
21. He Won Richardson Over With "The Speech" N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. he has more goodies in the Goody Bag to come
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mth44sc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
23. because he can... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC