DeadEyeDyck
(457 posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:20 PM
Original message |
| Al Gore still to be considered |
 |
Just heard on Hannity Radio (it is the only station I can get from my country office). He has John Zogby and Scott Rasmussen and are discussing what strategies it would take for the Dems to win the GE.
John Zogby says there is talk about handing the Presidential nomination to Al Gore, the VP to Obama Barack and offer Hillary Clinton the majority leadership.
The belief is that this would please more democrate voters then any other combination.
Both pollsters say that this is a serious discussion taking place in inner circles.
No links available.
|

As much as I love Gore, I don't see that happening at all. nt |
nonconformist |
Mar-20-08 04:21 PM |
#1 |
 
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-20-08 04:40 PM |
#39 |

Seriously? |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 05:46 PM |
#78 |

His source is Hannity |
proud2Blib |
Mar-20-08 06:15 PM |
#94 |

No, his source is Zogby, appearing on Hannity. n/t |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 06:17 PM |
#96 |

Yes, and I respect Mr. Zogby. It would be a winning ticket. |
Hieronymus |
Mar-20-08 06:43 PM |
#110 |

Aint gonna happen. Gore won't do it and it would be wrong to do it this way |
WillYourVoteBCounted |
Mar-21-08 04:10 AM |
#140 |

personally, I think Gore WOULD do it if he saw it as the only way to |
musicblind |
Mar-21-08 06:26 PM |
#148 |

I wouldn't mind a Gore/Obama ticket |
democrattotheend |
Mar-20-08 04:21 PM |
#2 |
 
Al Gore was the last fairly elected president, so I could go for that |
LSparkle |
Mar-20-08 04:23 PM |
#5 |
  
I will settle for VP Obama if it means President Gore. |
AX10 |
Mar-20-08 04:29 PM |
#19 |
  
I could, too. Man, would THAT be a dream ticket! |
calimary |
Mar-21-08 06:41 PM |
#152 |
 
I think that he is still pure is the ticket. |
DeadEyeDyck |
Mar-20-08 04:24 PM |
#10 |
  
LOOK at this! |
snappyturtle |
Mar-20-08 05:26 PM |
#74 |
   
Ahem. |
lildreamer316 |
Mar-20-08 05:53 PM |
#82 |
  
Yes, you do a great job |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 05:55 PM |
#84 |
  
Sorry....didn't know that...yes, I will drop in!! Thanks....look at it this |
snappyturtle |
Mar-20-08 06:09 PM |
#90 |
  
Right, and that's great! n/t |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 06:23 PM |
#98 |
  
OH don't apologize!! I just want to make sure you |
lildreamer316 |
Mar-20-08 06:57 PM |
#112 |
  
I think you are right. |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 05:49 PM |
#79 |
 
Actually, he already won the presidency. :) |
polichick |
Mar-20-08 04:25 PM |
#11 |

Yes, he won once and he can win again. |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 05:52 PM |
#81 |

If that is true then that means they are really displeased with Hillary |
oviedodem |
Mar-20-08 04:23 PM |
#3 |
 
I don't think so |
leftynyc |
Mar-20-08 04:24 PM |
#7 |

This primary has been playing out so ugly, I believe the party leaders have |
Window |
Mar-20-08 04:50 PM |
#49 |
 
I was under the impression that |
leftynyc |
Mar-20-08 04:52 PM |
#52 |

they are also elected officials generally and probably quaking in |
roguevalley |
Mar-20-08 05:17 PM |
#64 |

Not all SD's are party leaders. I'm thinking more of Pelosi, Reid, et al. |
Window |
Mar-20-08 05:51 PM |
#80 |

Makes sense to me n/t |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 05:54 PM |
#83 |

I can live with that |
leftynyc |
Mar-20-08 04:23 PM |
#4 |
 
Same here- I fear 2008 isn't the year for Obama and if he loses |
Alhena |
Mar-20-08 04:25 PM |
#12 |

Nah - tricky Dick came back |
leftynyc |
Mar-20-08 04:46 PM |
#45 |

This couldn't happen until the convention right |
gabeana |
Mar-20-08 04:24 PM |
#6 |
 
Yes- specifically the second vote at the convention. |
Alhena |
Mar-20-08 04:27 PM |
#14 |
 
Here is how it was explained... |
DeadEyeDyck |
Mar-20-08 04:31 PM |
#23 |

Hillary desperately wants to be POTUS. |
Window |
Mar-20-08 04:55 PM |
#54 |
 
Strictly speaking, she doesn't need to agree |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 06:06 PM |
#88 |

I agree. I've always said the SC would be perfect for her. |
Window |
Mar-20-08 06:09 PM |
#89 |

Right, that's one way it could happen. |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 06:03 PM |
#86 |

And I guess it begs the question; Why would we want to see an Al Gore as the nominee... |
LakeSamish706 |
Mar-20-08 04:24 PM |
#8 |
 
Gore is practically teflon at this point ... they could try to bloody him |
LSparkle |
Mar-20-08 04:28 PM |
#18 |

Yep, I edited my post (after some thought) and do agree with the logic. n/t |
LakeSamish706 |
Mar-20-08 04:29 PM |
#21 |

I mean, damn, the guy's got the Noble Peace Prize N/T |
DeadEyeDyck |
Mar-20-08 04:35 PM |
#29 |

That has to be a plus in world respect and diplomacy nt |
In_Transit |
Mar-20-08 04:38 PM |
#36 |

Yep, he would absolutely kick the crap out of McCain... (even with possible |
LakeSamish706 |
Mar-20-08 04:39 PM |
#37 |

So does Henry Kissinger |
proud2Blib |
Mar-20-08 04:43 PM |
#41 |

That would probably work against him among many American voters |
brentspeak |
Mar-20-08 05:22 PM |
#71 |

On Hannity? |
mmonk |
Mar-20-08 04:24 PM |
#9 |
 
I work in a metal building in an industrial park |
DeadEyeDyck |
Mar-20-08 04:26 PM |
#13 |

That's fine. I wasn't dissing you. |
mmonk |
Mar-20-08 04:27 PM |
#15 |

Wouldn't be thrilled to see Obama denied the nomination, but I could live w/ it (so long as he's VP) |
InAbLuEsTaTe |
Mar-20-08 04:27 PM |
#16 |
 
I, too, wouldn't be happy to see Obama denied but if this combo |
snappyturtle |
Mar-20-08 04:42 PM |
#40 |
 
If Obama has fallen so much that he couldn't be elected President |
brentspeak |
Mar-20-08 05:20 PM |
#70 |

If this is true |
knight_of_the_star |
Mar-20-08 04:28 PM |
#17 |
 
Exactly what I'm concerned about now. |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 06:10 PM |
#91 |

i would be friggin shocked if Gore even wanted the job tbh |
Texas Hill Country |
Mar-20-08 04:29 PM |
#20 |
 
I don't think he does want it, BUT |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 06:12 PM |
#92 |
 
I do not think that Al Gore wants the job, but think that he would take the job if it were the only |
musicblind |
Mar-21-08 06:36 PM |
#149 |

that's what I think |
Andrea |
Mar-22-08 12:09 AM |
#154 |

And if it does then it will be a good solution. |
musicblind |
Mar-22-08 06:13 AM |
#155 |

An apt metaphor |
Andrea |
Mar-22-08 12:23 PM |
#161 |

Um...... I would be behind that. |
Political Heretic |
Mar-20-08 04:30 PM |
#22 |

Well I heard on the all news CBS radio staion |
calico1 |
Mar-20-08 04:32 PM |
#24 |
 
Hmmmmmmmmm N/T |
DeadEyeDyck |
Mar-20-08 04:33 PM |
#27 |
 
These images are from five days ago...he does look great. |
Turn CO Blue |
Mar-20-08 08:08 PM |
#121 |

I'll believe it when I see it |
SharonRB |
Mar-20-08 04:32 PM |
#25 |
 
It was Hannity |
proud2Blib |
Mar-20-08 04:44 PM |
#43 |

No it wasn't |
musicblind |
Mar-21-08 06:38 PM |
#150 |

I could get behind that ticket |
NYCALIZ |
Mar-20-08 04:32 PM |
#26 |

Dont see it |
DJ13 |
Mar-20-08 04:33 PM |
#28 |
 
It wouldn't happen like that |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 06:16 PM |
#95 |
  
Consensus? |
MattBaggins |
Mar-20-08 07:46 PM |
#118 |
 
A consensus of those we voted for, including |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 09:12 PM |
#122 |
 
It wouldn't be like that. This wouldn't be Gore's ambitions |
musicblind |
Mar-21-08 06:40 PM |
#151 |

If the "inner circles" are going to nominate a candidate who did not run... |
VolcanoJen |
Mar-20-08 04:35 PM |
#30 |
 
Party unity, and actually *winning* the white house. |
joshcryer |
Mar-20-08 04:38 PM |
#34 |
  
Having the nominee "chosen" for me isn't going to make me feel very "unified" |
VolcanoJen |
Mar-20-08 04:52 PM |
#53 |
 
Well, if Michigan and Florida aren't going to count |
brentspeak |
Mar-20-08 05:14 PM |
#63 |

What on earth? |
Demobrat |
Mar-20-08 04:36 PM |
#31 |
 
It's within the rules of the convention |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 06:23 PM |
#97 |

sounds too far fetched to me.. |
IdClaire |
Mar-20-08 04:37 PM |
#32 |
 
Actually, I think they'd be more likely to endorse him than |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 06:26 PM |
#99 |

I would love that |
Mabus |
Mar-20-08 04:38 PM |
#33 |

Gore/Obama was my original dream ticket way back when |
Bullet1987 |
Mar-20-08 04:38 PM |
#35 |
 
I agree that the damage being done is so very damaging to the party. |
snappyturtle |
Mar-20-08 04:48 PM |
#46 |

Yep. It can most definitely happen. |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 06:29 PM |
#100 |

Hogwash |
Cali_Democrat |
Mar-20-08 04:39 PM |
#38 |

Not a chance. |
nsd |
Mar-20-08 04:43 PM |
#42 |

Wow! Awesome! |
RememberWellstone |
Mar-20-08 04:45 PM |
#44 |

Great plan |
The Traveler |
Mar-20-08 04:48 PM |
#47 |

Perhaps there would even be a deal to resign before the end of his first term. |
andym |
Mar-20-08 04:48 PM |
#48 |

I'd back this ticket - I've been thinking about Gore coming in |
RamboLiberal |
Mar-20-08 04:50 PM |
#50 |
 
I agree with you |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 06:34 PM |
#107 |

Fine with me- more then fine in fact but anything on Hannity Radio |
KaryninMiami |
Mar-20-08 04:52 PM |
#51 |
 
See snappyturtles post above for many links |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 06:32 PM |
#103 |

Unbelievable. After all of these primaries, do you think Dems would stand for this? |
CTyankee |
Mar-20-08 04:57 PM |
#55 |
 
Why would people not vote for Al Gore just because he's chosen at the convention? |
brentspeak |
Mar-20-08 05:18 PM |
#67 |

Well, I think that Dem voters would feel like their votes were whisked away |
CTyankee |
Mar-20-08 07:52 PM |
#119 |

Sure, it counts, to the extent that it's true, |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 09:18 PM |
#125 |

Actually they would |
kster |
Mar-20-08 10:34 PM |
#135 |

Sorry, no |
IDemo |
Mar-20-08 04:58 PM |
#56 |
 
No kidding! How crazy is this? |
CTyankee |
Mar-20-08 07:55 PM |
#120 |
 
Were al Gore to die before the convention, some would still write in his name. n/t |
Orsino |
Mar-22-08 08:38 AM |
#160 |

OK..you're officially driving me nuts...happy nuts! Back when a lot |
snappyturtle |
Mar-20-08 05:02 PM |
#57 |

I could get behind Gore/Obama. Gore WAS the last truly ELECTED President. It would |
K Gardner |
Mar-20-08 05:02 PM |
#58 |

ROTFLAFAO Wanna know something funny... |
In_Transit |
Mar-20-08 05:07 PM |
#59 |

Folks that are getting excited about this |
rodbailey |
Mar-20-08 05:08 PM |
#60 |
 
I think this is totally disrespectful to the man who has expressed his wishes to end this |
RestoreGore |
Mar-20-08 10:23 PM |
#131 |

Obama is too much a Leader to want to be Gore's bitch ... and Hillary is just a mess. |
quantass |
Mar-20-08 05:11 PM |
#61 |

As Unlikely As That Is, It Would Have My 100% Backing. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Mar-20-08 05:12 PM |
#62 |

What the F...? Dumbest post today. |
progressoid |
Mar-20-08 05:17 PM |
#65 |
 
I can't dispute your point D. |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 06:38 PM |
#109 |

Riiiight. |
progressoid |
Mar-20-08 07:00 PM |
#113 |

No real basis for discussion here |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 07:33 PM |
#116 |

Hey, after a couple glasses of shiraz with dinner |
progressoid |
Mar-21-08 03:09 PM |
#143 |

Well, |
Andrea |
Mar-21-08 04:16 PM |
#145 |

Somebody is Smokin' Crack |
crankychatter |
Mar-20-08 05:17 PM |
#66 |

From the beginning of this whole mess, I saw this as a possibility |
msallied |
Mar-20-08 05:18 PM |
#68 |
 
Oh please let this be true about Gore! |
girl_interrupted |
Mar-20-08 05:23 PM |
#72 |

Why don't you stream AAR? |
JSK |
Mar-20-08 05:19 PM |
#69 |
 
Sonic Wall N/T |
DeadEyeDyck |
Mar-20-08 07:25 PM |
#114 |

wow, i can't believe the people in this thread who would accept that. |
mopinko |
Mar-20-08 05:25 PM |
#73 |

The Rapture - Hannity saves DU : GDP for a day! |
cottonseed |
Mar-20-08 05:28 PM |
#75 |

this is bullshit... |
Ysabel |
Mar-20-08 05:34 PM |
#76 |

I don't think Gore would accept. |
tinrobot |
Mar-20-08 05:38 PM |
#77 |

How about an Obama/Al Gore ticket? |
DerekJ |
Mar-20-08 06:02 PM |
#85 |

Of course, because Hannity radio is so on the pulse of the Democratic leadership. |
tasteblind |
Mar-20-08 06:05 PM |
#87 |

Gore / Obama |
usrbs |
Mar-20-08 06:13 PM |
#93 |

sounds like wishful thinking to me |
HuffleClaw |
Mar-20-08 06:31 PM |
#101 |

"democrate voters" |
Lochloosa |
Mar-20-08 06:32 PM |
#102 |

If he had wanted it, he'd already be the nominee. |
SnowGoose |
Mar-20-08 06:32 PM |
#104 |

Color me enthused! |
mzmolly |
Mar-20-08 06:32 PM |
#105 |

That is a true Unity ticket |
Citizen Kang |
Mar-20-08 06:33 PM |
#106 |

Gore doesn't seem to want the job now |
high density |
Mar-20-08 06:36 PM |
#108 |

Great post, DeadEyeDyck |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 06:45 PM |
#111 |
 
Thanks |
DeadEyeDyck |
Mar-20-08 07:35 PM |
#117 |

Sounds good to this PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRAT! Bring it on!!!! |
KoKo01 |
Mar-20-08 07:27 PM |
#115 |

I've been... |
Pastiche423 |
Mar-20-08 09:15 PM |
#123 |

We need someone to unite us! |
Juniperx |
Mar-20-08 09:16 PM |
#124 |
 
Great drawing |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 09:20 PM |
#126 |

Yep... |
Juniperx |
Mar-20-08 09:26 PM |
#127 |

If there's any truth to this, the best case scenario would be |
Samantha |
Mar-20-08 10:01 PM |
#128 |
 
Well put |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 10:05 PM |
#129 |

After Pelosi saying superdelegates won't go against the voters? |
RestoreGore |
Mar-20-08 10:19 PM |
#130 |

This is certainly the most interesting Primary I have ever witnessed. |
rosesaylavee |
Mar-20-08 10:24 PM |
#132 |
 
It's like nothing I've ever seen before. n/t |
Andrea |
Mar-20-08 10:33 PM |
#134 |

Pipe dream. Fantasy. Ain't gonna happen. WASTED POST ! |
RBInMaine |
Mar-20-08 10:33 PM |
#133 |

And why are there no links available? A bit too convenient |
RestoreGore |
Mar-20-08 11:05 PM |
#136 |

this would be my dream ticket |
JustinL |
Mar-21-08 03:09 AM |
#137 |

The first two parts are excellent... |
autorank |
Mar-21-08 04:03 AM |
#138 |

Well, who knows what will happen, but I wouldn't bet the farm on |
Old Crusoe |
Mar-21-08 04:08 AM |
#139 |

I cant believe anybody took this hogwash seriously for one second. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
Mar-21-08 04:14 AM |
#141 |

Here's a link |
rodbailey |
Mar-21-08 10:04 AM |
#142 |
 
Nah |
shellinaya |
Mar-22-08 12:29 PM |
#164 |

Will never happen. n/t |
Jamastiene |
Mar-21-08 03:11 PM |
#144 |

This could happen. TPTB are concerned with winning the GE, |
greyghost |
Mar-21-08 04:50 PM |
#146 |

Gore/Obama together can heal our country... |
LaRaven |
Mar-21-08 06:20 PM |
#147 |

Right now I'm pro-Biden... |
knixphan |
Mar-21-08 06:47 PM |
#153 |

Devil's advocate for those who think drafting Gore would be unfair to BO/HRC,, or their voters..... |
mythyc |
Mar-22-08 07:38 AM |
#156 |
 
Could not have said it better. |
lildreamer316 |
Mar-22-08 08:16 AM |
#159 |
 
Excellent post, mythc. |
Uncle Joe |
Mar-22-08 12:33 PM |
#165 |
 
Beautiful post! |
Andrea |
Mar-22-08 01:28 PM |
#172 |
  
you're welcome =) |
mythyc |
Mar-22-08 06:36 PM |
#176 |
 
The grass is always greener... |
progressoid |
Mar-23-08 10:25 AM |
#179 |

I will not vote for Albert Gore |
cali |
Mar-22-08 07:56 AM |
#157 |

he missed his moment, and I was all for Gore. It's Obama's nomination. |
npincus |
Mar-22-08 07:59 AM |
#158 |

Please NO |
shellinaya |
Mar-22-08 12:27 PM |
#162 |

The only hope for a Dem landslide victory is Gore/Edwards. And it's not going to happen. |
Seabiscuit |
Mar-22-08 12:28 PM |
#163 |

I can't believe this BULL |
sunnystarr |
Mar-22-08 12:48 PM |
#166 |

Well, one scenario is a postive, although |
LWolf |
Mar-22-08 12:54 PM |
#167 |

I'd be ok with this, but I don't think it's going to happen |
LordJFT |
Mar-22-08 12:54 PM |
#168 |

That's been posted here quite a few times over the last few days |
Fighting Irish |
Mar-22-08 12:54 PM |
#169 |

Gore/Obama is probably the best "back room" ticket for Nov. That's a Country First decision |
Sensitivity |
Mar-22-08 01:06 PM |
#170 |

if it is unacceptable for the superdelegates to over rule the voters |
biggerfishsmallpond |
Mar-22-08 01:11 PM |
#171 |
 
The thing is, it's not unacceptable |
Andrea |
Mar-22-08 01:43 PM |
#173 |

Al, are you listening??? |
dbaker41 |
Mar-22-08 01:49 PM |
#174 |

Wow... |
I Vote In Pittsburgh |
Mar-22-08 02:01 PM |
#175 |

Gore/Obama would make a fine ticket. |
ozone_man |
Mar-22-08 06:44 PM |
#177 |

Yeah right. Stop yanking my chain.. |
Kahuna |
Mar-22-08 08:33 PM |
#178 |
nonconformist
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:21 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. As much as I love Gore, I don't see that happening at all. nt |
Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
proud2BlibKansan
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #78 |
| 94. His source is Hannity |
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #94 |
| 96. No, his source is Zogby, appearing on Hannity. n/t |
Hieronymus
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #96 |
| 110. Yes, and I respect Mr. Zogby. It would be a winning ticket. |
WillYourVoteBCounted
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-21-08 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #110 |
| 140. Aint gonna happen. Gore won't do it and it would be wrong to do it this way |  |
musicblind
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-21-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #140 |
| 148. personally, I think Gore WOULD do it if he saw it as the only way to |
 |
heal the party. Of course I'd rather Clinton or Edwards as Gore's VP in that situation, but over all this strategy Gore/Obama and Clinton as Majority Leader might be the best way out of this very tight spot.
|
democrattotheend
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:21 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. I wouldn't mind a Gore/Obama ticket |
 |
Although I do kind of have a problem with someone who has not campaigned or gotten any votes from primary voters coming in and getting the nomination. That seems even more undemocratic than Clinton getting it. That being said, a lot of people did want him to run this year, and it might be the only acceptable solution.
|
LSparkle
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 5. Al Gore was the last fairly elected president, so I could go for that |
AX10
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 19. I will settle for VP Obama if it means President Gore. |
calimary
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-21-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 152. I could, too. Man, would THAT be a dream ticket! |
 |
'Cause all this time, I must admit - as much as I DO like Obama and will vote for him eagerly if he's the nominee, my heart still belongs to Al Gore.
And it would be a nice consolation prize to throw at Hillary - giving her another glass ceiling to break. It's not THE glass ceiling, mind you, but it is A glass ceiling, and one of the few remaining in politics. Senate Majority Leader? I wouldn't turn my nose up at that one.
|
DeadEyeDyck
(457 posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 10. I think that he is still pure is the ticket. |
 |
this has been a really ugly primary season. Al is above the fray. I guess that is the thinking. All I heard was a sound-byte but I bet this story will have legs before the end of the day.
|
snappyturtle
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
 |
Edited on Thu Mar-20-08 05:41 PM by snappyturtle
http://www.algore.org/blog/earthmother/waiting_0#commen... Watching and waiting . . . Posted March 18th, 2008 by earthmother In November of 2007, AlGore.org suspended its active campaign to get Al Gore to be a candidate iin the 2008 race for the White House. At that time, we informed all of our organizers that we were going into a dormant mode. Publicly, we remain dormant, but we are carefully watching the race between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. As of this writing, Obama is ahead in delegates, but both candidates continue to split the available delegates in such a way that neither may have enough to be nominated on the first ballot at the convention in August. The next (and last) major state as far as delegates go is Pennsylvania. Depending on what happens there in April, we may decide that it's time to swing into action again. snip................ We're not the only ones entertaining this notion. There continue to be many articles written about Gore as the unity or compromise candidate. Here are a few of the more recent ones: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-abrams/al-de-gore_b_... http://www.nypost.com/seven/03062008/news/columnists/on... ... http://www.newsweek.com/id/119851 http://www.southernledger.com/blogs/stevegill/?m=200803 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marvin-kitman/al-gore-for... ... more........... Edit: The New York Post article is not free...I didn't read it. The Newsweek article is by Eleanor Cliff...it hints that a Clinton advisor says the Gore option could happen at the convention! Southern Ledger...scroll down to second article on page. Last Huffington link...pg. not found!
|
lildreamer316
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #74 |
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #82 |
| 84. Yes, you do a great job |
snappyturtle
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #82 |
| 90. Sorry....didn't know that...yes, I will drop in!! Thanks....look at it this |
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #90 |
| 98. Right, and that's great! n/t |
lildreamer316
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #90 |
| 112. OH don't apologize!! I just want to make sure you |
 |
knew about us,because sometimes it's easier to re-find the articles there if you're in a hurry. The more the merrier!!
|
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 79. I think you are right. |
 |
Al is above the fray. Things have degenerated everywhere. He hasn't been involved. A lot of us are really worried by all this in-fighting, and more will be as it goes on.
|
polichick
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 11. Actually, he already won the presidency. :) |
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 81. Yes, he won once and he can win again. |
oviedodem
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. If that is true then that means they are really displeased with Hillary |
leftynyc
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
 |
I find it rather odd that Al Gore, John Edwards and some other heavy hitter in the dem party have declined to endorse in this race. Can someone come up with a plausible reason other than they don't think either candidate is very good.
|
Window
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 49. This primary has been playing out so ugly, I believe the party leaders have |
 |
asked that the SD's hold off any more endorsements until they have some idea of where this is all heading. Just my opinion.
|
leftynyc
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #49 |
| 52. I was under the impression that |
roguevalley
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #52 |
| 64. they are also elected officials generally and probably quaking in |
Window
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #52 |
| 80. Not all SD's are party leaders. I'm thinking more of Pelosi, Reid, et al. |
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 83. Makes sense to me n/t |
leftynyc
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message |
Alhena
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 12. Same here- I fear 2008 isn't the year for Obama and if he loses |
leftynyc
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
| 45. Nah - tricky Dick came back |
 |
and he didn't have any of the brains or the charm (or the good looks) that Sen Obama has.
I'm going to be very honest here - I like Sen Obama and will vote for him enthusiastically in November but I will admit to being uncomfortable with his association with Rev Wright. Not because of the out of context remarks that are being played in a loop on TV for a week now - it's because of Rev Wright's embrace of Farrakhan who I despise. I don't think Sen Obama has a racist bone in his body but his association with someone who I believe has real anger issues and who embraces a hate monger like Farrakhan makes me uneasy. That said, I'd eat glass before I'd vote for McCain or any other republican for president.
|
gabeana
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. This couldn't happen until the convention right |
Alhena
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 14. Yes- specifically the second vote at the convention. |
DeadEyeDyck
(457 posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 23. Here is how it was explained... |
 |
and it sounds risky. Obama throws all his delegates to Gore and Gore, in turn offers him the VP. Hillary is offered the majority leader. I think they are looking for a winning ticket. No one said this was the rubblings of the DNC so I don't know whom they are referring too.
This radio station is WABC out of New York.
|
Window
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
| 54. Hillary desperately wants to be POTUS. |
 |
Edited on Thu Mar-20-08 04:57 PM by Window
I just can't see her settling for anything less. Hell, just before Mississippi she was offering the VP slot to Senator Obama, even though he was leading. Nah. Can't see it.
Girlfriend is not going to go quitely into the good night. (Or whatever the hell that expression is. LOL!)
Edited to say, it sounds like a great idea though.
|
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #54 |
| 88. Strictly speaking, she doesn't need to agree |
 |
for this to happen. Also, I could see her settling under certain circumstances, with the right pressure from the right people and the right inducement. Specifically, I think offering her the first available Supreme Court seat is something she would find hard to resist. I also think that Supreme Court Justice is a better fit with her skills.
|
Window
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #88 |
| 89. I agree. I've always said the SC would be perfect for her. |
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
| 86. Right, that's one way it could happen. |
 |
It could also be Clinton plus the super delegates going for Gore. The thing is, neither Obama nor Clinton will have enough delegates without the super delegates. It could also happen with both Obama and Clinton both throwing their delegates to Gore. I'd prefer that, for more unity. There are many kinds of deals that could be made. My favorite at this point is Obama for VP and Clinton for Supreme Court Justice. I think that positions the party and the nation to benefit from both of their extreme talents for at least a generation to come. I'd be happy with any deal they want to make, though. And don't forget, John Edwards still has delegates.
|
LakeSamish706
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. And I guess it begs the question; Why would we want to see an Al Gore as the nominee... |
 |
Edited on Thu Mar-20-08 04:28 PM by LakeSamish706
at this stage of the game, since he has had no desire to get bloody in the ring as the two candidates are doing now? At this point, I don't see that being very fair to Obama for sure.
Edited to say:
I guess however that Gore would be the candidate that would kick the crap outta McCain and thus save our country.... So, yep I would be ok with it as well for that reason.
|
LSparkle
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 18. Gore is practically teflon at this point ... they could try to bloody him |
 |
but it'd be seen as a cheap shot. They could continue to run the race Obama has tried to run, and let the wingers take the low road ...
I was thinking that the only way Gore would get involved is if the frontrunners had beaten each other to a bloody pulp. I didn't see that happening (nor did I want it to) but at this point, I wonder if that isn't what we're facing.
RE-ELECT PRESIDENT GORE!
|
LakeSamish706
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 21. Yep, I edited my post (after some thought) and do agree with the logic. n/t |
DeadEyeDyck
(457 posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
| 29. I mean, damn, the guy's got the Noble Peace Prize N/T |
Road Scholar
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
| 36. That has to be a plus in world respect and diplomacy nt |
LakeSamish706
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
| 37. Yep, he would absolutely kick the crap out of McCain... (even with possible |
 |
Edited on Thu Mar-20-08 04:41 PM by LakeSamish706
attempts to steal the election again).
And now you guys are probably getting me excited on a new and different level that won't come to pass.. grrr...
|
proud2BlibKansan
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
| 41. So does Henry Kissinger |
brentspeak
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
| 71. That would probably work against him among many American voters |
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message |
DeadEyeDyck
(457 posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 13. I work in a metal building in an industrial park |
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 15. That's fine. I wasn't dissing you. |
InAbLuEsTaTe
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message |
| 16. Wouldn't be thrilled to see Obama denied the nomination, but I could live w/ it (so long as he's VP) |
snappyturtle
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
| 40. I, too, wouldn't be happy to see Obama denied but if this combo |
 |
could hold the party together,it would be fantastic. Gore has global recognition and is loved. Might work out great for the Dems too....Gore/Obama in 2008 and Obama/? in 2012 figuring Gore might only want one term. If Gore went for two terms and Obama for two after that...wow! 16 years of Democrats in the executive and well, the legislative would surely follow along. I'm just thinking and postulating out loud..but maybe it could work. What's going on is very damaging and I don't want to lose Obama.
|
brentspeak
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
| 70. If Obama has fallen so much that he couldn't be elected President |
knight_of_the_star
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
This likely would only happen if we reach the convention and there still is no clear winner. If that were to happen then that could probably save the party and the country.
|
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
| 91. Exactly what I'm concerned about now. |
Texas Hill Country
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message |
| 20. i would be friggin shocked if Gore even wanted the job tbh |
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 92. I don't think he does want it, BUT |
musicblind
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-21-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 149. I do not think that Al Gore wants the job, but think that he would take the job if it were the only |
 |
way to salvage the country.
Of course I'd love Hillary to be president. Would love her to at least be VP. But Gore would be an amazing candidate, and better than Obama at this point because he has not been through the ringer in the way Obama and Clinton have.
|
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Mar-22-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #149 |
musicblind
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Mar-22-08 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #154 |
| 155. And if it does then it will be a good solution. |
 |
I said in another post ... we really missed the boat in 2000. I mean we REALLY missed the boat. We could have been sailing on a Royal Caribbean Freedom of the Seas Fun-Ship headed towards an island of Nobel Peace Prizes, with Academy Awards fun slides, and a world-wide-recognition-and-respect stage show. Instead we choose to hitch a ride on the Titanic ... Driven by captian McBushwacked Yeah ... we REALLY missed the boat in 2000. I just hope we don't freeze beneath an iceberg of lies, torture, and a hundred years of war in Iraq. Because if we don't find a live perserver this November our hearts will NOT go on. Sorry, the metaphor gets a little played out... but still... we SOOOOO missed that boat 
|
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Mar-22-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #155 |
Political Heretic
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message |
| 22. Um...... I would be behind that. |
calico1
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message |
| 24. Well I heard on the all news CBS radio staion |
 |
on the way to work earlier this week that Gore has lost a lot of weight. Don't know if that is of any significance.
|
DeadEyeDyck
(457 posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
Turn CO Blue
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
| 121. These images are from five days ago...he does look great. |
SharonRB
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message |
| 25. I'll believe it when I see it |
 |
My dream ticket would be Gore/Obama, but I'm not holding my breath for this one to come true. I'd like to know just who is really talking about this.
|
proud2BlibKansan
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
musicblind
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-21-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
 |
it was Zogby ON Hannity. If you were citing the source in a paper, you would have to quote it as being said by Zogby, not Hannity, because Zogby is the one who said it.
|
Fresh_Start
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message |
| 26. I could get behind that ticket |
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
Theres already polls showing that many Democrats wont support the nominee if Hillary was to win by having the super delegates overruling the pledged delegate winner in the convention (20% of Dems said they wouldnt vote for her).
I cant see a person (even if its Gore) stepping in and essentially stealing the nomination without even running as being a candidate who could hold the party together.
Gores best chance to put our party back together would be to throw his support behind the delegate leader as soon as possible, and to forget his ambitions.
|
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
| 95. It wouldn't happen like that |
 |
This would be a consensus nomination with support from at least one of Clinton or Obama, and more likely both. He wouldn't be stealing anything, he would be agreeing to a mass request. If it comes to this, it will be because Obama and/or Clinton see that this is better for the party than their own candidacy.
|
MattBaggins
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #95 |
 |
What consensus are you talking about? Al Gore was not any ballots that I know of. How will the democratic voters of this country reached a consensus if none of us got to vote for him? Having a bunch of people in Denver just pick a name out of the air would be worse than what we have now.
Come on, Al Gore isn't going to come swooshing in with a cape and save us all. He is way too busy fighting ManBearPig.
|
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #118 |
| 122. A consensus of those we voted for, including |
musicblind
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-21-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
| 151. It wouldn't be like that. This wouldn't be Gore's ambitions |
 |
He didn't even want the job. He would be doing it in response to a mass request because it is what everyone else wants him to do. He'd basically be giving up 4 or more years of his life as a favor to us Dems who have made such a mess at this point.
|
VolcanoJen
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message |
| 30. If the "inner circles" are going to nominate a candidate who did not run... |
 |
... what was the point in voting? Why did I drive people to polls? Why did I spend weeks registering people to vote? Why even go through such an exercise if "insiders" come along afterward and do whatever the hell they please, or deem "best" for us?
Hey, I love Al, but that idea is absolutely freaking ridiculous.
|
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
| 34. Party unity, and actually *winning* the white house. |
VolcanoJen
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
| 53. Having the nominee "chosen" for me isn't going to make me feel very "unified" |
 |
This idea is, seriously, one of the dumbest things I've ever heard about it elected politics.
It's MARCH. What are we all freaking out about? We'll be fine, we'll have a nominee by June, and we're going to beat McSame.
When did everyone get so damned skittish about this thing?
|
brentspeak
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
| 63. Well, if Michigan and Florida aren't going to count |
Demobrat
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
How can they hand the nomination to somebody who isn't running? I'd be delighted to death if this were to happen,but that's me. How would it not make a complete mockery of the process?
|
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
| 97. It's within the rules of the convention |
 |
Neither Obama nor Clinton is going to have enough delegates to win without the super delegates. If the super delegates sit out the first ballot, then deals can be made. Either Clinton or Obama or both can direct their delegates to vote for Gore. They would do this in response to a deal that they feel would get the best outcome for the party and the country. They can bargain about positions for themselves and planks in the party platform.
|
IdClaire
(120 posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message |
| 32. sounds too far fetched to me.. |
 |
I don't know how many people would go for that, nothing against Gore. Does anyone think Obama or Clinton will cede the way for him if they won't for each other?
|
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
| 99. Actually, I think they'd be more likely to endorse him than |
Mabus
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message |
Bullet1987
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message |
| 35. Gore/Obama was my original dream ticket way back when |
 |
I wouldn't think it fair, but it goes to show you how destructive this primary season has become when we need to bring in someone totally new at the last minute to not go into the General all bloodied up.
|
snappyturtle
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
| 46. I agree that the damage being done is so very damaging to the party. |
 |
I don't know enough about the rules to know if this sort of arrangement can happen. Do you? I suppose if the party put the pressure on Hillary & Obama to 'turn over' their delegates, it could happen. Anyone out there who knows the rules?
|
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #46 |
| 100. Yep. It can most definitely happen. |
Cali_Democrat
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message |
nsd
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
I admire Al Gore a great deal. If he had run, I would have supported him. If he had run, I think he would be our nominee right now. But he didn't run and that's not an option any longer. Too much has happened.
In the last 40 years, neither major party has given its presidential nomination to a candidate who didn't win it by running in the primaries and caucuses. To do so now would be an absolute disaster. That person, even if he were as well respected in the party as Gore, would lack legitimacy and would face scorn from loyalists of the candidates who did run.
Either Obama or Clinton is going to be the nominee. Barring some far-fetched event (e.g. they both die in a plane crash) no one else is even conceivable.
|
RememberWellstone
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message |
The Traveler
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message |
andym
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message |
| 48. Perhaps there would even be a deal to resign before the end of his first term. |
RamboLiberal
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message |
| 50. I'd back this ticket - I've been thinking about Gore coming in |
 |
Since the damn Wright video is going to haunt Obama to the election and if the SD's handed it to Clinton this would split the party besides her high negatives. Seems like a fair solution to me.
|
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #50 |
KaryninMiami
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message |
| 51. Fine with me- more then fine in fact but anything on Hannity Radio |
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #51 |
| 103. See snappyturtles post above for many links |
 |
Also, check in over at the Al Gore '08 forum here at DU. Yes, it's being talked about a lot. and, even though it was on Hannity, it was John Zogby that said it.
|
CTyankee
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message |
| 55. Unbelievable. After all of these primaries, do you think Dems would stand for this? |
 |
As popular as he is, Al Gore won no primaries this time. The people voted on their picks. To just throw all of them overboard and "appoint" Al Gore is a ridiculous notion. Besides which, it would look so awful that we'd lose really badly in the GE.
Hannity is messin' with our heads here...
|
brentspeak
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #55 |
| 67. Why would people not vote for Al Gore just because he's chosen at the convention? |
 |
Edited on Thu Mar-20-08 05:18 PM by brentspeak
And without Michigan and Florida's votes counting, the People's votes aren't exactly being counted anyway.
|
CTyankee
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #67 |
| 119. Well, I think that Dem voters would feel like their votes were whisked away |
 |
from underneath their feet and by whom, exactly? I am not so cavalier about dismissing the votes cast by all those thousands and thousands of Dem voters in all of the primaries so far. It would be an astounding act of arrogance on the part of the Democratic Party, IMO. The people spoke, in good conscious and good faith. Doesn't that count?
|
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #119 |
| 125. Sure, it counts, to the extent that it's true, |
 |
But look at what has happened. Look at all the Republicans that voted in our open primaries at the behest of Rush Limbaugh in order to distort the outcome. Look at all the Democrats who didn't get to vote for their candidate because he was knocked out so early on. Look at all the people who can't participate in caucuses because they have to work or have other responsibilities or have health issues that prevent them getting to the caucus. Look at FL and MI. This primary process stinks and led to this outcome: Two fairly evenly matched frontrunners, neither of whom can win the nomination without super delegates and neither of whom can beat McCain.
If those frontrunners put the interests of the party and the nation first, they may very well decide that going with a fair deal is the best solution.
|
kster
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #119 |
 |
be getting the man who they voted for in 2000. If this was to play out, I'd say the people who already voted would not have a problem supporting the idea. Al Gore was attacked on two fronts, electronic vote counting and the supreme court who had to step in to deliver the election to * after the electronic vote/counting machines failed to do the job. If this happens I want to know where these little pr*cks plan to show up. 
|
IDemo
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
The idea of Al being carried to the podium on the heads of supporters of both candidates who have invested sweat, tears, and maybe a bit of blood to get this far is insulting. I thought this place let go of the Al Gore fantasia months ago, guess not.
|
CTyankee
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #56 |
| 120. No kidding! How crazy is this? |
 |
Edited on Thu Mar-20-08 07:56 PM by CTyankee
This would be the ultimate insult to rank and file Dem voters who trudged to the polls to vote their choice of candidate. And who appointed anyone to elevate Al Gore.
And why on earth would Al even consent to doing this? I love Al but this is just nuts...
|
Orsino
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Mar-22-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #56 |
| 160. Were al Gore to die before the convention, some would still write in his name. n/t |
snappyturtle
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |
| 57. OK..you're officially driving me nuts...happy nuts! Back when a lot |
 |
of us were excited to imagine Al Gore as a candidate, we figured he'd enter the race late to avoid a lot of the campaigning associated with the public's learning curve of a lesser known candidate. However,I'm wondering now that he didn't enter to give Hillary "her" chance....inner circle Democratic party politics...whatever. But, NOW, that this race has been bludgeoned by its own candidates Gore could enter. I think the country would unite like we can't even imagine! (Can you tell that I'm excited by the thought of it?)
|
K Gardner
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |
| 58. I could get behind Gore/Obama. Gore WAS the last truly ELECTED President. It would |
 |
certainly get the Clintons out of the picture for the next 16 years. Eight years of Gore = Heaven. Another 8 years of Obama = hell, how could we lose with that?
|
Road Scholar
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message |
| 59. ROTFLAFAO Wanna know something funny... |
rodbailey
(249 posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message |
| 60. Folks that are getting excited about this |
 |
should swing on over to the Gore thread here at DU. We are getting people in various states to start compiling contact information for super delegates in their states, and lists of interested folks in their states to write letters/contact, etc. if it looks like the super delegates are going to be critical in this kind of "negotiation." Also, any interested Goreniacs should shuffle on over to the two, recently re-energized draft Gore web sites ( www.algore.org and www.draftgore.com ) and keep track of what's going on in this effort through those portals.
|
RestoreGore
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #60 |
| 131. I think this is totally disrespectful to the man who has expressed his wishes to end this |
quantass
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message |
| 61. Obama is too much a Leader to want to be Gore's bitch ... and Hillary is just a mess. |
 |
Edited on Thu Mar-20-08 05:12 PM by quantass
but i see the logic in your assumption but i just doubt Obama and Hillary would like to take lesser positions when there is still a chance they could go all the way. And Gore certainly doesnt want to be in the bitch position again after being one for 8 years.
|
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message |
| 62. As Unlikely As That Is, It Would Have My 100% Backing. |
progressoid
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message |
| 65. What the F...? Dumbest post today. |
 |
A. Don't care what Hannity's pal's insider's think.
2. There is a small issue of delegates and the convention.
III. Al's not running!!
D. I need a drink.
|
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #65 |
| 109. I can't dispute your point D. |
 |
But as to the others:
A. John Zogby is not Hannity's pal.
2. This would occur within the rules of the convention with the participation of the delegates.
III. He's not running. This is about a DRAFT.
|
progressoid
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #109 |
 |
So, tens of thousands of people that spent their hard earned money and time trying to get Obama or Clinton the nom are suddenly going to give up and sign on to the draft Gore bandwagon. And hundreds of delegates that have pledged their support to their candidate are going to chuck it out the window for a man that has shown absolutely no interest in the presidency. And the Clinton and Obama camps are going to just step aside and let it happen. And this is going to happen within a party that still can't figure out what to do about the FL/MI debacle.
Riiiight.
Here's what this really is: Sean Hannity poking the bee-hive to rile up all the worker bees.
|
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #113 |
| 116. No real basis for discussion here |
 |
Obviously, we disagree. I'm not sure you understand the process. If people worked hard for those candidates and those candidates decided another course was better for the good of the party, yeah those people would probably agree. John Zogby is not a mouthpiece for Sean Hannity. You've got that way wrong.
But, by all means, have another drink!
|
progressoid
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-21-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #116 |
| 143. Hey, after a couple glasses of shiraz with dinner |
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-21-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #143 |
crankychatter
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message |
| 66. Somebody is Smokin' Crack |
msallied
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message |
| 68. From the beginning of this whole mess, I saw this as a possibility |
 |
There is nothing unconstitutional about this scenario. It would just be undemocratic. But this primary is pretty much going to be that way anyway.
The thing that worries me, though, is the fact that if Gore is "installed" regardless of his popularity among core Dems, it's going to infuriate the independents and swing voters who voted for Obama when they might otherwise have voted more conservatively. And we can pretty much kiss the GE goodbye at this people.
The people will settle for no less than the person who got the most delegates and popular votes. I would definitely vote for Gore over Hillary any day, but it would destroy the party if this is how he was nominated.
|
girl_interrupted
(723 posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #68 |
| 72. Oh please let this be true about Gore! |
 |
I have heard the same rumor, keeping my fingers crossed! I don't think it would destroy the party at all..if anything, it's being destroyed right now by Hillary & Obama and their supporters. If anything Gore would be a uniter. And let's face it, he won the 2000 election, it's way past time he took his rightful place.
|
JSK
(918 posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message |
| 69. Why don't you stream AAR? |
DeadEyeDyck
(457 posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #69 |
mopinko
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message |
| 73. wow, i can't believe the people in this thread who would accept that. |
cottonseed
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message |
| 75. The Rapture - Hannity saves DU : GDP for a day! |
 |
It's nice to see DU : GDP come together for a much needed Kumbaya moment today. Never thought I'd be saying this, but "Thank you Hannity".
For the record: if this thing keeps on its ugly path, I'd definitely back this plan.
|
Ysabel
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
Edited on Thu Mar-20-08 05:35 PM by Ysabel
obama is the front runner and to suggest anything else is fucking insulting...
- typo...
|
tinrobot
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message |
| 77. I don't think Gore would accept. |
DerekJ
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message |
| 85. How about an Obama/Al Gore ticket? |
mattclearing
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message |
| 87. Of course, because Hannity radio is so on the pulse of the Democratic leadership. |
usrbs
(581 posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message |
HuffleClaw
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message |
| 101. sounds like wishful thinking to me |
Lochloosa
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message |
SnowGoose
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message |
| 104. If he had wanted it, he'd already be the nominee. |
 |
The primaries would have been more of a victory lap than a contest.
I didn't take my "Re-elect Gore in 08" button off my book bag (practically part of my body by now) until last week (I'm a stubborn SOB). So understand, there is nobody here who would be happier than me to see this happen, but at this time, even thinking about it is a distraction.
Make your peace with it and keep your eye on the prize.
|
mzmolly
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message |
Citizen Kang
(385 posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message |
| 106. That is a true Unity ticket |
high density
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message |
| 108. Gore doesn't seem to want the job now |
Andrea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message |
| 111. Great post, DeadEyeDyck |
 |
Edited on Thu Mar-20-08 06:45 PM by Andrea
I congratulate you, not just for the great content, but for doing what few others have been able to do: Start a civil discussion in GD-Primaries.
For those interested in an Al Gore nomination, please come by the Al Gore '08 forum here at DU. Click "Lobby" at the top of any page. Scroll down to the DU Groups section. It's the first listing in the left column under "Democrats".
Thanks everybody for the good discussion.
|
DeadEyeDyck
(457 posts)
|
Thu Mar-20-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #111 |
 |
I am not the source but only the messanger. I wish I had cable TV and I would probably watch H&C tonight. I also wish someone else would chime in and say, "yeah I heard it too." I feel a little vulnerable being the only one.
Kind of like being the only one to see a shooting star. I must admit as a newcomer I am a little sensitive to being challenged or attacked about something I post. Everytime I open the browser, I squint my eyes and open them slowly to see if I am being torched in flames. I guess I'll earn some callouses, soon enough.
|