Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Obama's camp set up the Wright story themselves?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:37 PM
Original message
Did Obama's camp set up the Wright story themselves?
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 10:38 PM by Teaser
Just something I'm toying with.

The story being dropped now doesn't make sense. Hilary's camp should have held onto it to right before Pennsylvania, or used it earlier in the campaign.

The R's should have either used it earlier to eliminate O, or held on till it was closer to the election.

But it get's dropped now, 6 weeks before PA? Why?

It's the best possible time to clear the story and render it as harmless as its ever likely to get. Furthermore,O decides to use this week to clear up
the Rezko stuff.

Was this a calculation on O's camp's part to release this when the damage could most easily be mitigated.

It's worth considering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. It could be. Would not be surprised.
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 10:38 PM by Katzenkavalier
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Like someone said on TV
It may not hurt him in the primary but it could in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think it was calculated at all by Obama
this was a right-wing attack that came from Hannity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Someone pointed out the tapes to Hannity though
Why now? The timing makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. The stories were circulating about Obama's church.
Nobody had to point anything to Hannity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Again...
something, though, made it punch through the noise at this moment.

These things aren't unitary phenomena. Lots of things come together to make them happen. They bubble under the radar for a bit, and something pushes them up into full view. What was that final push?

I don't know. It's kind of weird, because it doesn't benefit anyone as much as it should right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Do you think Obama works with Hannity
of Fox - a station he has refused to go for an interview - but Clinton has had many?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. No, because Hannity made a statement he was pushing this story a year ago
And seemed happy about it. He even takes credit for bringing it up first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Absolutely not. The timing is beneficial, but they didn't seem prepared much for the reaction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. That's a fair point.
Still I am baffled by the timing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. As a note, I think this is clever shit if true
I am not opposed to machiavellian scheming. I admire it, actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Maybe they weren't expecting
the reaction to be as strong as it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Probably not. Though I agree that the timing is fortunate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Obama obviously has some
pretty good timing in his life. Obama plays it straight..you can do that when you have gravitas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. absolutely
He's making Friday night news dumps to prepare for a huge negative assault of his own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. Whether Obama's camp did it our not, they should leak that they did
Make the story about another instance of Obama ju-jitsu rather than about Scary Black Preacher Mantm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Your sig line is the story of my current political views... next is 60% for Clinton and then 51%...
..on Nader over McCain or any other Republican... except for possibly Leiberman or pelosi I can't imagine a Democrat I'd not vote for against McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Mine will never be any % for Clinton
If she somehow manages to slime her way into the nomination, I'll change it to 100% AGAINST John McCain.

And then I'll weep.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Hilary is not the terrible person you paint her out to be...
Obama is the better candidate... I agree... but not by much...

I think that reality is settling in and she's becoming unsettled by the possibility of losing... she is not a bad candidate... she has made some mistakes but if she were to win it would mean...

a Democrat in charge of the Department of Justice...
a Democrat in charge of the Department of Defense...
a Democrat nominating Supreme Court Justices...
a Democrat in charge of the Department of Education...
a Democrat in charge of the Department of Health ...
a Democrat in sitting as the tie breaking vote in the Senate...
a Democrat in charge of the Department of the Treasury...
a Democrat in charge of the entire Executive Branch...

Hilary Clinton will not be alone in that job... she will be come the focal point for all that concentrated energy and the decisions she will make will be offered by Democrats, analyzed by Democrats, designed by Democrats and I don't know about you but I am really fucking tired of Republicans... I'm sick to death of them and wish they'd just fade away and choke on their own greed. If Hilary takes the nomination and that seems rather unlikely... I'll be glad to vote for her... proud to vote for her... eager to vote for her... I'm just glad that my third choice is doing well though my 4th choice will do just fine...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. I have personal knowledge of Hillary and her tactics
I helped campaign against her husband in 1992. Back then, they were fighting Jerry Brown and they needed my state -- Wisconsin -- to help put him out of the running.

So they started a whispering campaign that Brown used to host "drug parties" at the Governor's Mansion in California. When that wasn't enough, the "drug parties" became "drug orgies". Then it was "gay drug orgies", and then Brown was using the "gay drug orgies" to sell cocaine to minors.

The lies worked, the Clintons won WI and the rest is history. But I will never forget the shameless scumbaggery they used to get Bill into the White House. They are low, classless people and, once again, the nation is getting a facefull of their special brand of slime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. You'd think that they had done so many slimy things to their opponents
that they would have a ton of enemies.

Beats me why more people haven't risen up against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's possible. The timing is pretty good for him, could have been much worse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Awareness Test
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. Not in a million years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. Clinton's camp set it up to push Ferraro out of the news.
They were of course, waiting until a week or so before the PA primary to release this, but Ferraro's careless comments were hurting her badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I guess the fact that the sermons were for sale doesn't occur to
you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. It does occur to me. What should occur to you is the timing of these "revelations."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. possible
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:48 PM
Original message
No. It was only a matter of time before the msm bought the videos
If Obama were wise he would have told the TUCC to stop selling them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
27. another fair point
my mind certainly isn't made up on the topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trynottogiveuphope Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
22. I Doubt It
They would have made Wright take a walk long ago if they'd been prepared for this backlash. They knew it was coming, but never thought it would play out as strongly as it has so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
26. I wondered the same thing. This would have killed him in the general but it wont hurt him now
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 10:52 PM by McCamy Taylor
in the primary. Democrats won't really care (unless they get worried about its effect on the general). He does not have any caucuses coming up for a while so as long as he can keep his numbers vs. McCain's looking good this is a good time to defuse a story that was bound to break sooner or later.

The RW would rather he was the nominee than Hillary, because they still think they can use the Southern Strategy, though I think it doesn't work for them nearly as well as it used to. But it is hard for Karl Rove to learn new tricks. It is his greatest weakness.

So, yeah, I think maybe Obama is glad this is out now, even if he didn't actually hand FOX the tapes, maybe an Obama supporter handed FOX the tapes. Strategically it is a sound move and shows some political maturity on the part of his campaign. Thumbs up for good strategy.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
30. I think it's quite possible
As you said, the timing does not make sense for either Clinton or McCain. Obama's campaign knew this would be an issue (they have not come out and said it, but based on what Obama has said I am guessing that he first found out about the particular sermons in question when they had self-opposition research done at the beginning of the campaign), and this is a good time to get it out. Pretty smart move if that is the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
31. Poo flinging, by its very nature, is not calculated.
If Obama thought this was a *serious liability*, it would have been fixed and/or aired months before super Tuesday. It was handled in a minor way, because he trusts americans not to over-react to the weird things that happen in american churches.

This is just the monkeys flinging poo part of the campaign, to see if anything sticks.

Maybe next week Obama will be a baby-killer.

Or a bad father.

Or he'll forget to tip at a campaign stop.

Or he'll have a former crack-smoking-gay-lover-who-fails-a-polygraph.

This, friends, is kitchen sink.

Expect every, and any, lie/accusation/misdirection that Hillary or her surrogates can muster. Do not expect integrity, honesty, clarity, or decency. Those don't matter to her.

Just make sure that they matter to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
34. The wife & I were talking about this yesterday!! Wright is a net GAIN for Obama cause 1.) no longer
...a Muslim, 2.) Now he's a "strong" Christian with Christian values and is being beat up by the media because of his pastor which a good portion of America has the same type of pastor, 3.) the more he gets in front of cameras the more he seems presidential, hell...even Hillary had to stand at a podium yesterday to be a counter to Obama's attention. 4.) there's NO way McCaint can use Wright in the general election because of his own bigoted pastors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
35. Wouldn't they have done a better job preemptively softening the blow? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
36. If this is true Barack is is fearking best political genius in history Plus it clears up the muslim
Edited on Tue Mar-18-08 06:28 AM by barack the house
thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
37. Doesn't this make the Obama team kind of...duplicitous?
Edited on Tue Mar-18-08 06:31 AM by Perry Logan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
38. Barack was very prepared for response wasn't he. WTG Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. Keep this kicked folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC