Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'll make it real for you. We lose in '04, Kiss Roe v. Wade goodbye.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 07:36 PM
Original message
I'll make it real for you. We lose in '04, Kiss Roe v. Wade goodbye.
Stevens will go. O'Connor will go. Maybe Kennedy. That's five votes may be six for subjugating women. Is it real for you yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JHBowden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Forcing women to have babies is a non-issue.
Kerry is Bushlite, y'know. He has one ideologically impure speechwriter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freetobegay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So who do you suggest?
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHBowden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Kerry of course.
Edited on Mon Apr-26-04 07:44 PM by JHBowden
I'm just mocking certain people who claim they are for "change" while pretending Kerry is a neocon. I suppose they believe his positions on the environment, energy, civil rights, capital punishment, gun control, cutting pentagon waste, health care, etc. don't matter, since he is part of a Skull and Bones conspiracy to further the causes of the PNAC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. that's not fair. . .
Kerry is by no means as near as an looney toon extremist as Bush. I may not agree with everything Kerry says but there is absolutely no way that he could every be as much of a incurious, insensitive, felonious robber barron as *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. i believe that was sarcasm from JHBowden
i don't blame those who didn't get it though considering some of the things posted on here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastknowngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. I know that to be true not sure where I read the quote but one of
the reichwing SCOTUS filth decided to vote against his conscious this year so as not to over turn Roe v Wade because America is not ready yet. That means when the shrub gets reselected and they have 2/3 in the senate you can kiss it goodbye, that will be one of the first rights to go. Then they will shred the constitution and bill of rights even more by the time the shrub is finished we wont even be able to vote as we will be declared tarrrest by the Nazi regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gothmog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ginsberg is not in great health
I am not sure that she will last another four years. Rehnquist will likely retire ant that will let Bush control selection of the Chief Justice.

Roe v. Wade is on the line in the next election. We can let Bush have four or five appointments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terry_M Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Things aint ever gonna get better for us lefties
If we keep voting for centrists that don't even try to EARN our vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. So leave Bush in power and wait for a miracle?
Edited on Mon Apr-26-04 08:32 PM by jpgray
We have someone who speaks to the leftist vote, and it's Ralph Nader in the GE, and Kucinich in the primary. These guys get ignored, crapped on, and no one votes for them. In the case of Nader, his hypocrisy makes it somewhat deserved, but Kucinich deserves at least more recognition.

So either the system or the people reject those leftist values. What are we going to do about it? I say we move the country left whenever and however possible, and replacing Bush with Kerry moves it left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHBowden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. We'll be screwed for decades with the SC
Edited on Mon Apr-26-04 08:33 PM by JHBowden
if Bush sits in Gore's house for another four years. Kiss all of our worker safety, environmental, civil rights, and health laws goodbye. Seeing Chief Justice Scalia for a loooonnng time is a chilling thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveSZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. It's not only Roe V. Wade
If the justices that pass the Rove/Pat Robertson litmus test get confirmed, we'll have creationism and mandatory prayer in the schools, and a state religion imposed.

America will become Iran.

I tell that to people and they don't believe me unless they've also read all that I have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveSZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. You can also forget about gay rights
Edited on Mon Apr-26-04 08:44 PM by DaveSZ
or any other "rights."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. That's right!
A vote to reelect Bush is a vote to put a Scalia majority on the Supreme Court for decades. Justices are elected for life. Future voters could elect a liberal president and a iberal Congress and we'd STILL have the Scalia majority deciding things for our children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren.

Anybody who thinks that Kerry is not liberal enough for them ought to give that idea a good hard look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Environment, disabled, workers,
and any other right we've gotten in the last 100 years. Kiss them all goodbye if Bush gets in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. right, getting Green elected in 2008 wont defend against theocracy
if bush is able to appoint scalia types . and you know the republicans are going to appoint those young enough to be there for decades. if a liberal is elected in 2008 after bush gets to fill the supreme court with scalia type justices, legislation such as gay rights, abortion rights, rights for disabled, separation of church and state etc will all be overturned by the court.

i am a big support of john kerry, but this is one reason why i said i will be supporting whoever is the democratic nominee. it's one reason why i never even considered voting for anyone other than a democrat in 2000. if gore got into office, ginsberg who seems to be having health problems, and stevens who is old and will be retiring soon would probably have retired and allowed gore to appoint others in their place making those safe for us. but they have to hang on now as much as they can since bush would appoint right wingers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Without SCOTUS....
it won't fucking MATTER!!! What is it about the Supreme Court that you don't understand?? That is the bottom line of where our rights come from anyway. Criminy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. I kind of disagree.
I don't think the repugs will ever get rid of Roe v. Wade. It's too useful for them as a wedge issue, and a way of inciting the faithful. Restrictions, probably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Don't count on it
Woman-friends/relatives have said to me for years, "Oh they wouldn't really do that" as they voted for Reagan, then Bush, then Bush again.

Americans have this lovely quality of denial. It brought us 9/11. It brings us a host of environmental problems. It has given us a 30 year energy crisis that should've been solved 20 years ago.

These guys aren't fooling around.

Ignore them at our peril.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. Why i am pro choice

I am Pro Choice because i want control and autonomy over my own god damn body. NAFTA is anti choice to other women around the globe.NAFTA/WTO (and eventually the FTAA) has robbed women of their own self determination and autonomy.Corporations are fundmental extremists
If it is wrong for the us gov to occupy my womb then its certainly wrong for the us gov to occupy iraq and to fund the israeli occupation of palestine. that said i live in texas and dont have to worry and vote for nader but if i lived in a swing state then i would vote for kerry and then throw up in the poll booth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
18. Just dropped in to say you are dead right...
Go MikeG!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. I would like to see the bush's kill abortion. It would wake up all
of these stupid women who think like nader (there is no difference between dems and repugs).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC