Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Final Results are in - Obama wins Mississippi by over 100,000

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:12 PM
Original message
Final Results are in - Obama wins Mississippi by over 100,000
The last precincts have just trickled in.

Obama: 255,809

Clinton 155,686

That is amazing. A few hundred votes short of the popular vote in Texas.

Could Mississippi be in play this fall?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. And the fantasy of Hillary catching up in popular vote dies a little more
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
feedingfrenzy Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. MS will go McCain in the GE
sorry to rain on your Obarade
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. So will Texas
But somehow Clinton's 4-point victory there was a big win and hugely significant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
40. lol no we will not. TX was a staunchly DEM state for aged and it's
purple now.

Just you wait.

10% of the US military is from Texas and we ain't happy about this war, among other things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. But a hard fought race, using the 50 state strategy
Could possibly swing another representative. Either way, it helps!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
46. Welcome back
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
48. You're not rainin' on anything..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. No it doesn't. That's why they call it a fantasy
And that's why WE call it a freaking nightmare.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. When was the last time you know of that Mississippi voted blue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Why does this matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Jimmy Carter, I think
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDagnabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. when was Hasterts seat in Democratic hands?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. 1976.... also the last time the nation was this hungry for a change in Washington...
....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. If anyone can make Mississippi go blue, it's Obama.
I'm not saying he can but chances are increased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. 1976 - Carter
The point is to fight on all fronts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well done Mississippi!
You've done what my state couldn't--vote for Obama.

Goddamn Massachusetts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, it can. MS is a conservative blue state
They've had only two Republican governors since Reconstruction.

They've had a majority-blue House delegation except from 1997-1999 since Reconstruction.

It's a conservative blue state. They're ours if we work for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I don't know about that
I took a look at the numbers yesterday. With 37% of the population being African American, it seems like a state that should be in play. But in 2004, John Kerry and John Edwards, two white males, lost the white vote 85-15 in Mississippi, and that number might be even worse with an African American or a woman (or both) on the ticket.

There are two ways to look at that number: one interpretation is that Obama would do even worse because he's black (and you might be able to make the same case about Clinton because she's a woman). But there's another way to look at it. If Kerry and Edwards only got 15% white voters, that might mean that we have pretty much bottomed out among whites in Mississippi. Of the 15% left, how many more would vote Republican just because Obama's black or because Clinton is a woman?

Kerry and Edwards never campaigned in Mississippi, as far as I know. If they had, maybe they could have gotten their share of the white vote up a little. That, combined with higher black turnout, and maybe higher turnout among young people, could potentially move the state from Solid Republican to Likely Republican, maybe even to a leaner. If Obama could accomplish that higher turnout, and manage not to bleed any more white support (which may not be hard to do, given how low it was in 2004), maybe he could put the state in play. I don't have any illusions that we could win it, but if we can make it close enough for the RNC to spend money on ads and for John McCain to have to campaign there, that in and of itself would be a victory.

Still, the numbers from yesterday's exit poll are not encouraging, particularly the percentage of Clinton voters who would be dissatisfied with Obama as the nominee. I definitely think there was a Limbaugh effect in Mississippi yesterday that skewed some of these questions a little (why the hell else would 15% of people who voted for Clinton be dissatisfied if she got the nomination?) But judging by the exit polls, it's likely that Obama would bleed even more white support because he's black, making it hard to put the state in play even with a higher African American turnout.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. I think this party fundamentally misreads blue dogs
If Kerry and Edwards only got 15% white voters, that might mean that we have pretty much bottomed out among whites in Mississippi.

Blue dogs are economic populists and social conservatives. Except for Mike Huckabee, no candidate offers that. Neither party has these guys on the issues. They abandoned our party in 1994 when Gingrich ran a message that was economically populist and socially conservative -- by that point, we had lost most of our populist cred.

There is absolutely no reason we cannot get these voters back. Now, will Mississippi give its electors to Obama or Clinton? I'm not so sure. But, Lott's seat is up for replacement, and we can win it if we run an upticket candidate with coattails; we just need another Stennis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Mississippi will be the last state to go blue this fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Last, at number 40!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. You don't get around much do you?
Ever been to Utah, Alabama, or Oklahoma? Those will be the last states to ever turn Blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
33. All three will go blue before Mississippi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Are you serious? Mississippi has three times the amount of African Americans than the national.....
average. There is no reason why we should lose this state election after election other than the fact that the DLC likes the 17 state solution.


I'm going to bookmark this thread. If Obama gets the nomination, we will see if he can turn Mississippi, or how close he can come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. actually, though he won the state, the numbers are actually not really good news
he won because he got 90% of the black vote...

The problem is that he only got like 20 something percent of the white vote...


Big problem for a reach across the lines guy... punches huge holes in that whole idea...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. And Hillary got 77% of the puke vote.
It wouldn't have been nearly as close if not for that. Obama has no problem winning the all so sacred white vote. He has done it across the country. MS may be a little behind in race relations, but this is not a problem fro Obama at large.

Hillary, however has not done well with the black vote, or the youth vote anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. It's Mississippi
I was disappointed that he only got 26% of the white vote (I had hoped for 30), but I wasn't surprised. He is winning over white voters in a lot of places but Mississippi is the deep, deep South. The racial spread was similar in Alabama last month.

I am kind of disappointed by posts like yours, which carry the implication that the votes of white voters are somehow more important or more relevant in judging his success. Votes are votes, and for you to imply that it only matters how he does among white voters is kind of offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. This has been happening since before South Carolina.
Clinton campaign: White voters are issue voters. Black people only vote for a candidate out of blind loyalty or because the candidate is black.

The Clinton campaign lost it's share of the block vote and it's pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. He got 26% of the White vote.....

But in addition, it appears that Hillary got 24% of the Repug vote who were voting not for her, but against Obama for the General. So in essence that took away from Obama's calculation of the White vote by skewing it toward Hillary. So, increase his vote get by 25% and he actually got 49% of the bonifide Democratic/Independent White vote in Mississippi. I know it is hard to believe, but here are the facts:






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. This thread could explain a lot about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. If Obama gets 95% of the black vote, and 25% of the white vote in MS vs McCain... Obama wins....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. Depends on black turnout
And 25% of the white vote will be a tough climb. Kerry only got 15%, and he's a white male. It may be doable but it'll be pretty tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Yeah, because Alaska, Utah, North Dakota, Vermont, and Idaho have huge black populations
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. And Iowa is Harlem with cornfields.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. If not what percentage of going voters vote for him, it's how many he can turn out to vote.......
We know he can get 90% of the black vote, but if he can get 90% of the African-American community, who is voting age, to turn out and vote, then he can win Mississippi.

Demographically he would have the best chance of winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Are you saying White people won't hold their nose for one damn election? n/t
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 02:33 PM by Catherina
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. They did for decades
Neither party appeals to blue dogs entirely; the GOP got a lock on a lot of the deep south (though, I repeat, they only got a majority of Mississippi's House districts for 2 years) when they ran an economic populist message along with a social conservative message, and that only worked after our party had given up on populism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
38. I doubt Obama would win
The vote is no indication, since it did not come close to what Bush received in 200 or 2004. He didn't even beat Gore 2000 or Kerry 2004. However, getting MS dems fired up might force McCain to spend scant resources there, which would be a boon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RDANGELO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
32. and this is a relatively small state.
To give some perspective, Clinton, won Ohio by 200,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
35. that comes to 62.1% for Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
36. Final delegates: O-19, C-14 for net +5

I've finally found a working definition of success for Clinton last night: she beat Chuck Todd's estimate of Obama's minimum delegate take by two. Todd said going in to last night that Obama would net gain 7 at least.

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#MS

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2008/by_state/MS_Page_0311_D.html?SITE=MSJADELN&SECTION=POLITICS


I imagine this must mean that she carried the 1st district although I haven't turned up a link to cite. If so, way to go.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. So a 63% popular vote yields Obama 5 more delegates than Clinton? Now that's a landslide. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. Those aren't final (not certified). In fact, the number will be 20-13.
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 04:00 PM by thevoiceofreason
CNN has it wrong -- can you imagine that?

And, BTW, Hillary's "unbelievably huge win in the Texas primary?" Net 4 delegates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. She carried the first district
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 04:05 PM by thevoiceofreason
But actually lost the 4th (CNN has that wrong)

So, it was

1: 3-2 Clinton (barely)

2: 5-2 Obama (almost 6-1)

3: 3-2 Obama (2% away from 4-1)

4: 3-2 Obama (by 200 votes or so -- CNN seems to call this the other way)

Overall: 7-4 Obama (threshold was 59%)

Total: 20-13
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. 19-14
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yukari Yakumo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
43. Not matter how you argue this...
This was an ass-whooping by Obama.

Clinton's meager gains from "Firewall Tuesday"? Gone. And then some.
And now she deludes herself that PA will turn things around. Nuh-uh. Any gains there will be undone by Indiana and North Carolina. This highlights the failure of the Clinton campaign, absolute arrogance that big wins will get her the nom. Unfortunately for her, that hasn't happened, and she failed to realize smaller state can undo any gains from her "big state" wins. And what kind of argument is "she should be the nom 'cause she wins the big states"? Um... excuse me, but with the exception of Texas, most "big states" are Democratic strongholds. "Big states" are not what is important, "Swing states" are. Guess who's winning most of those? Barack Obama.

Clinton should realize the game is over. She should throw in the towel and salvage any political capital she has left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
44. A motivated black vote in November is the Republicans worst nightmare
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
47. It doesn't count. Too many black people voted.
Their votes should really only count for 3/5 of Hillary's vote.

That means Obama got 153,485.

Congratulations, Senator Clinton, on your victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC