|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
| Hawkeye-X
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:39 PM Original message |
| Hillary supporters - I don't get it. Why is Hillary STILL in the race? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| Obamaniac
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Ego, hubris, spite... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mudesi
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. I think DU should declare it over |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Joe the Revelator
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Good question.. Aside of acting as a McCain spoiler, whats the point of her |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mooney
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. To permanently destroy her credibility and future viability? n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| maddiejoan
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. Hmmm. Let me think |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hawkeye-X
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:43 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 9. Obama is leading the popular vote, not Hillary |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| maddiejoan
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:45 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 15. why is your info better than mine? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hawkeye-X
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:52 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 25. Because it's accurate? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| greyghost
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:02 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 45. No, it isn't. Michigan and Florida will be seated at the |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Gore1FL
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:05 PM Response to Reply #45 |
| 51. The might get chairs |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Joe the Revelator
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:13 PM Response to Reply #45 |
| 61. Not without a revote. Even that doesn't help McClinton. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| girl gone mad
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:21 PM Response to Reply #45 |
| 70. Not a chance. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Joe the Revelator
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:46 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 17. Its funny you said the same thing 4 different times in order to make it seem that there were |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| maddiejoan
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:48 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 20. not by enough to build a solid case for Obama |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hawkeye-X
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 37. OK. What would make you switch over to Obama then? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| maddiejoan
|
Sat Mar-08-08 11:45 PM Response to Reply #37 |
| 88. I'll vote for him if he is the nominee |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| greyghost
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:03 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 47. Less then 100 isn't badly. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Joe the Revelator
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:12 PM Response to Reply #47 |
| 58. At this stage? Hell yes it is. The math isn't there for her to make it up. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Gore1FL
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:33 PM Response to Reply #47 |
| 75. It'll probably be more than 100 probably 100-175 more. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Catherine Vincent
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. "Answer my questions, thanks." |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hawkeye-X
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:44 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 12. That's all you have to say? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| greyghost
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:05 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 50. Give me a break. I'm at the point that I want to see Obama lose |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hawkeye-X
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:07 PM Response to Reply #50 |
| 52. Then you don't belong in DU then. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| greyghost
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:10 PM Response to Reply #52 |
| 56. I've been a Dem since McGovern and you idiots aren't pushing |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:40 PM Response to Reply #52 |
| 78. WTF are you talking about? This is still the primaries |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| greyghost
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:18 AM Response to Reply #78 |
| 91. Thank you |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Saturday
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. She lost WY? Oh my, out of the 7000 voters that went |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Joe the Revelator
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 18. Don't you get it? Hillary had to SWEEP after Wisconson. She can no longer afford to lose anything |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Saturday
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:57 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 33. She has won all the big states where the population is. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hawkeye-X
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:59 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 39. That was recently debunked. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| greyghost
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:07 PM Response to Reply #39 |
| 53. Debunked by what ? Wishful thinking doesn't count, the heavily |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Joe the Revelator
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:00 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 40. You're kidding yourself. She lost Texas, she lost VA, she lost IL, the list goes on and on |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| greyghost
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:12 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 60. Yeah, sure they are. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KittyWampus
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 35. so you just insulted Democrats in Wyoming & you think their super delegates will support Clinton |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Az_lefty
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:20 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 92. yea, to Hillary WY is another don't matter state... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rodeodance
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. cause she has over half of the voter so far. How silly can you be? not keeping updated are you! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KittyWampus
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 38. she is still losing the popular vote. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rodeodance
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:38 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 77. nope--- |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| skooooo
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. So her husband can shill for her on the Rush Limbaugh show. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BlueJac
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. So she can support Mc Same........ |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| IndianaGreen
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. And McCain's poll numbers have risen since Hillary threw the kitchen sink |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MannyGoldstein
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. 2012 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Liberal Veteran
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. I'm going with "sense of entitlement" and "selfcenteredness" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. Why? Because she's a true Democrat and you're a World Class fool |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| IndianaGreen
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:49 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 21. A "true" Democrat like Joe Lieberman and Zell Miller? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ElsewheresDaughter
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:53 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 26. John Kerry asked McCain to be his VP in June 2004! Gore had Lieberman....now what? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:56 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 30. That had to be the most embarrassing Democratic moment EVER when Kerry courted McCain |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hawkeye-X
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:01 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 43. Except you got it completely backwards. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:11 PM Response to Reply #43 |
| 57. Only an Obamawhiner would take some poster's word from MyDD over the NY Times. LMFAO |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tom Joad
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:03 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 46. It would have been more respectable for Kerry to do "recruiting" for a partner in an airport |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hawkeye-X
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:04 PM Response to Reply #46 |
| 49. ROFL |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| karynnj
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:01 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 42. Kerry never offered him the VP, though McCain has occasionally lied and said he did |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:42 PM Response to Reply #42 |
| 81. No official offer was made, but Kerry courted him for it & he never denied that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| karynnj
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #81 |
| 94. that was NOT Kerry's story ever |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hawkeye-X
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:51 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 23. True Democrat? I don't think so. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:53 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 27. I counted 4 lies in your post. When you stop lying, maybe I'll answer your question. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hawkeye-X
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:01 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 44. Uh-huh. What lies are you claiming? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:09 PM Response to Reply #44 |
| 55. They're in the first four sentences of your previous post |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Joe the Revelator
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 24. True Democrats don't endorse republican candidates. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ElsewheresDaughter
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:55 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 29. John Kerry asked McCain to be his VP in June 2004! Gore had Lieberman......Obama loves repukes |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Joe the Revelator
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:59 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 36. This is your excuse for Hillary's most shameful moment (which is saying a lot)? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ElsewheresDaughter
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 22. latest super delegate count Hillary leads and we'll see ya in PA! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| greyghost
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:16 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 65. Lovely, simply lovely. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KoKo
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
| 28. They stay there because their candidate is getting votes and to ANNOY...YOU! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| McCamy Taylor
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 31. Because she likes a challenge and does not quit when the going gets tough? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Straight Shooter
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 32. Well, part of the reason is because voters like me want her to stay in the race. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KittyWampus
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:00 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 41. "so many things that can happen". Like what? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Straight Shooter
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:08 PM Response to Reply #41 |
| 54. Use your imagination. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Diane R
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 34. Hillary is still in the race to ruin Obama's chances, and position herself for 2012. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hawkeye-X
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:04 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 48. I don't think so. She already damaged herself for 2012 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| lastknowngood
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 59. Because we need at least one Democrat in the race |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Joe the Revelator
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:13 PM Response to Reply #59 |
| 62. Since when do democrats endorse people like John McCain?? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jalynn
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:41 PM Response to Reply #62 |
| 79. She |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Joe the Revelator
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:43 PM Response to Reply #79 |
| 82. She very clearly endorsed McCain over Democratic front runner Obama |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:14 PM Response to Reply #59 |
| 63. BINGO |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Quixote1818
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:31 PM Response to Reply #59 |
| 74. Then why does she always lose the most liberal counties in each state? nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Johnny Potpie
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
| 64. Mark my words |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| joshcryer
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:17 PM Response to Reply #64 |
| 67. Because of the superdelegates, the pledged delegates have little say in tight races. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| joshcryer
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 66. Because she wants to win and the MSM is allowing her to stay in. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Medusa
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 68. She's running for the VP slot |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BzaDem
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 69. Because she CAN win. Perfectly fairly. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| greyghost
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:21 PM Response to Reply #69 |
| 71. Exactly |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Samantha
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 72. You need to travel to Chappaqua and play that Roy Orbinson |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:28 PM Response to Reply #72 |
| 73. Roy wrote Pretty Woman with Hillary in mind |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rodeodance
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:37 PM Response to Reply #73 |
| 76. Hillary is beutiful. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| here_is_to_hope
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:31 PM Response to Reply #73 |
| 83. I just fucking threw up in my mouth...n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Snarkoleptic
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 80. I'm going to pop some corn...I'll be right back...anyone want some? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| amborin
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 84. she's winning it, that's why |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| istopforcookies
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:42 PM Response to Reply #84 |
| 85. Because I want to vote for her |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ElsewheresDaughter
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 86. here is just 1 reason... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| quakerboy
|
Sat Mar-08-08 11:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 87. I am an obama supporter |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| OPERATIONMINDCRIME
|
Sat Mar-08-08 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 89. Because She'd Make The Better President, Has More Support Among Democrats, And Can Still Win. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| antigop
|
Sat Mar-08-08 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 90. I am NOT a Hillary supporter, but, mathematically it is still POSSIBLE |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| annie1
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
| 93. ? is it ok if your candidate finally has to run against someone. wtf is your guys' problem... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 20th 2013, 12:47 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC