|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
| scheming daemons
|
Sat Mar-08-08 05:06 PM Original message |
| Obama: at least +2 delegates from Wyoming... Clinton: at best -3 delegates from Texas..... LOL |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| |
landonb16 | Mar-08-08 05:06 PM | #1 |
| |
AtomicKitten | Mar-08-08 05:08 PM | #2 |
| |
Kittycat | Mar-08-08 05:29 PM | #10 |
| |
usregimechange | Mar-08-08 05:12 PM | #3 |
| |
TwoSparkles | Mar-08-08 05:22 PM | #7 |
| |
K Gardner | Mar-08-08 05:25 PM | #8 |
| |
Voice for Peace | Mar-08-08 05:12 PM | #4 |
| |
K Gardner | Mar-08-08 05:26 PM | #9 |
| |
Not the Only One | Mar-08-08 05:33 PM | #11 |
| |
bluestateguy | Mar-08-08 05:14 PM | #5 |
| |
Kittycat | Mar-08-08 05:33 PM | #12 |
| |
featherman | Mar-08-08 05:19 PM | #6 |
| DUyellow
|
Sat Mar-08-08 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. GOBAMA |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AtomicKitten
|
Sat Mar-08-08 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. I believe they call that Joementum. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Kittycat
|
Sat Mar-08-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 10. Hillary W. McLieberman's School of Fuzzy Math |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| usregimechange
|
Sat Mar-08-08 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Yes we need more "big states" for Obama |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CoffeeCat
|
Sat Mar-08-08 05:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 7. I am thinking that the vast amount of time... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| K Gardner
|
Sat Mar-08-08 05:25 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 8. I agree completely. He also needs to eat up some 24 hr news cycles with HIS message and HIS |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Voice for Peace
|
Sat Mar-08-08 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. Is it still possible for him to reach 2025? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| K Gardner
|
Sat Mar-08-08 05:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 9. As is with Hillary, not without the Supers. Not unless she drops out. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Not the Only One
|
Sat Mar-08-08 05:33 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 11. Technically, yes. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bluestateguy
|
Sat Mar-08-08 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. This is the Obama strategy |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Kittycat
|
Sat Mar-08-08 05:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 12. Not a bad strategy, given that he'll win the blue states in Nov anyway. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| featherman
|
Sat Mar-08-08 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. There is an at-large (not super) delegate also based on overall |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 24th 2013, 04:39 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC