kpete
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 01:42 PM
Original message |
| OBAMA Says He Will "Review Every Executive Order Issued By Bush" |
|
Candidates rouse crowds in Wyoming By David Olinger The Denver Post Article Last Updated: 03/08/2008 08:26:59 AM MST CASPER — Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton crisscrossed Wyoming on Friday, campaigning for every available vote in a state that last voted for a Democratic presidential candidate in 1964. Saturday's prizes: 12 delegates in the Wyoming caucuses and precious momentum in a seesaw primary race. Obama told a cheering crowd at a town-hall meeting in Casper that he would restore respect for law in the White House by reviewing every executive order issued by President Bush and discarding any deemed unconstitutional. Obama's comments came in response to a question from a man in the audience who said he worried that presidents sometimes consider themselves above the law. more at: http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_8498322
|
-
Good on you, Obama!!! |
tekisui |
Mar-08-08 01:44 PM |
#1 |
 -
He nails it. He has my vote. Happily. Thank you, Mr. Obama. |
roguevalley |
Mar-08-08 09:51 PM |
#20 |
  -
Here's another thought |
nvme |
Mar-09-08 01:46 AM |
#43 |
 -
You mean he'll have his surrogates Review? |
hueyshort |
Mar-09-08 08:48 AM |
#65 |
 -
Being that he teaches Constitutional Law |
ekwhite |
Mar-09-08 11:35 AM |
#94 |
 -
he tells us a nice thing - but what does he tell the corporations and other nations? |
papau |
Mar-09-08 11:14 AM |
#91 |
  -
You mean does he lie like hillary??? |
movonne |
Mar-09-08 11:53 AM |
#97 |
 -
Well, knowing nothing else, this alone would clinch it for me. |
calimary |
Mar-09-08 02:30 PM |
#148 |
-
Obama is a constitutional lawyer so he will restore integrity in the WH |
bambino |
Mar-08-08 01:46 PM |
#2 |
 -
Also a Professor of Constitutional Law |
frog92969 |
Mar-09-08 12:35 AM |
#39 |
-
Not a professor -- he taught some classes |
LostinVA |
Mar-09-08 07:32 AM |
#56 |
 -
And your point is? Can you teach classes in Constitutional Law? |
michaz |
Mar-09-08 07:40 AM |
#58 |
  -
Why the snottiness because I made a legit point? |
LostinVA |
Mar-09-08 07:46 AM |
#59 |
   -
Professor is a rank |
BearSquirrel2 |
Mar-09-08 10:05 AM |
#75 |
    -
and then we have the titles within |
Kajsa |
Mar-09-08 10:19 AM |
#78 |
     -
Sounds right .. |
BearSquirrel2 |
Mar-09-08 10:54 AM |
#86 |
     -
goes like this |
RainDog |
Mar-09-08 01:33 PM |
#137 |
    -
Try telling that to the Professors with their Phd.'s. |
midnight |
Mar-09-08 11:19 AM |
#92 |
   -
So Carefully Worded |
Forrest Greene |
Mar-09-08 01:23 PM |
#134 |
  -
LostinVA makes a valid point. |
GMFORD |
Mar-09-08 02:39 PM |
#150 |
 -
Oh, I stand corrected. |
frog92969 |
Mar-09-08 10:38 AM |
#79 |
 -
That's right, he wasn't |
WesDem |
Mar-09-08 01:55 PM |
#143 |
 -
Professors have PHDs |
niceypoo |
Mar-09-08 02:43 PM |
#152 |
-
He's was a Lecturer ... |
BearSquirrel2 |
Mar-09-08 10:03 AM |
#73 |
 -
You know what they say about assume |
frog92969 |
Mar-09-08 10:45 AM |
#81 |
-
You joking ??? |
BearSquirrel2 |
Mar-09-08 10:58 AM |
#87 |
-
No |
frog92969 |
Mar-09-08 12:10 PM |
#100 |
-
I have a college degree and... |
Pacifist Patriot |
Mar-09-08 02:28 PM |
#147 |
-
You'll forgive us ... |
BearSquirrel2 |
Mar-09-08 04:10 PM |
#160 |
-
Um, no snootiness was intended. |
Pacifist Patriot |
Mar-09-08 05:28 PM |
#161 |
-
I think if you reread ... |
BearSquirrel2 |
Mar-10-08 12:39 AM |
#163 |
-
oooooh... |
RazBerryBeret |
Mar-09-08 11:07 AM |
#90 |
-
It seemed so innocent at the time. |
frog92969 |
Mar-09-08 11:49 AM |
#96 |
-
he he he... |
RazBerryBeret |
Mar-09-08 12:29 PM |
#105 |
-
Excellent |
tammywammy |
Mar-08-08 01:46 PM |
#3 |
 -
Has Hillary had "experience" as a Constitional lawyer? |
goclark |
Mar-08-08 01:48 PM |
#4 |
  -
Only in figuring out how to circumvent |
shraby |
Mar-08-08 01:50 PM |
#6 |
  -
I don't know. How many Constitutional lawyers has she slept next to? |
jgraz |
Mar-09-08 06:14 AM |
#49 |
   -
Aww you didn't have to say that |
Shae |
Mar-09-08 01:26 PM |
#135 |
  -
No, but she stayed in a Holiday Inn. |
kokono |
Mar-09-08 09:54 AM |
#70 |
 -
she would.. |
indimuse |
Mar-09-08 06:27 AM |
#52 |
  -
She would what? Sleep next to a constitutional professor, or gain "experience" by doing so? |
Thor_MN |
Mar-09-08 07:57 AM |
#61 |
 -
She will |
maddiejoan |
Mar-09-08 10:16 AM |
#76 |
-
Thanks maddiejoan |
tammywammy |
Mar-09-08 12:38 PM |
#107 |
-
Well, considering that |
Mme. Defarge |
Mar-08-08 01:50 PM |
#5 |
 -
Yea for Mme. Defarge nt |
goclark |
Mar-08-08 01:53 PM |
#7 |
  -
Entre nous, s'il vous plait ... |
Mme. Defarge |
Mar-08-08 02:40 PM |
#14 |
 -
I'll tell ya! |
bicentennial_baby |
Mar-08-08 02:45 PM |
#16 |
  -
Madame Defarge ... |
Mme. Defarge |
Mar-08-08 02:54 PM |
#17 |
 -
Mais oui! Pas de probleme! |
bicentennial_baby |
Mar-08-08 03:00 PM |
#18 |
 -
Check out the DU glossary |
DeeDeeNY |
Mar-09-08 07:56 AM |
#60 |
  -
Coolness! n/t |
Mme. Defarge |
Mar-09-08 02:52 PM |
#153 |
 -
Here's the link to the DU Glossary where many things like this are explained. |
I Have A Dream |
Mar-09-08 02:24 PM |
#146 |
 -
Merci beaucoup, Mme Defarge |
OKDem08 |
Mar-09-08 06:16 AM |
#50 |
 -
the Constitution |
90-percent |
Mar-09-08 07:58 AM |
#62 |
-
that is a HUGE step towards fixing the problems of the Bush White House |
NightWatcher |
Mar-08-08 01:54 PM |
#8 |
-
Reason number one to vote for Obama. |
gordianot |
Mar-08-08 01:58 PM |
#9 |
-
Why stop at Bush's orders, just issue an order rescinding all and then selectively re-approve. |
jody |
Mar-08-08 02:08 PM |
#10 |
 -
Even better yet! |
chill_wind |
Mar-08-08 09:50 PM |
#19 |
-
For anyone still on the fence, this should do it! rec'd |
williesgirl |
Mar-08-08 02:24 PM |
#11 |
 -
You would think so. |
frog92969 |
Mar-09-08 12:43 AM |
#40 |
 -
still on the fence btwn Hil and O? Hil already said it. |
annie1 |
Mar-09-08 12:53 PM |
#119 |
-
he has my vote and my campaign contributions |
MissWaverly |
Mar-08-08 02:25 PM |
#12 |
-
Hillary said the same thing months ago. nt |
Jim4Wes |
Mar-08-08 02:26 PM |
#13 |
 -
months and months ago |
bigtree |
Mar-08-08 02:44 PM |
#15 |
  -
Was that before or after Bush endorsed her? |
dailykoff |
Mar-08-08 10:12 PM |
#29 |
 -
No it was after Obama said there was no daylight between his position on Iraq and Bush's |
bigtree |
Mar-09-08 07:28 AM |
#55 |
 -
She said it in Oct.2007 |
bluedog |
Mar-09-08 11:24 AM |
#93 |
  -
damn she's good. |
annie1 |
Mar-09-08 12:54 PM |
#120 |
 -
Obama has a tendency to parrot Clinton on practically every |
lumpy |
Mar-09-08 12:57 PM |
#121 |
-
Yup. NYT: Obama followed the Hillary model.... |
annie1 |
Mar-09-08 01:16 PM |
#133 |
-
GOBAMA! |
anonymous171 |
Mar-08-08 09:51 PM |
#21 |
-
This is a winning message in many parts of the country... |
kentuck |
Mar-08-08 09:53 PM |
#22 |
 -
But a losing message |
frog92969 |
Mar-09-08 12:09 AM |
#35 |
-
Your post actually made me sad- that talking about the "law" would |
Olney Blue |
Mar-09-08 11:06 AM |
#89 |
-
It is sad |
frog92969 |
Mar-09-08 12:43 PM |
#113 |
-
Outstanding! |
cryingshame |
Mar-08-08 10:04 PM |
#23 |
-
I would LOVE to see that happen n/t |
canadian_is_cold |
Mar-08-08 10:06 PM |
#24 |
-
So |
MassDemm |
Mar-08-08 10:08 PM |
#25 |
 -
He is not an absolutist, social controller, or unilateralist |
Maineman |
Mar-09-08 09:31 AM |
#68 |
 -
I'm furking disgusted with Obama using Clintons words/ ideas |
lumpy |
Mar-09-08 01:03 PM |
#124 |
-
This is why I voted for him. |
Mooney |
Mar-08-08 10:09 PM |
#26 |
 -
Me too |
Maineman |
Mar-09-08 09:17 AM |
#67 |
-
That's right, you heard it before from Hillary Clinton. |
lumpy |
Mar-09-08 01:09 PM |
#127 |
-
That's right, you heard it before from Hillary Clinton. |
lumpy |
Mar-09-08 01:09 PM |
#128 |
-
It's been so long |
Pavlovs DiOgie |
Mar-08-08 10:09 PM |
#27 |
-
That's music to my ears. |
dailykoff |
Mar-08-08 10:11 PM |
#28 |
-
You know this is why |
zidzi |
Mar-08-08 10:13 PM |
#30 |
 -
Obama's Got My Vote |
mcollier |
Mar-09-08 12:27 PM |
#104 |
-
I wouldn't call Obama anymore of a uniter than Clinton is. |
lumpy |
Mar-09-08 01:14 PM |
#131 |
-
That is music to my ears! Thank you, Senator Obama. Thank you. |
hisownpetard |
Mar-08-08 11:28 PM |
#31 |
 -
Hillary said this in a debate months ago. |
annie1 |
Mar-09-08 12:39 PM |
#109 |
-
She also said that McCain has crossed the threshhold to be Commander in Chief. |
hisownpetard |
Mar-09-08 01:07 PM |
#125 |
-
Doesn't make an iota of difference to the wide eyed Obama |
lumpy |
Mar-09-08 01:16 PM |
#132 |
-
Way to go, Obama! |
slinkerwink |
Mar-08-08 11:29 PM |
#32 |
-
Now that's my Guy, and I'm so proud of him!! |
discerning christian |
Mar-08-08 11:33 PM |
#33 |
-
Now he's talking my issues ! |
frog92969 |
Mar-09-08 12:00 AM |
#34 |
-
This is it, Obama! This |
zidzi |
Mar-09-08 12:11 AM |
#36 |
 -
Hillary already talked about this change in 2007, and 2008 before now... |
annie1 |
Mar-09-08 12:57 PM |
#122 |
-
hilarly has a Record of not changing. |
zidzi |
Mar-09-08 01:08 PM |
#126 |
-
how has hillary enabled the war to keep going in ways that obama hasn't?... |
annie1 |
Mar-09-08 01:13 PM |
#130 |
-
hilary and the bushits got the war started |
zidzi |
Mar-09-08 01:32 PM |
#136 |
-
i'd repeat the question but clearly you didn't understand it the first time. not surprising. |
annie1 |
Mar-09-08 01:38 PM |
#138 |
-
"There's just no hypocricy like Hilary Hypocricy" |
zidzi |
Mar-09-08 01:45 PM |
#141 |
-
I've been waiting.... |
cliffordu |
Mar-09-08 12:19 AM |
#37 |
 -
Hillary already said it in a debate i think after IA, or right before. |
annie1 |
Mar-09-08 12:40 PM |
#110 |
-
Alot of people must not have been listening. |
frog92969 |
Mar-09-08 03:03 PM |
#154 |
-
I would think that would be a given, but then again... |
Neshanic |
Mar-09-08 12:23 AM |
#38 |
-
I would hope so. n/t |
TreasonousBastard |
Mar-09-08 12:57 AM |
#41 |
-
As it should be |
donheld |
Mar-09-08 01:32 AM |
#42 |
-
Maybe the press, |
CatnHat |
Mar-09-08 03:03 AM |
#44 |
-
N I C E |
Skittles |
Mar-09-08 04:46 AM |
#45 |
-
Well... there it 'tis. |
AzDar |
Mar-09-08 05:01 AM |
#46 |
-
That is good to hear! |
Oldenuff |
Mar-09-08 05:04 AM |
#47 |
 -
I think the gist is |
frog92969 |
Mar-09-08 03:10 PM |
#156 |
-
Excellent! Obama should definitely stress his constitutional law experience n/t |
AntiFascist |
Mar-09-08 05:37 AM |
#48 |
-
too bad while he's been in the senate he hasn't been a more boistorous |
glowing |
Mar-09-08 06:25 AM |
#51 |
-
FINALLY!!!!! A Candidate Spreaks That Which I Need To Hear. nt |
NoFederales |
Mar-09-08 07:00 AM |
#53 |
 -
Did you hear the Des Moines IA debate? it was said there by hillary and others... |
annie1 |
Mar-09-08 12:51 PM |
#118 |
-
This is exactly whats been missing |
jonnyra |
Mar-09-08 07:23 AM |
#54 |
 -
Senator Clinton has already said it -- quite a while ago, actually |
LostinVA |
Mar-09-08 09:13 AM |
#66 |
-
Quote? |
AchtungToddler |
Mar-09-08 10:47 AM |
#84 |
-
After so many years of living under the thumb of an idiot, |
Vinca |
Mar-09-08 07:36 AM |
#57 |
 -
It pisses me off |
Maureen1322 |
Mar-09-08 08:34 AM |
#63 |
-
It still pisses me off |
randr |
Mar-09-08 09:47 AM |
#69 |
-
Rule of Law is my number one issue also, But why not go further? |
aasleka |
Mar-09-08 08:44 AM |
#64 |
-
Which means not only will Bush documents be opened, but Clinton ones. |
TheZug |
Mar-09-08 09:57 AM |
#71 |
 -
So desperate |
frog92969 |
Mar-09-08 03:14 PM |
#157 |
-
trashed until deemed sane ... |
BearSquirrel2 |
Mar-09-08 10:01 AM |
#72 |
-
K&R-about time someone spoke of signing statements |
spanone |
Mar-09-08 10:05 AM |
#74 |
-
That is definitely one of the things I have wanted to hear. |
jwirr |
Mar-09-08 10:18 AM |
#77 |
 -
Hillary has said it several times. |
annie1 |
Mar-09-08 12:44 PM |
#114 |
-
You can bet that if Hillary ever becomes president |
bowens43 |
Mar-09-08 10:44 AM |
#80 |
-
So why isn't he calling for accountability now ?... |
RestoreGore |
Mar-09-08 10:46 AM |
#82 |
-
Yes! He knows his stuff. They don't just appoint anyone president of Harvard Law Review. |
Glimmer of Hope |
Mar-09-08 10:47 AM |
#83 |
-
Is this even logistically possible? |
Rosemary2205 |
Mar-09-08 10:50 AM |
#85 |
 -
True but |
Suzie57 |
Mar-09-08 12:48 PM |
#117 |
-
Promise to proscecute him for every crime he has commited and you can have my vote Sen. Obama |
JCMach1 |
Mar-09-08 10:58 AM |
#88 |
-
Bush: "I trust my legacy to Hillary" |
Kristi1696 |
Mar-09-08 11:37 AM |
#95 |
 -
That WAS an eye opener |
frog92969 |
Mar-09-08 03:20 PM |
#158 |
-
Absolutely. |
Usrename |
Mar-09-08 11:57 AM |
#98 |
-
Obama is once again following Clinton's lead. She said this months ago. |
goldcanyonaz |
Mar-09-08 11:59 AM |
#99 |
 -
i remember this too, do you have the quote? i can't believe obamanots are falling for this... |
annie1 |
Mar-09-08 12:39 PM |
#108 |
-
Kicked! |
alteredstate |
Mar-09-08 12:16 PM |
#101 |
-
How I wish I had been there to hear that. I have so longed for the next Prez to start from Day One-- |
Hekate |
Mar-09-08 12:21 PM |
#102 |
-
kick |
The Backlash Cometh |
Mar-09-08 12:23 PM |
#103 |
-
Hillary said this in a debate months ago. |
annie1 |
Mar-09-08 12:38 PM |
#106 |
 -
She speaks about it in townhalls too. |
wlucinda |
Mar-09-08 12:41 PM |
#111 |
-
Obama's lawyering creds |
90-percent |
Mar-09-08 12:42 PM |
#112 |
 -
Also, he was a Civil Rights Attorney |
WillYourVoteBCounted |
Mar-09-08 12:47 PM |
#116 |
 -
Be careful |
frog92969 |
Mar-09-08 03:24 PM |
#159 |
-
Obama taught Constitutional Law for 10 years, |
WillYourVoteBCounted |
Mar-09-08 12:45 PM |
#115 |
-
Hillary Clinton's reply to question asked her at National Town Hall meeting |
Tom Rinaldo |
Mar-09-08 12:59 PM |
#123 |
 -
She's already VOTED to SUPPORT BUSH Time and Time again. And she's in Bed with the Saudis/Dubai |
berni_mccoy |
Mar-09-08 01:40 PM |
#139 |
 -
Good for her. |
GMFORD |
Mar-09-08 02:41 PM |
#151 |
-
Well done. Signing statements too, though. |
gulliver |
Mar-09-08 01:12 PM |
#129 |
-
a question for ppl here |
RainDog |
Mar-09-08 01:43 PM |
#140 |
 -
No. "Yes we can" was the Farm Workers Union thing, their slogan... |
annie1 |
Mar-09-08 02:04 PM |
#144 |
-
thanks so much! n/t |
RainDog |
Mar-09-08 03:08 PM |
#155 |
-
Sometimes it takes a constitutional law scholar to clean up after a Bush. |
Qutzupalotl |
Mar-09-08 01:54 PM |
#142 |
-
What he (or Hillary) should be saying is not re-view, but RE-SCIND. |
pattmarty |
Mar-09-08 02:15 PM |
#145 |
-
But...wait... |
democrank |
Mar-09-08 02:31 PM |
#149 |
-
Wow! This is great! Sen. Obama, soon our nominee for President |
snappyturtle |
Mar-09-08 05:32 PM |
#162 |
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
When you review, prosecute the Constitutional violations!!!!
He has also vowed to close gitmo and restore Habeas Corpus.
|
roguevalley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 20. He nails it. He has my vote. Happily. Thank you, Mr. Obama. |
nvme
(486 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 43. Here's another thought |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 01:46 AM by nvme
I may be wrong but it should go a step further by Possibly ( I am not sure on the constitutionality) rescinding all signing statements. They were given as way the shrub laying groundwork to circumvent the law.
|
hueyshort
(293 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #43 |
| 65. You mean he'll have his surrogates Review? |
|
I don't think Obama gets into details.
|
ekwhite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #65 |
| 94. Being that he teaches Constitutional Law |
|
I believe he will review them himself.
|
papau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 91. he tells us a nice thing - but what does he tell the corporations and other nations? |
movonne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #91 |
| 97. You mean does he lie like hillary??? |
calimary
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 148. Well, knowing nothing else, this alone would clinch it for me. |
|
That's ABSOLUTELY one of the things OUR new president simply MUST do. A total and across-the-board ESSENTIAL. Priority ONE.
Hopefully that includes the sneaky-ass decision to lock up all the presidential papers from reagan on up. Funny enough, including bush's daddy's papers. I WANNA SEE THOSE MOST OF ALL!!!!!!! (Well, besides junior's, that is.)
This is VERY good to hear. Go, O!
|
Rosa Luxemburg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Obama is a constitutional lawyer so he will restore integrity in the WH |
frog92969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 39. Also a Professor of Constitutional Law |
LostinVA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #39 |
| 56. Not a professor -- he taught some classes |
|
I have friends who work in academia, and being named a Professor is a big deal.
|
michaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #56 |
| 58. And your point is? Can you teach classes in Constitutional Law? |
|
Being able to teach these classes is a big deal. You do have to know it to teach it! Duh!
|
LostinVA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #58 |
| 59. Why the snottiness because I made a legit point? |
|
I am qualified to teach other law-related higher education classes -- are you? DUH? See how TOTALLY unnecessarily rude that is. And, even though I can, that doesn't make me a professor. Nor does being an EMT means someone can be called doctor.
Jesus, another one for ignore.
|
BearSquirrel2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #59 |
|
Professor is an academic rank. It's like being a "made man" in academia. You're tenured and you can pretty much teach how you like from that point on. You still have to report to the bosses (department head, dean, president) though and they can make your life difficult (more classes, lower level) if you piss them off.
|
Kajsa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #75 |
| 78. and then we have the titles within |
|
the title of Professor,
Associate Professor Full Professor
did I miss any?
|
BearSquirrel2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #78 |
|
It's like saying Colonel ... there are different kinds.
I have to constantly correct my students when they call me professor. I am just a graduate lecturer.
|
RainDog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #78 |
|
with a PhD and an appt to teach at a U. the first level is Assistant Professor, if you get tenure, you are moved to Associate Professor. You then have another review in X amt. of years and you are then appointed to Full Professor status. Each level has salary minimums for that U. and that discipline. If you do amazing work and get nominated for a Pulitzer, etc. you can then be the "XX Professor of XX. The first is the name of someone who has endowed a dept. or U. with funds to reward work.
Just as anyone who works in a library is not a librarian (and there are all sorts of diff. kinds of librarians, too, some whose work involves tenure, just like Profs, and whose specialities do not overlap, anyone who teaches at a U. is not a professor. Someone who is a professor in one discipline is not a professor in another simply b/c of a PhD. Someone who is not a professor who teaches classes because of his/her expertise is generally called a Lecturer or a Visiting Scholar, etc.
I probably missed some of it, too. LostinVA makes a good point. No need to get upset with that. It doesn't detract from Obama's credentials because he would not teach at a well-regarded U. if he didn't have the chops.
|
midnight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #75 |
| 92. Try telling that to the Professors with their Phd.'s. |
|
That's like calling my mother who is a nurse a doctor because she is teaching a medical class. No one would ever extend that to my mother. Unless of course this women,my mother, had her doctorate.
|
Forrest Greene
(946 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #59 |
|
Law-related higher education classes = Driver's Ed?
|
GMFORD
(202 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #58 |
| 150. LostinVA makes a valid point. |
|
Obama is careful not to call himself a constitutional law professor and we should be careful too. It just gives the opposition a hanging thread to try to knit a sweater from.
|
frog92969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #56 |
| 79. Oh, I stand corrected. |
|
I'm just a bricklayer who doesn't know the difference between a professor and a university teacher. No attempt at deception was intended.
|
Adelante
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #56 |
| 143. That's right, he wasn't |
|
Not for want of offers he declined.
|
niceypoo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #56 |
| 152. Professors have PHDs |
BearSquirrel2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #39 |
| 73. He's was a Lecturer ... |
|
Though, I'm fairly certain that this wasn't a community college deal. U Chicago doesn't fuck around.
|
frog92969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #73 |
| 81. You know what they say about assume |
|
I thought you had to be a professor to teach at university, my bad. It was U of C though, and definitely a plus in my book.
|
BearSquirrel2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #81 |
|
What you never had a foreign TA? Your college experience is obviously incomplete.
Professors really aren't teachers per se. Their primary function is the generation of knowledge. Teaching is something that is done on the side. Teaching low level classes (especially remedial stuff) is often relegated to Limited Term Lecturers and Graduate Aids (me).
|
frog92969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #87 |
|
My college experience is nonexistent, there's nothing funny about that.
|
Pacifist Patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #87 |
| 147. I have a college degree and... |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 02:33 PM by Pacifist Patriot
I've never been taught by anyone who wasn't a professor. There are schools out there that do not use TAs. So please don't assume if someone is unfamiliar with TAs that it means their college experience is obviously incomplete. I am familiar with them, but I've got a couple of alumni friends who wouldn't have a clue what you were talking about if you used the term.
|
BearSquirrel2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #147 |
| 160. You'll forgive us ... |
|
You'll forgive those of us who went to state schools then that allowed graduates to answer our questions in recitation.
|
Pacifist Patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #160 |
| 161. Um, no snootiness was intended. |
|
Your generalization didn't apply to several of us whether we had college educations or not, that's all.
|
BearSquirrel2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-10-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #161 |
| 163. I think if you reread ... |
|
I think if you reread my original statement, you'll find it's a form of hyperbole as in:
"Dude, if you haven't seen Seinfeld you haven't really seen TV."
Do I have to explain any more? I've got an Khazak grad student ready to do it in a thick accent.
|
RazBerryBeret
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #39 |
|
I knew you were gonna be jumped for that comment..
|
frog92969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #90 |
| 96. It seemed so innocent at the time. |
RazBerryBeret
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #96 |
|
I'm relatively new around here--but I saw that one coming!!!
|
tammywammy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I would also hope that Hillary Clinton would do the same.
|
goclark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. Has Hillary had "experience" as a Constitional lawyer? |
shraby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. Only in figuring out how to circumvent |
|
the constitution...that's where her consitutional experience has come from.
|
jgraz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 49. I don't know. How many Constitutional lawyers has she slept next to? |
|
Apparently this is how she picks up experience.
|
Shae
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #49 |
| 135. Aww you didn't have to say that |
|
Now I have to clean the coke off my monitor.
|
Kokonoe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 70. No, but she stayed in a Holiday Inn. |
indimuse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
Thor_MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #52 |
| 61. She would what? Sleep next to a constitutional professor, or gain "experience" by doing so? |
maddiejoan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
She was asked this as a question in one of the debates (I forget which) but it was asked of all the Democratic candidates that were on the stage.
Biden, Dodd, Richardson, Edwards, Obama, AND Clinton --and they all responded they would.
|
tammywammy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #76 |
|
Now that you say it, I remember that debate.  Thanks for refreshing my memory.
|
Mme. Defarge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. Well, considering that |
|
I just donated to Obama last night, and re-registered from Independent to Democrat this morning so that I can vote for O. in the Oregon Primary, and volunteered to work on his campaign -- all on faith, since protecting the constitution is my most important issue -- this is very good news indeed!
|
goclark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 7. Yea for Mme. Defarge nt |
Mme. Defarge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 14. Entre nous, s'il vous plait ... |
|
after being on DU for almost 4 years, I have not yet figured out the meaning of "nt" -- could you translate please?
Merci!
|
bicentennial_baby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
It means "no text", as in no text included in the body of the post. 
|
Mme. Defarge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
likes to be "au current" and appreciates your assistance!
|
bicentennial_baby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
| 18. Mais oui! Pas de probleme! |
DeeDeeNY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
| 60. Check out the DU glossary |
Mme. Defarge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #60 |
I Have A Dream
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
| 146. Here's the link to the DU Glossary where many things like this are explained. |
OKDem08
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 50. Merci beaucoup, Mme Defarge |
|
C'est tres bien. Au revoir mon ami.
|
90-percent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 07:59 AM by 90-percent
This is my most important issue also. Well, the occupations are pretty important, too.
But our system is based on checks and balances, as laid out in the constitution. All the treasonous crap Bush has been allowed to get away with has to be wiped out like Polio or the Plague.
Like Frank Zappa, I am also a Constitutional Fundamentalist. With a fully restored Constitution, we could have a government of the people once again.
-90% Jimmy
|
NightWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. that is a HUGE step towards fixing the problems of the Bush White House |
gordianot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. Reason number one to vote for Obama. |
jody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. Why stop at Bush's orders, just issue an order rescinding all and then selectively re-approve. |
chill_wind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
williesgirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message |
| 11. For anyone still on the fence, this should do it! rec'd |
frog92969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
Too many people just don't know what's happening.
|
annie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 119. still on the fence btwn Hil and O? Hil already said it. |
MissWaverly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message |
| 12. he has my vote and my campaign contributions |
|
he's going to be the next president of the United States, folks, you heard it here first. 
|
BootinUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message |
| 13. Hillary said the same thing months ago. nt |
bigtree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 15. months and months ago |
dailykoff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
| 29. Was that before or after Bush endorsed her? |
bigtree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
| 55. No it was after Obama said there was no daylight between his position on Iraq and Bush's |
bluedog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 93. She said it in Oct.2007 |
|
Hillary Clinton blasted the Bush administration's expansion of executive power today, pledging to conduct a review of Bush's abuses if elected to the White House. She explained her general thoughts in a substantive interview with The Guardian's Michael Tomasky: I think it is clear that the power grab undertaken by the Bush-Cheney administration has gone much further than any other president and has been sustained for longer. Other presidents, like Lincoln, have had to take on extraordinary powers but would later go to the Congress for either ratification or rejection. But when you take the view that they're not extraordinary powers, but they're inherent powers that reside in the office and therefore you have neither obligation to request permission nor to ask for ratification, we're in a new territory here. And I think that I'm gonna have to review everything they've done because I've been on the receiving end of that. There were a lot of actions which they took that were clearly beyond any power the Congress would have granted or that in my view that was inherent in the constitution. There were other actions they've taken which could have obtained congressional authorization but they deliberately chose not to pursue it as a matter of principle. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ari-melber/clinton-on-exe...
|
annie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #93 |
lumpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 121. Obama has a tendency to parrot Clinton on practically every |
annie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #121 |
| 133. Yup. NYT: Obama followed the Hillary model.... |
|
"He met with nearly one-third of the Senate, from both sides of the aisle, including his future rival, Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, to learn about the institution and solicit advice on how to succeed. That shaped a strategy: work hard, tend to your constituents, and, above all, get along with others. He spent many weekends traveling across Illinois for town-hall-style meetings. ‘The Hillary model’ Mr. Obama’s advisers referred to it as “the Hillary model,” patterned after Mrs. Clinton’s approach when she joined the Senate in 2001. But while Mr. Obama expressed admiration for her at the time, he dissuaded reporters from making too close a comparison. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23540579/page/2/
|
anonymous171
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message |
|
This is great. Time to bring the constitution back from the dead.
|
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message |
| 22. This is a winning message in many parts of the country... |
|
especially out West and down South. These folks love to hear their politicians defend the Constitution.
|
frog92969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
|
when it comes to corporate controlled media, polling and voting machine vendors, as well as every branch of government.
Any plans he has to return to the rule of law, I hope he keeps them under his hat.
|
Olney Blue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #35 |
| 89. Your post actually made me sad- that talking about the "law" would |
|
be something negative in our country. What has happened to us? 
|
frog92969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #89 |
|
And just getting bu$h out of the Blight House won't fix it. We need a President who respects laws, treaties and human life, that would be a good start anyway.
Sorry I brought you down, it pained me to say it.
|
KittyWampus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message |
canadian_is_cold
(207 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message |
| 24. I would LOVE to see that happen n/t |
boston bean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:08 PM
Response to Original message |
|
This is more double speak.
If he must know the ones he finds unconstitutional. Why does he always try to leave himself so much wiggle room.
I will review them. That means diddly squat!
|
Maineman
(411 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
| 68. He is not an absolutist, social controller, or unilateralist |
|
He is a cooperator and a listener, as opposed to being an arrogant know-it-all like Bush-Cheney. I fear Hillary is a bit more like Bush-Cheney. I also note that Obama's campaign is better organized. Why did Hillary not plan her campaign beyond Super Tuesday? Hmmm. Bush did not plan his Iraq campaign beyond the initial invasion.
|
lumpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
| 124. I'm furking disgusted with Obama using Clintons words/ ideas |
|
as his own. This is political plagiarism.
|
Mooney
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message |
| 26. This is why I voted for him. |
|
He gets it. He understands what's been lost.
|
Maineman
(411 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #26 |
|
I have heard this before, and it is a big deal for me. Barack is an organizer and a leader. He does not need to act unilaterally. I am not so sure about Hillary.
|
lumpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #67 |
| 127. That's right, you heard it before from Hillary Clinton. |
|
Obama has a good organization capable of stealing words from Clinton's mouth and depositing them in Obamas mouth.
|
lumpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #67 |
| 128. That's right, you heard it before from Hillary Clinton. |
|
Obama has a good organization capable of stealing words from Clinton's mouth and depositing them in Obamas mouth.
|
Pavlovs DiOgie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message |
|
that it's hard to imagine a president that follows the Constitution. Wow, this past 7 years has felt like an eternity.
|
dailykoff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message |
| 28. That's music to my ears. |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:13 PM
Response to Original message |
|
the bushits, limpbaughs and the clintons of the country do not want Obama near the white house. It's a powerful force he and his team are going up against but he's got a lot of free thinkers behind him.
|
mcollier
(887 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
|
He is a leader the likes we have not seen in a lifetime...
If the past 20+ years have taught us one thing, we need a true uniter. Not one who just claims to be, but on who is displaying an ability to unite people right before our eyes...
Vote for Barack Obama.
Thanks.
|
lumpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #104 |
| 131. I wouldn't call Obama anymore of a uniter than Clinton is. |
|
Are you oblivious to the fact that Hillary Clinton has her fair share of supporters. Would be interesting to see if Obama could unite Congress. No president has been able to unite those bodies since FDR.
|
hisownpetard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message |
| 31. That is music to my ears! Thank you, Senator Obama. Thank you. |
annie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
| 109. Hillary said this in a debate months ago. |
hisownpetard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #109 |
| 125. She also said that McCain has crossed the threshhold to be Commander in Chief. |
|
McCAIN - crazy, doddering, war-mongering, hot-tempered Bush-licking McCain.
Yeah, I'm gonna put a lot of credence in what she has to say...
|
lumpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #109 |
| 132. Doesn't make an iota of difference to the wide eyed Obama |
slinkerwink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message |
JanusAscending
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message |
| 33. Now that's my Guy, and I'm so proud of him!! |
|
Anyone think that Hillary will do as much?? I don't!!
|
frog92969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:00 AM
Response to Original message |
| 34. Now he's talking my issues ! |
|
Best thing I've heard all primary. This was my hope when I voted for him.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:11 AM
Response to Original message |
| 36. This is it, Obama! This |
|
is some of that change we're talkin' about!
|
annie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
| 122. Hillary already talked about this change in 2007, and 2008 before now... |
|
i've heard her say it months ago and others here have as well. that's what we like about her. She's talking about things she will actually do.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #122 |
| 126. hilarly has a Record of not changing. |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 01:08 PM by zidzi
hilary has enabled bush to keep the War On Iraq going. Keep your eyes closed and you will not see hilary's dirty little secrets or her dirty little campaign lies. Keep those fingers in your ears and you won't hear the lies hilary tells her hangers on.
|
annie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #126 |
| 130. how has hillary enabled the war to keep going in ways that obama hasn't?... |
|
and who's got their fingers in their ears, this is the first time you're hearing obama talk about reviewing orders, he said it in January 2008.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #130 |
| 136. hilary and the bushits got the war started |
|
and now they need supplies but you knew that. hilary is a lying, cheating, mccain supporter who wants Obama to be her VP..but lies about him to the public..she's a dirty politician who will say anything and do nothing. And you still support her so that means you have no powers of observation..good luck with that.
|
annie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #136 |
| 138. i'd repeat the question but clearly you didn't understand it the first time. not surprising. |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #138 |
| 141. "There's just no hypocricy like Hilary Hypocricy" |
|
And that goes for her clingons too. 
|
cliffordu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:19 AM
Response to Original message |
| 37. I've been waiting.... |
|
For one of these candidates to say exactly those words.
Bravo -
We HAVE to get this man elected!!
|
annie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #37 |
| 110. Hillary already said it in a debate i think after IA, or right before. |
frog92969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #110 |
| 154. Alot of people must not have been listening. |
|
Or like me, don't believe it.
|
Neshanic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:23 AM
Response to Original message |
| 38. I would think that would be a given, but then again... |
TreasonousBastard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:57 AM
Response to Original message |
donheld
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:32 AM
Response to Original message |
CatnHat
(669 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 03:03 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Hillary, and the republicans should review Obama. That's more like it.
|
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 04:46 AM
Response to Original message |
AzDar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 05:01 AM
Response to Original message |
| 46. Well... there it 'tis. |
Oldenuff
(442 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 05:04 AM
Response to Original message |
| 47. That is good to hear! |
|
But I'd like to see him go even further.The Patriot Act,the Real ID Act,the Protect America Act,the new passport rules,those all need to be repealed as well.Has he taken a position on those abominations?I'll be honest,Obama was not my first choice in a candidate.On the other hand,Hillary was dead last in my choice as a candidate to support.I'm still inclined to say "feck it" and write in Kooch. Or Kinky Freidman...or Wilie Nelson.  North American Union be damned!
|
frog92969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #47 |
|
if it's not constitutional, it won't fly. That was my hope when I voted for him.
BTW - Kucinich was my 1st, Obama 5th, Clinton 8th.
|
AntiFascist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 05:37 AM
Response to Original message |
| 48. Excellent! Obama should definitely stress his constitutional law experience n/t |
glowing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 06:25 AM
Response to Original message |
| 51. too bad while he's been in the senate he hasn't been a more boistorous |
|
voice for all the power they signed away to Bush in the first place. seems more like, review, and pick and choose which one's will help him be king too.
|
NoFederales
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 07:00 AM
Response to Original message |
| 53. FINALLY!!!!! A Candidate Spreaks That Which I Need To Hear. nt |
annie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #53 |
| 118. Did you hear the Des Moines IA debate? it was said there by hillary and others... |
|
this is not anything new.
|
jonnyra
(205 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 07:23 AM
Response to Original message |
| 54. This is exactly whats been missing |
|
from all the election rhetoric...NO mention of the crimes committed y the Bush/Cheney crime family. And finally...FINALLY Obama brings it up and I must say he has just won my support. It will be interesting to see how fast Clinton responds with a similar statement.
|
LostinVA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #54 |
| 66. Senator Clinton has already said it -- quite a while ago, actually |
Schema Thing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #66 |
Vinca
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 07:36 AM
Response to Original message |
| 57. After so many years of living under the thumb of an idiot, |
|
won't it be refreshing to have a president with an operable brain who has not only read the Constitution, but taught it?
|
Maureen1322
(392 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #57 |
|
That whoever gets elected has to start by cleaning up the mess this administration has made.
|
randr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #63 |
| 69. It still pisses me off |
|
that when Bill Clinton took office he never pursued the corruption of Bush the elder. Had he pushed the investigations in place we may have avoided the divisiveness of the whole Clinton presidency as well as the entire Bush debacle. I want to hear from both HRC and BHO what they plan to do to bring the crimials to justice. America could use a year or more of cleansing.
|
aasleka
(465 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message |
| 64. Rule of Law is my number one issue also, But why not go further? |
|
Why not ask Congress for a law that would preclude any future executive orders based on the legality of the order reviewable for interpretation by the Courts? This would give a balance to the executive order bussiness that it currently does not have. There is a HUGE problem when Congress passes a law and the President signs an order stating that he is above the law.
|
TheZug
(886 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message |
| 71. Which means not only will Bush documents be opened, but Clinton ones. |
|
And the Bush/Clinton elite are desperate to keep this from happening.
|
frog92969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #71 |
|
that they're building up McCain!
|
BearSquirrel2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message |
| 72. trashed until deemed sane ... |
|
Yeah, he should have someone go through and trash everyone except those that sound remotely constitutional. I don't think many will survive.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message |
| 74. K&R-about time someone spoke of signing statements |
jwirr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message |
| 77. That is definitely one of the things I have wanted to hear. |
annie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #77 |
| 114. Hillary has said it several times. |
bowens43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message |
| 80. You can bet that if Hillary ever becomes president |
|
she will continue to expand the powers of the presidency in the same way that bush has. We saw that even while first lady, she took a dim view of our Constitution and abused what little power she had. The FBI files for instance. The thought of Hillary have the tools that bush put in place is truly frightening. She has an obvious lust for power and no matter what she says, we all know that she will never give up anything, constitutional or not, if it increases that power.
|
RestoreGore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message |
| 82. So why isn't he calling for accountability now ?... |
|
And who gets to "deem" which are unconstitutional? He is part of this Congress that has already allowed them to take effect. How do you reverse that damage? Empty words from another Congressional enabler is all I see. And that goes for Clinton and McCain too. If you can't stand up to Bush in Congress, don't expect me to believe you will at any other time just because you say it to get votes.
|
Glimmer of Hope
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message |
| 83. Yes! He knows his stuff. They don't just appoint anyone president of Harvard Law Review. |
Rosemary2205
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message |
| 85. Is this even logistically possible? |
|
I would assume the "we lost the emails" boy king will buy out the masterlock aisle at Ace Hardware and fire up the shredders long before the next president moves in.
|
Suzie57
(67 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #85 |
|
If Bush could destroy all records of his foolish signing statements then they would no longer exist and the laws he took exception to would stand as passed by congress, so that would be good. i actually don't think he could but who knows what he might try.
|
JCMach1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message |
| 88. Promise to proscecute him for every crime he has commited and you can have my vote Sen. Obama |
Barack_America
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message |
| 95. Bush: "I trust my legacy to Hillary" |
|
So, I'm guessing that means a 'no' on her scrutinizing his executive orders. 
|
frog92969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #95 |
| 158. That WAS an eye opener |
Usrename
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 12:00 PM by Usrename
I don't doubt it for a second.
|
goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message |
| 99. Obama is once again following Clinton's lead. She said this months ago. |
annie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #99 |
| 108. i remember this too, do you have the quote? i can't believe obamanots are falling for this... |
|
like he's the first person to say this. just wow.
|
alteredstate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message |
Hekate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message |
| 102. How I wish I had been there to hear that. I have so longed for the next Prez to start from Day One-- |
|
--and have hoped that from the day after his or her election that he or she would have people dedicated to the task of ferreting out every damn one of Bush's executive orders and signing statements with the intent of overturning them.
Bush started on his first day in the Oval Office. So should our Democratic president, because it will be like shoveling out the Augean Stables.
Hekate
|
The Backlash Cometh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message |
annie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message |
| 106. Hillary said this in a debate months ago. |
Lucinda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #106 |
| 111. She speaks about it in townhalls too. |
90-percent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message |
| 112. Obama's lawyering creds |
|
If he is indeed a Constitutional Scholar that should be plastered over every square inch of campaign lit he is.
Using the name; Barack "Constitutional Law Professor" Obama, would give him a 20 point kick in the polls all over the country.
I want my President to be an expert on the Constitution. I'm tired of eight years of knowing more about the Constitution than my President does!
-90% Jimmy
|
WillYourVoteBCounted
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #112 |
| 116. Also, he was a Civil Rights Attorney |
|
He was invited to do Corporate law (like Hillary) but he chose to work for a Civil Law firm.
He worked with Project Vote as well, which is another group that protects civil rights.
|
frog92969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #112 |
|
with the P word.
I made that mistake upthread and it started a brawl.
|
WillYourVoteBCounted
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message |
| 115. Obama taught Constitutional Law for 10 years, |
|
he will know how to restore it.
kicked, and RECOMMENDED.
|
Tom Rinaldo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
| 123. Hillary Clinton's reply to question asked her at National Town Hall meeting |
|
prior to the March 4th primaries, addressed this. She was asked what she would do the very first day she was in office as President. The first answer Hillary gave was that she would take the Constitution out of Cold Storage. She then said she would reverse many of George W. Bush's exectutive orders. That was the first time I heard either candidate discuss overturning Bush's executive orders. She followed that by saying she would convene her military and security advisors to begin implementing withdrawal from Iraq.
|
berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #123 |
| 139. She's already VOTED to SUPPORT BUSH Time and Time again. And she's in Bed with the Saudis/Dubai |
GMFORD
(202 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #123 |
|
I'm glad to see both our candidates realize how important this is.
|
gulliver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message |
| 129. Well done. Signing statements too, though. |
|
Every bill Bush used a signing statement on should be cleansed. Maybe just write one bill that makes signing statements null and void.
|
RainDog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message |
| 140. a question for ppl here |
|
when did Hillary start the chant, "Yes We Will."
I thought the "Yes We Can" was Obama's thing. Did I miss it before in her campaigns (before Ohio, that is).
|
annie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #140 |
| 144. No. "Yes we can" was the Farm Workers Union thing, their slogan... |
|
then he 'borrowed it', then after a lot of back and forth btwn obama and hil camp talking about the difference btwn talk and action people started say 'yes she *will*' to illustrate a difference. That was about 4 weeks ago maybe. i could be off by a week or 2.
|
RainDog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #144 |
Qutzupalotl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message |
| 142. Sometimes it takes a constitutional law scholar to clean up after a Bush. |
pattmarty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message |
| 145. What he (or Hillary) should be saying is not re-view, but RE-SCIND. |
democrank
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message |
|
What if we nominate someone who really understands the Constitution? Couldn`t that be problematic?
|
snappyturtle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-09-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message |
| 162. Wow! This is great! Sen. Obama, soon our nominee for President |
|
of the United States,(I just HAD to write that once)will need a team of people to clear up the executive order over-reach! Wonder if he'll look into the dreaded Presidential directives too?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 23rd 2013, 09:07 PM
Response to Original message |