|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
| Armstead
|
Sat Mar-08-08 07:46 AM Original message |
| Hillary herself makes it WORSE by reinforcing comparison of Obama to Ken Starr |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| Recursion
|
Sat Mar-08-08 07:47 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. But she's "vetted" so it shouldn't matter, right? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| earthlover
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:29 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 16. She doesn't WANT to be vetted! Why? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| InAbLuEsTaTe
|
Sat Mar-08-08 07:47 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. No. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Kittycat
|
Sat Mar-08-08 07:48 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. They're total scum. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BeyondGeography
|
Sat Mar-08-08 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
| 4. Because he's asking her to release her tax returns no less |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Armstead
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:00 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 10. The Clintons don't like to release anything |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ravy
|
Sat Mar-08-08 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
| 5. If people hate Hillary so much, I guess it would follow that they would love |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Armstead
|
Sat Mar-08-08 07:54 AM Response to Reply #5 |
| 7. You need to go back and Study Logic 101 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ravy
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:48 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 18. You need to study History 101. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Yossariant
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:02 AM Response to Reply #5 |
| 11. Precisely why saying it was smart and reinforcing it was smarter. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Armstead
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:06 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 12. So why doesn't she just release the information if it's innocuous? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Yossariant
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:14 AM Response to Reply #12 |
| 15. She may or may not release it. I don't think she should. It's none of your or Obama's business. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| earthlover
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:37 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 17. She filed it last April...she has had plenty of time. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Yossariant
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:45 AM Response to Reply #17 |
| 29. Many have been saying that precise thing about Obama's "lost" records from Illinois. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Armstead
|
Sat Mar-08-08 11:04 AM Response to Reply #29 |
| 34. He ought to release them too. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Armstead
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:17 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 21. Then why do you care about Rezko? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Yossariant
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:42 AM Response to Reply #21 |
| 27. Bribing public office holders is ILLEGAL. It is perfectly legal not to release your tax returns. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Armstead
|
Sat Mar-08-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 35. But why doesn't she want to |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Yossariant
|
Sat Mar-08-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #35 |
| 36. Why shouldn't the police be allowed to search your home whenever they please |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Armstead
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:11 PM Response to Reply #36 |
| 38. Yes of course -- all Clinton critics are right wing |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| earthlover
|
Sat Mar-08-08 11:47 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 37. not everything that is legal is wise, politically acceptable or moral |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dansolo
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:11 AM Response to Reply #5 |
| 13. I'll bet that most people defended Hillary at the time |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NashVegas
|
Sat Mar-08-08 07:53 AM Response to Original message |
| 6. She's Actually Campaigning FOR Obama When She Does That |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Smelting Pot
|
Sat Mar-08-08 07:56 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. No, she's not "campaigning for Obama" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jpak
|
Sat Mar-08-08 07:57 AM Response to Original message |
| 9. Ken Starr was a certified "Monster" - that is a historical fact - not an ad hominen |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MonkeyFunk
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:12 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 14. Well it's a good thing she didn't do that then |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ellacott
|
Sat Mar-08-08 08:55 AM Response to Reply #14 |
| 19. But Hillary said it was an accurate comparison n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Armstead
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:16 AM Response to Reply #14 |
| 20. She said it -- not just a spokesman |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| UALRBSofL
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
| 22. The more the Obama campaign bashes Hillary |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Armstead
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:32 AM Response to Reply #22 |
| 24. Isn't saying that Obama is like Ken Starr slamming of Obama? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Strelnikov_
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:45 AM Response to Reply #22 |
| 30. Clinton will be a GE disaster for the Democrats. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TwilightGardener
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
| 23. Words cannot express my disgust with this woman--I actually like the GOP more, at this point. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Armstead
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:32 AM Response to Reply #23 |
| 25. I wouldn't go that far....But at least they're clear about their sleaziness |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TwilightGardener
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:45 AM Response to Reply #25 |
| 28. No, I would go that far. I will vote for McCain, if she's the nominee, or stay home. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Strelnikov_
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
| 26. To answer your question, apparently not. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| npincus
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
| 31. Whatever do you mean? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| intheozone
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
| 32. Once again the feeling is, Ok, we have the criminals (the Clintons) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Armstead
|
Sat Mar-08-08 11:03 AM Response to Reply #32 |
| 33. Not at all a good comparison |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| anonymous171
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 39. The more she compares Obama to 90's era repugs |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 26th 2013, 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC