Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Camp Clinton Full Frontal Assault on MI/FL Delegations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
x-g.o.p.er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:27 PM
Original message
Camp Clinton Full Frontal Assault on MI/FL Delegations
McAuliffe was just on MSNBC and was politicking HARD for new primaries in Michigan and Florida.

The drumbeat is going to get louder and louder until it happens, and after tonight, with wind in her sails, super delegates will not defect.

This things going all the way to Denver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. And his insistence on new primaries in those states could well
be her undoing--finally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah
how DARE she want democrats to vote, and have their votes count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
x-g.o.p.er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. They have voted
And they were counted, as I remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curvy rider Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
43. I think Al Gore should serve as mediator to find a solution
So that the parties end up being happy with whatever decision is undertaken.
The Hillary and Obama camps will likely not reach an agreement by themselves, without the aide of a referee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. that's not the issue, and you full well know it.
I wish clinton supporters would refrain from this blatantly transparent framing of the Mich-Fla. delegates.
It fools no one.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. You know that MI is not fair as it is now.
I could take FL, if people agreed to it. But no way on MI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
x-g.o.p.er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Just curious, but why one and not the other?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Clinton was the only candidate on the ballot in MI n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. No she wasn't. But from what I've read your fav wasn't. But of course you're impartial I'm sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Who else was on the ballot?
I know Edwards and Obama were not - and weren't they the only two credible candidates left in the race?

Honest Question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Oh you're too funny...credible huh...Kucinich and Dodd were on along with Clinton
But of course you knew that....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. No - I didn't
I thought Kucinich - who isn't a credible candidate. Didn't know about Dodd - but he wasn't going to make a difference at that point - hell hadn't he already dropped out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. If the state puts them on the ballot they are credible kiddo. And no Dodd had not dropped out
before the primary vote. Hence his name was on the ballot. Biden too actually, and he too had dropped.

But really, Obama supporters don't consider Clinton a "credible" candidate on or off a ballot so what's the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. wtf is that post about?!?!
First of all - kiddo???

And no - your definition of credible isn't everyone's. Dodd & Kucinich didn't have a chance by the time we got to MI - so don't even try to pretend. That is ridiculous and you know it.

And huh? - I never said Clinton wasn't credible. She ran a bad campaign and fell apart in the last two weeks - went too negative and is hurting the party.

Hell No MI doesn't count. They knew the rules - they didn't play by them and they knew the consequences. It was their decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Well didn't take long to pop that pimple on your...well whatever...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. well that was a meaningful post. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Why do people keep spreading that lie?
There were four candidates on the ballot. The ones who weren't on there CHOSE to remove their names. Nobody made them do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Who else was on the ballot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. They chose to remove them just as MI (and FL) knew their delegates wouldn't be seated.
Can't have it both ways - that's called a double standard.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. No, they chose to remove them so as not to offend voters in Iowa and NH.
Plus its a weaker position to be placed on the ballot as a write in. So this way any votes that did not go the way of Kucinich or Dodd were assigned uncommitted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. Hillary is on record saying that the Michigan primary was meaningless (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Naturally the Michigan voters magically feel the same way of course...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Which Michigan voters...
The ones that voted in the Republican contest for Romney, as many Democrats were pushing for?

The ones that decided to stay home?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Oh I would say we'll all learn something come November....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
44. Thank you for pointing that out MonkeyFunk!!!
Christ almighty. I am so sick of that crap. They chose to remove their names because they did not want to insult Iowa and New Hampshire. However, if someone wanted to vote for either Edwards or Obama, they were to vote uncommitted. So give Obama all of the uncommitted votes and let Clinton have hers. We all were told that they would probably seat the delegates in the end. That is why millions of us in Michigan and Florida got out there and voted. Turnout was high in both states for a reason and we want our votes to count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:36 PM
Original message
I am against either being seated as is.
But, if push came to shove, I could accept FL, everyone was on the ballot, no one campaigned there. MI had only Hillary(of the front-runners) on the ballot. It was completely unfair.

I hope that Dean sticks to it. He said, no changing rules mid-game. Besides, Hillary would only net about 100 delegates against Obama. Not enough to win, and the effort would hurt her terribly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
x-g.o.p.er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
20. Oh, okay, makes sense
And I agree about Dean sticking to his guns. I think if there's a big stink, though, he'll cave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
32. And so it must be a relief to know that Edwards and Obama politely removed themselves from
the ballot in Michigan. They didn't have to and no penalties would have ensued. So just why did these candidates remove themselves from the Michigan ballot? Well let's see, Michigan agreed to to follow the primary rules so long as the rest of the states did too. And then NH moved up so that was the end of the agreement on that. But who cares when the fairytale of poor Edwards and poor Obama is so much more enthralling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
25. They agreed to the rules. Trying to change them now is CHEATING.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. Michigan agreed to the primary rules so long as nothing was changed. Then NH moved up
and that changed everything. But of course its only Michigan and Florida being taken to the woodshed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. If they hold another vote
Those states should go to the end of the line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. big state..alot of dem voters..you want to piss them off more?????? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wind in her sails? Turning a 20 point lead into a razor thin victory, if that, is good?
By that logic, Rudy Giuliani had a brilliant strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
x-g.o.p.er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. HRC and the press will hail it as a great comeback
And no one will remember the 20 point leads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. I don't think so - the press is pretty well focused on the delegate counts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. That tells me that today isn't going well for them
If they were expecting to win OH and TX, they wouldn't need to bring up MI and FL now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
x-g.o.p.er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. I think the opposite is happening
That they are winning both, and can use the momentum to completely re-shape the race, with FL and MI central to the comeback and eventual nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's not just Clinton people - most of the Dem leaders are behind it.
Also our Governor - Crist - who is really a Democrat despite having an "R" next to his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. ahh the dem leaders are for it if the state pays for it..not if the dem party has to pay. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
28. The Reps just want this to go on as long as possible.
they'd be happy to offer a new primary in, say, June or July.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. Florida would have voted today if they hadn't changed the dates.
they could have had an impact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. A HUGE impact. They have more delegates than Texas!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. it would be very hard to have a new election..in my county we just had delegate election saturday
that would mean each and every county would have to have a new delegate election as well..and remember Edwards won 11 counties!

and i will tell you the Edwards delegates will raise a shit storm!



fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
23. More like 'covertgoper;' A brokered convention = Nov loss for Dems
Anyone wanting this to "go to Denver" has their head up their ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
x-g.o.p.er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Nowhere did I say I wanted it to go to Denver,
but if this pattern that seems to be developing plays out, it very well could.

Please read the original post before you start throwing crap around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC