Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK. The Gloves Are Coming Off! Demand the Clintons Release Their Tax Records.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:22 PM
Original message
OK. The Gloves Are Coming Off! Demand the Clintons Release Their Tax Records.
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 12:27 PM by David Zephyr
When one's candidacy is funded by lobbyists,

When your husband has had financial dealings with foreign interests and dubious characters,

When your husband pardoned one of the most corrupt crooks of the decade without giving an explanation,

When you have advocated and supported the invasion of a nation for no reason whatsoever that happened to have the 3rd largest oil reserves on earth,

When your chief campaign strategist and manager is also the CEO (not just an employee) of a firm that worked for Blackwater,

When you are running to be the President of the United States and accuse your opponent --- who has released his tax records and who refuses lobbyist money --- of not being trustworthy,

And then when you refuse to release your tax records to the public, it is only natural to suspect there's something you do not want the public to see. Why the refusal?

DEMAND THAT HILLARY CLINTON RELEASE HER TAX RECORDS NOW! IT'S TIME TO MAKE THIS A BURNING ISSUE.

WHAT ARE THEY HIDING?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. A made up issue by Obama camp to avoid Rezko discussion. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. It is wonderful how you can come up with excuses...and what about
her endorsement of mccain???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. "endorsement of mccain?"
Obama supporters still making shit up.

Can't your guy win on merit? Never mind - Apparently not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
47. 11 in a row to date..
and still counting...


GOBAMA! Just say no to more of the same Clinton INC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I'll have Rezko discussion with you AND raise you a Jackson Stephens confab.
Care to talk? Bring your sense of proportion - if you can find where you left it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:37 PM
Original message
Can we talk about "the book deal"? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
26. Bill never mentioned BCCI one time in his book, yet the same characters he protected
when he deep-sixed those matters, many of them popped up again on 9-11, 2001, and in our sabre-rattling at Iran.

Why do you think Clinton decided to not mention in his book anything at all about why he deep-sixed all those matters for GHWBush and Jackson Stephens, Dubai and Saudi royals, Marc Rich, James Bath, AQ Khan, Bin Ladens, et al....????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. So says someone who thinks that knowing our nation's actual record is a disorder.
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 12:58 PM by blm
The pride some Dems take in being ignorant of the contents of the National Security Archives is just unfathomable to those of us CITIZENS who take that duty seriously.

Your judgment shows that you think a wannabe Chicago player is a threat to this nation while the man who brought BCCI into this country along with GHWBush deserved protection from Bill Clinton throughout the 90s ven as BCCI matters left outstanding led directly to Bush2, 9-11 and this Iraq war.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UndertheOcean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. Hillary made it an issue by not releasing her records
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am sure there is a reason they are withholding the release. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UndertheOcean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
30. Where there is smoke there is fire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. maybe Marc Rich is still paying them for his pardon and she doesnt want to show it
http://www.time.com/time/2007/presidential_pardons/10.html

MARC RICH, 2001
In 1983, financier Rich was indicted for evading more than $48 million in taxes, and charged with 51 counts of tax fraud, as well as running illegal oil deals with Iran during the 1979-1980 hostage crisis. During his last week in office, President Bill Clinton pardoned Rich, who had fled the U.S. during his prosecution and was residing in Switzerland. Clinton's eleventh-hour move, along with pardons of his half-brother, Roger, and former business partner Susan McDougal, outraged Republicans and Democrats alike. The Rich pardon sparked an investigation into whether it was bought by the hefty donations Rich's ex-wife, Denise, had given to the Clintons and the Democrats. In the end, investigators did not find enough evidence to indict Clinton.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why should I hold Clinton to a different standard?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh noes, David Zephyr is taking his gloves off!
Be afraid, be VERY afraid! :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. That is a good thing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. The legal due date is April 15th. I'll bet that's Hillary's as well.
I believe it is illegal to demand tax returns before midnight of April 15th. You should check into this before you get yourself in trouble with Uncle Sammy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Duh..that's a filing deadline and has nothing to do with releasing to the public your tax records.
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 12:37 PM by David Zephyr
You might want to think before you post. Obviously, we are speaking about her recent returns that are already filed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
39. So, because a bunch of demamding O supporters say so, she should fall down and do what you say?
It's not a requirement. If this pisses you off so badly, get to work and have the rules changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. OK, you win. Now, how about her 2006 tax records?
(tapping my foot)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
35. Perhaps she feels her 2006 financial disclosure to the Senate is sufficent for now
It is not a requirement for now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Or perhaps she's hiding something.
Or perhaps I should "take her at her word" when she promises she'll, you know, get around to releasing those tax records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. You only wish she is hiding something.
Hillary has been around the sun too many times to fall into that trap. Give it a rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. So prove it. There is no other logical reason to hold back tax records from 2006.
There isn't. Stop deluding yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. At this late point, after so much excuse making, it's clear there's something to hide.
There's no other reason for them hiding their tax returns which will reveal how they have made their income these past years and from whom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Um - Obama released his. She has refused to.
She dances around the issue, saying she'll release them if she's the nominee. When pressed, she said she'll TRY to release them sooner. She's hiding something, and it couldn't be more obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #19
36. Obama merely wanted to show off - - it's not a requirement, you know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. Blinders on? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #36
48. Show off? I think not.
He showed he had nothing to hide. Hillary does. If she didn't, she wouldn't have made it into such a big deal - we can't exactly change our vote if she's the nominee, can we now? But that's when she'll release them, supposedly.

Her excuses for not releasing them are pitiful, as well. A lot of things aren't a "requirement", but it sure helps if the candidate is forthcoming with the information. Now, think - why would she not want to release them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. Don't forget Wal Mart
The Union Workers that she is snow jobbing don't have a clue how she undermined them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. she promised on a national debate to have them out by now..
shes a liar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. Are the candidates required to release their tax returns as part
of the financial disclosure or is it just common practice for them to do so? If it's not a requirement then why is it such a big issue even if other candidates have already released theirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. because she told us on a national debate she would absolutly do it, and it was a lie
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
54. No, she didn't say she'd have them out by now
But why tell the truth when a good lie suits your agenda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. Before Today.(today is the deadline) is what debate said her target would be. it was a lie.
she is a LIAR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. She Was Asked In The Debate & She Promised Disclosure
She didn't say let me wait until April 15th she said she would release them, she hasn't. She is a fucking LIAR. And if you can not understand why this is a big deal you are dense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. Best Attack for Obama- "Hillary abandoned 30 states. Ignores WY & PA". Use her fucked up campaign
against her.

Obama- "I want to President of all 50 states so I've built organizations and run campaigns in all 50 states. Hillary has abandoned 20, she thinks YOUR state doesn't count."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. Right on!!! This is getting ridiculous - And how about the Clinton's Rezko - Vin Gupta - Read link!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. Less than 1% of her total campaign contributions equals funded by lobbyists?
"who refuses lobbyist money"

Caveat: He refuses to take money from currently registered federal lobbyists.

He has a former lobbyists as a top advisors and bundlers and takes money from people at lobbying firms that are not registered lobbyists.

Does it matter that he take lobbyist dough when its such a small percentage of his total? No.

Do I think he is bought off? No.

Does he act hoilier than thou while still remaining cozy with the supposed tainted interests? Yes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. What is she hiding?
Release the tax returns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
complain jane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
21. Oh so wait,
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 12:40 PM by the dogfish
Obama supporters are mad at Hillary for "attacking" Obama (which amounts to pointing out the fact that he doesn't have much experience compared to her), but it's perfectly acceptable for Obama supporters to "attack" Hillary.

And that's not a double standard, is that correct?

And it's Hillary's fault that the Dem party is divided, and she's "nasty" for attacking a Dem, but fine for you guys to do it. Do I have that right?

Taking me a while to get the hang of the rules here on Obama Underground, bear with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. at this point, if she insists on this charade and continuing, he has to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
complain jane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. I see... so I did have it right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jonathan2000 Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
22. Hillary has had it easy so far
It’s not true that Hillary has been fully vetted concerning past Clinton scandals. At the time, the press was more interested in Bill’s involvement rather than Hillary’s and the issue of Hillary’s judgment was not relevant. This is part of her lifetime experience she now promotes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
25. Obama is acting presidential in all of this..
No doubt, there is plenty to go negative on Hillary with, if he wanted. Plenty. But he is not getting in the mud just yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. It's one of the many reasons he's winning.
Americans across the country have responded to his positive message. Clinton should try it, maybe she'd stop the free-fall.

But that's not fucking likely. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #25
50. He's a better man than me.
I think the Clintons were so confident that she'd sew up the nomination by Super Tuesday that they figured there'd never be a call for them to release their taxes.

There's definitely something smelly in their refusal to release their tax records.

Tolerance of this has gone on too long. I gave it a pass thinking she'd pull out gracefully and because I never expected to see such shit slinging by the Clintons against a good Democrat.

Now the spotlight on their income sources must be focused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. Why would she wait until after she was the nominee to release the records unless....
There was something in the records that would prevent her from becoming the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. Tatiana, I don't think they ever intended to release the records.
They thought they'd never have to campaign past Super Tuesday in the primaries and figured no Republican would challenge them on the tax return issue.

They were wrong.

We need to make it the burning issue after tonight.

She must release the returns or it's obvious there's something very smelly that they don't want the public to see. There is no other rationale for them hiding their income sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. You're probably right. Actually... yeah, you're absolutely right.
I spent half the morning calling the offices of some supers in CA, and let me tell you, the Hillary supporters are very nervous. I keep hearing "this won't go till June."

Either these people are completely naive or they are willfully refusing to see what's in front of their eyes. Hillary has opened an office in WYOMING. She plans to take this to Puerto Rico (where she will LOSE AGAIN).

Her stubbornness is astounding.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
32. When you "loaned" your campaign FIVE MILLION DOLLARS of money from MYSTERY sources....
That's the biggest reason.

WHO is funding her campaign? WHERE did that $5 million come from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
38. Hillary, where did the money you loaned to your campaign come from?
Who did you meet with when you were First Lady and how did this provide you with "executive" experience?

I demand to know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
41. She won't release them until it's too late. She's hiding something. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
42. Ha ha ha - putting those widdle pinkies your trying to show off aside
having temper tantrums will not change the rules.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
43. Yawn. Nobody cares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
44. Cut it out, guys. The Loungers are laughing at us already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omega3 Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
51. you obots are funny, I laugh every time I read this shit, she endorsed McCain, tax records , thanks
:bounce: :toast: :nopity: :hurts: :hi: :puffpiece: :tinfoilhat: :cry: :rant: :rofl:


where the : :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
57. wheres the records?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
58. What are they hiding? Indeed
I, for one, am curious...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC