Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Either Makes Huge Strides In Closing Pledged Delegate Gap Tomorrow Or Concedes Soon After

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:29 AM
Original message
Hillary Either Makes Huge Strides In Closing Pledged Delegate Gap Tomorrow Or Concedes Soon After
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 12:34 AM by cryingshame
No matter how hard the Clintons' pathetic attempt to move the goal posts, the reality of the Math involved doesn't change.

Or maybe Math has a well-known Obama bias?

Anyway, if she insists on going forward after NOT coming up with a significant majority of pledged delegates tomorrow you can count on:

Her ass getting whopped in Wyoming and Mississippi after which Obama will probably increase his pledged delegate lead to at least 180
Even more Super Delegates defecting from her camp
Even more Super Delegates previously undeclared coming out for Obama
Obama or surrogates finally having to go negative and the Clintons have a lot of recent dirt the Mediawhores haven't bothered highlighting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
moobu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Obama should concede as soon as possible for everyone’s sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. You know, when I read the vast majority of these threads: the term
uppity comes to mind a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Then Hillary could be McCains VP
and we wouldn't need an election!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. I Think Math Is Sexist
And it doesn't count.


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Um...if she wins tomorrow when everyone was saying she was toast
13 days ago, that shows that the race is not over yet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. She has to gain 80-100 delegates morethanObama to have a chance
I don't see that happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. who says she has to gain that many to stay in the race?
Y'all take anything less than a massive victory to be an automatic loss.

No, it just means that the agony of the campaign shall continue and this is a good thing...the later states should have more of a voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. She can stay in the race
She'll just be the Democratic Mike Huckabee or Ron Paul.

She is going to gain way less delegates in NC,MS, and WY than Obama. If shes doesn't pull off 80-100 delegates, she'll have to somehow upset Obama in states her campaign considers unimportant, and regain a sizeable lead in PA.

She has effectively wedged herself out of that scenario in her attempts to win in TX and OH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. well since the Senator needs at least 990 delegates to win the magic
number, and Senator Obama needs only 833 (well if you discount the superdelegates and I think they may be disappearing soon) with only 981 left to be awarded...

She may manage to push a brokered convention which is good for the Party because it pushes the Party forward in the media...who wants to watch the boring crowning of Senator McCain when there is a major contest over in the D side to pay attention to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Super delegates are needed for the equations.
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 02:44 AM by Gore1FL
otherwise "needed to win" is reduced.

4047 total delegates - 795 Super delegates = 3252 3252/2 = 1626 (+1 for majority) = 1627 needed to win.

with pledge delegate counts of:

Clinton: 1038
Obama: 1193

That would make Obama's "magic number 434 instead of 633.

They aren't "going away" though so we have to include them for the 2025 needed to win.

If you divided them disproportionately to Hillary by the unlikely 55%-45% ratio, the total would still be:


Clinton: 1038 + 438 (she gets the round up) = 1476
Obama: 1193 + 357 = 1550

Assuming the extemely unlikely even they split the final Primaries (including March 4, but not PA) where Obama, in some cases has double digit leads) the totals would be:

1476 + 412 (she gets the round up) = 1888
1550 + 411 = 1961

PA has 158 pledged delegates. Obama would need 64 or 41% to win a total of 2025.

Will Hillary get 55% of the Super delegates? Doubtful.

Will Hillary get 50% of the delegates in every state besides PA? Doubtful

Will Hillary get 60% of the PA delegates? Doubtful.

Edited (twice) to fix formatting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Good edit but I was refering to the fact that a LOT of people are unhappy
with the idea of superdelegates right now. So it is possible to have a forced vote to strip them of their power at convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Again, it's about the Math involved and not Clinton's spin. A paltry increase in delegates= Clinton
unable to overcome Obama's lead.

And after MS and WY, it'll just get worse for her.

Especially since Obama or his surrogates will have to start going negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Once they do, you do not think Senator Clinton will not get nasty?
I mean really nasty? Not this lukewarm nastiness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. you don't think if that happens Obama or his surrogates won't retaliate and get nasty back?
And the Clintons have a LOT of recent dirt the Mediawhores haven't bothered with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. like what?
I have not been paying much attention to this race so I have no idea what the media could use against the junior Senator from New York that they have not already used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. google: Gupta Sued By Shareholders Bill Clinton Millions
for instance.

Or

unreleased tax returns

or

Marc Rich Clinton Pardon - Denise Rich Donate Clinton Library

for starters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. wait a second! A person pardoned by President Clinton donates to his library?!
be still my heart.

That is as silly as the anti-Obama people saying that his friend's trial will destroy his campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. Both should stay in
That way, at least until the convention, the thugs will be unsure who to swiftboat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. They don't have to
Hillary will take care of that for them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. That wastes millions of dollars and weakens both candidates driving up their negatives.
And regardless, the Math doesn't change. So "going to the Convention" would be an exercise in futility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thurston Howell III Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. I wonder.
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 12:53 AM by Thurston Howell III
:tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat:

Could it be that she's ...... Nah. The attacks are too vicious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. Her campaign has made strategic blunders that will stop her from getting huge victories
For whatever reason, she has gone the way of the wedge. That is a bad idea any time. It is a worse idea in a nomination process.

Once someone is wedged away they have a hard time coming back. The recent "experience" nonsense has really put off Obama leaners and fence sitters.

The pseudo McCain endorsement, the phone ad, et al, have divded the electorate in such a way she'll have a hard time gaining the 60% wins she needs to have a credible chance.

I could go on about the experience fiasco, but I am sure it has been covered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. And her "Experience" attack will be easy for Obama or surrogates to turn against her
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 12:53 AM by cryingshame
And totally lethal in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
12. clinton has already lost. she just doesn't know it yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
19. Odds are Obama will win more delegates tomorrow (again) Thanks to Texas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
23. Clinton radio ads telling differing times for caucus tomorrow.
I just heard that the Clintons are running radio ads in Houston telling Clinton people to caucus at 6:45PM and Obama people at 7:15PM.

7:15PM is when the caucus starts. Those assholes! They are suppressing the vote



this is a comment from A Thread at the Field website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
26. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC